Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

En studie for å evaluere den langsiktige effektiviteten, sikkerheten og toleransen ved gjentatt administrering av Upadacitinib (ABT-494) hos deltakere med Crohns sykdom

10. august 2026 oppdatert av: AbbVie

En fase 2, multisenter, åpen etikettutvidelse (OLE) studie for å observere den langsiktige effekten, sikkerheten og toleransen ved gjentatt administrering av Upadacitinib (ABT-494) hos personer med Crohns sykdom

Dette er en åpen utvidelsesstudie (OLE) designet for å evaluere den langsiktige effekten, sikkerheten og toleransen til Upadacitinib (ABT-494).

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

107

Fase

  • Fase 2

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

  • Belgia
    • Liege
      • Liège, Liege, Belgia, 4000
        • Duplicate_CHU de Liege /ID# 149912
  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
        • University of Alberta Hospital /ID# 149873
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • University of British Columbia (UBC) - Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Ce /ID# 149876
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 2K5
        • Duplicate_(G.I.R.I.) GI Research Institute Foundation /ID# 149878
    • Ontario
      • Vaughan, Ontario, Canada, L4L 4Y7
        • Toronto Digestive Disease Associates /ID# 149877
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1
        • Disc_Royal Victoria Hospital / McGill University Health Centre /ID# 149871
  • Danmark
    • Capital Region
      • Hvidovre, Capital Region, Danmark, 2650
        • Kobenhavns Universitet - Hvidovre Hospital (HH) /ID# 149890
    • Central Jutland
      • Aarhus N, Central Jutland, Danmark, 8200
        • Duplicate_Aarhus University Hospital /ID# 149919
  • Forente stater
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, Forente stater, 92037
        • UC San Diego Health System /ID# 150041
      • San Francisco, California, Forente stater, 94143-2204
        • Univ California, San Francisco /ID# 149987
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, Forente stater, 32610
        • Duplicate_University of Florida - Archer /ID# 150033
      • Hollywood, Florida, Forente stater, 33021
        • The Ctr for Gastro Disorders /ID# 150012
      • Inverness, Florida, Forente stater, 34452-4717
        • Nature Coast Clinical Research - Inverness /ID# 149975
    • Georgia
      • Macon, Georgia, Forente stater, 31201
        • Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia, LLC /ID# 149870
      • Marietta, Georgia, Forente stater, 30060
        • GI Specialists of GA, PC /ID# 150015
    • Kansas
      • Topeka, Kansas, Forente stater, 66606
        • Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center, Digestive Health /ID# 149900
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, Forente stater, 40202
        • Duplicate_University of Louisville /ID# 149884
    • Maryland
      • Annapolis, Maryland, Forente stater, 21401
        • Investigative Clinical Research /ID# 149886
      • Towson, Maryland, Forente stater, 21204
        • Charm City Research Group /ID# 150040
    • Michigan
      • Chesterfield, Michigan, Forente stater, 48047
        • Clin Res Inst of Michigan, LLC /ID# 150008
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, Forente stater, 55905-0001
        • Mayo Clinic - Rochester /ID# 149894
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, Forente stater, 64131
        • Kansas City Research Institute /ID# 149888
      • St Louis, Missouri, Forente stater, 63110
        • Washington University-School of Medicine /ID# 149899
    • New York
      • Lake Success, New York, Forente stater, 11042
        • NYU Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates /ID# 149976
      • New York, New York, Forente stater, 10021-4872
        • Weill Cornell Medicine/NYP /ID# 149895
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Forente stater, 27514-4220
        • Univ NC Chapel Hill /ID# 149982
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, Forente stater, 45219
        • University Of Cincinnati Medical Center /ID# 149977
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, Forente stater, 74104
        • Options Health Research, LLC /ID# 150010
    • Texas
      • Southlake, Texas, Forente stater, 76092
        • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants - Southlake /ID# 149869
      • Southlake, Texas, Forente stater, 76092
        • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants - Southlake /ID# 149989
    • Utah
      • Orem, Utah, Forente stater, 84058
        • Aspen Clinical Research /ID# 150020
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, Forente stater, 22908
        • University of Virginia /ID# 149881
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Forente stater, 98109
        • University of Washington /ID# 149988
      • Seattle, Washington, Forente stater, 98101
        • Virginia Mason Hospital & Medical Center /ID# 150042
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Forente stater, 53215
        • Wisconsin Center for Advanced Research /ID# 149863
  • Frankrike
    • Meurthe-et-Moselle
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, Frankrike, 54500
        • Duplicate_CHRU Nancy - Hopitaux de Brabois /ID# 149896
    • Nord
      • Lille, Nord, Frankrike, 59037
        • CHRU Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez /ID# 149897
    • Somme
      • Amiens, Somme, Frankrike, 80054
        • Duplicate_CHU Amiens-Picardie Site Sud /ID# 149921
  • Israel
      • Petah Tikva, Israel, 4941492
        • Rabin Medical Center. /ID# 149942
    • Central District
      • Ẕerifin, Central District, Israel, 70300
        • Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center /ID# 149943
    • Tel Aviv
      • Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv, Israel, 5265601
        • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center /ID# 149945
  • Italia
    • Calabria
      • Catanzaro, Calabria, Italia, 88100
        • University of Catanzaro /ID# 149927
    • Emilia-Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italia, 40138
        • Duplicate_IRCCS AOU di Bologna - Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi /ID# 149958
  • Nederland
    • North Holland
      • Amsterdam, North Holland, Nederland, 1105 AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC, locatie AMC /ID# 149932
    • Utrecht
      • Utrecht, Utrecht, Nederland, 3584 CX
        • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht /ID# 149933
  • New Zealand
    • Otago
      • Otago, Otago, New Zealand, 9016
        • Dunedin Hospital /ID# 149964
  • Norge
    • Oslo
      • Oslo, Oslo, Norge, 0440
        • Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus /ID# 149967
  • Polen
    • Masovian Voivodeship
      • Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Polen, 02-507
        • Panstwowy Instytut Medyczny MSWiA w Warszawie /ID# 149978
    • Łódź Voivodeship
      • Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, Polen, 90-302
        • Santa Sp. z o.o. Santa Familia Centrum Badan, Profilaktyki i Leczenia /ID# 149979
  • Romania
      • Timișoara, Romania, 300002
        • Cabinet Particular Policlinic Algomed /ID# 149993
  • Slovakia
    • Nitra Region
      • Nitra, Nitra Region, Slovakia, 949 01
        • Duplicate_KM Management, spol. s.r.o. /ID# 149949
    • Presov
      • Prešov, Presov, Slovakia, 080 01
        • Gastro I., s.r.o. /ID# 149948
  • Spania
    • A Coruna
      • Ferrol, A Coruna, Spania, 15405
        • Hospital Arquitecto Marcide - Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol /ID# 149996
    • Madrid
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spania, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz /ID# 149997
  • Storbritannia
    • Manchester
      • Manchester, Manchester, Storbritannia, M13 9WL
        • Duplicate_Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 150006
    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, Storbritannia, OX3 9DU
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 149963
  • Tsjekkia
    • Hradec Kralove
      • Hradec Králové, Hradec Kralove, Tsjekkia, 500 12
        • Hepato-Gastroenterologie HK, s.r.o. /ID# 149882
  • Tyskland
      • Berlin, Tyskland, 14050
        • DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend /ID# 149905
      • Münster, Tyskland, 48155
        • Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Portal 10 /ID# 149930
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Tyskland, 24105
        • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel /ID# 149936
  • Ungarn
      • Budapest, Ungarn, 1124
        • Magyar Elhizastudomanyi Kozpont Kft. /ID# 149907

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år til 75 år (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inklusjonskriterier:

  • Deltakeren må ha fullført studie M13-740 til og med uke 52.
  • Hvis kvinnen er, må deltakeren være postmenopausal, kirurgisk steril eller bruke prevensjonsmetode.

Ekskluderingskriterier:

  • Av en eller annen grunn anses deltakeren av etterforskeren for å være en uegnet kandidat
  • Kvinnelig deltaker med positiv graviditetstest ved Baseline eller som vurderer å bli gravid i løpet av studien.
  • Deltakeren er ikke i samsvar med tidligere og samtidige medisineringskrav og prosedyrer gjennom hele studie M13-740.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Ikke-randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Upadacitinib (ABT-494) Dose A
Åpen dose A én gang daglig (QD)
Legemiddel: ABT-494
Nettbrett: Oral
Andre navn:
  • RINVOQ
  • Upadacitinib
Eksperimentell: Upadacitinib (ABT-494) Dose B
Åpen etikettdose B QD
Legemiddel: ABT-494
Nettbrett: Oral
Andre navn:
  • RINVOQ
  • Upadacitinib

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Month 12
Tidsramme: Month 12
Endoscopic remission was based on Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD). The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable.
Month 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Month 12
Tidsramme: Month 12
Clinical remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than Baseline and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline in Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Month 12

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD. The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Clinical remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Modified Clinical Remission
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Modified Clinical Remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤2.8 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740, among participants with stool frequency ≥4.0 or abdominal pain score ≥2.0 at Baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission=clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was an average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain"; rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]) cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per CDAI. Abdominal pain score range: 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a pre-specified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher CDAI scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. CDAI remission was defined as CDAI score <150.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total score range: 32 to 224. A higher score indicating better outcome. IBDQ remission was defined as IBDQ score ≥170.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic improvement was defined as SES-CD at least 50% reduction from Baseline or endoscopic remission. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Taking Steroids at Baseline (of Study M13-740) Who Are Steroid-Free at the Specified Timepoint in Study M14-327
Tidsramme: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission and Normal C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission = clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated: none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum; scored 0 to 3 per segment. Sum of scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Normal CRP=high-sensitivity CRP <5 mg/L.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants in Remission at Week 0 Who Maintained Remission
Tidsramme: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission=clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was an average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain"; rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]) cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per CDAI. Abdominal pain score range: 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission at Week 0 Who Maintained Endoscopic Remission
Tidsramme: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Response
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Response = clinical and endoscopic response. Clinical response was average daily stool frequency at least 30% reduction from baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than baseline or average daily abdominal pain at least 30% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain based on CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] cumulative total over past 7 days and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0-105. Endoscopic response was decrease ≥25% SES-CD from baseline of Study M13-740. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, rectum), scored 0 to 3 per each segment. Sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0-15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0-11; total score ranged from 0-56. Lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Enhanced Clinical Response
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Enhanced Clinical Response was defined as average daily stool frequency at least 65% reduction from baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than baseline or average daily abdominal pain score at least 35% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740.Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]; cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Clinical response was defined as average daily stool frequency at least 30% reduction from Baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than Baseline or average daily abdominal pain score at least 30% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]; cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Response
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a prespecified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. CDAI response was defined as a reduction in CDAI scores by ≥70 from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Enhanced CDAI Response
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a prespecified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. Enhanced CDAI response was defined as reduction in CDAI score by ≥100 from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic response was defined as decrease ≥ 25% SES-CD from Baseline of Study M13-740. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving IBDQ Response
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total Score range 32 to 224. A higher score indicated better outcome. IBDQ response was defined as an increase in IBDQ score ≥16 point from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Taking Steroids at Baseline (of Study M13-740) Who Are Steroid-Free for At Least 90 Days and Achieve Remission
Tidsramme: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission = clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was average daily stool frequency ≤1.5, not worse than baseline, and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI. Total score range 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2- point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Stool samples were collected for analysis of fecal calprotectin levels.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in Hs-CRP Levels
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in IBDQ Total Score
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total score range from 32 to 224. A higher score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in SES-CD
Tidsramme: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

AbbVie

Etterforskere

  • Studieleder: ABBVIE INC., AbbVie

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Generelle publikasjoner

Hjelpsomme linker

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

18. mai 2016

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

18. juli 2025

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

18. juli 2025

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

23. mai 2016

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

23. mai 2016

Først lagt ut (Antatt)

25. mai 2016

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

13. august 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

10. august 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. august 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Nøkkelord

Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • M14-327
  • 2015-003759-23 (EudraCT-nummer)

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

AbbVie er forpliktet til ansvarlig datadeling angående de kliniske forsøkene vi sponser. Dette inkluderer tilgang til anonymiserte, individuelle data og data på prøvenivå (analysedatasett), samt annen informasjon (f.eks. protokoller, analyseplaner, kliniske studierapporter), så lenge forsøkene ikke er en del av et pågående eller planlagt regelverk. innlevering. Dette inkluderer forespørsler om kliniske forsøksdata for ulisensierte produkter og indikasjoner.

IPD-delingstidsramme

For detaljer om når studier er tilgjengelige for deling besøk https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/

Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling

Tilgang til disse kliniske studiedataene kan bes om av alle kvalifiserte forskere som engasjerer seg i streng uavhengig vitenskapelig forskning, og vil bli gitt etter gjennomgang og godkjenning av et forskningsforslag og statistisk analyseplan og utførelse av en datadelingserklæring. Dataforespørsler kan sendes inn når som helst etter godkjenning i USA og/eller EU, og et primærmanuskript godtas for publisering. For mer informasjon om prosessen, eller for å sende inn en forespørsel, besøk følgende lenke https://www.abbvieclinicaltrials.com/hcp/data-sharing/

IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SEVJE
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Ja

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

produkt produsert i og eksportert fra USA

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere