Phase 3 study of dasatinib 140 mg once daily versus 70 mg twice daily in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase resistant or intolerant to imatinib: 15-month median follow-up

Hagop Kantarjian, Jorge Cortes, Dong-Wook Kim, Pedro Dorlhiac-Llacer, Ricardo Pasquini, John DiPersio, Martin C Müller, Jerald P Radich, H Jean Khoury, Nina Khoroshko, M Brigid Bradley-Garelik, Chao Zhu, Martin S Tallman, Hagop Kantarjian, Jorge Cortes, Dong-Wook Kim, Pedro Dorlhiac-Llacer, Ricardo Pasquini, John DiPersio, Martin C Müller, Jerald P Radich, H Jean Khoury, Nina Khoroshko, M Brigid Bradley-Garelik, Chao Zhu, Martin S Tallman

Abstract

Dasatinib is the most potent BCR-ABL inhibitor, with 325-fold higher potency than imatinib against unmutated BCR-ABL in vitro. Studies have demonstrated the benefits of dasatinib 70 mg twice daily in patients with accelerated-phase chronic myeloid leukemia intolerant or resistant to imatinib. A phase 3 study compared the efficacy and safety of dasatinib 140 mg once daily with the current twice-daily regimen. Here, results from the subgroup with accelerated-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 317) with a median follow-up of 15 months (treatment duration, 0.03-31.15 months) are reported. Among patients randomized to once-daily (n = 158) or twice-daily (n = 159) treatment, rates of major hematologic and cytogenetic responses were comparable (major hematologic response, 66% vs 68%; major cytogenetic response, 39% vs 43%, respectively). Estimated progression-free survival rates at 24 months were 51% and 55%, whereas overall survival rates were 63% versus 72%. Once-daily treatment was associated with an improved safety profile. In particular, significantly fewer patients in the once-daily group experienced a pleural effusion (all grades, 20% vs 39% P < .001). These results demonstrate that dasatinib 140 mg once daily has similar efficacy to dasatinib 70 mg twice daily but with an improved safety profile. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #CA180-035.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00123487.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram for the CA180-035 study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier analyses of duration. (A) Major hematologic response. (B) Major cytogenetic response.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival (all randomized patients).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (all randomized patients).

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel