Sexual assault resistance education for university women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (SARE trial)

Charlene Y Senn, Misha Eliasziw, Paula C Barata, Wilfreda E Thurston, Ian R Newby-Clark, H Lorraine Radtke, Karen L Hobden, SARE study team, Charlene Y Senn, Misha Eliasziw, Paula C Barata, Wilfreda E Thurston, Ian R Newby-Clark, H Lorraine Radtke, Karen L Hobden, SARE study team

Abstract

Background: More than one in six women will be sexually assaulted in their lifetimes, most by men they know. The situation on university campuses is even more startling, with as many as 1 in 4 female students being victims of rape or attempted rape. The associated physical and mental health effects are extensive and the social and economic costs are staggering. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether a novel, small-group sexual assault resistance education program can reduce the incidence of sexual assault among university-attending women, when compared to current university practice of providing informational brochures.

Methods/design: The trial will evaluate a theoretically and empirically sound four-unit, 12-hour education program that has been demonstrated in pilot studies to have short-term efficacy. Three of the four units provide information, skills, and practice aimed at decreasing the time needed for women to assess situations with elevated risk of acquaintance sexual assault as dangerous and to take action, reducing emotional obstacles to taking action, and increasing the use of the most effective methods of verbal and physical self-defense. The fourth unit focuses on facilitating a stronger positive sexuality from which women may resist sexual coercion by male intimates more successfully. The trial will extend the pilot evaluations by expanding the participant pool and examining the long term efficacy of the program. A total of 1716 first-year female students (age 17 to 24 years) from three Canadian universities will be enrolled. The primary outcome is completed sexual assault, measured by The Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization instrument. Secondary outcomes include changes in knowledge, attitudes, and skills related to the process of sexual assault resistance. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 1 week, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.

Discussion: The results of the trial will be used to produce a maximally effective sexual assault resistance education program that can be adopted by universities, to assess whether aspects of the program need to be strengthened, and also to indicate how long the effects of the program last and at which point in time refresher sessions may be necessary.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01338428.

References

    1. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs: National Violence Against Women Survey; 2000.
    1. Johnson H, Dawson M. In: Violence against Women in Canada: Research and Policy Perspectives. Johnson H, Dawson M, editor. Toronto: Oxford University; 2011. Sexual assault; pp. 93–122.
    1. Russell DEH, editor. Sexual exploitation: Rape, child sexual abuse, and workplace harassment. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications Inc; 1984.
    1. Gavey N. Sexual victimization prevalence among New Zealand university students. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59:464–466.
    1. Gavey N. Sexual victimization among Auckland University students: How much and who does it? N Z J Psychol. 1991;20:63–70.
    1. Koss MP, Gidycz CA, Wisniewski N. The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55(2):162–170.
    1. Dekeseredy WS, Schwartz MD, Tait K. Sexual assault and stranger aggression on a Canadian university campus. Sex Roles. 1993;28(5–6):263–277.
    1. Fisher B, Cullen F, Turner M. The Sexual Victimization of College Women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2000.
    1. Kimble M, Neacsiu AD, Flack WFJ, Horner J. Risk of unwanted sex for college women: evidence for a red zone. J Am Coll Health. 2008;57(3):331–332. doi: 10.3200/JACH.57.3.331-338.
    1. Koss MP, Heise L, Russo NF. The global health burden of rape. Psychol Women Q. 1994;18(4):509–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01046.x.
    1. Basile KC, Black MC, Simon TR, Arias I, Brener ND, Saltzman LE. The Association between Self-Reported Lifetime History of Forced Sexual Intercourse and Recent Health-Risk Behaviors: Findings from the 2003 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39(5):e1–e7.
    1. Brener ND, McMahon PM, Warren CW, Douglas KA. Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67(2):252–259.
    1. Brener ND, McMahon PM, Warren CW, Douglas KA. Forced sexual intercourse and associated health risk behaviours among female college students in the U.S. J Couns Clin Psychol. 1999;67(2):252–259.
    1. Koss MP, Figueredo AJ, Prince RJ. Cognitive mediation of rape’s mental, physical, and social health impact: Tests of four models in cross-sectional data. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(4):926–941.
    1. Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Rape among African American women: Sexual, psychological, and social correlates predisposing survivors to risk of STD/HIV. J Womens Health. 1998;7(1):77–84. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.77.
    1. Day T. The Health-Related Costs of Violence Against Women in Canada: The Tip of the Iceberg. London, Ontario: Centre for Research on Violence against Women and Children; 1995.
    1. Greaves L, Hankivsky O, Kingston-Riechers J. Selected Estimates of the Cost of Violence against Women. London, ON: Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children; 1995.
    1. Stanko EA, editor. Everyday violence: How women and men experience sexual and physical danger. London: Pandora; 1990.
    1. Stanko EA, editor. Intimate intrusion: Women's experiences of male violence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1985.
    1. Koss MP, Goodman LA, Browne A, Fitzgerald LF, Puryear Keita G, Felipe Russo N. Uniting all women: The fear of rape. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1994.
    1. Gordon MT, Riger S. The female fear: The social cost of rape. New York: The Free Press; 1989.
    1. Hanmer J, Saunders S. Well-founded fear: A community study of violence to women. London: Hutchinson & Co Ltd; 1984.
    1. Senn CY, Dzinas K. Measuring fear of rape: A new scale. Can J Behav Sci. 1996;28(1):141–144.
    1. Balsam KF, Rothblum ED, Beauchaine TP. Victimization over the life span: A comparison of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual siblings. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(3):477–487.
    1. Canadian Panel on Violence Against Women. Changing the landscape: Ending violence, achieving equality. Ottawa, ON: Ministry of Supply and Services Canada; 1993.
    1. Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1994.
    1. Bachar K, Koss MP. In: Sourcebook on Violence Against Women. Renzetti CM, Edleson JL, Kennedy Bergen R, editor. London: Sage Publications; 2001. From Prevalence to Prevention: Closing the Gap Between What We Know About Rape and What We Do; pp. 117–142.
    1. Pacifici C, Stoolmiller M, Nelson C. Evaluating a prevention program for teenagers on sexual coercion: A differential effectiveness approach. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(3):552–559.
    1. Yeater EA, O’Donohue W. Sexual assault prevention programs: Current issues, future directions, and the potential efficacy of interventions with women. Clin psychol rev. 1999;19(7):739–771. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00075-0.
    1. Women Against Rape. 'Community action strategies to stop rape’: A rape prevention program in an urban area. J Women Cult Soc. 1980;5(3):238–241.
    1. Lonsway KA, Banyard VL, Berkowitz AD, Gidycz CA, Katz JT, Koss MP, Schewe PA, Ullman SE. Rape prevention and risk reduction: Review of the research literature for practitioners. National Online Resource Center on Violence Against Women; 2009. Retrieved from .
    1. Anderson LA, Whiston SC. Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychol Women Q. 2005;29:374–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00237.x.
    1. Breitenbecher KH. Sexual assault on college campuses: Is an ounce of prevention enough. Appl Preventative Psychol. 2000;9:23–52. doi: 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80036-8.
    1. Gidycz CA, Rich CL, Marioni NL. In: The Trauma of Adult Sexual Assault: Treatment, Prevention and Policy. Petrak J, Hedge B, editor. New York: Wiley; 2002. Interventions to prevent rape and sexual assault; pp. 235–259.
    1. Lonsway KA. Preventing acquaintance rape through education: What do we know? Psychol Women Q. 1996;20(2):229–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00469.x.
    1. Banyard VL, Eckstein RP, Moynihan MM. Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. J Commun Psychol. 2007;35(4):463–481. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20159.
    1. Banyard VL, Plante EG, Moynihan MM. Bystander education: bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. J Commun Psychol. 2004;32(1):61–79. doi: 10.1002/jcop.10078.
    1. Burn SM. A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles. 2009;60(11–12):779–792.
    1. Schewe PA. In: Preventing violence in relationships. Schewe PA, editor. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2002. Guidelines for developing rape prevention and risk reduction interventions; pp. 107–136.
    1. Foubert JD, Newberry JT, Tatum JL. Behavior differences seven months later: Effects of a rape prevention program. NASPA J. 2007;44(4):728–748.
    1. Rozee PD, Koss MP. Rape: A century of resistance. Psychol Women Q. 2001;25:295–311. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00030.
    1. Eagly AH, Chaiken S. In: Advances in experimental social psychology. Volume 12. Berkowitz L, editor. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1984. Cognitive Theories of persuation; pp. 267–359.
    1. Chaiken S, Liberman A, Eagly AH. In: Unintended thought. Bargh JSUJA, editor. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press; 1989. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context; pp. 212–252.
    1. Nurius PS, Norris J. A cognitive ecological model of women’s response to male sexual coercion in dating. J Psychol Hum Sex. 1996;8(1):117–139.
    1. Ullman SE. Review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance. Crim Justice Behav. 1997;24(2):177–204. doi: 10.1177/0093854897024002003.
    1. Gidycz CA, Rich CL, Orchowski L, King C, Miller AK. The evaluation of a sexual assault self-defense and risk-reduction program for college women: A prospective study. Psychol Women Q. 2006;30(2):173–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00280.x.
    1. Orchowski LM, Gidycz CA, Raffle H. Evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction and self-defense program: A prospective analysis of a revised protocol. Psychol Women Q. 2008;32:204–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00425.x.
    1. Hanson KA, Gidycz CA. Evaluation of a sexual assault prevention program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(6):1046–1052.
    1. Hanson Breitenbecher K, Gidycz CA. An empirical evaluation of a program designed to reduce the risk of multiple sexual victimization. J Interpers Violence. 1998;13(4):472–488. doi: 10.1177/088626098013004004.
    1. Breitenbecher KH, Scarce M. An evaluation of the effectiveness of a sexual assault education program focusing on pychological barriers to resistance. J Interpers Violence. 2001;16(5):387–407. doi: 10.1177/088626001016005001.
    1. Gidycz CA, Lynn SJ, Rich CL, Marioni NL, Loh C, Blackwell LM, Stafford J, Fite R, Pashdag J. The evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction program: A multisite investigation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(6):1073–1078.
    1. Yeater EA, Naugle AE, O’Donohue W, Bradley AR. Sexual assault prevention with college-aged women: A bibliotherapy approach. Violence Vict. 2004;19(5):593–612. doi: 10.1891/vivi.19.5.593.63685.
    1. Weitlauf JC, Ruzek JI, Westrup DA, Lee T, Keller J. Empirically assessing participation perceptions of the research experience in a randomized clinical trial: the women’s self-defense project as a case example. Empirical Res on Human Ethics. 2007;2(2):11–24. doi: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.2.11.
    1. Senn CY, Saunders K, Gee S. In: Violences faites aux femmes in the collection: Problemes sociaux et interventions sociales. Arcand S, Damant D, Gravel S, Harper E, editor. Quebec City: Les Presses de Université du Québec; 2008. Walking the tightrope: Providing sexual assault resistance education for University women without victim blame; pp. 353–372.
    1. Gavey N. Just Sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. London: Routledge; 2005.
    1. Kimball RS. Our whole lives: Sexuality for adults. Boston: Unitarian Universalist Association; 2000.
    1. Senn CY, Gee SS, Thake J. Emancipatory sexuality education and sexual assault resistance: Does the former enhance the latter? Psychol Women Q. 2011;35(1):72–91. doi: 10.1177/0361684310384101.
    1. Norris J, Nurius PS, Graham TL. When a date changes from fun to dangerous: Factors affecting women’s ability to distinguish. Violence Against Women. 1999;5(3):230–350. doi: 10.1177/10778019922181202.
    1. Koss MP. The underdetection of rape: Methodological choices and their effects on incidence estimates. J Soc Issues. 1992;48(1):61–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01157.x.
    1. Nurius PS, Norris J, Macy RJ, Huang B. Women’s situational coping with acquaintance sexual assault: Applying an appraisal-based model. Violence Against Women. 2004;10(5):450–478. doi: 10.1177/1077801204264367.
    1. McCaw J, Senn CY. Perception of cues in conflictual dating situations: A test of the Miscommunication Hypothesis. Violence Against Women. 1998;4(5):609–624. doi: 10.1177/1077801298004005006.
    1. Beres M, Senn CY, McCaw J. Taking "mis" out of miscommunication: Navigating desire differences in heterosex. Toronto, Ontario: Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association; 2009.
    1. Cleveland HH, Koss MP, Lyons J. Rape tactics from the survivors’ perspective: Contextual dependence and within-event independence. J Interpers Violence. 1999;14(5):532–547. doi: 10.1177/088626099014005005.
    1. Nurius PS, Norris J, Dimeff LA, Graham TL. Expectations regarding acquaintance sexual aggression among sorority and fraternity members. Sex Roles. 1996;35(7/8):429–445.
    1. Ullman SE. In: Preventing violence in relationships. Schewe PA, editor. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2002. Rape avoidance: Self-protection strategies for women; pp. 137–162.
    1. Ullman SE, Knight RA. Fighting back: Women’s resistance to rape. J Interpers Violence. 1992;7(1):31–43. doi: 10.1177/088626092007001003.
    1. Ullman SE. Does offender violence escalate when rape victims fight back? J Interpers Violence. 1998;13(2):179–192. doi: 10.1177/088626098013002001.
    1. Bart PB, O’Brien PH. Stopping rape: Successful survival strategies. New York, N.Y.: Teachers College Press; 1985.
    1. Sochting I, Fairbrother N, Koch WJ. Sexual assault of women: Prevention efforts and risk factors. Violence Against Women. 2004;10(1):73–93. doi: 10.1177/1077801203255680.
    1. Ullman SE, Knight RA. A multivariate model for predicting rape and physical injury outcomes during sexual assaults. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(5):724–731.
    1. Koss MP, Abbey A, Campbell R, Cook S, Norris J, Testa M, Ullman SE, West C, White J. Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychol Women Q. 2007;31:237–270.
    1. Koss MP, Gidycz CA. Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53(3):422–423.
    1. Check JVP, Elias B, Barton SA. In: Violence in intimate relationships. Russell GW, Great N, editor. NY: PMA; 1988. Hostility toward men in female victims of male sexual aggression; pp. 149–162.
    1. Simpson A, Senn CY. Sexual coercion and sexual assault: Are the effects on hostility gender specific? Guid Couns. 2003;18(3):111–117.
    1. Testa M, VanZile-Tamsen C, Livingston JA, Koss MP. Assessing women’s experiences of sexual aggression using the sexual experiences survey: evidence for validity and implications for research. Psychol Women Q. 2004;28(3):256–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00143.x.
    1. Gray MD, Lesser D, Quinn E, Brounds C. The effectiveness of personalizing acquaintance rape prevention: Programs on perception of vulnerability and on reducing risk-taking behavior. J Coll Stud Dev. 1990;31:217–220.
    1. Marx BP, Calhoun KS, Wilson AE, Meyerson LA. Sexual revictimization prevention: An outcome evaluation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(1):25–32.
    1. Ozer EM, Bandura A. Mechanisms governing improvement effects: A self-efficacy analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(4):472–486.
    1. Testa M, VanZile-Tamsen C, Livingston JA. The role of women’s alcohol consumption in managing sexual intimacy and sexual safety motives. J Stud Alcohol. 2006;67:1–10.
    1. Messman-Moore TL, Brown AL. Risk perception, rape and sexual revictimization: A prospective study of college women. Psychol Women Q. 2006;30:159–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00279.x.
    1. Payne DL, Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF. Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. J Res Personal. 1999;33(1):27–68. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238.
    1. Cowan G, Campbell RR. Rape causal attitudes among adolescents. J Sex Res. 1995;32(2):145–153. doi: 10.1080/00224499509551784.
    1. Cowan G, Quinton WJ. Cognitive style and attitudinal correlates of the perceived causes of rape scale. Psychol Women Q. 1997;21(2):227–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00110.x.
    1. Saunders DM, Fisher WA, Hewitt EC, Clayton JP. A method for empirically assessing volunteer selection effects: Recruitment procedures and responses to erotica. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;49(6):1703–1712.
    1. Koss MP, Oros CJ. Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982;50(3):455–457.
    1. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley and Sons, Inc: Canada; 2000.
    1. Persistence in Post-secondary education in Canada: The latest research. .
    1. Grady C, Dickert N, Jawetz T, Gensler G, Emmanuel E. An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005;26(3):365–375. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2005.02.003.
    1. Dickert N, Emanuel E, Grady C. Paying research subjects: An analysis of current policies. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(5):368–373. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00009.
    1. Lemmens T, Elliot C. Guinea pigs on the payroll: The ethics of paying research subjects. Account Res. 1999;7:3–20. doi: 10.1080/08989629908573939.
    1. Lang DL, DiClemente RJ, Hardin JW, Crosby RA, Salazar LF, Hertsberg VS. Threats of cross-contamination on effects of a sexual risk reduction intervention: Fact or fiction. Prev Sci. 2009;10:270–275. doi: 10.1007/s11121-009-0127-z.
    1. SAS Institute Inc. Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2011.
    1. Little RJA. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83(404):1198–1202. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir