Evaluation of Intense Androgen Deprivation Before Prostatectomy: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Enzalutamide and Leuprolide With or Without Abiraterone

Rana R McKay, Huihui Ye, Wanling Xie, Rosina Lis, Carla Calagua, Zhenwei Zhang, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Steven L Chang, Lauren C Harshman, Ashley E Ross, Kenneth J Pienta, Daniel W Lin, William J Ellis, Bruce Montgomery, Peter Chang, Andrew A Wagner, Glenn J Bubley, Adam S Kibel, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Rana R McKay, Huihui Ye, Wanling Xie, Rosina Lis, Carla Calagua, Zhenwei Zhang, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Steven L Chang, Lauren C Harshman, Ashley E Ross, Kenneth J Pienta, Daniel W Lin, William J Ellis, Bruce Montgomery, Peter Chang, Andrew A Wagner, Glenn J Bubley, Adam S Kibel, Mary-Ellen Taplin

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with locally advanced prostate cancer have an increased risk of cancer recurrence and mortality. In this phase II trial, we evaluate neoadjuvant enzalutamide and leuprolide (EL) with or without abiraterone and prednisone (ELAP) before radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Patients and methods: Eligible patients had a biopsy Gleason score of 4 + 3 = 7 or greater, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 20 ng/mL, or T3 disease (by prostate magnetic resonance imaging). Lymph nodes were required to be smaller than 20 mm. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to ELAP or EL for 24 weeks followed by RP. All specimens underwent central pathology review. The primary end point was pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease (residual tumor ≤ 5 mm). Secondary end points were PSA, surgical staging, positive margins, and safety. Biomarkers associated with pathologic outcomes were explored.

Results: Seventy-five patients were enrolled at four centers. Most patients had high-risk disease by National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria (n = 65; 87%). The pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease rate was 30% (n = 15 of 50) in ELAP-treated patients and 16% (n = four of 25) in EL-treated patients (two-sided P = .263). Rates of ypT3 disease, positive margins, and positive lymph nodes were similar between arms. Treatment was well-tolerated. Residual tumors in the two arms showed comparable levels of ERG, PTEN, androgen receptor PSA, and glucocorticoid receptor expression. Tumor ERG positivity and PTEN loss were associated with more extensive residual tumors at RP.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant hormone therapy followed by RP in locally advanced prostate cancer resulted in favorable pathologic responses in some patients, with a trend toward improved pathologic outcomes with ELAP. Longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate the impact of therapy on recurrence rates. The potential association of ERG and PTEN alterations with worse outcomes warrants additional investigation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02268175.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram. Newly diagnosed unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk patients with prostate cancer were randomly assigned 2:1 to abiraterone, enzalutamide, leuprolide, and prednisone versus enzalutamide and leuprolide for 24 weeks followed by radical prostatectomy. (*) One patient allocated to the abiraterone, enzalutamide, leuprolide, and prednisone arm had a delay in radical prostatectomy by 2 months.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel