A Couples-Based Intervention (Ghya Bharari Ekatra) for the Primary Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence in India: Pilot Feasibility and Acceptability Study

Ameeta Shivdas Kalokhe, Sandhya Iyer, Keshav Gadhe, Tuman Katendra, Ambika Kolhe, Girish Rahane, Rob Stephenson, Seema Sahay, Ameeta Shivdas Kalokhe, Sandhya Iyer, Keshav Gadhe, Tuman Katendra, Ambika Kolhe, Girish Rahane, Rob Stephenson, Seema Sahay

Abstract

Background: The high global prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) and its association with poor physical and mental health underscore the need for effective primary prevention. We previously developed Ghya Bharari Ekatra (GBE), a couples-based primary prevention intervention for IPV among newly married couples residing in slum communities in Pune, India.

Objective: Through this pilot study, we aimed to explore the acceptance, safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of GBE.

Methods: Between January and May 2018, we enrolled and assigned 20 couples to receive GBE plus information on IPV support services and 20 control couples to receive information on IPV support services alone. The GBE intervention was delivered over 6 weekly sessions to groups of 3 to 5 couples by lay peer educators in the communities in which the participants resided. Intervention components addressed relationship quality, resilience, communication and conflict negotiation, self-esteem, sexual communication and sexual health knowledge, and norms around IPV. Outcome evaluation included exit interviews with participants and peers to examine acceptance and feasibility challenges and baseline and 3-month follow-up interviews to examine change in IPV reporting and mental health (by women) and alcohol misuse (by men). The process evaluation examined dose delivered, dose received, fidelity, recruitment, participation rate, and context.

Results: Half (40/83) of the eligible couples approached agreed to participate in the GBE intervention. Retention rates were high (17/20, 85% across all 6 sessions), feedback from exit interviews suggested the content and delivery methods were very well received, and the community was highly supportive of the intervention. The principal feasibility challenge involved recruiting men with the lowest income who were dependent on daily wages. No safety concerns were reported by female participants over the course of the intervention or at the 3-month follow-up. There were no reported physical or sexual IPV events in either group, but there were fewer incidents of psychological abuse in GBE participants (3/17, 18%) versus control participants (4/16, 25%) at 3-month follow-up. There was also significant improvement in the overall mental health of female intervention participants and declines in the control participants (change in mean General Health Questionnaire-12 score: -0.13 in intervention vs 0.13 in controls; P=.10).

Conclusions: GBE has high acceptance, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy in preventing IPV and improving mental health among women. Next steps include refining the intervention content based on pilot findings and examining intervention efficacy through a large-scale randomized trial with longer follow-up.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03332134; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03332134. Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI/2018/01/011596; http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=21443.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/11533.

Keywords: India; acceptance; domestic violence; efficacy; feasibility; gender-based violence; intervention; intimate partner violence; mental health; pilot study; prevalence; prevention; safety; violence.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Ameeta Shivdas Kalokhe, Sandhya Iyer, Keshav Gadhe, Tuman Katendra, Ambika Kolhe, Girish Rahane, Rob Stephenson, Seema Sahay. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 01.02.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment and enrollment of participants into Ghya Bharari Ekatra intervention and control groups.

References

    1. Understanding and addressing violence against women. World Health Organization. 2012. [2021-01-19].
    1. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization. 2013. [2021-01-19]. .
    1. Sustainable Development Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. United Nations. [2021-01-19].
    1. Preventing Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence Against Women: taking action and generating evidence. World Health Organization. [2021-01-19]. .
    1. Saggurti N, Nair S, Silverman JG, Naik DD, Battala M, Dasgupta A, Balaiah D, Raj A. Impact of the RHANI Wives intervention on marital conflict and sexual coercion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jul;126(1):18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.01.015.
    1. Pronyk PM, Hargreaves JR, Kim JC, Morison LA, Phetla G, Watts C, Busza J, Porter JD. Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomised trial. The Lancet. 2006 Dec;368(9551):1973–1983. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69744-4.
    1. Gupta J, Falb KL, Lehmann H, Kpebo D, Xuan Z, Hossain M, Zimmerman C, Watts C, Annan J. Gender norms and economic empowerment intervention to reduce intimate partner violence against women in rural Côte d’Ivoire: a randomized controlled pilot study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013 Nov 1;13(1):46. doi: 10.1186/1472-698x-13-46.
    1. Peacock D, Levack A. The Men as Partners Program in South Africa: Reaching Men to End Gender-Based Violence and Promote Sexual and Reproductive Health. Int J Men's Health. 2004 Sep 1;3(3):173–188. doi: 10.3149/jmh.0303.173.
    1. Pulerwitz J, Michaelis A, Verma R, Weiss E. Addressing gender dynamics and engaging men in HIV programs: lessons learned from Horizons research. Public Health Rep. 2010 Mar;125(2):282–92. doi: 10.1177/003335491012500219.
    1. Hossain M, Zimmerman C, Kiss L, Abramsky T, Kone D, Bakayoko-Topolska M, Annan J, Lehmann H, Watts C. Working with men to prevent intimate partner violence in a conflict-affected setting: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial in rural Côte d'Ivoire. BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 10;14:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-339.
    1. Pulerwitz J, Hui W, Arney J, Scott LM. Changing Gender Norms and Reducing HIV and Violence Risk Among Workers and Students in China. J Health Commun. 2015 Aug;20(8):869–78. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018573.
    1. Jones DL, Peltzer K, Villar-Loubet O, Shikwane E, Cook R, Vamos S, Weiss SM. Reducing the risk of HIV infection during pregnancy among South African women: a randomized controlled trial. AIDS Care. 2013;25(6):702–9. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2013.772280.
    1. Jewkes R, Gibbs A, Jama-Shai N, Willan S, Misselhorn A, Mushinga M, Washington L, Mbatha N, Skiweyiya Y. Stepping Stones and Creating Futures intervention: shortened interrupted time series evaluation of a behavioural and structural health promotion and violence prevention intervention for young people in informal settlements in Durban, South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 29;14:1325. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1325.
    1. Jewkes R, Nduna M, Levin J, Jama N, Dunkle K, Khuzwayo N, Koss M, Puren A, Wood K, Duvvury N. A cluster randomized-controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of Stepping Stones in preventing HIV infections and promoting safer sexual behaviour amongst youth in the rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: trial design, methods and baseline findings. Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Jan;11(1):3–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01530.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01530.x.
    1. Green EP, Blattman C, Jamison J, Annan J. Women's entrepreneurship and intimate partner violence: A cluster randomized trial of microenterprise assistance and partner participation in post-conflict Uganda (SSM-D-14-01580R1) Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:177–88. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.042.
    1. Wagman JA, Gray RH, Campbell JC, Thoma M, Ndyanabo A, Ssekasanvu J, Nalugoda F, Kagaayi J, Nakigozi G, Serwadda D, Brahmbhatt H. Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort. The Lancet Global Health. 2015 Jan;3(1):e23–e33. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70344-4.
    1. Abramsky T, Devries K, Kiss L, Nakuti J, Kyegombe N, Starmann E, Cundill B, Francisco L, Kaye D, Musuya T, Michau L, Watts C. Findings from the SASA! Study: a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Med. 2014 Jul 31;12:122. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0122-5.
    1. Kalokhe AS, Iyer S, Katendra T, Gadhe K, Kolhe AR, Paranjape A, Del Rio C, Stephenson R, Sahay S. Primary Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence Among Recently Married Dyads Residing in the Slums of Pune, India: Development and Rationale for a Dyadic Intervention. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 18;8(1):e11533. doi: 10.2196/11533.
    1. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. International Institute for Population Sciences. 2017. [2018-10-01]. .
    1. Wolfe DA, Wekerle C, Scott K, Straatman A, Grasley C, Reitzel-Jaffe D. Dating violence prevention with at-risk youth: a controlled outcome evaluation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Apr;71(2):279–91. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.2.279.
    1. Foshee VA, Bauman KE, Ennett ST, Linder GF, Benefield T, Suchindran C. Assessing the long-term effects of the Safe Dates program and a booster in preventing and reducing adolescent dating violence victimization and perpetration. Am J Public Health. 2004 Apr;94(4):619–24. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.619.
    1. The Face of Global Sex 2007. First Sex: an opportunity of a lifetime. Durex Network. [2021-01-19]. .
    1. Lewis MA, McBride CM, Pollak KI, Puleo E, Butterfield RM, Emmons KM. Understanding health behavior change among couples: an interdependence and communal coping approach. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Mar;62(6):1369–80. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.006.
    1. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Fernandez ME. Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2011.
    1. Kalokhe AS, Iyer SR, Gadhe K, Katendra T, Paranjape A, Del Rio C, Stephenson R, Sahay S. Correlates of domestic violence perpetration reporting among recently-married men residing in slums in Pune, India. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0197303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197303.
    1. Kalokhe AS, Iyer SR, Kolhe AR, Dhayarkar S, Paranjape A, Del Rio C, Stephenson R, Sahay S. Correlates of domestic violence experience among recently-married women residing in slums in Pune, India. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195152.
    1. Mumbai (Greater Mumbai) City Census 2011 Data. Census Organization of India. [2021-01-19]. .
    1. Pune City Population 2011-2021. Census Organization of India. [2021-01-19]. .
    1. Kalokhe AS, Stephenson R, Kelley ME, Dunkle KL, Paranjape A, Solas V, Karve L, del Rio C, Sahay S. The Development and Validation of the Indian Family Violence and Control Scale. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0148120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148120.
    1. Putting Women First: Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Research on Domestic Violence Against Women. World Health Organization. 2001. [2021-01-19]. .
    1. Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):134–47. doi: 10.1177/1524839904273387.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel