CLUE: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of IV nicardipine versus labetalol use in the emergency department

W Frank Peacock, Joseph Varon, Brigitte M Baumann, Pierre Borczuk, Chad M Cannon, Abhinav Chandra, David M Cline, Deborah Diercks, Brian Hiestand, A Hsu, Preeti Jois-Bilowich, Brian Kaminski, Philip Levy, Richard M Nowak, Jon W Schrock, W Frank Peacock, Joseph Varon, Brigitte M Baumann, Pierre Borczuk, Chad M Cannon, Abhinav Chandra, David M Cline, Deborah Diercks, Brian Hiestand, A Hsu, Preeti Jois-Bilowich, Brian Kaminski, Philip Levy, Richard M Nowak, Jon W Schrock

Abstract

Introduction: Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of food and drug administration (FDA) recommended dosing of IV nicardipine versus IV labetalol for the management of acute hypertension.

Methods: Multicenter randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients had 2 systolic blood pressure (SBP) measures ≥180 mmHg and no contraindications to nicardipine or labetalol. Before randomization, the physician specified a target SBP ± 20 mmHg (the target range: TR). The primary endpoint was the percent of subjects meeting TR during the initial 30 minutes of treatment.

Results: Of 226 randomized patients, 110 received nicardipine and 116 labetalol. End organ damage preceded treatment in 143 (63.3%); 71 nicardipine and 72 labetalol patients. Median initial SBP was 212.5 (IQR 197, 230) and 212 mmHg (IQR 200,225) for nicardipine and labetalol patients (P = 0.68), respectively. Within 30 minutes, nicardipine patients more often reached TR than labetalol (91.7 vs. 82.5%, P = 0.039). Of 6 BP measures (taken every 5 minutes) during the study period, nicardipine patients had higher rates of five and six instances within TR than labetalol (47.3% vs. 32.8%, P = 0.026). Rescue medication need did not differ between nicardipine and labetalol (15.5 vs. 22.4%, P = 0.183). Labetalol patients had slower heart rates at all time points (P < 0.01). Multivariable modeling showed nicardipine patients were more likely in TR than labetalol patients at 30 minutes (OR 2.73, P = 0.028; C stat for model = 0.72)

Conclusions: Patients treated with nicardipine are more likely to reach the physician-specified SBP target range within 30 minutes than those treated with labetalol.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00765648.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient entry into CLUE trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SBP changes over time in patients randomized to receive either nicardipine or labetalol. Mean percent change and 95% confidence interval (CI), evaluated by Student's T test, relative to presenting blood pressure, during the initial 30 minutes, with the median upper level of target range and median target range indicated by horizontal dotted lines, in patients randomized to receive either nicardipine or labetalol. SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Heart rate changes over time in patients randomized to receive either nicardipine or labetalol. CI, confidence interval; HR, heart rate.

References

    1. Varon J, Marik PE. Clinical review: the management of hypertensive crisis. Crit Care. 2003;7:374–384. doi: 10.1186/cc2351.
    1. Webster J, Petrie JC, Jeffers TA, Lovell HG. Accelerated hypertension--patterns of mortality and clinical factors affecting outcome in treated patients. Q J Med. 1993;86:485–493.
    1. Mansoor GA, Frishman WH. Comprehensive management of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies. Heart Dis. 2002;4:358–371. doi: 10.1097/00132580-200211000-00005.
    1. Halpern NA, Sladen RN, Goldberg JS, Neely C, Wood M, Alicea M, Krakoff LR, Greenstein R. Nicardipine infusion for postoperative hypertension after surgery of the head and neck. Crit Care Med. 1990;18:950–955. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199009000-00009.
    1. Haas CE, LeBlanc JM. Acute postoperative hypertension: a review of therapeutic options. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61:1661–1673. quiz 74-75.
    1. Liu-Deryke X, Janisse J, Coplin WM, Parker D Jr, Norris G, Rhoney DH. A comparison of nicardipine and labetalol for acute hypertension management following stroke. Neurocrit Care. 2008;9:167–176. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9057-z.
    1. Varon J, Marik P. The diagnosis and management of hypertensive crisis. Chest. 2000;118:215.
    1. Wu MM, Chanmugam A. In: Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. 5. Tintinalli J, editor. McGraw-Hill; 2000. Hypertension; p. 401.
    1. Katz JN, Gore JM, Amin A, Anderson FA, Dasta JF, Ferguson JF, Kleinschmidt K, Mayer SA, Multz AS, Peacock WF, Peterson E, Pollack C, Sung GY, Shorr A, Varon J, Wyman A, Emery LA, Granger CB. STAT Investigators. Practice Patterns, Outcomes, and End-Organ Dysfunction for Patients with Acute Severe Hypertension: The Studying the Treatment of Acute hyperTension (STAT) Registry. Am Heart J. 2009;158:599–606. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.020.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel