Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison

Michelle R Rauzi, Jared R H Foran, Michael J Bade, Michelle R Rauzi, Jared R H Foran, Michael J Bade

Abstract

Background: The ideal treatment of early-stage arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the treatment effect, including variability, and feasibility of a multimodal physical therapy program as compared to manipulation under anesthesia.

Methods: This was a prospective feasibility study with a retrospective cohort comparison. Ten consecutive patients (aged 64 ± 9 years, 7 females) with early-stage arthrofibrosis were enrolled 6 weeks after primary total knee arthroplasty and participated in the multimodal physical therapy program. The multimodal physical therapy program consisted of manual therapy, therapeutic exercise, and static progressive splinting delivered over 4 weeks. The outcomes included knee range of motion (ROM), adherence, patient satisfaction, and safety. Data were compared to a retrospective cohort of 31 patients with arthrofibrosis (aged 65 ± 9 years, 20 females) who underwent manipulation under anesthesia followed by physical therapy.

Results: Overall, knee ROM outcomes were similar between multimodal physical therapy (110° ± 14) and manipulation under anesthesia (109° ± 11). Seven out of ten patients achieved functional ROM (≥ 110°) and avoided manipulation under anesthesia with the multimodal physical therapy program. Three out of 10 multimodal physical therapy patients required manipulation under anesthesia secondary to failure to demonstrate progress within 4 weeks of the multimodal physical therapy program. Adherence to the multimodal physical therapy program was 87 ± 9%. The median patient satisfaction with the multimodal physical therapy program was "very satisfied." Safety concerns were minimal.

Conclusion: The use of the multimodal physical therapy program is feasible for treating early-stage arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty, with 70% of patients avoiding manipulation under anesthesia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the efficacy of the multimodal physical therapy program and to determine the optimal patient selection for the multimodal physical therapy program versus manipulation under anesthesia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04837872 .

Keywords: Arthrofibrosis; Manual therapy; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Static progressive splinting; Total knee arthroplasty.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timeline of outcome assessments
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in knee flexion over time
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Changes in knee flexion for the MPT group (individual) compared to the MUA group

References

    1. Husain A, Lee G-C. Establishing realistic patient expectations following total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(12):707–713. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00049.
    1. Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(7):1479–84.
    1. Donaldson JR, Tudor F, Gollish J. Revision surgery for the stiff total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(5):622–627. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B5.35969.
    1. Kalson NS, Borthwick LA, Mann DA, Deehan DJ, Lewis P, Mann C, et al. International consensus on the definition and classification of fibrosis of the knee joint. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-b(11):1479–1488. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.98b10.37957.
    1. Yercan HS, Sugun TS, Bussiere C, Ait Si Selmi T, Davies A, Neyret P. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence, management and outcomes. Knee. 2006;13(2):111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2005.10.001.
    1. Desai AS, Karmegam A, Dramis A, Board TN, Raut V. Manipulation for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: when and how often to do it? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(7):1291–1295. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1387-7.
    1. Usher KM, Zhu S, Mavropalias G, Carrino JA, Zhao J, Xu J. Pathological mechanisms and therapeutic outlooks for arthrofibrosis. Bone Res. 2019;7:9. doi: 10.1038/s41413-019-0047-x.
    1. Rodríguez-Merchán EC. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causes, treatment modalities and results. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(10):602–10. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180105.
    1. Ghani H, Maffulli N, Khanduja V. Management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. 2012;19(6):751–9. 10.1016/j.knee.2012.02.010.
    1. Cheuy VA, Foran JRH, Paxton RJ, Bade MJ, Zeni JA, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(8):2604–2611. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.005.
    1. Fitzsimmons SE, Vazquez EA, Bronson MJ. How to treat the stiff total knee arthroplasty?: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(4):1096–1106. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1230-y.
    1. Gu A, Michalak AJ, Cohen JS, Almeida ND, McLawhorn AS, Sculco PK. Efficacy of manipulation under anesthesia for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1598–1605. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.054.
    1. Yoo JH, Oh JC, Oh HC, Park SH. Manipulation under anesthesia for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015;27(4):233–239. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.4.233.
    1. Keating EM, Ritter MA, Harty LD, Haas G, Meding JB, Faris PM, et al. Manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(2):282–286. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.E.00205.
    1. Colacchio ND, Abela D, Bono JV, Shah VM, Bono OJ, Scott RD. Efficacy of manipulation under anesthesia beyond three months following total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today. 2019;5(4):515–520. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.08.002.
    1. Choi HR, Siliski J, Malchau H, Freiberg A, Rubash H, Kwon YM. How often is functional range of motion obtained by manipulation for stiff total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop. 2014;38(8):1641–1645. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2421-z.
    1. Daluga D, Lombardi AV, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK. Knee manipulation following total knee arthroplasty. 1991;6(2):119–28. 10.1016/s0883-5403(11)80006-9.
    1. Choi HR, Siliski JM, Malchau H, Kwon YM. Effect of repeated manipulation on range of motion in patients with stiff total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2015;38(3):e157–e162. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150305-51.
    1. Jansen MJ, Viechtbauer W, Lenssen AF, Hendriks EJ, de Bie RA. Strength training alone, exercise therapy alone, and exercise therapy with passive manual mobilisation each reduce pain and disability in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2011;57(1):11–20. doi: 10.1016/s1836-9553(11)70002-9.
    1. Dávila Castrodad IM, Recai TM, Abraham MM, Etcheson JI, Mohamed NS, Edalatpour A, et al. Rehabilitation protocols following total knee arthroplasty: a review of study designs and outcome measures. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(Suppl 7):S255. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.15.
    1. Pozzi F, Snyder-Mackler L, Zeni J. Physical exercise after knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of controlled trials. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;49(6):877–892.
    1. Bonutti PM, Marulanda GA, McGrath MS, Mont MA, Zywiel MG. Static progressive stretch improves range of motion in arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(2):194–199. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0947-1.
    1. Chughtai M, McGinn T, Bhave A, Khan S, Vashist M, Khlopas A, et al. Innovative multimodal physical therapy reduces incidence of repeat manipulation under anesthesia in post-total knee arthroplasty patients who had an initial manipulation under anesthesia. J Knee Surg. 2016;29(8):639–644. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592339.
    1. Seyler TM, Marker DR, Bhave A, Plate JF, Marulanda GA, Bonutti PM, et al. Functional problems and arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 3):59–69. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00457.
    1. Laubenthal KN, Smidt GL, Kettelkamp DB. A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living. Phys Ther. 1972;52(1):34–42. doi: 10.1093/ptj/52.1.34.
    1. Bailey M, Maillardet F, Messenger N. Kinematics of cycling in relation to anterior knee pain and patellar tendinitis. J Sports Sci. 2003;21(8):649–657. doi: 10.1080/0264041031000102015.
    1. Norkin CC. Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. 4. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2009.
    1. Abbott JH. The distinction between randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and preliminary feasibility and pilot studies: what they are and are not. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(8):555–558. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.0110.
    1. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
    1. Sodhi N, Yao B, Anis HK, Khlopas A, Sultan AA, Newman JM, et al. Patient satisfaction and outcomes of static progressive stretch bracing: a 10-year prospective analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(4):67. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.08.31.
    1. Jakobsen TL, Christensen M, Christensen SS, Olsen M, Bandholm T. Reliability of knee joint range of motion and circumference measurements after total knee arthroplasty: does tester experience matter? Physiother Res Int. 2010;15(3):126–134. doi: 10.1002/pri.450.
    1. Bade MJ, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Early high-intensity rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty improves outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(12):932–941. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3734.
    1. Ipach I, Mittag F, Lahrmann J, Kunze B, Kluba T. Arthrofibrosis after TKA - influence factors on the absolute flexion and gain in flexion after manipulation under anaesthesia. 2011;12(1):184. 10.1186/1471-2474-12-184.
    1. Dzaja I, Vasarhelyi EM, Lanting BA, Naudie DD, Howard JL, Somerville L, et al. Knee manipulation under anaesthetic following total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort design. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-b(12):1640–1644. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b12.35767.
    1. Ferrel JR, Davis RL, 2nd, Agha OA, Politi JR. Repeat manipulation under anesthesia for persistent stiffness after total knee arthroplasty achieves functional range of motion. Surg Technol Int. 2015;26:256–260.
    1. Issa K, Banerjee S, Kester MA, Khanuja HS, Delanois RE, Mont MA. The effect of timing of manipulation under anesthesia to improve range of motion and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(16):1349–1357. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.M.00899.
    1. Bade MJ, Kittelson JM, Kohrt WM, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Predicting functional performance and range of motion outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(7):579–585. doi: 10.1097/phm.0000000000000065.
    1. Bialosky JE, Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, Coronado RA, Penza CW, Simon CB, et al. Unraveling the mechanisms of manual therapy: modeling an approach. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(1):8–18. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7476.
    1. Threlkeld AJ. The effects of manual therapy on connective tissue. Phys Ther. 1992;72(12):893–902. doi: 10.1093/ptj/72.12.893.
    1. Hwang YG, Kwoh CK. The meteor trial: no rush to repair a torn meniscus. 2014;81(4):226–32. 10.3949/ccjm.81a.13075.
    1. Murphy SA. An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Stat Med. 2005;24(10):1455–1481. doi: 10.1002/sim.2022.
    1. Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. Bmj. 2015;350:h391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h391.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel