Progress in identifying infants with hearing loss—United States, 2006-2012
Tonya R Williams, Suhana Alam, Marcus Gaffney, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Tonya R Williams, Suhana Alam, Marcus Gaffney, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Abstract
Congenital hearing loss affects one to three of every 1,000 live born infants and negatively impacts children through delayed speech, language, social, and emotional development when undetected. To address this public health issue, jurisdiction-based Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs are working to ensure all newborns are screened for hearing loss, receive follow-up diagnostic testing (DX) if they do not pass the screening, and are enrolled in early intervention (EI) services if diagnosed with a permanent hearing loss. Although substantial progress has been made in the provision and documentation of services, challenges remain because, unlike screening results, diagnostic test results and enrollment in EI are not consistently reported to the EHDI programs. Therefore, it is difficult for states and territories to know if infants received recommended follow-up services (diagnostic testing and/or EI services), often resulting in infants being classified at either stage as lost to follow-up (LFU)/lost to documentation (LTD). To assess progress toward identifying children with hearing loss and reducing LFU/LTD for DX (LFU/LTD-DX) and EI enrollment (LFU/LTD-EI), CDC analyzed EHDI surveillance data for 2006-2012. Results indicated that the number of jurisdictions reporting data increased from 49 to 57, rates of screening increased from 95.2% to 96.6%, rates of referral from screening decreased from 2.3% to 1.6%, rates of diagnosis among infants not passing their final screening increased from 4.8% to 10.3%, and enrollment in EI among children diagnosed with hearing loss increased from 55.4% to 61.7%, whereas rates for both LFU/LTD-DX and LFU/LTD-EI declined. These findings show sustained progress toward screening, identification, and enrollment in EI as well as highlighting the need for continued improvements in the provision and documentation of EHDI services.
Figures
References
- Vohr B. Overview: Infants and children with hearing loss—part I. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9:62–4.
- Kusché CA, Greenberg MT. Evaluative understanding and role-taking ability: a comparison of deaf and hearing children. Child Dev. 1983;54:141–7.
- Culbertson JL, Gilbert LE. Children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: cognitive, academic, and social development. Ear Hear. 1986;7:38–42.
- CDC. Identifying infants with hearing loss—United States, 1999–2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:220–3.
- Mason CA, Gaffney M, Green DR, Grosse SD. Measures of follow-up in early hearing detection and intervention programs: a need for standardization. Am J Audiol. 2008;17:60–7.
- Ross DS, Visser SN. Pediatric primary care physicians’ practices regarding newborn hearing screening. J Prim Care Community Health. 2012;3:256–63.
- Frieden TR, Mostashari F. Health care as if health mattered. JAMA. 2008;299:950–2.
- Congressional Budget Office. Evidence on the costs and benefits of health information technology. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office; 2008. Pub. No. 2976. Available at .
- Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:742–52.
Source: PubMed