- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT04921345
Pharmacocinétique, innocuité et efficacité du nemolizumab chez les participants atteints de dermatite atopique modérée à sévère
1 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Galderma R&D
Un essai clinique multicentrique, ouvert et à groupe unique pour évaluer la pharmacocinétique, l'innocuité et l'efficacité du nemolizumab (CD14152) chez des sujets pédiatriques (âgés de 2 à 11 ans) atteints de dermatite atopique modérée à sévère
Le but de cette étude est d'évaluer la pharmacocinétique (PK), l'efficacité et l'innocuité du nemolizumab chez les participants pédiatriques atteints de dermatite atopique (DA) modérée à sévère.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
109
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Hellerup, Danemark, 2900
- Galderma Investigational Site #6218
-
-
-
-
-
Esplugues de Llobregat, Espagne, 0850
- Galderma Investigational Site #5896
-
-
-
-
-
Budapest, Hongrie, 1036
- Galderma Investigational Site #6147
-
Szeged, Hongrie, 6720
- Galderma Investigational Site #5531
-
-
-
-
-
Lodz, Pologne, 90-265
- Galderma Investigational Site #5570
-
Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, Pologne, 27-400
- Galderma Investigational Site #6237
-
Rzeszów, Pologne, 35-055
- Galderma Investigational Site #5495
-
Warsaw, Pologne, 02-953
- Galderma Investigational Site #6262
-
Wroclaw, Pologne, 51-685
- Galderma Investigational Site #6261
-
-
-
-
California
-
Fountain Valley, California, États-Unis, 92708-3701
- Galderma Investigational Site #8636
-
San Diego, California, États-Unis, 92123-2746
- Galderma Investigational Site #9937
-
Vista, California, États-Unis, 92083-6031
- Galderma Investigational Site #9930
-
-
Florida
-
Coral Gables, Florida, États-Unis, 92083-6031
- Galderma Investigational Site #9929
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, États-Unis, 46250-2041
- Galderma Investigational Site #8142
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, États-Unis, 40217-1444
- Galderma Investigational Site #8092
-
-
Michigan
-
Troy, Michigan, États-Unis, 48084-5260
- Galderma Investigational Site #8155
-
West Bloomfield, Michigan, États-Unis, 48322
- Galderma Investigational Site #8560
-
-
New York
-
Brooklyn, New York, États-Unis, 11203-2012
- Galderma Investigational Site #8242
-
New York, New York, États-Unis, 10032-3729
- Galderma Investigational Site #9938
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Norman, Oklahoma, États-Unis, 73069-6301
- Galderma Investigational Site #8206
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 19103-4708
- Galderma Investigational Site #8255
-
-
Texas
-
Beaumont, Texas, États-Unis, 77706-3061
- Galderma Investigational Site #9931
-
San Antonio, Texas, États-Unis, 78218-3128
- Galderma Investigational Site #78218-3128
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
2 ans à 12 ans (Enfant)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
La description
Critère d'intégration:
- MA chronique qui a été documentée pendant au moins 6 mois pour les participants âgés de 2 à 6 ans et au moins 1 an pour les participants âgés de 7 à 11 ans avant la visite de sélection et confirmée selon les critères de consensus de l'American Academy of Dermatology au moment de la visite de dépistage
- Score EASI> = 16 lors des visites de dépistage et de référence
- Score IGA> = 3 lors des visites de dépistage et de référence
- Participation AD> = 10% de la surface corporelle lors des visites de dépistage et de référence
- Score maximal (maximal) PP NRS d'au moins 4,0 lors des visites de dépistage et de référence
- Accepter d'appliquer quotidiennement une crème hydratante tout au long de l'étude à partir de la visite de dépistage, et généreusement au besoin ; accepter d'appliquer un corticostéroïde topique autorisé (TCS) à partir de la visite de dépistage et tout au long de l'étude, tel que jugé approprié par l'investigateur
- Participant et soignant désireux et capable de se conformer à tous les engagements de temps et aux exigences procédurales du protocole d'essai clinique
- D'autres critères d'inclusion définis par le protocole pourraient s'appliquer
Critère d'exclusion:
- Poids corporel inférieur à 10 kilogrammes (kg)
- Enfant pris en charge : un enfant qui a été placé sous le contrôle ou la protection d'une agence, d'une organisation, d'une institution ou d'une entité par les tribunaux, le gouvernement ou un organisme gouvernemental, agissant conformément aux pouvoirs qui lui sont conférés par la loi ou la réglementation
- Participants ayant des antécédents médicaux actuels de bronchite chronique
- Nécessite un traitement de secours pour la MA pendant la période de rodage ou devrait nécessiter un traitement de secours dans les 2 semaines suivant la visite de référence
- Résultats sérologiques positifs pour l'antigène de surface de l'hépatite B (HBsAg) ou l'anticorps central de l'hépatite B (HBcAb), l'anticorps de l'hépatite C (VHC) avec un test de confirmation positif pour le VHC (exemple ; réaction en chaîne par polymérase [PCR]) ou le virus de l'immunodéficience humaine (VIH) anticorps lors de la visite de dépistage
- Antécédents de maladie lymphoproliférative, hypersensibilité (y compris anaphylaxie) à un produit d'immunoglobuline et intolérance aux corticostéroïdes topiques de puissance faible ou moyenne
- Immunosuppression connue ou suspectée
- Les participants ne veulent pas s'abstenir d'utiliser des médicaments interdits pendant l'essai clinique.
- D'autres critères d'exclusion définis par le protocole pourraient s'appliquer
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Non randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Cohorte 2 : participants âgés de 2 à 6 ans
Les participants âgés de 2 à 6 ans recevront du nemolizumab pendant 52 semaines.
|
Les participants recevront une injection sous-cutanée (SC) de 10, 20 ou 30 milligrammes (mg) de nemolizumab, toutes les 4 semaines (Q4W) pendant 52 semaines avec une dose de charge de 20, 40 ou 60 mg au jour 1 en fonction du poids corporel.
Autres noms:
Les participants recevront une injection SC de 5, 10 ou 15 mg de nemolizumab, Q4W pendant 52 semaines avec une dose de charge de 10, 20 ou 30 mg au jour 1 en fonction du poids corporel.
Autres noms:
|
|
Expérimental: Cohorte 1.1 : Participants âgés de 7 à 11 ans
Les participants âgés de 7 à 11 ans recevront du nemolizumab pendant 52 semaines.
|
Les participants recevront une injection sous-cutanée (SC) de 10, 20 ou 30 milligrammes (mg) de nemolizumab, toutes les 4 semaines (Q4W) pendant 52 semaines avec une dose de charge de 20, 40 ou 60 mg au jour 1 en fonction du poids corporel.
Autres noms:
Les participants recevront une injection SC de 5, 10 ou 15 mg de nemolizumab, Q4W pendant 52 semaines avec une dose de charge de 10, 20 ou 30 mg au jour 1 en fonction du poids corporel.
Autres noms:
|
|
Expérimental: Cohorte 1: Participants âgés de 7 à 11 ans
Les participants âgés de 7 à 11 ans recevront du Nemolizumab pendant 52 semaines.
|
Les participants recevront une injection sous-cutanée (SC) de 10, 20 ou 30 milligrammes (mg) de nemolizumab, toutes les 4 semaines (Q4W) pendant 52 semaines avec une dose de charge de 20, 40 ou 60 mg au jour 1 en fonction du poids corporel.
Autres noms:
Les participants recevront une injection SC de 5, 10 ou 15 mg de nemolizumab, Q4W pendant 52 semaines avec une dose de charge de 10, 20 ou 30 mg au jour 1 en fonction du poids corporel.
Autres noms:
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations
Délai: At Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
|
At Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
|
Apparent Total Body Clearance (Cl/F) of Nemolizumab
Délai: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
CL/F is apparent clearance of the drug from the serum, calculated as the drug dose divided area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time [AUC (0-inf)].
Individual nemolizumab.
|
Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Nemolizumab
Délai: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
Vd/F was calculated as dose divided by lambda_z *AUC(0-inf).
|
Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
|
Absorption Rate Constant (Ka) of Nemolizumab
Délai: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
|
|
Serum Concentration Observed Immediately Before Next Dosing (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab
Délai: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
|
Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
|
|
|
Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) of Nemolizumab
Délai: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
|
|
Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Nemolizumab
Délai: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Délai: Baseline through Week 52
|
AE defined as any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant administered a medicinal product which does not necessarily have causal relationship with this treatment.
TEAEs defined as AEs occurring after first administration of study drug during the study.
SAE was any untoward medical occurrence, in view of either Investigator or Sponsor, that resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was congenital anomaly/birth defect or was important medical event.
AESI was noteworthy TEAE for study drug that was to be monitored closely and reported promptly.
Relatedness to study drug was based on Investigator's discretion.
AEs Leading to study treatment withdrawal and AEs Leading to study withdrawal will also be reported.
|
Baseline through Week 52
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification.
The severity was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed.
The EASI score ranged from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification.
The severity was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed.
The EASI score ranged from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification.
The severity was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed.
The EASI score ranged from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 responders will be the participants who achieved greater than or equal to (>=) 50%, >=75% and >=90% overall improvement in EASI score respectively from baseline to Week 52.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
IGA is a 5-point scale used by the investigator or trained designee to evaluate the global severity of AD.
The Investigator reviewed the participant's skin and give a score of 0 (Clear), 1 (Almost clear), 2 (Mild), 3 (Moderate), or 4 (Severe).
Here, higher score indicates severe outcome.
Success was defined as an IGA of 0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost clear] and a >=2-points improvement from baseline.
Number of participants with IGA success rate was reported for this outcome measure.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]) and reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined.
The reported percentage of BSA was combined percentage of all major body sections.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
Pruritus NRS is a scale that will be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours.
For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'.
Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours.
For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'.
Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours.
For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'.
Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours.
For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'.
Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours.
For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'.
Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night?
On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'.
Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night?
On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'.
Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Any Rescue Therapy by Rescue Treatment
Délai: From Baseline up to Week 52
|
Percentage of participants receiving any rescue therapy by rescue treatment was reported.
|
From Baseline up to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity and the extent of AD signs and symptoms.
Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored.
Total score ranged from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease), a higher score indicated severe disease.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) For Participants >=4 Years of Age
Délai: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52
|
The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment.
The participant rated each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and score ranged from 0 to 30.
A higher total score indicated a poorer quality of life (QoL).
|
Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Infants' Dermatology Life Quality Index (iDLQI) Score For Participants Less Than (<) 4 Years of Age
Délai: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52
|
The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment.
The participant rated each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and score ranged from 0 to 30.
A higher total score indicated a poorer QoL.
|
Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
Délai: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52
|
The POEM is a 7-item questionnaire that assessed disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease).
A high score indicated poor QOL.
|
Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52
|
|
Pharmacokinetic (PK)/Pharmacodynamic (PD) Relationship Between Nemolizumab Serum Concentration and Changes in PP NRS
Délai: Baseline up to Week 52
|
The relationship between nemolizumab serum concentrations and changes in PP-NRS score was established using population point estimate of IC50, where IC50 is the concentration leading to half of the maximum drug-induced reduction (Imax) in PP NRS.
|
Baseline up to Week 52
|
|
PK/PD Relationship Between Nemolizumab Serum Concentration and Changes in EASI Score
Délai: Baseline up to Week 52
|
The relationship between nemolizumab serum concentrations and changes in EASI score was established using population point estimate of IC50.
Where, IC50 is the concentration leading to half of the maximum drug-induced reduction (Imax) in EASI score.
|
Baseline up to Week 52
|
|
PK/PD Relationship Between Nemolizumab Serum Concentration and Changes in IGA Score
Délai: Baseline up to Week 52
|
The relationship between nemolizumab serum concentrations and changes in IGA score was established using the population point estimate of the slope parameter.
|
Baseline up to Week 52
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) for Nemolizumab
Délai: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52
|
ADA positive was defined as a sample that was evaluated as positive in both the ADA screening and confirmatory assays.
ADA positive participants was defined as participants who had at least 1 positive ADA result.
|
Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
24 juin 2021
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
28 avril 2025
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
28 avril 2025
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
4 juin 2021
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
4 juin 2021
Première publication (Réel)
10 juin 2021
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
25 juin 2026
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
1 juin 2026
Dernière vérification
1 avril 2026
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Maladies génétiques, innées
- Maladies du système immunitaire
- Hypersensibilité immédiate
- Hypersensibilité
- Maladies de la peau
- Maladies de la peau, Génétique
- Maladies de la peau, eczémateux
- Dermatite
- Maladies et anomalies congénitales, héréditaires et néonatales
- Maladies de la peau et du tissu conjonctif
- Dermatite atopique
- némolizumab
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- RD.06.SPR.118126
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Oui
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .