Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Eine Studie zur Bewertung der langfristigen Wirksamkeit, Sicherheit und Verträglichkeit der wiederholten Verabreichung von Upadacitinib (ABT-494) bei Teilnehmern mit Morbus Crohn

10. August 2026 aktualisiert von: AbbVie

Eine multizentrische Open-Label-Extension-Studie (OLE) der Phase 2 zur Beobachtung der langfristigen Wirksamkeit, Sicherheit und Verträglichkeit der wiederholten Verabreichung von Upadacitinib (ABT-494) bei Patienten mit Morbus Crohn

Dies ist eine offene Verlängerungsstudie (OLE) zur Bewertung der langfristigen Wirksamkeit, Sicherheit und Verträglichkeit von Upadacitinib (ABT-494).

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

107

Phase

  • Phase 2

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Belgien
    • Liege
      • Liège, Liege, Belgien, 4000
        • Duplicate_CHU de Liege /ID# 149912
  • Deutschland
      • Berlin, Deutschland, 14050
        • DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend /ID# 149905
      • Münster, Deutschland, 48155
        • Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Portal 10 /ID# 149930
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Deutschland, 24105
        • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel /ID# 149936
  • Dänemark
    • Capital Region
      • Hvidovre, Capital Region, Dänemark, 2650
        • Kobenhavns Universitet - Hvidovre Hospital (HH) /ID# 149890
    • Central Jutland
      • Aarhus N, Central Jutland, Dänemark, 8200
        • Duplicate_Aarhus University Hospital /ID# 149919
  • Frankreich
    • Meurthe-et-Moselle
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, Frankreich, 54500
        • Duplicate_CHRU Nancy - Hopitaux de Brabois /ID# 149896
    • Nord
      • Lille, Nord, Frankreich, 59037
        • CHRU Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez /ID# 149897
    • Somme
      • Amiens, Somme, Frankreich, 80054
        • Duplicate_CHU Amiens-Picardie Site Sud /ID# 149921
  • Israel
      • Petah Tikva, Israel, 4941492
        • Rabin Medical Center. /ID# 149942
    • Central District
      • Ẕerifin, Central District, Israel, 70300
        • Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center /ID# 149943
    • Tel Aviv
      • Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv, Israel, 5265601
        • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center /ID# 149945
  • Italien
    • Calabria
      • Catanzaro, Calabria, Italien, 88100
        • University of Catanzaro /ID# 149927
    • Emilia-Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italien, 40138
        • Duplicate_IRCCS AOU di Bologna - Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi /ID# 149958
  • Kanada
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Kanada, T6G 2B7
        • University of Alberta Hospital /ID# 149873
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Kanada, V5Z 1M9
        • University of British Columbia (UBC) - Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Ce /ID# 149876
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Kanada, V6Z 2K5
        • Duplicate_(G.I.R.I.) GI Research Institute Foundation /ID# 149878
    • Ontario
      • Vaughan, Ontario, Kanada, L4L 4Y7
        • Toronto Digestive Disease Associates /ID# 149877
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Kanada, H4A 3J1
        • Disc_Royal Victoria Hospital / McGill University Health Centre /ID# 149871
  • Neuseeland
    • Otago
      • Otago, Otago, Neuseeland, 9016
        • Dunedin Hospital /ID# 149964
  • Niederlande
    • North Holland
      • Amsterdam, North Holland, Niederlande, 1105 AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC, locatie AMC /ID# 149932
    • Utrecht
      • Utrecht, Utrecht, Niederlande, 3584 CX
        • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht /ID# 149933
  • Norwegen
    • Oslo
      • Oslo, Oslo, Norwegen, 0440
        • Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus /ID# 149967
  • Polen
    • Masovian Voivodeship
      • Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Polen, 02-507
        • Panstwowy Instytut Medyczny MSWiA w Warszawie /ID# 149978
    • Łódź Voivodeship
      • Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, Polen, 90-302
        • Santa Sp. z o.o. Santa Familia Centrum Badan, Profilaktyki i Leczenia /ID# 149979
  • Rumänien
      • Timișoara, Rumänien, 300002
        • Cabinet Particular Policlinic Algomed /ID# 149993
  • Slowakei
    • Nitra Region
      • Nitra, Nitra Region, Slowakei, 949 01
        • Duplicate_KM Management, spol. s.r.o. /ID# 149949
    • Presov
      • Prešov, Presov, Slowakei, 080 01
        • Gastro I., s.r.o. /ID# 149948
  • Spanien
    • A Coruna
      • Ferrol, A Coruna, Spanien, 15405
        • Hospital Arquitecto Marcide - Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol /ID# 149996
    • Madrid
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spanien, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz /ID# 149997
  • Tschechien
    • Hradec Kralove
      • Hradec Králové, Hradec Kralove, Tschechien, 500 12
        • Hepato-Gastroenterologie HK, s.r.o. /ID# 149882
  • Ungarn
      • Budapest, Ungarn, 1124
        • Magyar Elhizastudomanyi Kozpont Kft. /ID# 149907
  • Vereinigte Staaten
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92037
        • UC San Diego Health System /ID# 150041
      • San Francisco, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 94143-2204
        • Univ California, San Francisco /ID# 149987
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 32610
        • Duplicate_University of Florida - Archer /ID# 150033
      • Hollywood, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33021
        • The Ctr for Gastro Disorders /ID# 150012
      • Inverness, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 34452-4717
        • Nature Coast Clinical Research - Inverness /ID# 149975
    • Georgia
      • Macon, Georgia, Vereinigte Staaten, 31201
        • Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia, LLC /ID# 149870
      • Marietta, Georgia, Vereinigte Staaten, 30060
        • GI Specialists of GA, PC /ID# 150015
    • Kansas
      • Topeka, Kansas, Vereinigte Staaten, 66606
        • Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center, Digestive Health /ID# 149900
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, Vereinigte Staaten, 40202
        • Duplicate_University of Louisville /ID# 149884
    • Maryland
      • Annapolis, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 21401
        • Investigative Clinical Research /ID# 149886
      • Towson, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 21204
        • Charm City Research Group /ID# 150040
    • Michigan
      • Chesterfield, Michigan, Vereinigte Staaten, 48047
        • Clin Res Inst of Michigan, LLC /ID# 150008
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, Vereinigte Staaten, 55905-0001
        • Mayo Clinic - Rochester /ID# 149894
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, Vereinigte Staaten, 64131
        • Kansas City Research Institute /ID# 149888
      • St Louis, Missouri, Vereinigte Staaten, 63110
        • Washington University-School of Medicine /ID# 149899
    • New York
      • Lake Success, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 11042
        • NYU Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates /ID# 149976
      • New York, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 10021-4872
        • Weill Cornell Medicine/NYP /ID# 149895
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 27514-4220
        • Univ NC Chapel Hill /ID# 149982
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, Vereinigte Staaten, 45219
        • University Of Cincinnati Medical Center /ID# 149977
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, Vereinigte Staaten, 74104
        • Options Health Research, LLC /ID# 150010
    • Texas
      • Southlake, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 76092
        • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants - Southlake /ID# 149869
      • Southlake, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 76092
        • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants - Southlake /ID# 149989
    • Utah
      • Orem, Utah, Vereinigte Staaten, 84058
        • Aspen Clinical Research /ID# 150020
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, Vereinigte Staaten, 22908
        • University of Virginia /ID# 149881
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Vereinigte Staaten, 98109
        • University of Washington /ID# 149988
      • Seattle, Washington, Vereinigte Staaten, 98101
        • Virginia Mason Hospital & Medical Center /ID# 150042
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Vereinigte Staaten, 53215
        • Wisconsin Center for Advanced Research /ID# 149863
  • Vereinigtes Königreich
    • Manchester
      • Manchester, Manchester, Vereinigtes Königreich, M13 9WL
        • Duplicate_Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 150006
    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, Vereinigtes Königreich, OX3 9DU
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 149963

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 75 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Einschlusskriterien:

  • Der Teilnehmer muss die Studie M13-740 bis Woche 52 abgeschlossen haben.
  • Bei Frauen muss die Teilnehmerin postmenopausal, chirurgisch steril sein oder eine Verhütungsmethode anwenden.

Ausschlusskriterien:

  • Aus irgendeinem Grund wird der Teilnehmer vom Ermittler als ungeeigneter Kandidat angesehen
  • Teilnehmerin mit einem positiven Schwangerschaftstest zu Studienbeginn oder die erwägt, während der Studie schwanger zu werden.
  • Der Teilnehmer erfüllt während der gesamten Studie M13-740 nicht die Anforderungen und Verfahren für vorherige und begleitende Medikamente.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Nicht randomisiert
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Upadacitinib (ABT-494) Dosis A
Open-Label-Dosis A einmal täglich (QD)
Arzneimittel: ABT-494
Tablette: Oral
Andere Namen:
  • RINVOQ
  • Upadacitinib
Experimental: Upadacitinib (ABT-494) Dosis B
Open-Label-Dosis B QD
Arzneimittel: ABT-494
Tablette: Oral
Andere Namen:
  • RINVOQ
  • Upadacitinib

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Month 12
Zeitfenster: Month 12
Endoscopic remission was based on Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD). The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable.
Month 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Month 12
Zeitfenster: Month 12
Clinical remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than Baseline and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline in Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Month 12

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD. The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Clinical remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Modified Clinical Remission
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Modified Clinical Remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤2.8 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740, among participants with stool frequency ≥4.0 or abdominal pain score ≥2.0 at Baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission=clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was an average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain"; rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]) cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per CDAI. Abdominal pain score range: 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a pre-specified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher CDAI scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. CDAI remission was defined as CDAI score <150.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total score range: 32 to 224. A higher score indicating better outcome. IBDQ remission was defined as IBDQ score ≥170.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic improvement was defined as SES-CD at least 50% reduction from Baseline or endoscopic remission. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Taking Steroids at Baseline (of Study M13-740) Who Are Steroid-Free at the Specified Timepoint in Study M14-327
Zeitfenster: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission and Normal C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission = clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated: none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum; scored 0 to 3 per segment. Sum of scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Normal CRP=high-sensitivity CRP <5 mg/L.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants in Remission at Week 0 Who Maintained Remission
Zeitfenster: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission=clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was an average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain"; rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]) cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per CDAI. Abdominal pain score range: 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission at Week 0 Who Maintained Endoscopic Remission
Zeitfenster: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Response
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Response = clinical and endoscopic response. Clinical response was average daily stool frequency at least 30% reduction from baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than baseline or average daily abdominal pain at least 30% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain based on CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] cumulative total over past 7 days and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0-105. Endoscopic response was decrease ≥25% SES-CD from baseline of Study M13-740. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, rectum), scored 0 to 3 per each segment. Sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0-15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0-11; total score ranged from 0-56. Lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Enhanced Clinical Response
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Enhanced Clinical Response was defined as average daily stool frequency at least 65% reduction from baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than baseline or average daily abdominal pain score at least 35% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740.Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]; cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Clinical response was defined as average daily stool frequency at least 30% reduction from Baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than Baseline or average daily abdominal pain score at least 30% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]; cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Response
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a prespecified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. CDAI response was defined as a reduction in CDAI scores by ≥70 from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Enhanced CDAI Response
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a prespecified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. Enhanced CDAI response was defined as reduction in CDAI score by ≥100 from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic response was defined as decrease ≥ 25% SES-CD from Baseline of Study M13-740. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving IBDQ Response
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total Score range 32 to 224. A higher score indicated better outcome. IBDQ response was defined as an increase in IBDQ score ≥16 point from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Taking Steroids at Baseline (of Study M13-740) Who Are Steroid-Free for At Least 90 Days and Achieve Remission
Zeitfenster: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission = clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was average daily stool frequency ≤1.5, not worse than baseline, and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI. Total score range 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2- point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Stool samples were collected for analysis of fecal calprotectin levels.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in Hs-CRP Levels
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in IBDQ Total Score
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total score range from 32 to 224. A higher score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in SES-CD
Zeitfenster: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

AbbVie

Ermittler

  • Studienleiter: ABBVIE INC., AbbVie

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Nützliche Links

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

18. Mai 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

18. Juli 2025

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

18. Juli 2025

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

23. Mai 2016

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

23. Mai 2016

Zuerst gepostet (Geschätzt)

25. Mai 2016

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

13. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

10. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • M14-327
  • 2015-003759-23 (EudraCT-Nummer)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

AbbVie verpflichtet sich zu einem verantwortungsbewussten Datenaustausch in Bezug auf die von uns gesponserten klinischen Studien. Dies umfasst den Zugriff auf anonymisierte Daten auf Einzel- und Studienebene (Analysedatensätze) sowie andere Informationen (z. B. Protokolle, Analysepläne, klinische Studienberichte), sofern die Studien nicht Teil einer laufenden oder geplanten Zulassung sind Vorlage. Dazu gehören Anfragen nach Daten klinischer Studien für nicht lizenzierte Produkte und Indikationen.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

Einzelheiten dazu, wann Studien zum Teilen verfügbar sind, finden Sie unter https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

Der Zugang zu diesen klinischen Studiendaten kann von allen qualifizierten Forschern beantragt werden, die sich mit strenger unabhängiger wissenschaftlicher Forschung befassen, und wird nach Prüfung und Genehmigung eines Forschungsvorschlags und statistischen Analyseplans sowie der Unterzeichnung einer Erklärung zur gemeinsamen Nutzung von Daten gewährt. Datenanfragen können jederzeit nach Genehmigung in den USA und/oder der EU eingereicht werden und ein Primärmanuskript wird zur Veröffentlichung angenommen. Weitere Informationen zum Verfahren oder zum Einreichen einer Anfrage finden Sie unter folgendem Link: https://www.abbvieclinicaltrials.com/hcp/data-sharing/

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Ja

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren