Periacetabular osteotomy with or without arthroscopic management in patients with hip dysplasia: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Geoffrey P Wilkin, Stéphane Poitras, John Clohisy, Etienne Belzile, Ira Zaltz, George Grammatopoulos, Gerd Melkus, Kawan Rakhra, Tim Ramsay, Kednapa Thavorn, Paul E Beaulé, Geoffrey P Wilkin, Stéphane Poitras, John Clohisy, Etienne Belzile, Ira Zaltz, George Grammatopoulos, Gerd Melkus, Kawan Rakhra, Tim Ramsay, Kednapa Thavorn, Paul E Beaulé

Abstract

Background: Hip dysplasia is one of the most common causes of hip arthritis. Its incidence is estimated to be between 3.6 and 12.8% (Canadian Institute for Health Information, Hip and knee replacements in Canada, 2017-2018: Canadian joint replacement registry annual report, 2019; Jacobsen and Sonne-Holm, Rheumatology 44:211-8, 2004). The Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) has been used successfully for over 30 years (Gosvig et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1162-9, 2010), but some patients continue to exhibit symptoms post-surgery (Wyles et al., Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:336-50, 2017). A hip arthroscopy, performed using a small camera, allows surgeons to address torn cartilage inside the hip joint. Although both procedures are considered standard of care treatment options, it is unknown whether the addition of hip arthroscopy improves patient outcomes compared to a PAO alone. To delay or prevent future joint replacement surgeries, joint preservation surgery is recommended for eligible patients. While previous studies found an added cost to perform hip arthroscopies, the cost-effectiveness to Canadian Health care system is not known.

Methods: Patients randomized to the experimental group will undergo central compartment hip arthroscopy prior to completion of the PAO. Patients randomized to the control group will undergo isolated PAO. Patient-reported quality of life will be the primary outcome used for comparison between the two treatment groups as measured by The International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) (Saberi Hosnijeh et al., Arthritis Rheum 69:86-93, 2017). Secondary outcomes will include the four-square step test and sit-to-stand (validated in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain) and hip-specific symptoms and impairment using the HOOS; global health assessment will be compared using the PROMIS Global 10 Score; health status will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L and EQ VAS questionnaires (Ganz et al., Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:264-72, 2008) pre- and post-operatively. In addition, operative time, hospital length of stay, adverse events, and health services utilization will be collected. A sub-group of patients (26 in each group) will receive a T1rho MRI before and after surgery to study changes in cartilage quality over time. A cost-utility analysis will be performed to compare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with the intervention.

Discussion: We hypothesize that (1) concomitant hip arthroscopy at the time of PAO to address central compartment pathology will result in clinically important improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) versus PAO alone, that (2) additional costs associated with hip arthroscopy will be offset by greater clinical improvements in this group, and that (3) combined hip arthroscopy and PAO will prove to be a cost-effective procedure.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03481010 . Registered on 6 March 2020. Protocol version: version 3.

Keywords: Arthroscopy; Periacetabular osteotomy; Quality of life; Randomized control trial.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information . Hip and knee replacements in Canada, 2017–2018: Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Ottawa: CIHI; 2019.
    1. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S. Hip dysplasia: a significant risk factor for the development of hip osteoarthritis. A cross-sectional survey. Rheumatology. 2004;44(2):211–218.
    1. Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Palm H, Troelsen A. Prevalence of malformations of the hip joint and their relationship to sex, groin pain, and risk of osteoarthritis: a population-based survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(5):1162–1169.
    1. Wyles CC, Heidenreich MJ, Jeng J, Larson DR, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ. The John Charnley Award: redefining the natural history of osteoarthritis in patients with hip dysplasia and impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(2):336–350.
    1. Wylie JD, Peters CL, Aoki SK. Natural history of structural hip abnormalities and the potential for hip preservation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(15):515–525.
    1. Saberi Hosnijeh F, Zuiderwijk ME, Versteeg M, Smeele HT, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, et al. Cam deformity and acetabular dysplasia as risk factors for hip osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2017;69(1):86–93.
    1. Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(2):264–272.
    1. Clohisy JC, Beaule PE, O'Malley A, Safran MR, Schoenecker P. AOA symposium. Hip disease in the young adult: current concepts of etiology and surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(10):2267–2281.
    1. Engesæter IØ, Lehmann T, Laborie LB, Lie SA, Rosendahl K, Engesæter LB. Total hip replacement in young adults with hip dysplasia: age at diagnosis, previous treatment, quality of life, and validation of diagnoses reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1987 and 2007. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(2):149–154.
    1. Chu CR, Millis MB, Olson SA. Osteoarthritis: from palliation to prevention: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(15):e130.
    1. Ng KCG, Lamontagne M, Beaulé PE. Differences in anatomical parameters between the affected and unaffected hip in patients with bilateral cam-type deformities. Glasgow: XXV Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics; 2015.
    1. Kim YJ, Jaramillo D, Millis MB, Gray ML, Burstein D. Assessment of early osteoarthritis in hip dysplasia with delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85A(10):1987–1992.
    1. Sankar WN, Duncan ST, Baca GR, Beaulé PE, Millis MB, Y-j K, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of acetabular dysplasia: the Academic Network of Conservational Hip Outcomes Research (ANCHOR) periacetabular osteotomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(2):150–159.
    1. van Bergayk AB, Garbuz DS. Quality of life and sports-specific outcomes after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84B(3):339–343.
    1. Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:26–36.
    1. Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA. Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(7):1633–1644.
    1. Ziran N, Varcadipane J, Kadri O, Ussef N, Kanim L, Foster A, et al. Ten-and 20-year survivorship of the hip after periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(7):247–255.
    1. Zaltz I, Baca G, Kim YJ, Schoenecker P, Trousdale R, Sierra R, et al. Complications associated with the periacetabular osteotomy: a prospective multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(23):1967–1974.
    1. Wyles CC, Vargas JS, Heidenreich MJ, Mara KC, Peters CL, Clohisy JC, et al. Natural history of the dysplastic hip following modern periacetabular osteotomy. JBJS. 2019;101(10):932–938.
    1. Sharifi E, Sharifi H, Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Diab M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90A(7):1447–1456.
    1. Ross JR, Zaltz I, Nepple JJ, Schoenecker PE, Clohisy JC. Arthroscopic disease classification and interventions as an adjunct in the treatment of acetabular dysplasia. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(Suppl Jul):72s–78s.
    1. Kim K-I, Cho Y-J, Ramteke A, Yoo M-C. Peri-acetabular rotational osteotomy with concomitant hip arthroscopy for treatment of hip dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(6):732–737.
    1. Nepple JJ, Carlisle JC, Nunley RM, Clohisy JC. Clinical and radiographic predictors of intra-articular hip disease in arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(2):296–303.
    1. Domb BG, Lareau JM, Baydoun H, Botse I, Millis MB, Yen YM. Is intraarticular pathology common in patients with hip dysplasia undergoing periacetabular osteotomy? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:674–680.
    1. Redmond JM, Gupta A, Stake CE, Domb BG. The prevalence of hip labral and chondral lesions identified by method of detection during periacetabular osteotomy: arthroscopy versus arthrotomy. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(3):382–388.
    1. Dorrell JH, Catterall A. The torn acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986;68B(3):400–403.
    1. Hartig-Andreasen C, Troelsen A, Thillemann TM, Gelineck J, Søballe K. Risk factors for the need of hip arthroscopy following periacetabular osteotomy. J Hip Preservation Surg. 2015;2(4):374–384.
    1. Reurink G, Jansen SP, Bisselink JM, Vincken PW, Weir A, Moen MH. Reliability and validity of diagnosing acetabular labral lesions with magnetic resonance arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(18):1643–1648.
    1. Domb B, LaReau J, Redmond JM. Combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy: indications, advantages, technique, and complications. Arthrosc Tech. 2014;3(1):e95–e100.
    1. Ricciardi BF, Mayer SW, Fields KG, Wentzel C, Kelly BT, Sink EL. Patient characteristics and early functional outcomes of combined arthroscopic labral refixation and periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(10):2518–2525.
    1. Nakayama H, Fukunishi S, Fukui T, Yoshiya S. Arthroscopic labral repair concomitantly performed with curved periacetabular osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(4):938–941.
    1. Haynes JA, Pascual-Garrido C, An TW, Nepple JJ, Clohisy JC. Trends of hip arthroscopy in the setting of acetabular dysplasia. J Hip Preservation Surg. 2018;5(3):267–273.
    1. Hingsammer AM, Miller PE, Millis MB, Kim Y-J. Does periacetabular osteotomy have depth-related effects on the articular cartilage of the hip? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(12):3735–3743.
    1. Kremers HM, Schilz SR, Van Houten HK, Herrin J, Koenig KM, Bozic KJ, et al. Trends in utilization and outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the United States between 2005 and 2013. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(3):750–755.
    1. Shearer DW, Kramer J, Bozic KJ, Feeley BT. Is hip arthroscopy cost-effective for femoroacetabular impingement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(4):1079–1089.
    1. Care OMoHaL-T . OHIP schedule of benefits and fees. 2019.
    1. Yeung M, Kowalczuk M, Simunovic N, Ayeni O. Hip arthroscopy in the setting of hip dysplasia: a systematic review. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5(6):225–231.
    1. Kirsch JM, Khan M, Bedi A. Does hip arthroscopy have a role in the treatment of developmental hip dysplasia? J Arthroplast. 2017;32(9):S28–S31.
    1. Ding Z, Sun Y, Liu S, Chen J. Hip arthroscopic surgery in borderline developmental dysplastic hips: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(10):2494–2500.
    1. Lodhia P, Chandrasekaran S, Gui C, Darwish N, Suarez-Ahedo C, Domb BG. Open and arthroscopic treatment of adult hip dysplasia: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(2):374–383.
    1. Adler KL, Giordano BD. The utility of hip arthroscopy in the setting of acetabular dysplasia: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(1):237–248.
    1. Domb BG, LaReau JM, Hammarstedt JE, Gupta A, Stake CE, Redmond JM. Concomitant hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(11):2199–2206.
    1. Goronzy J, Franken L, Hartmann A, Thielemann F, Postler A, Paulus T, et al. What are the results of surgical treatment of hip dysplasia with concomitant cam deformity? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(4):1128–1137.
    1. Lodhia P, Gui C, Chandrasekaran S, Suarez-Ahedo C, Dirschl DR, Domb BG. The economic impact of acetabular labral tears: a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing hip arthroscopic surgery and structured rehabilitation alone in patients without osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1771–1780.
    1. Mather RC, III, Nho SJ, Federer A, Demiralp B, Nguyen J, Saavoss A, et al. Effects of arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome on quality of life and economic outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(5):1205–1213.
    1. Ito H, Tanino H, Sato T, Nishida Y, Matsuno T. Early weight-bearing after periacetabular osteotomy leads to a high incidence of postoperative pelvic fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):234.
    1. Adler KL, Cook PC, Geisler PR, Yen Y-M, Giordano BD. Current concepts in hip preservation surgery: part II—rehabilitation. Sports Health. 2016;8(1):57–64.
    1. Mast NH, Impellizzeri F, Keller S, Leunig M. Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(1):188–199.
    1. Wilkin GP, Ibrahim MM, Smit KM, Beaule PE. A contemporary definition of hip dysplasia and structural instability: toward a comprehensive classification for acetabular dysplasia. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(9S):S20–S27.
    1. Mohtadi NG, Griffin DR, Pedersen ME, Chan D, Safran MR, Parsons N, et al. The development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) Arthroscopy. 2012;28(5):595–605.
    1. Thorborg K, Tijssen M, Habets B, Bartels E, Roos EM, Kemp J, et al. Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaires for young to middle-aged adults with hip and groin disability: a systematic review of the clinimetric evidence. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(12):812.
    1. Ramisetty N, Kwon Y, Mohtadi N. Patient-reported outcome measures for hip preservation surgery—a systematic review of the literature. J Hip Preservation Surg. 2015;2(1):15–27.
    1. Sheean AJ, Schmitz MR, Ward CL, Barrow AE, Tennent DJ, Roach CJ, et al. Assessment of disability related to femoroacetabular impingement syndrome by use of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) and objective measures of physical performance. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(11):2476–2482.
    1. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–1194.
    1. Rakhra KS, Lattanzio PJ, Cardenas-Blanco A, Cameron IG, Beaule PE. Can T1-rho MRI detect acetabular cartilage degeneration in femoroacetabular impingement?: a pilot study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2012;94(9):1187–1192.
    1. Melkus G, Rakhra K, Wilkin G, P Beaulé. Quantitative hip cartilage MRI of patients with hip dysplasia: evaluation of dGEMRIC, T1ρ and T2* mapping. Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS) 2019 Meeting; Austin, TX, USA2019.
    1. Anwander H, Rakhra KS, Melkus G, Beaulé PE. T1ρ hip cartilage mapping in assessing patients with cam morphology: how can we optimize the regions of interest? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(4):1066–1075.
    1. Chen BP, Dobransky J, Poitras S, Forster A, Beaule PE. Impact of definition and timeframe on capturing surgery-related readmissions after primary joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(12):3563–3567.
    1. Sink EL, Leunig M, Zaltz I, Gilbert JC, Clohisy J. Reliability of a complication classification system for orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(8):2220–2226.
    1. Beaulé PE, Bleeker H, Singh A, Dobransky J. Defining modes of failure after joint-preserving surgery of the hip. Bone Joint J. 2017;99:303–309.
    1. Thanacharoenpanich S, Boyle MJ, Murphy RF, Miller PE, Millis MB, Kim Y-J, et al. Periacetabular osteotomy for developmental hip dysplasia with labral tears: is arthrotomy or arthroscopy required? J Hip Preservation Surg. 2018;5(1):23–33.
    1. Hartman JD, Craig BM. Comparing and transforming PROMIS utility values to the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(3):725–733.
    1. Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2005;14(5):487–496.
    1. Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SS, Polsky D. Economic evaluation in clinical trials: OUP Oxford. 2014.
    1. Hylkema TH, Stevens M, Selzer F, Amick BA, Katz JN, Brouwer S. Activity impairment and work productivity loss after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Arthroplast. 2019;34(11):2637–2645.
    1. Mohtadi NG, Griffin DR, Pedersen ME, Chan D, Safran MR, Parsons N, et al. The development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) Arthroscopy. 2012;28(5):595–610.e1.
    1. Kemp JL, Collins NJ, Roos EM, Crossley KM. Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(9):2065–2073.
    1. Nwachukwu BU, Fields K, Chang B, Nawabi DH, Kelly BT, Ranawat AS. Preoperative outcome scores are predictive of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(3):612–619.
    1. Nwachukwu BU, Chang B, Rotter B-Z, Kelly BT, Ranawat AS, Nawabi DH. Minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after revision hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(6):1862–1868.
    1. Beaule PE, Speirs AD, Anwander H, Melkus G, Rakhra K, Frei H, et al. Surgical correction of cam deformity in association with femoroacetabular impingement and its impact on the degenerative process within the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(16):1373–1381.
    1. Melkus G, Beaulé PE, Wilkin G, Rakhra K. Quantitative hip cartilage MRI of patients with hip dysplasia: evaluation of dGEMRIC, T1ρ and T2* mapping. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2019. p. 1317.
    1. Clohisy JC, Ackerman J, Baca G, Baty J, Beaule PE, Kim YJ, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy from the prospective ANCHOR cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(1):33–41.
    1. Clohisy JC, Baca G, Beaule PE, Kim YJ, Larson CM, Millis MB, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a North American cohort of patients undergoing surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(6):1348–1356.
    1. Knight SJ, Abraham CL, Peters CL, Weiss JA, Anderson AE. Changes in chondrolabral mechanics, coverage, and congruency following peri-acetabular osteotomy for treatment of acetabular retroversion: a patient-specific finite element study. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(11):2567–2576.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel