Anal incontinence, urinary incontinence and sexual problems in primiparous women - a comparison between women with episiotomy only and women with episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury

Mona Stedenfeldt, Jouko Pirhonen, Ellen Blix, Tom Wilsgaard, Barthold Vonen, Pål Øian, Mona Stedenfeldt, Jouko Pirhonen, Ellen Blix, Tom Wilsgaard, Barthold Vonen, Pål Øian

Abstract

Background: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) might cause anal incontinence (AI) and sexual dysfunction, and might be associated with urinary incontinence (UI). Episiotomy has been identified both as a risk and a protective factor of OASIS. Lately, episiotomies with specific characteristics have shown to be protective against the risk of OASIS. However, little is known about episiotomy characteristics and pelvic floor dysfunction. This study investigates AI, UI, and sexual problems in primiparous women with episiotomy, comparing women with and without OASIS. Associations between episiotomy characteristics and AI, UI, and sexual problems were assessed.

Methods: This is a matched case-control study investigating 74 women with one vaginal birth, all with an episiotomy. Among these, 37 women sustained OASIS and were compared to 37 women without OASIS. The two groups were matched for vacuum/forceps. AI, UI and sexual problem symptoms were obtained from St. Mark's scoring-tool and self-administered questionnaires. The episiotomy characteristics were investigated and results assessed for the whole group.

Results: The mean time from birth was 34.5 months (range1.3-78.2) for those with OASIS and 25.9 months (range 7.0-57.4) for those without OASIS, respectively. More women with OASIS reported AI: 14 (38%) vs. 3 (8%) p = 0.05 (OR 4.66, 95% CI 1.34-16.33) as well as more problem with sexual desire p = 0.02 (OR 7.62, 95% CI 1.30-44.64) compared to women without OASIS. We found no association between episiotomy with protective characteristics and dysfunctions.

Conclusion: Women with OASIS had more AI and sexual problems than those without OASIS. Episiotomy characteristics varied greatly between the women. Episiotomy with protective characteristics was not associated with increased dysfunctions. OASIS should be avoided, and correct episiotomy used if indicated.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adapted from Andrews et al. 2005 [19] and Stedenfeldt et al. 2012 [18] and illustrates the episiotomy measurements taken.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Combined sexual problems: desire, orgasm and pain (scores) for women with and without OASIS.

References

    1. de Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME, Struijk PC, Hop WC, Wallenburg HC. Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:830–834. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.2001.080009830.x.
    1. Marsh F, Lynne R, Christine L, Alison W. Obstetric anal sphincter injury in the UK and its effect on bowel, bladder and sexual function. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154:223–227. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.09.006.
    1. Roos AM, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;6:368–374. doi: 10.1002/uog.7512.
    1. Norderval S, Nsubuga D, Bjelke C, Frasunek J, Myklebust I, Vonen B. Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tears: incidence in a Norwegian county. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:989–994. doi: 10.1080/j.0001-6349.2004.00647.x.
    1. Scheer I, Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Urinary incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)-is there a relationship? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:179–183. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0431-8.
    1. Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Postpartum female sexual function. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145:133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.04.014.
    1. Borello-France D, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Zyczynski H, Fitzgerald MP, Whitehead W, Fine P, Nygaard I, Handa VL, Visco AG, Weber AM, Brown MB. Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:863–872. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000232504.32589.3b.
    1. Roos AM, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Sexual problems in the gynecology clinic: are we making a mountain out of a molehill? Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:145–152. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1516-y.
    1. Tincello DG, Williams A, Fowler GE, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Alfirevic Z. Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors. BJOG. 2003;110:1041–1044. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.03030.x.
    1. Wong KW, Ravindran K, Thomas JM, Andrews V. Mediolateral episiotomy: are trained midwives and doctors approaching it from a different angle? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;174:46–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.002.
    1. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth. 2006;33:117–122. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00088.x.
    1. Eogan M, Daly L, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? BJOG. 2006;113:190–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00835.x.
    1. Handa VL, Blomquist JL, McDermott KC, Friedman S, Munoz A. Pelvic floor disorders after vaginal birth: effect of episiotomy, perineal laceration and operative birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:669–673. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000119223.04441.c9.
    1. Kalis V, Laine K, de Leeuw JW, Ismail K, Tincello D. Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology. BJOG. 2012;119:724–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03293.x.
    1. Raisanen SH, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:1365–1372. doi: 10.3109/00016340903295626.
    1. Fodstad K, Laine K, Staff AC. Different episiotomy techniques, postpartum perineal pain, and blood loss: an observational study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:865–872. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1960-3.
    1. Grigoriadis T, Athanasiou S, Zisou A, Antsaklis A. Episiotomy and perineal repair practices among obstetricians in Greece. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;106:27–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.013.
    1. Stedenfeldt M, Pirhonen J, Blix E, Wilsgaard T, Vonen B, Oian P. Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case–control study. BJOG. 2012;119:724–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03293.x.
    1. Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW. Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral? BJOG. 2005;112:1156–1158. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00645.x.
    1. Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G, Pregazzi R, Grimaldi E, Guaschino S. The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:669–673. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000119223.04441.c9.
    1. Ejegard H, Ryding EL, Sjogren B. Sexuality after delivery with episiotomy: a long-term follow-up. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;66:1–7.
    1. Coats PM, Chan KK, Wilkins M, Beard RJ. A comparison between midline and mediolateral episiotomies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:408–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04569.x.
    1. Sultan AH. Obstetric perinealinjury and anal incontinence. Clinical Risk. 1999;5:193–196.
    1. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999;44:77–80. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.1.77.
    1. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: A brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:322–330. doi: 10.1002/nau.20041.
    1. Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: The ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28:411–415. doi: 10.1002/nau.20674.
    1. Traeen B, Stigum H. Sexual problems in 18-67-year-old Norwegians. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38:445–456. doi: 10.1177/1403494810371245.
    1. Sultan AH, Thakar R. Third and Forth Degree Tears. In: Sultan AH, Thakar R, Fenner D, editors. Perineal and Anal Sphincter Trauma. London: Spinger-Verlag; 2007. pp. 33–51.
    1. Mous M, Muller SA, de Leeuw JW. Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. BJOG. 2008;115:234–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01502.x.
    1. Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke JT. Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:881–888. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.113855.
    1. Kalis V, Landsmanova J, Bednarova B, Karbanova J, Laine K, Rokyta Z. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112:220–224. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.09.015.
    1. Bols EMJ, Hendriks EJM, Berghmans BCM, Baeten CGMI, Nijhuis JG, de Bie RA. A systematic review of etiological factors for postpartum fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:302–314. doi: 10.3109/00016340903576004.
    1. Solans-Domenech M, Sanchez E, Espuna-Pons M. Urinary and anal incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum: incidence, severity, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:618–628. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d04dff.
    1. de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG. 2001;108:383–387.
    1. MacArthur C, Glazener C, Lancashire R, Herbison P, Wilson D, Grant A. Faecal incontinence and mode of first and subsequent delivery: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG. 2005;112:1075–1082. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00721.x.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel