Clinical Trial Page

Summary
EudraCT Number:2006-005604-14
Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:AIFA TX
National Competent Authority:Italy - Italian Medicines Agency
Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
Trial Status:Completed
Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2007-01-05
Trial results View results
Index
A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
P. END OF TRIAL
A. Protocol Information
A.1Member State ConcernedItaly - Italian Medicines Agency
A.2EudraCT number2006-005604-14
A.3Full title of the trial
A randomized, prospective, multicenter trial to compare the effect on chronic allograft nephropathy prevention of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine as the sole immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplant recipients
A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
MAMMOUTH
A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberAIFA TX
A.5.1ISRCTN (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial) NumberND
A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan Information not present in EudraCT
A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
B. Sponsor Information
B.Sponsor: 1
B.1.1Name of SponsorIST. DI RICERCHE FARMACOLOG. M. NEGRI
B.1.3.4CountryItaly
B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
B.4.1Name of organisation providing support
B.4.2Country
B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
B.5.1Name of organisation
B.5.2Functional name of contact point
D. IMP Identification
D.IMP: 1
D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
D.2.1.1.1Trade name CELLCEPT*50CPR 500MG
D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderROCHE SpA
D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Tablet
D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
D.3.10 Strength
D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
D.3.10.3Concentration number500
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
D.IMP: 2
D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
D.2.1.1.1Trade name AZATIOPRINA WELL*50CPR RIV50MG
D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderGLAXOSMITHKLINE SpA
D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Tablet
D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
D.3.10 Strength
D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
D.3.10.3Concentration number50
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
D.8 Information on Placebo
E. General Information on the Trial
E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
kidney transplant
MedDRA Classification
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
E.1.2Version 6.1
E.1.2Level PT
E.1.2Classification code 10023439
E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
E.2 Objective of the trial
E.2.1Main objective of the trial
To compare the incidence of CAN in kidney transplant patients receiving induction therapy with basiliximab and low-dose RATG and maintenance immunosuppression with low-dose MMF or AZA monotherapy.
E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
- To evaluate whether MMF may exert an higher activity against acute allograft rejection as compared to AZA when used as the sole immunosuppressive agent. - To evaluate the relationships between acute rejection episodes and subsequent occurrence of CAN, and long-term graft function/survival. Should the study demonstrate the superiority of any of the two drugs in preventing CAN, patients will be put on the more effective immunosuppressive treatment. This will allow assessing whether the lesions of CAN may recover in those patients who are shifted from the less to the more effective treatment. The extension phase of the study will be aimed at assessing the long-term patient and graft survival.
E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study Information not present in EudraCT
E.3Principal inclusion criteria
- Males and females aged 18-60 years; - First single kidney transplant from living or deceased donors; - Written informed consent.
E.4Principal exclusion criteria
- Specific contraindications to RATG therapy such as severe leucopenia WBC 2000/mm3 ; - High immunological risk such as second transplant recipients or those who have a panel reactivity 10 ; - history of malignancy except non metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated successfully; - Evidence of active hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus or human acquired immunodeficiency virus infection; - Any chronic clinical conditions that may affect completion of the trial or confound data interpretation; - Pregnancy or lactating; - Women of childbearing potential without following a scientifically accepted form of contraception; - Legal incapacity and/or other circumstances rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequence of the trial; - Evidence of an uncooperative attitude; - Any evidence that patient will not be able to complete the trial follow-up.
E.5 End points
E.5.1Primary end point(s)
Incidence of biopsy-proven CAN at 3 years follow-up end phase B .
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
E.6Scope of the trial
E.6.1Diagnosis No
E.6.2Prophylaxis No
E.6.3Therapy Yes
E.6.4Safety No
E.6.5Efficacy Yes
E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
E.6.8Bioequivalence Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.9Dose response No
E.6.10Pharmacogenetic Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
E.6.13Others Information not present in EudraCT
E.7Trial type and phase
E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
E.7.1.3Other No
E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
E.8 Design of the trial
E.8.1Controlled No
E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
E.8.1.2Open Yes
E.8.1.3Single blind No
E.8.1.4Double blind No
E.8.1.5Parallel group No
E.8.1.6Cross over No
E.8.1.7Other No
E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) Yes
E.8.2.2Placebo No
E.8.2.3Other No
E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years5
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months6
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years5
E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months6
F. Population of Trial Subjects
F.1 Age Range
F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
F.1.1.1In Utero No
F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) No
F.2 Gender
F.2.1Female Yes
F.2.2Male Yes
F.3 Group of trial subjects
F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
F.3.2Patients Yes
F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Information not present in EudraCT
F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception For clinical trials recorded in the database before the 10th March 2011 this question read: "Women of childbearing potential" and did not include the words "not using contraception". An answer of yes could have included women of child bearing potential whether or not they would be using contraception. The answer should therefore be understood in that context. This trial was recorded in the database on 2007-01-05. Yes
F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Information not present in EudraCT
F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
F.3.3.4Nursing women No
F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
F.3.3.7Others No
F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
F.4.1In the member state224
F.4.2 For a multinational trial
F.4.2.1In the EEA 224
F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 224
G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2006-12-19
N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2006-11-13
P. End of Trial
P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
P.Date of the global end of the trial2017-11-29

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe