Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

Tutkimus upadasitinibin (ABT-494) toistuvan antamisen pitkän aikavälin tehon, turvallisuuden ja siedettävyyden arvioimiseksi Crohnin tautia sairastavilla potilailla

maanantai 10. elokuuta 2026 päivittänyt: AbbVie

Vaihe 2, monikeskus, avoin laajennus (OLE) tutkimus upadasitinibin (ABT-494) toistuvan annostelun pitkän aikavälin tehon, turvallisuuden ja siedettävyyden tarkkailemiseksi Crohnin tautia sairastavilla potilailla

Tämä on avoin laajennustutkimus (OLE), jonka tarkoituksena on arvioida upadasitinibin (ABT-494) pitkän aikavälin tehoa, turvallisuutta ja siedettävyyttä.

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Tila

Valmis

Ehdot

Interventio / Hoito

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Todellinen)

107

Vaihe

  • Vaihe 2

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskelupaikat

  • Alankomaat
    • North Holland
      • Amsterdam, North Holland, Alankomaat, 1105 AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC, locatie AMC /ID# 149932
    • Utrecht
      • Utrecht, Utrecht, Alankomaat, 3584 CX
        • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht /ID# 149933
  • Belgia
    • Liege
      • Liège, Liege, Belgia, 4000
        • Duplicate_CHU de Liege /ID# 149912
  • Espanja
    • A Coruna
      • Ferrol, A Coruna, Espanja, 15405
        • Hospital Arquitecto Marcide - Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol /ID# 149996
    • Madrid
      • Madrid, Madrid, Espanja, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz /ID# 149997
  • Israel
      • Petah Tikva, Israel, 4941492
        • Rabin Medical Center. /ID# 149942
    • Central District
      • Ẕerifin, Central District, Israel, 70300
        • Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center /ID# 149943
    • Tel Aviv
      • Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv, Israel, 5265601
        • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center /ID# 149945
  • Italia
    • Calabria
      • Catanzaro, Calabria, Italia, 88100
        • University of Catanzaro /ID# 149927
    • Emilia-Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italia, 40138
        • Duplicate_IRCCS AOU di Bologna - Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi /ID# 149958
  • Kanada
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Kanada, T6G 2B7
        • University of Alberta Hospital /ID# 149873
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Kanada, V5Z 1M9
        • University of British Columbia (UBC) - Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Ce /ID# 149876
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Kanada, V6Z 2K5
        • Duplicate_(G.I.R.I.) GI Research Institute Foundation /ID# 149878
    • Ontario
      • Vaughan, Ontario, Kanada, L4L 4Y7
        • Toronto Digestive Disease Associates /ID# 149877
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Kanada, H4A 3J1
        • Disc_Royal Victoria Hospital / McGill University Health Centre /ID# 149871
  • Norja
    • Oslo
      • Oslo, Oslo, Norja, 0440
        • Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus /ID# 149967
  • Puola
    • Masovian Voivodeship
      • Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Puola, 02-507
        • Panstwowy Instytut Medyczny MSWiA w Warszawie /ID# 149978
    • Łódź Voivodeship
      • Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, Puola, 90-302
        • Santa Sp. z o.o. Santa Familia Centrum Badan, Profilaktyki i Leczenia /ID# 149979
  • Ranska
    • Meurthe-et-Moselle
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, Ranska, 54500
        • Duplicate_CHRU Nancy - Hopitaux de Brabois /ID# 149896
    • Nord
      • Lille, Nord, Ranska, 59037
        • CHRU Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez /ID# 149897
    • Somme
      • Amiens, Somme, Ranska, 80054
        • Duplicate_CHU Amiens-Picardie Site Sud /ID# 149921
  • Romania
      • Timișoara, Romania, 300002
        • Cabinet Particular Policlinic Algomed /ID# 149993
  • Saksa
      • Berlin, Saksa, 14050
        • DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend /ID# 149905
      • Münster, Saksa, 48155
        • Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Portal 10 /ID# 149930
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Saksa, 24105
        • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel /ID# 149936
  • Slovakia
    • Nitra Region
      • Nitra, Nitra Region, Slovakia, 949 01
        • Duplicate_KM Management, spol. s.r.o. /ID# 149949
    • Presov
      • Prešov, Presov, Slovakia, 080 01
        • Gastro I., s.r.o. /ID# 149948
  • Tanska
    • Capital Region
      • Hvidovre, Capital Region, Tanska, 2650
        • Kobenhavns Universitet - Hvidovre Hospital (HH) /ID# 149890
    • Central Jutland
      • Aarhus N, Central Jutland, Tanska, 8200
        • Duplicate_Aarhus University Hospital /ID# 149919
  • Tšekki
    • Hradec Kralove
      • Hradec Králové, Hradec Kralove, Tšekki, 500 12
        • Hepato-Gastroenterologie HK, s.r.o. /ID# 149882
  • Unkari
      • Budapest, Unkari, 1124
        • Magyar Elhizastudomanyi Kozpont Kft. /ID# 149907
  • Uusi Seelanti
    • Otago
      • Otago, Otago, Uusi Seelanti, 9016
        • Dunedin Hospital /ID# 149964
  • Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta
    • Manchester
      • Manchester, Manchester, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta, M13 9WL
        • Duplicate_Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 150006
    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta, OX3 9DU
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 149963
  • Yhdysvallat
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, Yhdysvallat, 92037
        • UC San Diego Health System /ID# 150041
      • San Francisco, California, Yhdysvallat, 94143-2204
        • Univ California, San Francisco /ID# 149987
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, Yhdysvallat, 32610
        • Duplicate_University of Florida - Archer /ID# 150033
      • Hollywood, Florida, Yhdysvallat, 33021
        • The Ctr for Gastro Disorders /ID# 150012
      • Inverness, Florida, Yhdysvallat, 34452-4717
        • Nature Coast Clinical Research - Inverness /ID# 149975
    • Georgia
      • Macon, Georgia, Yhdysvallat, 31201
        • Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia, LLC /ID# 149870
      • Marietta, Georgia, Yhdysvallat, 30060
        • GI Specialists of GA, PC /ID# 150015
    • Kansas
      • Topeka, Kansas, Yhdysvallat, 66606
        • Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center, Digestive Health /ID# 149900
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, Yhdysvallat, 40202
        • Duplicate_University of Louisville /ID# 149884
    • Maryland
      • Annapolis, Maryland, Yhdysvallat, 21401
        • Investigative Clinical Research /ID# 149886
      • Towson, Maryland, Yhdysvallat, 21204
        • Charm City Research Group /ID# 150040
    • Michigan
      • Chesterfield, Michigan, Yhdysvallat, 48047
        • Clin Res Inst of Michigan, LLC /ID# 150008
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, Yhdysvallat, 55905-0001
        • Mayo Clinic - Rochester /ID# 149894
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, Yhdysvallat, 64131
        • Kansas City Research Institute /ID# 149888
      • St Louis, Missouri, Yhdysvallat, 63110
        • Washington University-School of Medicine /ID# 149899
    • New York
      • Lake Success, New York, Yhdysvallat, 11042
        • NYU Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates /ID# 149976
      • New York, New York, Yhdysvallat, 10021-4872
        • Weill Cornell Medicine/NYP /ID# 149895
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Yhdysvallat, 27514-4220
        • Univ NC Chapel Hill /ID# 149982
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, Yhdysvallat, 45219
        • University Of Cincinnati Medical Center /ID# 149977
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, Yhdysvallat, 74104
        • Options Health Research, LLC /ID# 150010
    • Texas
      • Southlake, Texas, Yhdysvallat, 76092
        • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants - Southlake /ID# 149869
      • Southlake, Texas, Yhdysvallat, 76092
        • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants - Southlake /ID# 149989
    • Utah
      • Orem, Utah, Yhdysvallat, 84058
        • Aspen Clinical Research /ID# 150020
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, Yhdysvallat, 22908
        • University of Virginia /ID# 149881
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Yhdysvallat, 98109
        • University of Washington /ID# 149988
      • Seattle, Washington, Yhdysvallat, 98101
        • Virginia Mason Hospital & Medical Center /ID# 150042
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Yhdysvallat, 53215
        • Wisconsin Center for Advanced Research /ID# 149863

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

18 vuotta - 75 vuotta (Aikuinen, Vanhempi Aikuinen)

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Ei

Kuvaus

Sisällyttämiskriteerit:

  • Osallistujan on täytynyt suorittaa tutkimus M13-740 viikkoon 52 asti.
  • Naispuolisen osallistujan tulee olla postmenopausaalinen, kirurgisesti steriili tai ehkäisymenetelmää käyttävä.

Poissulkemiskriteerit:

  • Mistä tahansa syystä tutkija pitää osallistujaa sopimattomana ehdokkaana
  • Naispuolinen osallistuja, jolla on positiivinen raskaustesti lähtötilanteessa tai joka harkitsee raskautta tutkimuksen aikana.
  • Osallistuja ei noudata aikaisempia ja samanaikaisia ​​lääkitysvaatimuksia ja menettelyjä tutkimuksen M13-740 aikana.

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Hoito
  • Jako: Ei satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Kokeellinen: Upadasitinibi (ABT-494) annos A
Avoin annos A kerran päivässä (QD)
Lääke: ABT-494
Tabletti: Suun kautta
Muut nimet:
  • RINVOQ
  • Upadasitinibi
Kokeellinen: Upadasitinibi (ABT-494) annos B
Avoin etiketti-annos B QD
Lääke: ABT-494
Tabletti: Suun kautta
Muut nimet:
  • RINVOQ
  • Upadasitinibi

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Month 12
Aikaikkuna: Month 12
Endoscopic remission was based on Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD). The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable.
Month 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Month 12
Aikaikkuna: Month 12
Clinical remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than Baseline and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline in Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Month 12

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD. The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Clinical remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Modified Clinical Remission
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Modified Clinical Remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤2.8 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740, among participants with stool frequency ≥4.0 or abdominal pain score ≥2.0 at Baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission=clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was an average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain"; rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]) cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per CDAI. Abdominal pain score range: 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a pre-specified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher CDAI scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. CDAI remission was defined as CDAI score <150.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total score range: 32 to 224. A higher score indicating better outcome. IBDQ remission was defined as IBDQ score ≥170.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic improvement was defined as SES-CD at least 50% reduction from Baseline or endoscopic remission. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Taking Steroids at Baseline (of Study M13-740) Who Are Steroid-Free at the Specified Timepoint in Study M14-327
Aikaikkuna: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission and Normal C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission = clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated: none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum; scored 0 to 3 per segment. Sum of scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Normal CRP=high-sensitivity CRP <5 mg/L.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants in Remission at Week 0 Who Maintained Remission
Aikaikkuna: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission=clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was an average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain"; rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]) cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per CDAI. Abdominal pain score range: 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission at Week 0 Who Maintained Endoscopic Remission
Aikaikkuna: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Response
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Response = clinical and endoscopic response. Clinical response was average daily stool frequency at least 30% reduction from baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than baseline or average daily abdominal pain at least 30% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain based on CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] cumulative total over past 7 days and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0-105. Endoscopic response was decrease ≥25% SES-CD from baseline of Study M13-740. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, rectum), scored 0 to 3 per each segment. Sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0-15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0-11; total score ranged from 0-56. Lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Enhanced Clinical Response
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Enhanced Clinical Response was defined as average daily stool frequency at least 65% reduction from baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than baseline or average daily abdominal pain score at least 35% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740.Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]; cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Clinical response was defined as average daily stool frequency at least 30% reduction from Baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than Baseline or average daily abdominal pain score at least 30% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]; cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Response
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a prespecified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. CDAI response was defined as a reduction in CDAI scores by ≥70 from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Enhanced CDAI Response
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a prespecified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. Enhanced CDAI response was defined as reduction in CDAI score by ≥100 from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic response was defined as decrease ≥ 25% SES-CD from Baseline of Study M13-740. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving IBDQ Response
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total Score range 32 to 224. A higher score indicated better outcome. IBDQ response was defined as an increase in IBDQ score ≥16 point from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Taking Steroids at Baseline (of Study M13-740) Who Are Steroid-Free for At Least 90 Days and Achieve Remission
Aikaikkuna: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission = clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was average daily stool frequency ≤1.5, not worse than baseline, and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI. Total score range 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2- point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Stool samples were collected for analysis of fecal calprotectin levels.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in Hs-CRP Levels
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in IBDQ Total Score
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total score range from 32 to 224. A higher score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in SES-CD
Aikaikkuna: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Sponsori

AbbVie

Tutkijat

  • Opintojohtaja: ABBVIE INC., AbbVie

Julkaisuja ja hyödyllisiä linkkejä

Tutkimusta koskevien tietojen syöttämisestä vastaava henkilö toimittaa nämä julkaisut vapaaehtoisesti. Nämä voivat koskea mitä tahansa tutkimukseen liittyvää.

Yleiset julkaisut

Hyödyllisiä linkkejä

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)

Keskiviikko 18. toukokuuta 2016

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Perjantai 18. heinäkuuta 2025

Opintojen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Perjantai 18. heinäkuuta 2025

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Maanantai 23. toukokuuta 2016

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Maanantai 23. toukokuuta 2016

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Arvioitu)

Keskiviikko 25. toukokuuta 2016

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Torstai 13. elokuuta 2026

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Maanantai 10. elokuuta 2026

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Lauantai 1. elokuuta 2026

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Avainsanat

Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja

Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot

  • M14-327
  • 2015-003759-23 (EudraCT-numero)

Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)

Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?

JOO

IPD-suunnitelman kuvaus

AbbVie on sitoutunut vastuulliseen tietojen jakamiseen sponsoroimiemme kliinisten tutkimusten osalta. Tämä sisältää pääsyn anonymisoituihin, yksilöllisiin ja tutkimustason tietoihin (analyysitietojoukot) sekä muihin tietoihin (esim. protokolliin, analyysisuunnitelmiin, kliinisiin tutkimusraportteihin) niin kauan kuin tutkimukset eivät ole osa meneillään olevaa tai suunniteltua sääntelyä. lähetys. Tämä sisältää kliinisten tutkimusten tietojen pyynnöt lisensoimattomista tuotteista ja käyttöaiheista.

IPD-jaon aikakehys

Lisätietoja siitä, milloin tutkimukset ovat jaettavissa, käy osoitteessa https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/

IPD-jaon käyttöoikeuskriteerit

Pääsyä näihin kliinisen kokeen tietoihin voivat pyytää kaikki pätevät tutkijat, jotka tekevät tiukkaa riippumatonta tieteellistä tutkimusta, ja ne annetaan tutkimusehdotuksen ja tilastollisen analyysisuunnitelman tarkastelun ja hyväksymisen sekä tiedonjakolausunnon täytäntöönpanon jälkeen. Tietopyynnöt voidaan lähettää milloin tahansa sen jälkeen, kun se on hyväksytty Yhdysvalloissa ja/tai EU:ssa, ja ensisijainen käsikirjoitus hyväksytään julkaistavaksi. Jos haluat lisätietoja prosessista tai lähettää pyynnön, käy seuraavassa linkissä https://www.abbvieclinicaltrials.com/hcp/data-sharing/

IPD-jakamista tukeva tietotyyppi

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • MAHLA
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta

Joo

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta

Ei

Yhdysvalloissa valmistettu ja sieltä viety tuote

Ei

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Tilaa