Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Hua Zhang, Bo Wang, Jie He, Zhongju Du, Hua Zhang, Bo Wang, Jie He, Zhongju Du

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: A literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Review, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of all retrieved studies. The research was reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure the reliability and verity of the results. The statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 13.0.

Results: Nine randomized controlled trials were collected for the data extraction and meta-analysis. Significant differences in the pain score at 4, 12, and 24 weeks were found between patients treated with radiofrequency ablation and those treated with placebo. Furthermore, the use of radiofrequency ablation was associated with an improved outcome of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. No serious adverse events were observed in any patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation.

Conclusion: Radiofrequency ablation is efficacious and safe for reducing pain and improving knee function in patients with knee osteoarthritis, without increasing the risk of adverse effects.

Keywords: Knee osteoarthritis; adverse event; knee function; meta-analysis; pain; radiofrequency ablation.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of study selection. RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Risk-of-bias summary.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Risk-of-bias graph.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Meta-analysis of pain score. WMD, weighted mean difference; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Meta-analysis of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. WMD, weighted mean difference; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Meta-analysis of Lequesne index. WMD, weighted mean difference; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Meta-analysis of adverse effects. RD, risk difference; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Publication bias. SE, standard error; MD, mean difference.

References

    1. Visuri T, Makela K, Pulkkinen P, et al.. Long-term mortality and causes of death among patients with a total knee prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis. Knee 2016; 23: 162–166.
    1. Pai YC, Rymer WZ, Chang RW, et al.. Effect of age and osteoarthritis on knee proprioception. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40: 2260–2265.
    1. Paredes-Carnero X, Escobar J, Galdo JM, et al.. Total knee arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis associated with extra-articular deformity. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2018; 9: 125–132.
    1. Tani I, Nakano N, Takayama K, et al.. Navigated total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with extra-articular deformity. Acta Ortop Bras 2018; 26: 170–174.
    1. Dai WL, Lin ZM, Guo DH, et al.. Efficacy and safety of hylan versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. J Knee Surg 2019; 32: 259–268.
    1. Li W, Pan Y, Yang Q, et al.. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e11418.
    1. Saseen JJ. Which is most effective of osteoarthritis of the knee: rofecoxib, celecoxib, or acetaminophen? J Fam Pract 2002; 51: 307.
    1. Southworth TM, Naveen NB, Tauro TM, et al.. The use of platelet-rich plasma in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. J Knee Surg 2019; 32: 37–45.
    1. Hong K, Georgiades C. Radiofrequency ablation: mechanism of action and devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21: S179–S186.
    1. Connors JC, Boike AM, Rao N, et al.. Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of painful neuroma. J Foot Ankle Surg 2020; 59: 457–461.
    1. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al.. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928.
    1. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al.. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328: 1490.
    1. Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, et al.. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain 2011; 152: 481–487.
    1. Rahimzadeh P, Imani F, Faiz SH, et al.. Investigation the efficacy of intra-articular prolotherapy with erythropoietin and dextrose and intra-articular pulsed radiofrequency on pain level reduction and range of motion improvement in primary osteoarthritis of knee. J Res Med Sci 2014; 19: 696–702.
    1. Sari S, Aydin ON, Turan Y, et al.. Which one is more effective for the clinical treatment of chronic pain in knee osteoarthritis: radiofrequency neurotomy of the genicular nerves or intra-articular injection? Int J Rheum Dis 2018; 21: 1772–1778.
    1. Shen WS, Xu XQ, Zhai NN, et al.. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation in relieving refractory pain of knee osteoarthritis. Am J Ther 2017; 24: e693–e700.
    1. Yuan Y, Shen W, Han Q, et al. . Clinical observation of pulsed radiofrequency in treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2016; 9: 20050–20055.
    1. El-Hakeim EH, Elawamy A, Kamel EZ, et al.. Fluoroscopic guided radiofrequency of genicular nerves for pain alleviation in chronic knee osteoarthritis: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain Physician 2018; 21: 169–177.
    1. Xiao L, Shu F, Xu C, et al.. Highly selective peripheral nerve radio frequency ablation for the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. Exp Ther Med 2018; 16: 3973–3977.
    1. Davis T, Loudermilk E, DePalma M, et al.. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover clinical trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation with corticosteroid injection in the management of knee pain from osteoarthritis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018; 43: 84–91.
    1. Chen AF, Khalouf F, Zora K, et al.. Cooled radiofrequency ablation compared with a single injection of hyaluronic acid for chronic knee pain: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial demonstrating greater efficacy and equivalent safety for cooled radiofrequency ablation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102: 1501–1510.
    1. Hootman JM, Helmick CG. Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54: 226–229.
    1. Chung SR, Baek JH, Choi YJ, et al.. Longer-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for locally recurrent papillary thyroid cancer. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 4897–4903.
    1. Hlavsa J, Prochazka V, Andrasina T, et al.. Radiofrequency ablation in pancreatic cancer. Rozhl Chir 2019; 98: 441–449.
    1. Leggett LE, Soril LJ, Lorenzetti DL, et al.. Radiofrequency ablation for chronic low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain Res Manag 2014; 19: e146–e153.
    1. Amr SA, Reyad RM, Othman AH, et al.. Comparison between radiofrequency ablation and chemical neurolysis of thoracic splanchnic nerves for the management of abdominal cancer pain, randomized trial. Eur J Pain 2018; 22: 1782–1790.
    1. Bastos R, Mathias M, Andrade R, et al.. Intra-articular injections of expanded mesenchymal stem cells with and without addition of platelet-rich plasma are safe and effective for knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26: 3342–3350.
    1. Huang Y, Liu X, Xu X, et al.. Intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma, hyaluronic acid or corticosteroids for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled study. Orthopade 2019; 48: 239–247.
    1. Conger A, McCormick ZL, Henrie AM. Pes anserine tendon injury resulting from cooled radiofrequency ablation of the inferior medial genicular nerve. PM R 2019; 11: 1244–1247.
    1. Kim SY, Le PU, Kosharskyy B, et al.. Is genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation safe? A literature review and anatomical study. Pain Physician 2016; 19: E697–E705.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel