Procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography point-of-care testing to determine antibiotic prescription in patients with lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: pragmatic cluster randomised trial

Loïc Lhopitallier, Andreas Kronenberg, Jean-Yves Meuwly, Isabella Locatelli, Yolanda Mueller, Nicolas Senn, Valérie D'Acremont, Noémie Boillat-Blanco, Loïc Lhopitallier, Andreas Kronenberg, Jean-Yves Meuwly, Isabella Locatelli, Yolanda Mueller, Nicolas Senn, Valérie D'Acremont, Noémie Boillat-Blanco

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether point-of care procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography can safely reduce unnecessary antibiotic treatment in patients with lower respiratory tract infections in primary care.

Design: Three group, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial from September 2018 to March 2020.

Setting: 60 Swiss general practices.

Participants: One general practitioner per practice was included. General practitioners screen all patients with acute cough; patients with clinical pneumonia were included.

Interventions: Randomisation in a 1:1:1 of general practitioners to either antibiotics guided by sequential procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography point-of-care tests (UltraPro; n=152), procalcitonin guided antibiotics (n=195), or usual care (n=122).

Main outcomes: Primary outcome was proportion of patients in each group prescribed an antibiotic by day 28. Secondary outcomes included duration of restricted activities due to lower respiratory tract infection within 14 days.

Results: 60 general practitioners included 469 patients (median age 53 years (interquartile range 38-66); 278 (59%) were female). Probability of antibiotic prescription at day 28 was lower in the procalcitonin group than in the usual care group (0.40 v 0.70, cluster corrected difference -0.26 (95% confidence interval -0.41 to -0.10)). No significant difference was seen between UltraPro and procalcitonin groups (0.41 v 0.40, -0.03 (-0.17 to 0.12)). The median number of days with restricted activities by day 14 was 4 days in the procalcitonin group and 3 days in the usual care group (difference 1 day (95% confidence interval -0.23 to 2.32); hazard ratio 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97)), which did not prove non-inferiority.

Conclusions: Compared with usual care, point-of-care procalcitonin led to a 26% absolute reduction in the probability of 28 day antibiotic prescription without affecting patients' safety. Point-of-care lung ultrasonography did not further reduce antibiotic prescription, although a potential added value cannot be excluded, owing to the wide confidence intervals.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03191071.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Leenaards Foundation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Consort flowchart of trial participants. COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fig 2
Fig 2
Probability (%) of antibiotic prescription by days 0, 7, and 28 according to study group (usual care, procalcitonin, and UltraPro (sequential procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography point-of-care tests))

References

    1. Schappert SM, Burt CW. Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 2001-02. Vital Health Stat 13 2006;(159):1-66.
    1. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, et al. Joint Taskforce of the European Respiratory Society and European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases . Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011;17(Suppl 6):E1-59. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03672.x.
    1. Huchon GJ, Gialdroni-Grassi G, Léophonte P, Manresa F, Schaberg T, Woodhead M. Initial antibiotic therapy for lower respiratory tract infection in the community: a European survey. Eur Respir J 1996;9:1590-5. 10.1183/09031936.96.09081590
    1. Cals JW, Hopstaken RM, Butler CC, Hood K, Severens JL, Dinant GJ. Improving management of patients with acute cough by C-reactive protein point of care testing and communication training (IMPAC3T): study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract 2007;8:15. 10.1186/1471-2296-8-15.
    1. Anthierens S, Tonkin-Crine S, Cals JW, et al. GRACE/CHAMP INTRO team . Clinicians’ views and experiences of interventions to enhance the quality of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:408-16. 10.1007/s11606-014-3076-6.
    1. Metlay JP, Kapoor WN, Fine MJ. Does this patient have community-acquired pneumonia? Diagnosing pneumonia by history and physical examination. JAMA 1997;278:1440-5. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550170070035
    1. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, et al. Joint Taskforce of the European Respiratory Society and European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases . Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011;17(Suppl 6):E1-59. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03672.x.
    1. Burkhardt O, Ewig S, Haagen U, et al. . Procalcitonin guidance and reduction of antibiotic use in acute respiratory tract infection. Eur Respir J 2010;36:601-7. 10.1183/09031936.00163309.
    1. Briel M, Young J, Tschudi P, et al. . Prevalence and influence of diagnostic tests for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care [published Online First: 2006/05/19]. Swiss Med Wkly 2006;136:248-53. 10.4414/smw.2006.11343.
    1. Ye X, Xiao H, Chen B, Zhang S. Accuracy of Lung Ultrasonography versus Chest Radiography for the Diagnosis of Adult Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0130066. 10.1371/journal.pone.0130066.
    1. Simon L, Gauvin F, Amre DK, Saint-Louis P, Lacroix J. Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:206-17. 10.1086/421997.
    1. Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Thomann R, et al. ProHOSP Study Group . Effect of procalcitonin-based guidelines vs standard guidelines on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: the ProHOSP randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009;302:1059-66. 10.1001/jama.2009.1297.
    1. Huang DT, Yealy DM, Filbin MR, et al. ProACT Investigators . Procalcitonin-Guided Use of Antibiotics for Lower Respiratory Tract Infection. N Engl J Med 2018;379:236-49. 10.1056/NEJMoa1802670.
    1. Briel M, Schuetz P, Mueller B, et al. Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use vs a standard approach for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2000-7. 10.1001/archinte.168.18.2000
    1. Cortellaro F, Colombo S, Coen D, Duca PG. Lung ultrasound is an accurate diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2012;29:19-23. 10.1136/emj.2010.101584.
    1. Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest 2008;134:117-25. 10.1378/chest.07-2800.
    1. Masiá M, Gutiérrez F, Shum C, et al. . Usefulness of procalcitonin levels in community-acquired pneumonia according to the patients outcome research team pneumonia severity index. Chest 2005;128:2223-9. 10.1378/chest.128.4.2223.
    1. Lhopitallier L, Kronenberg A, Meuwly JY, et al. . Procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography point-of-care testing to decide on antibiotic prescription in patients with lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. BMC Pulm Med 2019;19:143. 10.1186/s12890-019-0898-3.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-81. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
    1. Watson L, Little P, Moore M, Warner G, Williamson I. Validation study of a diary for use in acute lower respiratory tract infection. Fam Pract 2001;18:553-4. 10.1093/fampra/18.5.553
    1. Cals JW, Butler CC, Hopstaken RM, Hood K, Dinant GJ. Effect of point of care testing for C reactive protein and training in communication skills on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2009;338:b1374. 10.1136/bmj.b1374.
    1. Gasquet I, Villeminot S, Dos Santos C, et al. . [Cultural adaptation and validation of questionnaires measuring satisfaction with the French health system]. Sante Publique 2003;15:383-402. 10.3917/spub.034.0383
    1. Kolditz M, Ewig S, Schütte H, Suttorp N, Welte T, Rohde G, CAPNETZ study group . Assessment of oxygenation and comorbidities improves outcome prediction in patients with community-acquired pneumonia with a low CRB-65 score. J Intern Med 2015;278:193-202. 10.1111/joim.12349.
    1. Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, CONSORT Group . Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 2012;345:e5661. 10.1136/bmj.e5661.
    1. Lhopitallier L, Brahier T, Opota O, et al. . No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 circulation before identification of the first Swiss SARS-CoV-2 case. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020;56:106100. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106100.
    1. Federal Office of Public Health. Swiss Antibiotic Resistance Report 2020. Usage of Antibiotics and Occurrence of Antibiotic Resistance in Switzerland. November 2020. 2020-OEG-64.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir