Associations between coherent neural activity in the brain's value system during antismoking messages and reductions in smoking

Nicole Cooper, Steven Tompson, Matthew B O'Donnell, Jean M Vettel, Danielle S Bassett, Emily B Falk, Nicole Cooper, Steven Tompson, Matthew B O'Donnell, Jean M Vettel, Danielle S Bassett, Emily B Falk

Abstract

Objective: Worldwide, tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death and illness. One common strategy for reducing the prevalence of cigarette smoking and other health risk behaviors is the use of graphic warning labels (GWLs). This has led to widespread interest from the perspective of health psychology in understanding the mechanisms of GWL effectiveness. Here we investigated differences in how the brain responds to negative, graphic warning label-inspired antismoking ads and neutral control ads, and we probed how this response related to future behavior.

Method: A group of smokers (N = 45) viewed GWL-inspired and control antismoking ads while undergoing fMRI, and their smoking behavior was assessed before and one month after the scan. We examined neural coherence between two regions in the brain's valuation network, the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and ventral striatum (VS).

Results: We found that greater neural coherence in the brain's valuation network during GWL ads (relative to control ads) preceded later smoking reduction.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the integration of information about message value may be key for message influence. Understanding how the brain responds to health messaging and relates to future behavior could ultimately contribute to the design of effective messaging campaigns, as well as more broadly to theories of message effects and persuasion across domains. (PsycINFO Database Record

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None

(c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Figures

Fig 1. Task design
Fig 1. Task design
Participants viewed GWL-inspired images portraying the negative health and social consequences of smoking and neutral control images. After viewing each image, participants rated how much the ad made them want to quit smoking, then viewed an intertrial fixation period.
Fig 2. Analysis design and results
Fig 2. Analysis design and results
(A) Histogram of smoking behavior change, where a negative percent change represents a reduction in cigarettes smoked per day. (B) Functional connectivity within value regions (from MPFC to VS) was assessed for the contrast of GWL > control ads. (C) Percent change in cigarettes smoked per day plotted against functional connectivity for each participant. Greater connectivity during GWL ads was related to a larger reduction in smoking.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel