Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Un estudio para evaluar la eficacia, seguridad y tolerabilidad a largo plazo de la administración repetida de upadacitinib (ABT-494) en participantes con enfermedad de Crohn

10 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: AbbVie

Un estudio de fase 2, multicéntrico, abierto, de extensión (OLE) para observar la eficacia, seguridad y tolerabilidad a largo plazo de la administración repetida de upadacitinib (ABT-494) en sujetos con enfermedad de Crohn

Este es un estudio de extensión de etiqueta abierta (OLE) diseñado para evaluar la eficacia, seguridad y tolerabilidad a largo plazo de Upadacitinib (ABT-494).

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

107

Fase

  • Fase 2

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Alemania
      • Berlin, Alemania, 14050
        • DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend /ID# 149905
      • Münster, Alemania, 48155
        • Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Portal 10 /ID# 149930
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Alemania, 24105
        • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel /ID# 149936
  • Bélgica
    • Liege
      • Liège, Liege, Bélgica, 4000
        • Duplicate_CHU de Liege /ID# 149912
  • Canadá
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canadá, T6G 2B7
        • University of Alberta Hospital /ID# 149873
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canadá, V5Z 1M9
        • University of British Columbia (UBC) - Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Ce /ID# 149876
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canadá, V6Z 2K5
        • Duplicate_(G.I.R.I.) GI Research Institute Foundation /ID# 149878
    • Ontario
      • Vaughan, Ontario, Canadá, L4L 4Y7
        • Toronto Digestive Disease Associates /ID# 149877
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canadá, H4A 3J1
        • Disc_Royal Victoria Hospital / McGill University Health Centre /ID# 149871
  • Chequia
    • Hradec Kralove
      • Hradec Králové, Hradec Kralove, Chequia, 500 12
        • Hepato-Gastroenterologie HK, s.r.o. /ID# 149882
  • Dinamarca
    • Capital Region
      • Hvidovre, Capital Region, Dinamarca, 2650
        • Kobenhavns Universitet - Hvidovre Hospital (HH) /ID# 149890
    • Central Jutland
      • Aarhus N, Central Jutland, Dinamarca, 8200
        • Duplicate_Aarhus University Hospital /ID# 149919
  • Eslovaquia
    • Nitra Region
      • Nitra, Nitra Region, Eslovaquia, 949 01
        • Duplicate_KM Management, spol. s.r.o. /ID# 149949
    • Presov
      • Prešov, Presov, Eslovaquia, 080 01
        • Gastro I., s.r.o. /ID# 149948
  • España
    • A Coruna
      • Ferrol, A Coruna, España, 15405
        • Hospital Arquitecto Marcide - Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol /ID# 149996
    • Madrid
      • Madrid, Madrid, España, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz /ID# 149997
  • Estados Unidos
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, Estados Unidos, 92037
        • UC San Diego Health System /ID# 150041
      • San Francisco, California, Estados Unidos, 94143-2204
        • Univ California, San Francisco /ID# 149987
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, Estados Unidos, 32610
        • Duplicate_University of Florida - Archer /ID# 150033
      • Hollywood, Florida, Estados Unidos, 33021
        • The Ctr for Gastro Disorders /ID# 150012
      • Inverness, Florida, Estados Unidos, 34452-4717
        • Nature Coast Clinical Research - Inverness /ID# 149975
    • Georgia
      • Macon, Georgia, Estados Unidos, 31201
        • Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia, LLC /ID# 149870
      • Marietta, Georgia, Estados Unidos, 30060
        • GI Specialists of GA, PC /ID# 150015
    • Kansas
      • Topeka, Kansas, Estados Unidos, 66606
        • Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center, Digestive Health /ID# 149900
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, Estados Unidos, 40202
        • Duplicate_University of Louisville /ID# 149884
    • Maryland
      • Annapolis, Maryland, Estados Unidos, 21401
        • Investigative Clinical Research /ID# 149886
      • Towson, Maryland, Estados Unidos, 21204
        • Charm City Research Group /ID# 150040
    • Michigan
      • Chesterfield, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 48047
        • Clin Res Inst of Michigan, LLC /ID# 150008
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, Estados Unidos, 55905-0001
        • Mayo Clinic - Rochester /ID# 149894
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, Estados Unidos, 64131
        • Kansas City Research Institute /ID# 149888
      • St Louis, Missouri, Estados Unidos, 63110
        • Washington University-School of Medicine /ID# 149899
    • New York
      • Lake Success, New York, Estados Unidos, 11042
        • NYU Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates /ID# 149976
      • New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10021-4872
        • Weill Cornell Medicine/NYP /ID# 149895
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Estados Unidos, 27514-4220
        • Univ NC Chapel Hill /ID# 149982
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 45219
        • University Of Cincinnati Medical Center /ID# 149977
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, Estados Unidos, 74104
        • Options Health Research, LLC /ID# 150010
    • Texas
      • Southlake, Texas, Estados Unidos, 76092
        • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants - Southlake /ID# 149869
      • Southlake, Texas, Estados Unidos, 76092
        • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants - Southlake /ID# 149989
    • Utah
      • Orem, Utah, Estados Unidos, 84058
        • Aspen Clinical Research /ID# 150020
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, Estados Unidos, 22908
        • University of Virginia /ID# 149881
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Estados Unidos, 98109
        • University of Washington /ID# 149988
      • Seattle, Washington, Estados Unidos, 98101
        • Virginia Mason Hospital & Medical Center /ID# 150042
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 53215
        • Wisconsin Center for Advanced Research /ID# 149863
  • Francia
    • Meurthe-et-Moselle
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, Francia, 54500
        • Duplicate_CHRU Nancy - Hopitaux de Brabois /ID# 149896
    • Nord
      • Lille, Nord, Francia, 59037
        • CHRU Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez /ID# 149897
    • Somme
      • Amiens, Somme, Francia, 80054
        • Duplicate_CHU Amiens-Picardie Site Sud /ID# 149921
  • Hungría
      • Budapest, Hungría, 1124
        • Magyar Elhizastudomanyi Kozpont Kft. /ID# 149907
  • Israel
      • Petah Tikva, Israel, 4941492
        • Rabin Medical Center. /ID# 149942
    • Central District
      • Ẕerifin, Central District, Israel, 70300
        • Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center /ID# 149943
    • Tel Aviv
      • Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv, Israel, 5265601
        • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center /ID# 149945
  • Italia
    • Calabria
      • Catanzaro, Calabria, Italia, 88100
        • University of Catanzaro /ID# 149927
    • Emilia-Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italia, 40138
        • Duplicate_IRCCS AOU di Bologna - Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi /ID# 149958
  • Noruega
    • Oslo
      • Oslo, Oslo, Noruega, 0440
        • Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus /ID# 149967
  • Nueva Zelanda
    • Otago
      • Otago, Otago, Nueva Zelanda, 9016
        • Dunedin Hospital /ID# 149964
  • Países Bajos
    • North Holland
      • Amsterdam, North Holland, Países Bajos, 1105 AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC, locatie AMC /ID# 149932
    • Utrecht
      • Utrecht, Utrecht, Países Bajos, 3584 CX
        • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht /ID# 149933
  • Polonia
    • Masovian Voivodeship
      • Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Polonia, 02-507
        • Panstwowy Instytut Medyczny MSWiA w Warszawie /ID# 149978
    • Łódź Voivodeship
      • Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, Polonia, 90-302
        • Santa Sp. z o.o. Santa Familia Centrum Badan, Profilaktyki i Leczenia /ID# 149979
  • Reino Unido
    • Manchester
      • Manchester, Manchester, Reino Unido, M13 9WL
        • Duplicate_Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 150006
    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, Reino Unido, OX3 9DU
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 149963
  • Rumania
      • Timișoara, Rumania, 300002
        • Cabinet Particular Policlinic Algomed /ID# 149993

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 75 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Criterios de inclusión:

  • El participante debe haber completado el estudio M13-740 hasta la semana 52.
  • Si es mujer, la participante debe ser posmenopáusica, esterilizada quirúrgicamente o usando un método anticonceptivo.

Criterio de exclusión:

  • Por cualquier motivo, el investigador considera que el participante es un candidato inadecuado
  • Participante mujer con una prueba de embarazo positiva al inicio o que esté considerando quedar embarazada durante el estudio.
  • El participante no cumple con los requisitos y procedimientos de medicación anteriores y concomitantes a lo largo del Estudio M13-740.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: No aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Upadacitinib (ABT-494) Dosis A
Dosis abierta A una vez al día (QD)
Droga: ABT-494
Tableta: Oral
Otros nombres:
  • RINVOQ
  • Upadacitinib
Experimental: Upadacitinib (ABT-494) Dosis B
Etiqueta abierta dosis B QD
Droga: ABT-494
Tableta: Oral
Otros nombres:
  • RINVOQ
  • Upadacitinib

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Month 12
Periodo de tiempo: Month 12
Endoscopic remission was based on Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD). The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable.
Month 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Month 12
Periodo de tiempo: Month 12
Clinical remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than Baseline and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline in Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Month 12

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD. The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Clinical remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Modified Clinical Remission
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Modified Clinical Remission was defined as average daily stool frequency ≤2.8 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740, among participants with stool frequency ≥4.0 or abdominal pain score ≥2.0 at Baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], and severe [3]) (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI to calculate abdominal pain score; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission=clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was an average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain"; rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]) cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per CDAI. Abdominal pain score range: 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a pre-specified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher CDAI scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. CDAI remission was defined as CDAI score <150.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total score range: 32 to 224. A higher score indicating better outcome. IBDQ remission was defined as IBDQ score ≥170.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic improvement was defined as SES-CD at least 50% reduction from Baseline or endoscopic remission. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Taking Steroids at Baseline (of Study M13-740) Who Are Steroid-Free at the Specified Timepoint in Study M14-327
Periodo de tiempo: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission and Normal C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission = clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated: none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum; scored 0 to 3 per segment. Sum of scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Normal CRP=high-sensitivity CRP <5 mg/L.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants in Remission at Week 0 Who Maintained Remission
Periodo de tiempo: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission=clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was an average daily stool frequency ≤1.5 and not worse than baseline and average daily abdominal pain score of ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain"; rated as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]) cumulative total over the past 7 days and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per CDAI. Abdominal pain score range: 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission at Week 0 Who Maintained Endoscopic Remission
Periodo de tiempo: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic remission was based on SES-CD and assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, ulcerated surface, endoscopic extension and presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments: Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum. Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Week 52 visit of Study M13-740 was considered Week 0 (Baseline) of Study M14-327.
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Response
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Response = clinical and endoscopic response. Clinical response was average daily stool frequency at least 30% reduction from baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than baseline or average daily abdominal pain at least 30% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain based on CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] cumulative total over past 7 days and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0-105. Endoscopic response was decrease ≥25% SES-CD from baseline of Study M13-740. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, rectum), scored 0 to 3 per each segment. Sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0-15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0-11; total score ranged from 0-56. Lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Enhanced Clinical Response
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Enhanced Clinical Response was defined as average daily stool frequency at least 65% reduction from baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than baseline or average daily abdominal pain score at least 35% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740.Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]; cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Clinical response was defined as average daily stool frequency at least 30% reduction from Baseline and average daily abdominal pain score not worse than Baseline or average daily abdominal pain score at least 30% reduction from baseline of Study M13-740 and average daily stool frequency not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed by CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3]; cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by prespecified factor of 5; total score range from 0 to 105.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Response
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a prespecified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. CDAI response was defined as a reduction in CDAI scores by ≥70 from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Enhanced CDAI Response
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
CDAI is a measure of clinical response and remission that includes 8 variables encompassing both participant-reported (symptoms, general well-being) and objective (medication usage, laboratory variables, presence of abdominal mass or complications, and weight) variables. For symptoms scores, participants kept a diary card and the daily symptom scores were summed for the week. Each item in the CDAI was assigned a prespecified factor to calculate the subtotals, and the subtotals of the items were totaled to produce the CDAI. Higher scores indicated greater disease activity, with a lower limit of 0 and no set upper limit. Total score range: 0 to 600. Enhanced CDAI response was defined as reduction in CDAI score by ≥100 from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Endoscopic response was defined as decrease ≥ 25% SES-CD from Baseline of Study M13-740. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Achieving IBDQ Response
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total Score range 32 to 224. A higher score indicated better outcome. IBDQ response was defined as an increase in IBDQ score ≥16 point from baseline of Study M13-740.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Percentage of Participants Taking Steroids at Baseline (of Study M13-740) Who Are Steroid-Free for At Least 90 Days and Achieve Remission
Periodo de tiempo: Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Remission = clinical remission and endoscopic remission. Clinical remission was average daily stool frequency ≤1.5, not worse than baseline, and average daily abdominal pain score ≤1.0 and not worse than baseline of Study M13-740. Abdominal pain was assessed using the CDAI component "abdominal pain" rated none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], severe [3] (cumulative total over the past 7 days) and multiplied by a factor of 5 as per the CDAI. Total score range 0 to 105. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least 2- point reduction versus baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome
Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Stool samples were collected for analysis of fecal calprotectin levels.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in Hs-CRP Levels
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in IBDQ Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The IBDQ is a 32-item (ranged 1 to 7) self-report questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the participant-reported outcomes across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). IBDQ total score range from 32 to 224. A higher score indicated better outcome.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Change From Baseline in SES-CD
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
The SES-CD assessed the size of mucosal ulcers, the ulcerated surface, the endoscopic extension and the presence of stenosis. SES-CD was based on endoscopic findings in 5 bowel segments (Ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon/sigmoid, and rectum). Each item was scored 0 to 3 per segment. The sum of the scores for each endoscopic variable ranged from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it varied between 0 and 11; total score ranged from 0 to 56. A lower score indicated better outcome. Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤4 and at least two-point reduction versus Baseline of Study M13-740 and no subscore >1 in any individual variable.
Week 0 (Baseline), Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

AbbVie

Investigadores

  • Director de estudio: ABBVIE INC., AbbVie

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Enlaces Útiles

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

18 de mayo de 2016

Finalización primaria (Actual)

18 de julio de 2025

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

18 de julio de 2025

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

23 de mayo de 2016

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

23 de mayo de 2016

Publicado por primera vez (Estimado)

25 de mayo de 2016

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

13 de agosto de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

10 de agosto de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • M14-327
  • 2015-003759-23 (Número EudraCT)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

AbbVie está comprometida con el intercambio responsable de datos sobre los ensayos clínicos que patrocinamos. Esto incluye el acceso a datos anonimizados, individuales y a nivel de ensayo (conjuntos de datos de análisis), así como otra información (p. ej., protocolos, planes de análisis, informes de estudios clínicos), siempre que los ensayos no formen parte de un marco regulatorio planificado o en curso. envío. Esto incluye solicitudes de datos de ensayos clínicos para productos e indicaciones sin licencia.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Para obtener detalles sobre cuándo los estudios están disponibles para compartir, visite https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Cualquier investigador calificado que participe en una investigación científica independiente rigurosa puede solicitar acceso a los datos de este ensayo clínico, y se proporcionará luego de la revisión y aprobación de una propuesta de investigación y un plan de análisis estadístico y la ejecución de una declaración de intercambio de datos. Las solicitudes de datos se pueden enviar en cualquier momento después de la aprobación en los EE. UU. y/o la UE y se acepta un manuscrito principal para su publicación. Para obtener más información sobre el proceso o enviar una solicitud, visite el siguiente enlace https://www.abbvieclinicaltrials.com/hcp/data-sharing/

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA
  • CÓDIGO_ANALÍTICO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

Sí

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir