The negative impact of wearing personal protective equipment on communication during coronavirus disease 2019

T Hampton, R Crunkhorn, N Lowe, J Bhat, E Hogg, W Afifi, S De, I Street, R Sharma, M Krishnan, R Clarke, S Dasgupta, S Ratnayake, S Sharma, T Hampton, R Crunkhorn, N Lowe, J Bhat, E Hogg, W Afifi, S De, I Street, R Sharma, M Krishnan, R Clarke, S Dasgupta, S Ratnayake, S Sharma

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 personal protective equipment has been reported to affect communication in healthcare settings. This study sought to identify those challenges experimentally.

Method: Bamford-Kowal-Bench speech discrimination in noise performance of healthcare workers was tested under simulated background noise conditions from a variety of hospital environments. Candidates were assessed for ability to interpret speech with and without personal protective equipment, with both normal speech and raised voice.

Results: There was a significant difference in speech discrimination scores between normal and personal protective equipment wearing subjects in operating theatre simulated background noise levels (70 dB).

Conclusion: Wearing personal protective equipment can impact communication in healthcare environments. Efforts should be made to remind staff about this burden and to seek alternative communication paradigms, particularly in operating theatre environments.

Keywords: Communication; Coronavirus Infections; Health Personnel; Noise; Protective Devices.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared

References

    1. Public Health England. COVID-19 personal protective equipment (PPE). In: [3 May 2020]
    1. Cullen P. Life in an ICU during Covid-19: ‘There is no hugging someone who is upset’. Irish Times, 26 March 2020. In: [6 July 2020]
    1. Hah S, Yuditsky T, Schulz KA, Dorsey H, Deshmukh AR, Sharra J. Evaluation of Human Performance while Wearing Respirators (DOT/FAA/TC-09/10). Egg Harbor Township, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration, 2009
    1. World Health Organization. Personal Protective Equipment for Use in a Filovirus Disease Outbreak: Rapid Advice Guideline. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016
    1. Ellis R, Hay-David A, Brennan PA. Operating during the COVID-19 pandemic: how to reduce medical error. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;58:570–80
    1. Vermiglio A, Soli S, Freed D, Fisher L. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index. J Am Acad Audiol 2012;768:779–88
    1. Musiek F, Shinn J, Chermak G, Bamiou DE. Perspectives on the pure-tone audiogram. J Am Acad Audiol 2017;28:655–71
    1. Wilson R. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet. J Am Acad Audiol 2011;22:405–23
    1. Walden B, Schwartz D, Williams D, Holum-Hardegen LL, Crowley JM. Test of the assumption underlying comparative hearing aid evaluations. J Speech Hear Disord 1983;48:264–73
    1. Nilsson M, Soli S, Sullivan J. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:1085–99
    1. Beattie R, Barr T, Roup C. Normal and hearing impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise. Br J Audiol 1997;31:153–64
    1. Taylor B. Speech-in-noise tests: how and why to include them in your basic test battery. Hear J 2003;56:40–3
    1. Killion M, Niquette P, Gudmundsen G, Revit L, Banerjee S. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;116:2395–405
    1. Bench J, Kowal A, Bamford J. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol 1979;13:108–12
    1. Shaw P. The Parrot Speech Discrimination Test. Br Soc Audiol News 1997;20:44–5
    1. Niquette P, Arcaroli J, Revit L, Parkinson A, Staller S, Skinner M et al.. Development of the BKB-SIN Test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Auditory Society, March 2003, Scottsdale, AZ
    1. Atcherson SR, Mendel LL, Baltimore WJ, Patro C, Lee S, Pousson M et al. The effect of conventional and transparent surgical masks on speech understanding in individuals with and without hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2017;28:58–67
    1. Bottalico P, Passione II, Graetzer S, Hunter EJ. Evaluation of the starting point of the Lombard effect. Acta Acust United Acust 2017;103:169–72
    1. Kam PCA, Kam AC, Thompson JF. Noise pollution in the anaesthetic and intensive care environment. Anaesthesia 1994;49:982–98
    1. Weldon SM, Korkiakangas T, Bezemer J, Kneebone R. Music and communication in the operating theatre. J Adv Nurs 2015;71:2763–74
    1. Schwendimann R, Blatter C, Lüthy M, Mohr G, Girard T, Batzer S et al. Adherence to the WHO surgical safety checklist: an observational study in a Swiss academic center. Patient Saf Surg 2019;13:14.
    1. Le Prell CG, Clavier OH. Effects of noise on speech recognition: challenges for communication by service members. Hear Res 2017;349:76–89
    1. Robinson G, Casali J. Speech communications and signal detection in noise In: Berger EH, Royster LH, Royster JD, Driscoll DP, Layne M, eds. The Noise Manual, 5th edn. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association, 2003;567–600
    1. Neuman AC, Wroblewski M, Hajicek J, Rubinstein A. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults. Ear Hear 2010;31:336–44
    1. McClain M, Brady K, Brandstein M, Quatieri T. Automated lip-reading for improved speech intelligibility. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Montreal, 2004;I-701
    1. Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. RCSLT guidance on personal protective equipment (PPE) and COVID-19, 1 May 2020. In: [15 May 2020]
    1. Liew MF, Siow WT, MacLaren G, See KC. Preparing for COVID-19: early experience from an intensive care unit in Singapore. Crit Care 2020;24:83.
    1. Micrashell. In: [6 July 2020]
    1. Pneumask Project. Voice Amplification. In: [6 July 2020]
    1. Cardmedic. In: [6 July 2020]

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel