Use of CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores to predict subsequent myocardial infarction, stroke, and death in patients with acute coronary syndrome: data from Taiwan acute coronary syndrome full spectrum registry

Su-Kiat Chua, Huey-Ming Lo, Chiung-Zuan Chiu, Kou-Gi Shyu, Su-Kiat Chua, Huey-Ming Lo, Chiung-Zuan Chiu, Kou-Gi Shyu

Abstract

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients have a wide spectrum of risks for subsequent cardiovascular events and death. However, there is no simple, convenience scoring system to identify risk of adverse outcomes. We investigated whether CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were useful tools to assess the risk for adverse events among ACS patients.

Methods: This observational prospective study was conducted at 39 hospitals. Totally 3,183 patients with ACS were enrolled, and CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were calculated. The primary endpoint was occurrence of adverse event, including subsequent myocardial infarction, stroke, or death, within 1 year of discharge.

Results: CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were significant predictors of adverse events in separate multivariate regression analyses. A Kaplan-Meier analysis of CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores of ≥2 showed a higher rate of adverse events as compared with scores of <2 (P<0.001;log-rank test). CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was better than CHADS₂ score in predicting subsequent adverse events; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased from 0.66 to 0.70 (p<0.001). Patients with CHADS₂ scores of 0 or 1 were further classified according to CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, using a cutoff value of 2. The rate of adverse events significantly differed between those with a score of <2 and those with a score of ≥2 (4.1% vs.10.7%, P<0.001).

Conclusions: CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were useful predictors of subsequent adverse events in ACS patients.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Although this research is partly sponsored by Sanofi-Aventis company, the data is independently analyzed by the investigators. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1. Rates of adverse events, including…
Figure 1. Rates of adverse events, including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or death, according to CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores.
The rate of MI, stroke, or death increased as CHADS2 (A) and CHA2DS2-VASc (B) scores increased.
Figure 2. Adjusted hazard ratios for the…
Figure 2. Adjusted hazard ratios for the composite endpoint myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or death, in relation to CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores, in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
The risk of MI, stroke, or death progressively increased with each unit increase in CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores. The reference groups are patients with scores of 0. * And § are defined as p<0.001 vs. CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 0, respectively.
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for the time…
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for the time to the composite endpoint of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or death, according to CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores.
Survival analysis showed that a CHADS2 score of ≥2 was associated with a higher event rate than a score of <2 (p<0.001; log-rank test) (A). In addition, a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2 was a significant predictor of adverse events (p<0.001; log-rank test) (B).
Figure 4. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves…
Figure 4. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and GRACE scores predicting myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or death.
Diagnostic performance in predicting MI, stroke, or death was better for CHA2DS2-VASc score than for CHADS2 score. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) increased from 0.66 to 0.70, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Besides, the diagnostic accuracy in predicting adverse events was better for GRACE score than for CHA2DS2-VASc score (AUC 0.74 vs. 0.70, p<0.001).
Figure 5. Flowchart of adverse event rates…
Figure 5. Flowchart of adverse event rates and risk scores in the patients with CHADS2 score of 0 or 1.
(A) Rate of MI, stroke, or death in patients with a CHADS2 score of 0 or 1, according to CHA2DS2-VASc score. The rate of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or death progressively increased, from 3.0% to 33.3%, with increasing CHA2DS2-VASc score. (B) The flowchart shows the rate of MI, stroke, or death in patients stratified by CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores.

References

    1. Rouleau JL, Talajic M, Sussex B, Potvin L, Warnica W, et al. (1996) Myocardial infarction patients in the 1990s–their risk factors, stratification and survival in Canada: the Canadian Assessment of Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 27: 1119–1127.
    1. Armstrong PW, Fu Y, Chang WC, Topol EJ, Granger CB, et al. (1998) Acute coronary syndromes in the GUSTO-IIb trial: prognostic insights and impact of recurrent ischemia. The GUSTO-IIb Investigators. Circulation 98: 1860–1868.
    1. Daida H, Miyauchi K, Ogawa H, Yokoi H, Matsumoto M, et al. (2013) Management and two-year long-term clinical outcome of acute coronary syndrome in Japan: prevention of atherothrombotic incidents following ischemic coronary attack (PACIFIC) registry. Circ J 77: 934–943.
    1. Boden H, van der Hoeven BL, Karalis I, Schalij MJ, Jukema JW (2012) Management of acute coronary syndrome: achievements and goals still to pursue. Novel developments in diagnosis and treatment. J Intern Med 271: 521–536.
    1. Nakatani D, Sakata Y, Suna S, Usami M, Matsumoto S, et al. (2013) Incidence, predictors, and subsequent mortality risk of recurrent myocardial infarction in patients following discharge for acute myocardial infarction. Circ J 77: 439–446.
    1. Fox KA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, et al. (2006) Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ 333: 1091.
    1. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, McCabe CH, Horacek T, et al. (2000) The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 284: 835–842.
    1. Boersma E, Pieper KS, Steyerberg EW, Wilcox RG, Chang WC, et al. (2000) Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators. Circulation 101: 2557–2567.
    1. Henriksson KM, Farahmand B, Johansson S, Asberg S, Terent A, et al. (2010) Survival after stroke–the impact of CHADS2 score and atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 141: 18–23.
    1. Crandall MA, Horne BD, Day JD, Anderson JL, Muhlestein JB, et al. (2009) Atrial fibrillation significantly increases total mortality and stroke risk beyond that conveyed by the CHADS2 risk factors. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32: 981–986.
    1. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137: 263–272.
    1. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, et al. (2010) Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 31: 2369–2429.
    1. Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, et al. (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in partnership with the European Society of Cardiology and in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 57: e101–198.
    1. Poci D, Hartford M, Karlsson T, Herlitz J, Edvardsson N, et al. (2012) Role of the CHADS2 score in acute coronary syndromes: risk of subsequent death or stroke in patients with and without atrial fibrillation. Chest 141: 1431–1440.
    1. Shyu K-G, Wu C-J, Mar G-Y, Hou CJY, Li AH, et al. (2011) Clinical Characteristics, Management and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome - Observations from the Taiwan ACS Full Spectrum Registry. Acta Cardiol Sin 27: 10.
    1. Park JH, Joung B, Son NH, Shim JM, Lee MH, et al. (2011) The electroanatomical remodelling of the left atrium is related to CHADS2/CHA2DS2VASc score and events of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Europace 13: 1541–1549.
    1. Chao TF, Cheng CC, Lin WS, Tsao HM, Lin YJ, et al. (2011) Associations among the CHADS(2) score, atrial substrate properties, and outcome of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 8: 1155–1159.
    1. Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, et al. (2006) ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 114: e257–354.
    1. John Camm A (2013) Managing anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: current issues and future strategies. J Intern Med 273: 31–41.
    1. Gustafsson F, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, Hildebrandt P, Ottesen MM, et al. (1998) Long-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in patients with a history of arterial hypertension. TRACE study group. Eur Heart J 19: 588–594.
    1. Avezum A, Makdisse M, Spencer F, Gore JM, Fox KA, et al. (2005) Impact of age on management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Am Heart J 149: 67–73.
    1. Das RR, Seshadri S, Beiser AS, Kelly-Hayes M, Au R, et al. (2008) Prevalence and correlates of silent cerebral infarcts in the Framingham offspring study. Stroke 39: 2929–2935.
    1. Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, et al. (2010) Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet 375: 2215–2222.
    1. Herman B, Greiser E, Pohlabeln H (1997) A sex difference in short-term survival after initial acute myocardial infarction. The MONICA-Bremen Acute Myocardial Infarction Register, 1985–1990. Eur Heart J 18: 963–970.
    1. Hochman JS, McCabe CH, Stone PH, Becker RC, Cannon CP, et al. (1997) Outcome and profile of women and men presenting with acute coronary syndromes: a report from TIMI IIIB. TIMI Investigators. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 30: 141–148.
    1. Hochman JS, Tamis JE, Thompson TD, Weaver WD, White HD, et al. (1999) Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb Investigators. N Engl J Med 341: 226–232.
    1. Dormandy J, Heeck L, Vig S (1999) Lower-extremity arteriosclerosis as a reflection of a systemic process: implications for concomitant coronary and carotid disease. Semin Vasc Surg 12: 118–122.
    1. Leng GC, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG, Whiteman M, Dunbar J, et al. (1996) Incidence, natural history and cardiovascular events in symptomatic and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the general population. Int J Epidemiol 25: 1172–1181.
    1. Leng GC, Fowkes FG, Lee AJ, Dunbar J, Housley E, et al. (1996) Use of ankle brachial pressure index to predict cardiovascular events and death: a cohort study. BMJ 313: 1440–1444.
    1. Dormandy J, Heeck L, Vig S (1999) The natural history of claudication: risk to life and limb. Semin Vasc Surg 12: 123–137.
    1. Al-Thani HA, El-Menyar A, Zubaid M, Rashed WA, Ridha M, et al. (2011) Peripheral arterial disease in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome in six middle eastern countries. Int J Vasc Med 2011: 815902.
    1. Goldberg RJ, McCormick D, Gurwitz JH, Yarzebski J, Lessard D, et al. (1998) Age-related trends in short- and long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction: a 20-year population-based perspective (1975–1995). Am J Cardiol 82: 1311–1317.
    1. Roger VL, Jacobsen SJ, Weston SA, Goraya TY, Killian J, et al. (2002) Trends in the incidence and survival of patients with hospitalized myocardial infarction, Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979 to 1994. Ann Intern Med 136: 341–348.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel