Feasibility and effect of adding a concurrent parental component to a school-based wellness program using two modes of mobile-based technology - mixed methods evaluation of RCT

Moria Golan, Shakked Benifla, Aviv Samo, Noa Alon, Maya Mozeikov, Moria Golan, Shakked Benifla, Aviv Samo, Noa Alon, Maya Mozeikov

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the feasibility and effect of two mobile modes (WhatsApp vs. a specially designed app) in their delivery of updates and assignments to parents.

Methods: Two three-armed, randomized, controlled feasibility studies were conducted. In each trial, four schools with a total of 418 students in grade 5th, mean age 10.1 years, were randomly allocated to the control arm, youth-only arm, or youth & parental component arm. Only the data of those that completed all three assessments (pre, post and 3 months post program) were analyzed: 133 in the first trial and 137 in the second. In the youth-only arm, students participated in an interactive age-tailored prevention program delivered in 10 weekly, 90-min sessions on self-care behaviors, media literacy, self-esteem, and positive body image. The control groups in both studies received three health- and nutrition-related sessions. In the parental arm, in addition to the 'Favoring-Myself-Young's ten sessions program, parents received updates and were requested to complete shared assignments with their children. In the first year, the assignments were sent via WhatsApp, and in the following year via "Favoring Myself" smartphone application. Facilitators were third year undergraduate students. They used a detailed semi-structured guide and received 4-weekly hours of didactic and group dynamic supervision. Mixed-methods assessments were performed using semi-structured interviews with ten parents and five school staff members each year, as well as a computerized self-report questionnaire.

Results: Feasibility of parent-adolescent shared assignments in both digital modes was lower than expected. The use of WhatsApp had higher feasibility and uptake than the use of the special application. The addition of the concurrent parental component via WhatsApp was associated with superior improvement in self-esteem and identification of advertisement strategies, compared with the youth-only program. However, adolescents in the youth-only program delivered via the smartphone application demonstrated superior improvement compared to those in the youth and parental component arm.

Conclusions: Although the addition of the concurrent parenting component was praised by the actively participating parents, overall, under the chosen structure and population, it did not prove to add statistically significant value to the youth-only arm.

Trial registrations: NCT03216018 (12.7.2017) and NCT03540277 (26.4.2018).

Keywords: Body esteem; Mobile application; Prevention; School-based; Self-esteem.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of research participation in both studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Screenshots (translated to English) from the “Favoring Myself” smartphone application
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of Dyad’s shared assignments’ submission (parental component arm) delivered through WhatsApp vs. the special application
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
WhatsApp mode: Youths’ self-esteem in the three groups over time
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
WhatsApp mode: Number of advertising strategies identified in each study arm over time

References

    1. Alfredsson EK, Thorvaldsson V, Axberg U, Broberg AG. Parenting programs during adolescence: Outcomes from universal and targeted interventions offered in real-world settings. Scand J Psychol. 2018;59:378–391. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12446.
    1. Barlow J, Coren E. The effectiveness of parenting programs: A review of Campbell Reviews. Res Soc Work Pract. 2018;28:99–102. doi: 10.1177/1049731517725184.
    1. Hill KE, Hart LM, Paxton SJ. Confident body, confident child: outcomes for children of parents receiving a universal parenting program to promote healthful eating patterns and positive body image in their pre-schoolers. An exploratory RCT extension. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):891. doi:10.3390/ijerph17030891
    1. Duerden MD, Witt PA, Harrist CJ. The impact of parental involvement on a structured youth program experience: A qualitative inquiry. J Youth Dev. 2013;8:106–123. doi: 10.5195/jyd.2013.88.
    1. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.
    1. Bronfenbrenner U. Interacting systems in human development. Research paradigms: Present and future. In: Bolger N, Caspi A, Downey G, Moorehouse M, editors. Persons in context: Developmental processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1988. pp. 25–49.
    1. Kilgus MD, Maxmen JS, Ward NG. Essential psychopathology & its treatment. 4. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company; 2015.
    1. Hart LM, Cornell C, Damiano SR, Li-Wai-Suen CSN, Paxton SJ. Parents and prevention: A systematic review of interventions involving parents that aim to prevent body dissatisfaction or eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2015;48:157–169. doi: 10.1002/eat.22284.
    1. Hart LM, Damiano SR, Li-Wai-Suen CSN, Paxton SJ. Confident body, confident child: Evaluation of a universal parenting resource promoting healthy body image and eating patterns in early childhood—6- and 12-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Int J Eat Disord. 2019;52:121–131. doi: 10.1002/eat.22992.
    1. Shorey S, ED NG. The efficacy of mindful parenting interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121(103996). 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103996 Epub 2021 Jun 7. PMID: 34175531.
    1. Chu JTW, Wadham A, Jiang Y, Whittaker R, Stasiak K, Shepherd M, et al. Effect of MyTeen SMS-based mobile intervention for parents of adolescents: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1911120. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11120.
    1. Hurley E, Dietrich T & Rundle-Thiele S. A systematic review of parent-based programs to prevent or reduce alcohol consumption in adolescents. BMC Public Health, 2021;19:1451 (2019). 10.1186/s12889-019-7733.
    1. Hornby G, Lafaele R. Barriers to parental involvement in education: an explanatory model. Educational Review. 2011;63(1):37–52. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2010.488049.
    1. Sim WH, Toumbourou JW, Clancy EM, Westrupp EM, Benstead ML, Yap MBH. Strategies to increase uptake of parent education programs in preschool and school settings to improve child outcomes: A Delphi study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:3524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073524.
    1. Finan et al. Parental engagement in preventive parenting programs for child mental health: a systematic review of predictors and strategies to increase engagement. Peer J 2018; 6:e4676; DOI 10.7717/peerj.4676.
    1. Yap MBH, Mahtani S, Rapee RM, Nicolas C, Lawrence KA, MacKinnon A, et al. A tailored web-based intervention to improve parenting risk and protective factors for adolescent depression and anxiety problems: Postintervention findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9139.
    1. Corralejo SM, Domenech Rodríguez MM. Technology in parenting programs: A systematic review of existing interventions. J Child Fam Stud. 2018;27:2717–2731. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1117-1.
    1. Schueller SM, Torous J. Scaling evidence-based treatments through digital mental health. Am Psychol. 2020;75:1093–1104. doi: 10.1037/amp0000654.
    1. Dhaliwal J, Perez AJ, Holt NL, Gokiert R, Chanoine JP, Morrison KM, et al. Why do parents discontinue health services for managing paediatric obesity? A multi-centre, qualitative study. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2017;11:335–343. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2016.10.285.
    1. Linardon J, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Messer M, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. The efficacy of app-supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry. 2019;18:325–336. doi: 10.1002/wps.20673.
    1. Hornby G, Blackwell I. Barriers to parental involvement in education: An update. Educ Rev. 2018;70:109–119. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2018.1388612.
    1. Hackworth NJ, Matthews J, Westrupp EM, Nguyen C, Phan T, Scicluna A, et al. What influences parental engagement in early intervention? Parent, program and community predictors of enrolment, retention and involvement. Prev Sci. 2018;19:880–893. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0897-2.
    1. O’Toole L, Kiely J, McGillicuddy D, O’Brien EZ, O’Keeffe C. Parental involvement, engagement and partnership in their children’s education during the primary school years National Parents Council. 2019. Parental%20Involvement%20Research%20Doc.pdf. Accessed March 2021
    1. Golan M, Ahmad WA. School-based versus after-school delivery of a universal wellness programme—A randomized controlled multi-arm trial. Eat Behav. 2018;31:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.08.003.
    1. Slaten CD. Elison ZM. Interpersonal process group counseling for educationally marginalized youth: The MAGNIFY program. J Sch Couns; 2015. p. 13.
    1. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
    1. Rosenberg M. Conceiving the self. Malabar, FL: RE Krieger; 1986.
    1. Gasanov E, Abu Ahmad W, Golan M. Assessment of “young in favor of myself”: A school-based wellness program for preadolescents. EC Psychol Psychiatr. 2018;7:13–22.
    1. Mendelson BK, Mendelson MJ, White DR. Body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults. J Pers Assess. 2001;76:90–106. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_6.
    1. Kliem S, Schmidt R, Vogel M, Hiemisch A, Kiess W, Hilbert A. An 8-item short form of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire adapted for children (ChEDE-Q8) Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50:679–686. doi: 10.1002/eat.22658.
    1. Golan M, Hagay N, Tamir S. The effect of “in favor of myself”: Preventive program to enhance positive self and body image among adolescents. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078223.
    1. Schaefer LM, Burke NL, Thompson JK, Dedrick RF, Heinberg LJ, Calogero RM, et al. Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4) Psychol Assess. 2015;27:54–67. doi: 10.1037/a0037917.
    1. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965.
    1. Bearman M, Dawson P. Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education. Med Educ. 2013;47:252–260. doi: 10.1111/medu.12092.
    1. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:45–53. doi: 10.1177/135581960501000110.
    1. Guagliano JM, Armitage SM, Brown HE, Coombes E, Fusco F, Hughes C, et al. A whole family-based physical activity promotion intervention: Findings from the Families Reporting Every Step to Health (FRESH) pilot randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:120. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01025-3.
    1. Kilpatrick KD, Kilgus SP, Eklund K, Herman KC. An evaluation of the potential efficacy and feasibility of the resilience education program: A tier 2 internalizing intervention. School Ment Health. 2021. 10.1007/s12310-021-09428-8.
    1. Wild CE, Rawiri NT, Willing EJ, Hofman PL, Anderson YC. What affects programme engagement for Māori families? A qualitative study of a family-based, multidisciplinary healthy lifestyle programme for children and adolescents. J Paediatr Child Health. 2021;57:670–676. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15309.
    1. Zeiler M, Kuso S, Nacke B, Klesges LM, Waldherr K. Evaluating reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of Internet-based interventions to prevent eating disorders in adolescents: A systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30:179–188. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz130.
    1. Amaral ACS, Stice E, Ferreira MEC. A controlled trial of a dissonance-based eating disorders prevention program with Brazilian girls. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2019;32:13. doi: 10.1186/s41155-019-0126-3.
    1. Morgan J, Fischer JA, Hart LM, Kelly CM, Kitchener BA, Reavley NJ, Yap MBH, Jorm AF. Long-term effects of Youth Mental Health First Aid training: randomized controlled trial with 3-year follow-up. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20:487. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02860-1.
    1. Hayes D, Christie P, Mills M, Lingard B. Teachers and schooling making a difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. London, UK: Routledge; 2020.
    1. Flannery H, Portnoy S, Daniildi X, Kambakara Gedara C, Korchak G, Lambert D, et al. Keeping young people connected during COVID-19: The role of online groups. Arch Dis Child. 2021. 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320,222.
    1. Cohen AO, Breiner K, Steinberg L, Bonnie RJ, Scott ES, Taylor-Thompson K, et al. When is an adolescent an adult? Assessing cognitive control in emotional and nonemotional contexts. Psychol Sci. 2016;27:549–562. doi: 10.1177/0956797615627625.
    1. Garcia LMT, Hunter RF, de la Haye K, Economos CD, King AC. An action-oriented framework for systems-based solutions aimed at childhood obesity prevention in US Latinx and Latin American populations. Obes Rev. 2021:e13241. doi:10.1111/obr.13241.
    1. Waterloo SF, Baumgartner SE, Peter J, Valkenburg PM. Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media Soc. 2018;20:1813–1831. doi: 10.1177/1461444817707349.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir