Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to test the effect of a smartphone application on oral-health behavior and oral hygiene in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances

Janneke F M Scheerman, Berno van Meijel, Pepijn van Empelen, Gem J C Kramer, Gijsbert H W Verrips, Amir H Pakpour, Matheus C T Van den Braak, Cor van Loveren, Janneke F M Scheerman, Berno van Meijel, Pepijn van Empelen, Gem J C Kramer, Gijsbert H W Verrips, Amir H Pakpour, Matheus C T Van den Braak, Cor van Loveren

Abstract

Background: Adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances are at high risk of developing dental caries. To date, new smartphone technologies have seldom been used to support them in the preventive behavior that can help prevent dental caries. After an intervention-mapping process, we developed a smartphone application (the WhiteTeeth app) for preventing dental caries through improved oral-health behavior and oral hygiene. The app, which is intended to be used at home, will help adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances perform their oral self-care behavior. The app is based on the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) theory, and incorporates several behavior-change techniques that target the psychosocial factors of oral-health behavior. This article describes the protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effects of the WhiteTeeth app on oral-health behavior and oral-hygiene outcomes (presence of dental plaque and gingival bleeding) compared with those of care as usual, in patients aged 12-16 with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Methods/design: The RCT has two conditions: an experimental group that will receive the WhiteTeeth app in addition to care as usual, and a control group that will only receive care as usual. Care as usual will include routine oral-health education and instruction at orthodontic check-ups. In the western part of the Netherlands 146 participants will be recruited from four orthodontic clinics. Data will be collected during three orthodontic check-ups: baseline (T0), 6 weeks of follow-up (T1) and 12 weeks of follow-up (T2). The primary study outcomes are the presence of dental plaque (measured with a modified Silness and Loë Plaque Index); and gingival bleeding (measured with the Bleeding on Marginal Probing Index). Secondary outcomes include changes in self-reported oral-health behaviors and its psychosocial factors identified by the HAPA theory, such as outcome expectancies, intention, action self-efficacy, coping planning and action control.

Discussion: Since the intervention was designed to target psychosocial factors in the motivational and volitional components of the behavior-change process, we hypothesize that the app will cause greater improvements in oral-health behavior and oral hygiene more than traditional oral-health-promotion programs (i.e., care as usual).

Trial registration: The trial has been registered with the Dutch Trial Register ( NTR6206 : 20 February 2017).

Keywords: App; Behavioral intervention; M-health; Oral health behavior; Oral health promotion; Oral hygiene; Prevention; Study protocol.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures will be carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee (METC) at VU Medical Centre Amsterdam (protocol. nr. 2016.162, see Additional file 8). Before the start of the study, written informed consent will be obtained from each patient and one of their parents (or guardians). All information about the participants will be kept strictly confidential. Clinicians will inform the patients and their parents that participation in the study is entirely voluntary and that, if they refuse, their decision will not affect the care as usual they receive. All patients will also be informed of their right to withdraw from the trial whenever they desire without giving the researchers any reason for their decision.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An overview of the study procedures and design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Health Action Process Approach Model [21]

References

    1. Schuller AA, van Kempen CPF, Poorterman JHG, Verrips GHW. Kies voor tanden. Een onderzoek naar mondgezondheid en preventief tandheelkundig gedrag van jeugdigen. Hoofdmeting 2011, een vervolg op de reeks TJZ-onderzoeken. Leiden, TNO, 2013;44. , . Accessed 27 Dec 2016.
    1. Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, González-Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;138:188–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.019.
    1. Lovrov S, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U. Enamel demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment – incidence and correlation to various oral-hygiene parameters. J Orofac Orthop. 2007;68:353–363. doi: 10.1007/s00056-007-0714-1.
    1. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:93–98. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-X.
    1. Boersma JG, Van Der Veen MH, Lagerweij MD, Bokhout B, Prahl-Andersen B. Caries prevalence measured with QLF after treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances: influencing factors. Caries Res. 2005;39:41–47. doi: 10.1159/000081655.
    1. Øgaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-years-olds; a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1989;96:423–427. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90327-2.
    1. Shungin D, Olsson AI, Persson M. Orthodontic treatment related white spot lesions: a 14-year prospective quantitative follow-up, including bonding material assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2010;138:136.e1–136.e8. .
    1. Axelson P, Lindhe J. Effect of oral hygiene instruction and pro- fessional toothcleaning on caries and gingivitis in schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1981;9:251–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1981.tb00340.x.
    1. Kerbusch AEG, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Mulder J, Sanden der WJVD. Methods used for prevention of white spot lesion development during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70:564–568. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.640282.
    1. Zachrisson BU, Zachrisson S. Caries incidence and oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment. Scand J Dent Res. 1971;79:394–401.
    1. Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett AJ, Benson BJ. Reducing white spot lesions in orthodontic populations with fluoride rinsing. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;101:403–407. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70112-N.
    1. Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett AJ, Griswold PG. The effect of a fluoride program on white spot formation during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;93:29–37. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90190-4.
    1. Derks A, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Frencken JE, Van’t Hof MA, Katsaros C. Caries preventive measures used in orthodontic practices: an evidence-based decision? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132:165–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.028.
    1. Mehra T, Nanda R, Sinha P. Orthodontists' Assessment and management of patient compliance. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:115–122.
    1. JFM S, Empelen Van P, C L v, Pakpour AH, B M v, Gholami M, Mierzaie Z, van den MTC B, GHW V. An application of the health action process approach model to oral hygiene behaviour and dental plaque in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2017; in press
    1. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). ICT Facts & Figures: The World in 2015. Geneva, Switzerland: ITU; 2015. www. itu. int/ en/ ITU- D/ Statistics/ Documents/ facts/ ICTFactsFigures20 15. Pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2016.
    1. Pew Research Center. Emerging Nations Embrace Internet, Mobile Technology. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2014. Www. pewglobal. org/ fi les/ 2014/ 02/ Pew- Research- Center- Global- Attitudes Project- Technology- Report- FINALFebruary- 13- 20147. Pdf.http:// Accessed 27 Dec 2016.
    1. Netherlands GK. "GfK trends in Digital Media & Entertaiment" as cited in press release. June. 2015;18 , . Accessed 27 Dec 2016.
    1. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Fernandez ME. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
    1. Scheerman JFM, Loveren C, Meijel B, Dusseldorp E, Wartewig E, Verrips GHW, Ket JCF, Empelen P. Psychosocial correlates of oral hygiene behaviour in people aged 9 to 19 – a systematic review with meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016;44:331–341. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12224.
    1. Modeling SR. Health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:1–29.
    1. Tougher-Decker R, Van Loveren C. Sugars and dental caries. Am J Clinic Nutr. 2003;78:881S–892S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/78.4.881S.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:660–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00341.x.
    1. Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Peters GJY, Mullen PD, Parcel GS, Ruiter RA, Fernandez ME, Markham C, Bartholomew LK. A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an intervention mapping approach. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;10:1–16.
    1. Boyd RL. Longitudinal evaluation of a system for self-monitoring plaque control effectiveness in orthodontic patients. J Clinic Periodontol. 1983;10:380–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01287.x.
    1. Schwarzer R, Antoniuk A, Gholami M. A brief intervention changing oral self-care, self-efficacy, and self-monitoring. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20:56–67. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12091.
    1. Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advance Exp Social Psychol. 2006;38:69–119. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1.
    1. Gallo IS, Gollwitzer PM. Implementation Intentions: a look back at fifteen years of progress. Psicothema. 2007;19:37–42.
    1. Armitage CJ. A volitional help sheet to encourage smoking cessation: a randomized exploratory trial. Health Psychol. 2008;27:557–566. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.5.557.
    1. Brent Bowen T, Rinchuse DJ, Zullo T, ME DM. The influence of text messaging on oral hygiene effectiveness. Angle Orthod. 2014;85:543–548. doi: 10.2319/071514-495.1.
    1. Jejurikar H, Nene S, Kalia A, Gupta G, Mirdehghan N. Does text messaging reminder help in the orthodontic compliance of patients to maintain their oral hygiene. Oral Hyg Health. 2014; 10.4172/2332-0702.1000152.
    1. Pakpour AH, Hidarnia A, Hajizadeh E, Plotnikoff RC. Action and coping planning with regard to dental brushing among Iranian adolescents. Psychol Health Med. 2012;17:176–187. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.596551.
    1. Tolvanen M, Lahti S, Miettunen J, Hausen H. Relationship between oral health-related knowledge, attitudes and behavior among 15–16-year-old adolescents—a structural equation modeling approach. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70:169–176. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.600722.
    1. Schwarzer R, Schüz B, Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S, Luszczynska A, Scholz U. Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:156–166. doi: 10.1007/BF02879897.
    1. Al-Anezi SA, NWT H. Quantifying Plaque during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2011;82:748–753. doi: 10.2319/050111-312.1.
    1. Williams P, Clerehugh V, Worthington HV, Shaw WC. Comparison Of two plaque indices for use in fixed orthodontic appliance patients. J Dent Res. 1991;70:703.
    1. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman Nijboer A, Reijerse E, Van der Velden U. Comparison of different approaches to assess bleeding on probing as indicators of gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1994;21:589–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00748.x.
    1. Zotti F, Dalessandri D, Salgarello S, Piancino M, Bonetti S, Visconti L, Paganelli C. Usefulness of an app in improving oral hygiene compliance in adolescent orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2015;86:101–107. doi: 10.2319/010915-19.1.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149–1160. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
    1. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol. 1982;13:290–12.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Krleža-Jerić K. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010;1:100–107. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.72352.
    1. Publishing GF. Study protocols: making them more visible will improve registration, reporting and recruitment. BMC. News Views. 2001;2:4.
    1. Wilding S, Conner M, Sandberg T, Prestwich A, Lawton R, Wood C, Miles E, Godin G, Sheeran P. The question-behaviour effect: a theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2016;27:196–230. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1245940.
    1. Löe H. Oral hygiene in the prevention of caries and periodontal disease. Int Dent J. 2000;50:129–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00553.x.
    1. Gardner B, Lally P, Wardle J. Making health habitual: the psychology of “habit-formation” and general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(605):664–666. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X659466.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel