Implementation of a 23-h surgery model in a tertiary care hospital: a safe and feasible model with high patient satisfaction

U-M Ruohoaho, P Toroi, J Hirvonen, S Aaltomaa, H Kokki, M Kokki, U-M Ruohoaho, P Toroi, J Hirvonen, S Aaltomaa, H Kokki, M Kokki

Abstract

Background: The 23-h surgery model consists of elective operative care with an overnight hospital stay for patients unsuitable for day case surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the success of the 23-h surgery model.

Methods: This was a prospective follow-up study of patients undergoing surgery with the planned 23-h model in a tertiary-care university hospital during a 12-month period 2 years after the model was implemented. Patients were interviewed 2 weeks after surgery, and the hospital operative database and patient records were searched. The primary outcome was the success of the process, defined as discharge before 10.00 hours on the first morning after surgery. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission and reoperation rates, adverse events, and patient satisfaction with the process.

Results: Between May 2017 and May 2018, 993 adult patients underwent surgery with the 23-h model, of whom 937 adhered to the model as planned (success rate 94·4 per cent). Gynaecological, gastrointestinal and orthopaedic surgery were the three most common surgical specialties. The surgical process was changed to an in-hospital model for 45 patients (4·5 per cent), and 11 (1·1 per cent) were discharged on the day of surgery. The readmission rate was 1·9 per cent (19 of 993), and five patients (0·5 per cent) had a reoperation within 30 days of surgery. Fifty-nine adverse events were noted in 53 patients (5·3 per cent), most commonly infection. Patient satisfaction was a median of 6-7 (maximum 7) points for various aspects of the model.

Conclusion: The success rate and patient satisfaction for the 23-h surgery model was high.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04142203.

© 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time to procedure‐related emergency department visit after discharge according to the proportion of operations in each specialty ED, emergency department; ENT, ear, nose and throat.

References

    1. International Association for Ambulatory Surgery . Ambulatory (Day) Surgery: Suggested International Terminology and Definitions; 2003. [accessed 20 October 2019].
    1. Solodkyy A, Hakeem AR, Oswald N, Di Franco F, Gergely S, Harris AM. ‘True day case’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a high‐volume specialist unit and review of factors contributing to unexpected overnight stay. Minim Invasive Surg 2018; 2018: 1260358.
    1. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, British Association of Day Surgery . Day case and short stay surgery: 2. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 417–434.
    1. Vaughan J, Gurusamy KS, Davidson BR. Day‐surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (7)CD006798.
    1. Perera AH, Patel SD, Law NW. Thyroid surgery as a 23‐hour stay procedure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2014; 96: 284–288.
    1. Lang BH, Chow FC. Evaluating the incidence, cause, and risk factors for unplanned 30‐day readmission and emergency department/general practitioner visit after short‐stay thyroidectomy. World J Surg 2016; 40: 329–336.
    1. Whippey A, Kostandoff G, Paul J, Ma J, Thabane L, Ma HK. Predictors of unanticipated admission following ambulatory surgery: a retrospective case–control study. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 675–683.
    1. Hothem Z, Baker D, Jenkins CS, Douglas J, Callahan RE, Shuell CC et al Predictors of readmission in nonagenarians: analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project dataset. J Surg Res 2017; 213: 32–38.
    1. State of Victoria , Department of Health and Human Services. Extended Day Surgery: Guidelines for the Implementation and Evaluation of 23‐hour Service Models in Victoria; 2011. [accessed 20 October 2019].
    1. Raspanti C, Porrello C, Augello G, Dafnomili A, Rotolo G, Randazzo A et al 23‐Hour observation endocrine neck surgery: lessons learned from a case series of over 1700 patients. G Chir 2017; 38: 15–22.
    1. Ruohoaho U‐M, Kokki M, Hirvonen J, Joukainen S, Aaltomaa S, Fraunberg M et al Value stream map assessment of the extended day: 23h surgery model. Intelligent Buildings International 2020; 12: 17–31.
    1. Harju J, Kokki H, Pääkkönen M, Karjalainen K, Eskelinen M. Feasibility of minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery: a prospective randomised study. Scand J Surg 2010; 99: 132–136.
    1. Piirainen P, Kokki H, Anderson B, Hannam J, Hautajärvi H, Ranta VP, et al Analgesic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of epidural oxycodone in pain management after gynaecological laparoscopy – a randomised, double blind, active control, double‐dummy clinical comparison with intravenous administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2019; 85: 1798–1807.
    1. Smirnov G, Terävä M, Tuomilehto H, Hujala K, Seppänen M, Kokki H. Etoricoxib for pain management during thyroid surgery – a prospective, placebo‐controlled study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 138: 92–97.
    1. Aubry A, Saget A, Manceau G, Faron M, Wagner M, Tresallet C et al Outpatient appendectomy in an emergency outpatient surgery unit 24 h a day: an intention‐to‐treat analysis of 194 patients. World J Surg 2017; 41: 2471–2479.
    1. Turunen E, Miettinen M, Setälä L, Vehviläinen‐Julkunen K. The impact of a structured preoperative protocol on day of surgery cancellations. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27: 288–305.
    1. Mattila K, Hynynen M; Intensium Consortium Study Group . Day surgery in Finland: a prospective cohort study of 14 day‐surgery units. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 455–463.
    1. Leslie RJ, Beiko D, van Vlymen J, Siemens DR. Day of surgery cancellation rates in urology: identification of modifiable factors. Can Urol Assoc J 2013; 7: 167–173.
    1. Wong DJN, Harris SK, Moonesinghe SR; SNAP‐2: EpiCCS collaborators; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia; Study Steering Group; Net Solving Limited; Trainee Research Networks ; et al Cancelled operations: a 7‐day cohort study of planned adult inpatient surgery in 245 UK National Health Service hospitals. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121: 730–738.
    1. Magnusson H, Felländer‐Tsai L, Hansson MG, Ryd L. Cancellations of elective surgery may cause an inferior postoperative course: the ‘invisible hand’ of health‐care prioritization? Clin Ethics 2011; 6: 27–31.
    1. McIntosh B, Cookson G, Jones S. Cancelled surgeries and payment by results in the English National Health Service. J Health Serv Res Policy 2012; 17: 79–86.
    1. Lee A, Kerridge RK, Chui PT, Chiu CH, Gin T. Perioperative systems as a quality model of perioperative medicine and surgical care. Health Policy 2011; 102: 214–222.
    1. Al Talalwah N, McIltrot KH. Cancellation of surgeries: integrative review. J Perianesth Nurs 2019; 34: 86–96.
    1. de Kok M, van der Weijden T, Voogd AC, Dirksen CD, van de Velde CJ, Roukema JA et al Implementation of a short‐stay programme after breast cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 189–194.
    1. Hadeed MM, Kandil A, Patel V, Morrison A, Novicoff WM, Yarboro SR. Factors associated with patient‐initiated telephone calls after orthopaedic trauma surgery. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31: e96–e100.
    1. Dahlberg K, Jaensson M, Nilsson U. ‘Let the patient decide’ –person‐centered postoperative follow‐up contacts, initiated via a phone app after day surgery: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 2019; 61: 33–37.
    1. McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 267–277.
    1. Sepponen K, Kokki H, Ahonen R. Training of medical staff positively influences postoperative pain management at home in children. Pharm World Sci 1999; 21: 168–172.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel