Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Probing Prefrontal Cortex Hemodynamic Alterations for Major Depression Disorder (MDD)

11 juillet 2018 mis à jour par: Xijing Hospital

Probing Prefrontal Cortex Hemodynamic Alterations During Facial Emotion Recognition for Major Depression Disorder Through Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy

Major depression disorder (MDD) has high estimated lifetime prevalence rates of 16.6%. Currently, the diagnosis for the MDD mainly depends on patients' reports of symptoms, observed behaviors and disease course. Establishment of clinically useful biomarkers for the MDD diagnosis would enhance patient management and treatment effect, and lead to the therapies adjusted to the individual. However, no such biomarkers have been established up to now. Therefore, the development of objective and feasible biomarkers is of special significance and a great challenge for accurate and early diagnosis and treatment of depression, in order to overcome the limitations of relying on clinical interviews alone.The ability to correctly recognize emotional states from faces is instrumental for interpersonal engagement and social functioning. Impairments processing of facial emotional expressions and biased facial emotion detection are frequently found in the MDD patients. To date, the studies on neural mechanism of the facial emotion recognition of the MDD patients were mainly based on the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has not been applied for the facial emotion recognition for the depression patients up to now. To bridge the important gap in the literature, we used the fNIRS methodology to investigate the neural mechanisms of facial emotion recognition for the patients with depression. We hypothesize the physiological feature of the hemodynamic responses in prefrontal cortex measured by fNIRS under the task of face emotion recognition, including the difference of the median, the Mayer wave power, the mean cross wavelet coefficient, and the mean wavelet coherence coefficient, combined with the behavior measurement (behavior accuracy and response time), could provide a reliable and feasible diagnosis approach to differentiate patients with the MDD from healthy control (HC) subjects with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Inconnue

Les conditions

Description détaillée

The fMRI technique for functional imaging were limited by the fact that the individuals need to be placed in an uncomfortable or unnatural setting and foreign, noisy, dark, or claustrophobic environment (e.g., lying in a supine position in a narrow gantry with the head restrained during the entire examination), for accurate measurement during the procedure, with relatively lower temporal resolution. In contrast, a multi-channel fNIRS machine provides a completely non-invasive, quiet and mobile measurement of brain function in ordinary clinical settings and allows patients to be comfortably seated in a normal posture in a well-lit room, with higher temporal resolution making it possible to obtain a recording of the actual time course of a hemodynamic epoch in response to a specific cognitive task (e.g., facial emotion recognition task in our study) in a single trial. Additionally, due to the small operating and maintenance costs associated with NIRS, it is possible to run fNIRS study with a large sample of participants.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Anticipé)

200

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, Chine, 710032
        • Department of psychiatry, Xijing Hospital; Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 35 ans (Adulte)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

This study was performed in Xijing Hospital and Xi'an Jiaotong University in China. 100 right-handed subjects meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression were recruited by advertisement to participate in the study, and were matched with a control group of 100 comparison subjects of university staff members, university students and members of the general population.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • MDD group:

All subjects were free of psychotropic medication for a minimum of 4 weeks; Psychiatric diagnosis was determined by DSM-IV criteria; Depressed subjects were included with 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) scores ≥ 18; Mini-mental State Examination(MMSE) ≥ 24; All subjects had normal or corrected-to-normal vision.

  • HC group:

All subjects were free of psychotropic medication for a minimum of 4 weeks; All subjects did not have any mental, neurological or physical diseases;HRSD scores ≤ 7; MMSE ≥ 28; All subjects had normal or corrected-to-normal vision.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria were any history of neurologic trauma resulting in loss of consciousness, any current neurologic disorder, any lifetime psychiatric disorder other than major depression in the MDD subjects, or any lifetime psychiatric disorder in control subjects. Careful attention was paid to excluding substance abuse disorders.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Modèles d'observation: Cas-témoins
  • Perspectives temporelles: Éventuel

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
MDD group
The major depression group (MDD group) received antidepressant treatment but did not interfere with drug selection.
HC group
The healthy control group (HC group) don't accept intervention and treatment.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Hamilton Depression Scale-17(HAMD-17) score alterations
Délai: Change from baseline HAMD-17 scores at 6 months
The HAMD-17 scores are to evaluate the severity degree of depression, and the HAMD-17 scores reduction rate is used to evaluate the clinical treatment effect. If the reduction rate exceeds 50%, it indicates that the clinical treatment is effective.
Change from baseline HAMD-17 scores at 6 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
facial emotion recognition
Délai: Difference at facial emotion recognition between day 1 and month 6.
The ability to correctly recognize emotional states from faces is instrumental for interpersonal engagement and social functioning. Impairments processing of facial emotional expressions and biased facial emotion detection are frequently found in the MDD patients. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has not been applied for the facial emotion recognition for the depression patients up to now.
Difference at facial emotion recognition between day 1 and month 6.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI)
Délai: Difference at PSQI between day 1, month 3 and month 6.
PSQI was used to assess the quality of sleep for subjects in the recent month. The total score ranges from 0 to 21 points. The higher the score, the worse the sleep quality.
Difference at PSQI between day 1, month 3 and month 6.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chaise d'étude: Huaning Wang, doctorate, Department of psychiatry, Xijing Hospital

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

16 février 2017

Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)

31 août 2018

Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)

31 décembre 2018

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

24 juin 2018

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

11 juillet 2018

Première publication (Réel)

23 juillet 2018

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

23 juillet 2018

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

11 juillet 2018

Dernière vérification

1 février 2018

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

Indécis

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

3
S'abonner