- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT04904640
Biomechanical Reconstruction of Three Different Hip Stem Designs in Hip Dysplasia Using a 3D CT-based Planning Software (CTdevice)
Evaluation of the Reconstruction of Biomechanical Parameters Provided by Three Different Hip Stem Designs in Developmental Hip Dysplasia Using a 3D CT-based Software for Surgical Planning
Aperçu de l'étude
Description détaillée
Pre-operative planning in hip arthroplasty with dedicated software is a useful guide to provide a better reconstruction of the biomechanical parameters of the replaced hip and to optimize the choice of component, improving the geometric understanding of the hip anatomy and the interaction between the native morphological structure and the prosthetic component.
The use of a 3D CT-based software for pre-operative planning may provide a better knowledge of the hip anatomy, simulating the biomechanical parameters more closely than a 2D X-ray-based software. In addition, it is the only way to anticipate the correct interaction between the prosthetic components, or the combined anteversion, a key factor in preventing implant instability.
Severe hip deformities, like developmental hip dysplasia, may not be adequately reconstructed by every implant and 3D pre-operative CT may increase the three-dimensional anatomical knowledge of the hip, improving the choice of the correct implant and possibly reducing the possible consequences of intra and post-operative complications.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to pre-operatively plan, in a random series of 200 native pelvis and thigh CT scans performed in patients with hip dysplasia, 3 different types of hip stem designs using the 3D Hip-Op software, with the aim of analyzing, on the CT simulations, the percentage of adequate reconstruction of the optimal biomechanical parameters (combined anteversion between 25°-50°, global offset not inferior to 12% of the native offset, leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm, sagittal and coronal tilt not superior to +/-5°, canal filling not inferior to 80%). The percentage of every stem design providing the optimal reconstruction in dysplastic hips (all the 5 parameters matched) will be assessed. The single parameters, especially the combined anteversion, the offset restoration and the leg lengthening, will be assessed for every simulation.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Bologna, Italie, 40136
- Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti di Anca e Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Population étudiée
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- definition of developmental hip dysplasia according to Wiberg (center edge angle <20°)
- pre-operative CT scan extended from the fourth lumbar vertebra to the tibial plateaus
Exclusion Criteria:
- other types of hip pathologies
- inadequate Ct scans
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
CLS stem
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
|
In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|
Wagner cone stem
Wagner cone Zimmer stem implantation (conical tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
|
In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|
Aptafix stem
Aptafix Ortho stem implantation (anatomical stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
|
In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Correct Reconstruction CLS
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips correctly reconstructed using CLS stem: the correctly reconstructed hip should have combined anteversion between 25° and 50°, global offset not inferior to 12% of the native offset, leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm, sagittal and coronal tilt not superior to +/-5°, canal filling not inferior to 80% (all the 5 parameters should be present at the same time).
Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 the worst
|
Day 0
|
|
Correct Reconstruction Wagner Cone
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips correctly reconstructed using CLS stem: the correctly reconstructed hip should have combined anteversion between 25° and 50°, global offset not inferior to 12% of the native offset, leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm, sagittal and coronal tilt not superior to +/-5°, canal filling not inferior to 80% (all the 5 parameters should be present at the same time).
Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 the worst
|
Day 0
|
|
Correct Reconstruction Aptafix
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips correctly reconstructed using CLS stem: the correctly reconstructed hip should have combined anteversion between 25° and 50°, global offset not inferior to 12% of the native offset, leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm, sagittal and coronal tilt not superior to +/-5°, canal filling not inferior to 80% (all the 5 parameters should be present at the same time).
Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 the worst
|
Day 0
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Anteversion CLS
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips with adequate combined anteversion according to Dorr (25-50°) and Widmer (<37°) using CLS stems.
Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
|
Day 0
|
|
Combined Anteversion Wagner Cone
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips with adequate combined anteversion according to Dorr (25-50°) and Widmer (<37°) using CLS stems.
Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
|
Day 0
|
|
Combined Anteversion Aptafix
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips with adequate combined anteversion according to Dorr (25-50°) and Widmer (<37°) using CLS stems.
Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
|
Day 0
|
|
Offset CLS
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips with acetabular+femoral offset not inferior to 12% of the native value using CLS stems.
Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
|
Day 0
|
|
Offset Wagner Cone
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips with acetabular+femoral offset not inferior to 12% of the native value using CLS stems.
Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
|
Day 0
|
|
Offset Aptafix
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips with acetabular+femoral offset not inferior to 12% of the native value using CLS stems.
Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
|
Day 0
|
|
Leg Lengthening CLS
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips with leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm using CLS stems.
Minimum-maximum values (as percentages %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
|
Day 0
|
|
Leg Lengthening Wagner Cone
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips with leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm using CLS stems.
Minimum-maximum values (as percentages %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
|
Day 0
|
|
Leg Lengthening Aptafix
Délai: Day 0
|
Percentage of hips with leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm using CLS stems.
Minimum-maximum values (as percentages %): 0-100.
100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
|
Day 0
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Directeur d'études: Francesco Traina, Professor, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Taniguchi N, Jinno T, Koga D, Hagino T, Okawa A, Haro H. Cementless Hip Stem Anteversion in the Dysplastic Hip: A Comparison of Tapered Wedge vs Metaphyseal Filling. J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1547-1552. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
- Argenson JN, Ryembault E, Flecher X, Brassart N, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Three-dimensional anatomy of the hip in osteoarthritis after developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Sep;87(9):1192-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.15928.
- Sugano N, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishii T, Miki H. Does CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3054-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2378-4.
- Castagnini F, Valente G, Crimi G, Taddei F, Bordini B, Stea S, Toni A. Component positioning and ceramic damage in cementless ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2019 Jul;24(4):643-651. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Processus pathologiques
- Blessures et Blessures
- Anomalies congénitales
- Maladies articulaires
- Maladies musculo-squelettiques
- Blessures à la hanche
- Anomalies musculosquelettiques
- Luxations articulaires
- Hyperplasie
- Luxation de la hanche
- Dysplasie développementale de la hanche
- Luxation de la hanche, congénitale
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 29/2021/Oss/IOR
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .