Exposure-adjusted adverse events comparing blinatumomab with chemotherapy in advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Anthony S Stein, Richard A Larson, Andre C Schuh, William Stevenson, Ewa Lech-Maranda, Qui Tran, Zachary Zimmerman, William Kormany, Max S Topp, Anthony S Stein, Richard A Larson, Andre C Schuh, William Stevenson, Ewa Lech-Maranda, Qui Tran, Zachary Zimmerman, William Kormany, Max S Topp

Abstract

In the phase 3 TOWER study, blinatumomab demonstrated an overall survival benefit over standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in adults with relapsed or refractory (r/r) Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Nearly all patients in both treatment arms experienced an adverse event (AE), and the incidence rate of serious AEs was higher for blinatumomab. However, as treatment exposure differed between the 2 arms, we conducted an exploratory safety analysis comparing exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) of blinatumomab vs SOC. Analyses were conducted for all patients who received therapy (safety population). Patients received a median (range) of 2 cycles (1-9) of blinatumomab (N = 267) vs 1 cycle (1-4) of SOC (N = 109). Grade ≥3 AE rates were generally higher in cycle 1 of blinatumomab than in cycle 2 (76% vs 37%). After adjusting for time on treatment, EAERs of grade ≥3 were significantly lower for blinatumomab vs SOC overall (10.73 vs 45.27 events per patient-year; P < .001) and for events of clinical interest, including infections (1.63 vs 6.49 events per patient-year; P < .001), cytopenias (3.64 vs 20.07 events per patient-year; P < .001), and neurologic events (0.38 vs 0.95 events per patient-year; P = .008). The EAER of grade ≥3 cytokine-release syndrome was higher for blinatumomab than for SOC (0.16 vs 0 events per patient-year; P = .038). These data further support the role of blinatumomab as an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with r/r Ph- ALL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02013167.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: A.S.S. received consulting fees and is a member of the speaker’s bureau for Amgen Inc. R.A.L received consulting fees from Amgen Inc. A.C.S. received consulting fees from Amgen Inc. W.S. received honoraria from Amgen Inc. E.L.-M. received consulting fees from Amgen Inc, Roche, and Janssen-Cilag. Q.T. is an employee of Amgen Inc. Z.Z. and W.K. are employees of and hold stock in Amgen Inc. M.S.T. received research grants from Amgen Inc, Gilead, Macrogenics, Roche, and Regeneron, as well as consulting fees from Amgen Inc, Roche, and Regeneron.

© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient disposition. Data cutoff was 4 January 2016. CR, complete remission; CRh, complete remission with partial hematologic recovery; CRi, complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs by treatment cycle. For (A) blinatumomab and (B) SOC.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel