β-Blockers and Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Without Heart Failure or Ventricular Dysfunction

Tatendashe B Dondo, Marlous Hall, Robert M West, Tomas Jernberg, Bertil Lindahl, Hector Bueno, Nicolas Danchin, John E Deanfield, Harry Hemingway, Keith A A Fox, Adam D Timmis, Chris P Gale, Tatendashe B Dondo, Marlous Hall, Robert M West, Tomas Jernberg, Bertil Lindahl, Hector Bueno, Nicolas Danchin, John E Deanfield, Harry Hemingway, Keith A A Fox, Adam D Timmis, Chris P Gale

Abstract

Background: For acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without heart failure (HF), it is unclear if β-blockers are associated with reduced mortality.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine the association between β-blocker use and mortality in patients with AMI without HF or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).

Methods: This cohort study used national English and Welsh registry data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project. A total of 179,810 survivors of hospitalization with AMI without HF or LVSD, between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2013 (final follow-up: December 31, 2013), were assessed. Survival-time inverse probability weighting propensity scores and instrumental variable analyses were used to investigate the association between the use of β-blockers and 1-year mortality.

Results: Of 91,895 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 87,915 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 88,542 (96.4%) and 81,933 (93.2%) received β-blockers, respectively. For the entire cohort, with >163,772 person-years of observation, there were 9,373 deaths (5.2%). Unadjusted 1-year mortality was lower for patients who received β-blockers compared with those who did not (4.9% vs. 11.2%; p < 0.001). However, after weighting and adjustment, there was no significant difference in mortality between those with and without β-blocker use (average treatment effect [ATE] coefficient: 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.60 to 0.75; p = 0.827). Findings were similar for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ATE coefficient: 0.30; 95% CI: -0.98 to 1.58; p = 0.637) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ATE coefficient: -0.07; 95% CI: -0.68 to 0.54; p = 0.819).

Conclusions: Among survivors of hospitalization with AMI who did not have HF or LVSD as recorded in the hospital, the use of β-blockers was not associated with a lower risk of death at any time point up to 1 year. (β-Blocker Use and Mortality in Hospital Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure; NCT02786654).

Keywords: NSTEMI; STEMI; average treatment effect; preserved left ventricular systolic function; propensity score; survival.

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Analytical Cohort Derivation Flowchart Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology diagram shows the derivation of the analytical cohort from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project dataset. AMI = acute myocardial infarction; CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; NSTEMI = non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimates (n = 16,683) In these adjusted survival curves according to prescription of β-blockers at discharge for the (A) AMI, (B) NSTEMI, and (C) STEMI groups, covariates and the inverse weighted propensity scores of receipt of care were adjusted for, and no statistical differences in survival were noted. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
β-Blockers and Mortality After AMI Without HF In this study, patients experiencing an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without heart failure (HF) or left ventricular systolic dysfunction were commonly prescribed β-blockers at hospital discharge (94.8%). However, in this nationwide observational study using propensity score analysis (1-year follow-up), the use of β-blockers was not associated with a significant difference in survival times after AMI.

References

    1. Capricorn Investigators Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;357:1385–1390.
    1. Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:801–807.
    1. Yusuf S., Wittes J., Friedman L. Overview of results of randomized clinical trials in heart disease: I. Treatments following myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1988;260:2088–2093.
    1. Chen Z., Pan H., Chen Y. Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1622–1632.
    1. Roffi M., Patrono C., Collet J.P. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J. 2016;37:267–315.
    1. Steg P.G., James S.K., Atar D. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569–2619.
    1. Amsterdam E.A., Wenger N.K., Brindis R.G. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:e139–e228.
    1. O'Gara P.T., Kushner F.G., Ascheim D.D. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:485–510.
    1. Huang B., Huang F., Zuo Z. Meta-analysis of relation between oral β-blocker therapy and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:1529–1538.
    1. Puymirat E., Riant E., Aissoui N. β-Blockers and mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure: multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2016;354:i4801.
    1. Chen Z.M., Pan H.C., Chen Y.P., COMMIT (Clopidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) Collaborative Group Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1622–1632.
    1. Herrett E., Smeeth L., Walker L., Weston C. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) Heart. 2010;96:1264–1267.
    1. Imai K., Ratkovic M. Covariate balancing propensity score. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2014;76:243–263.
    1. Austin P.C., Stuart E.A. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34:3661–3679.
    1. Hamm C., Bassand J., Agewall S., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2999–3054.
    1. Desta L., Jernberg T., Lofman I. Incidence, temporal trends, and prognostic impact of heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction. The SWEDEHEART Registry (Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies): a study of 199,851 patients admitted with index acute myocardial infarctions, 1996 to 2008. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2015;3:234–242.
    1. Fox K.A., Steg P.G., Eagle K.A. Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999-2006. JAMA. 2007;297:1892–1900.
    1. Timmis A., Rapsomaniki E., Chung S. Prolonged dual anti-platelet therapy in stable coronary disease: a comparative observational study of benefits and harms in unselected versus trial populations. BMJ. 2016;353:i3163.
    1. Freemantle N., Cleland J., Young P., Mason J., Harrison J. β Blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis. BMJ. 1999;318:1730–1737.
    1. Bangalore S., Steg G., Deedwania P. β-Blocker use and clinical outcomes in stable outpatients with and without coronary artery disease. JAMA. 2012;308:1340–1349.
    1. Melloni C., Alexander K.P., Ou F. Predictors of early discontinuation of evidence-based medicine after acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:175–181.
    1. Hjalmarson Å., Goldstein S., Fagerberg B. Effects of controlled-release metoprolol on total mortality, hospitalizations, and well-being in patients with heart failure: the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) JAMA. 2000;283:1295–1302.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel