An Algorithm to Decide on Antibiotic Prescription in Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Primary Care (UltraPro)

July 16, 2020 updated by: Dr Boillat-Blanco Noemie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Procalcitonin and Lung Ultrasonography Point-of-care Testing to Decide on Antibiotic Prescription in Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection at Primary Care Level: Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial

The study is randomized clustered pragmatic trial whose objective is to decrease unnecessary antibiotic prescription in adult patients with lower respiratory tract infection managed at primary care level in Switzerland, using a simple algorithm based on 2 point of care test results

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will have two distinct phases:

The first phase will test the feasibility of the intervention (UltraPro) along a pilot study. Following the setup of a lung ultrasound training curriculum for general practitioners, the practicality of the whole UltraPro algorithm will be evaluated at primary care level.

The second phase will be a pragmatic randomized three-arm intervention study using an algorithm based on the results of procalcitonin and lung ultrasound to manage patients with lower respiratory tract infections at primary care level. The procalcitonin-ultrasound algorithm will be compared to procalcitonin-guided management alone and usual care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

469

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1025
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

All patients presenting to a participating GP's office for a consultation for an acute respiratory infection (ARI) will be screened for inclusion in the study

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed Consent as documented by signature (Informed Consent Form)
  • Patients aged 18 years or more
  • No antibiotics prescribed for the current episode
  • Acute cough of up to 21 days duration and at least one of the following symptom or sign:
  • History of fever for more than 4 days
  • dyspnoea
  • tachypnoea (≥ 22 cycles per minutes)
  • abnormal focal finding during auscultation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous prescription of antibiotics for the current episode
  • Working diagnosis of acute sinusitis or a non-infective disorder
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Previous episode of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation treated with antibiotics during the last 6 months
  • Known pregnancy
  • Severe immunodeficiency (untreated HIV infection with CD4 count < 200 cells/mm3, solid organ transplant receiver, neutropenia, treatment with corticosteroids with dose equivalent to 20 mg prednisone/day for > 28
  • Admission of the patient
  • GP not available for performing study
  • Patient unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: UltraPro

General practitioners randomly assigned to the UltraPro arm will be responsible to recruit patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and manage them using the UltraPro algorithm.

The UltraPro algorithm combines the result of a procalcitonin point-of-care test with lung ultrasound result to decide on antibiotic prescription. Blood sampling will be performed to identify potential novel biomarkers. Naso-pharyngeal swabs as well as sputum culture will allow for microbiologic identification of aetiological agents.

First, procalcitonin will be measured using a rapid point-of-care test. In case of elevated procalcitonin result (≥0.25 µg/L), a lung ultrasound will be performed to look for the presence of a lung infiltrate or consolidation suggesting the presence of community acquired pneumonia. A portable ultrasound machine with a convex probe, that will be provided to the general practitioner by the study, will be used.

The lung ultrasound will be done following international evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound using the basic eight-region sonographic technique and the criteria for positive scan and positive examination for the diagnosis of pneumonia .

A venous blood sample (17.5 mL) will be collected. Whole blood and plasma will be stored at - 80°C. Further analysis will be performed in order to identify novel biomarkers and gene transcription patterns that could predict the necessity of antibiotic prescription or the severity of disease.
A pooled nasal swab will be performed and sputum will be collected. Samples will be stored at -80°C. Further analysis of the naso-pharyngeal swab and cultures of sputum will be performed to identify by molecular techniques pathogens implicated in the clinical presentation.
Experimental: Procalcitonin

General practitioners randomly assigned to the procalcitonin arm will be responsible to recruit patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and manage them using the procalcitonin algorithm.

The procalcitonin point-of-care test will be performed, as described above, to decide on antibiotic prescription. Blood sampling will be performed to identify potential novel biomarkers. Naso-pharyngeal swabs as well as sputum culture will allow for microbiologic identification of aetiological agents.

A venous blood sample (17.5 mL) will be collected. Whole blood and plasma will be stored at - 80°C. Further analysis will be performed in order to identify novel biomarkers and gene transcription patterns that could predict the necessity of antibiotic prescription or the severity of disease.
A pooled nasal swab will be performed and sputum will be collected. Samples will be stored at -80°C. Further analysis of the naso-pharyngeal swab and cultures of sputum will be performed to identify by molecular techniques pathogens implicated in the clinical presentation.
Procalcitonin will be measured using a rapid point-of-care test
Active Comparator: Usual Care

General practitioners randomly assigned to the usual care arm will be responsible to recruit patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and will manage and treat these patients as they usually do. Only general practitioners who do not use procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography routinely will be included in the usual care arm.

Naso-pharyngeal swabs as well as sputum culture will be performed to allow for microbiologic identification of aetiological agents.

A pooled nasal swab will be performed and sputum will be collected. Samples will be stored at -80°C. Further analysis of the naso-pharyngeal swab and cultures of sputum will be performed to identify by molecular techniques pathogens implicated in the clinical presentation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients prescribed an antibiotic in each arm
Time Frame: Assessed at day 28 after baseline
For each arm, we will assess the proportion of patient's prescribed an antibiotic following the consultation with the general practitioner. This will be done by recording the prescription decision of the general practitioner.
Assessed at day 28 after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of the episode
Time Frame: Assessed at day 28 after baseline
Number of days, within the first 28 days after enrolment, during which the patient's daily activities (work or recreation) were restricted by the lower respiratory tract infection. This will be assessed by telephone follow-up consultations
Assessed at day 28 after baseline
Clinical failure
Time Frame: Day 7 after baseline
Presence of symptoms of an ongoing or relapsing lower respiratory tract infection at 28 days after enrolment. This will be assessed by a telephone follow-up consultation.
Day 7 after baseline
Number of medical visits
Time Frame: Day 7 and Day 28 after baseline
The incidence of supplementary medical visits for the episode of lower respiratory tract infection within 28 days of enrolment will be assessed by reporting from the general practitioners and telephone follow-up consultations
Day 7 and Day 28 after baseline
Serious adverse outcome
Time Frame: During the first 28 days following baseline
Secondary hospitalisation or death of any cause or disease specific complications (lung abscess, empyema and acute respiratory distress), within 28 days of enrolment. Assessed by serious adverse event reporting, general practitioner reporting and telephone follow-up.
During the first 28 days following baseline
Duration of algorithm completion
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline (Day 0)
Median duration of time spent for the medical consultation, procalcitonin testing, lung ultrasound and total time spent in the practice. These will be assessed by the general practitioner by filling in a case report form at baseline.
Assessed at baseline (Day 0)
Satisfaction of providers
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The overall satisfaction of general practitioners regarding the process of the consultation and its different components will be assessed using a Likert scale.
Assessed at baseline
Satisfaction of patients
Time Frame: Assessed at day 7
The overall satisfaction of patients regarding the process of the consultation and of follow-up will be assessed using a Likert scale. These will be assessed by telephone follow-up.
Assessed at day 7
Cost / effectiveness ratio
Time Frame: Assessed one month after data collection is complete
Cost / effectiveness ratio expressed as the cost required per 1% decrease of the rate of antibiotic prescription during the studio will be assessed using review of the medical records and estimation of the costs of the various process of the diagnostic algorithm based on the Swiss Federal HealthCare Law.
Assessed one month after data collection is complete
Aetiology of LRTIs in primary care
Time Frame: Assessed within the first year after data collection is complete
Prevalence of different respiratory pathogens as assessed by realtime multiplex PCR performed on a naso-pharyngeal swab and in sputum
Assessed within the first year after data collection is complete
Host biomarkers
Time Frame: Assessed within the first year after data collection is complete
Sensitivity and specificity of combinations of host biomarkers to identify patients with clinical failure or with pneumonia
Assessed within the first year after data collection is complete
Transcription patterns
Time Frame: Assessed within the first year after data collection is complete
Association between SNPs in genes involved in microvascular integrity and poor outcome or clinical failure
Assessed within the first year after data collection is complete

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Noémie Boillat, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Only coded and anonymous data will be made available to protect patients right to privacy

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Resp Tract Infection

Clinical Trials on UltraPro

3
Subscribe