Office Hysteroscopic Laser Enucleation of Submucous Myomas without Mass Extraction: A Case Series Study

Sergio Haimovich, Maite López-Yarto, Julio Urresta Ávila, Alejandro Saavedra Tascón, José L Hernández, Ramón Carreras Collado, Sergio Haimovich, Maite López-Yarto, Julio Urresta Ávila, Alejandro Saavedra Tascón, José L Hernández, Ramón Carreras Collado

Abstract

Background and Objectives. A new two-step hysteroscopic myomectomy carried out in the office setting and without anesthesia was feasible for the excision of submucous myomas. The objective of this study was to assess whether removal of submucous myomas from the uterine cavity after hysteroscopic laser enucleation is necessary. Methods. Between June 2009 and April 2013, all outpatients with symptomatic myomatosis (bleeding, pelvic pain, and infertility) assessed ultrasonographically were eligible to participate in a prospective study. All patients underwent office hysteroscopic enucleation of submucous myomas. Enucleated myomas were left in the uterine cavity. Neither anesthesia nor antibiotic prophylaxis was used. Results. Sixty-one women (mean age: 47.3 years) were included. Regardless of hysteroscopic localization and grading, all myomas were enucleated. The mean (standard deviation, SD) diameter of the myoma as measured by the ultrasound scan was 22.6 (8.5) mm. In 29 cases (47.5%), the diameter of the resected myoma was >20 mm and in 10 cases (16.4%) >30 mm. After a mean follow-up of 68.2 (16.5) days, none of the patients showed a residual myoma inside the uterine cavity. Conclusions. The present results indicate that leaving laser-enucleated submucous myoma in the uterine cavity is a feasible and safe therapeutic option.

References

    1. Guo X. C., Segars J. H. The impact and management of fibroids for fertility: an evidence-based approach. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2012;39(4):521–533. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.09.005.
    1. Duhan N., Sirohiwal D. Uterine myomas revisited. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2010;152(2):119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.05.010.
    1. Baird D. D., Dunson D. B., Hill M. C., Cousins D., Schectman J. M. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2003;188(1):100–107. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.99.
    1. Lasmar R. B., Barrozo P. R. M., Dias R., de Oliveira M. A. P. Submucous myomas: a new presurgical classification to evaluate the viability of hysteroscopic surgical treatment—preliminary report. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2005;12(4):308–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.05.014.
    1. Di Spiezio Sardo A., Mazzon I., Bramante S., et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques. Human Reproduction Update. 2008;14(2):101–119. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmm041.
    1. Roy K. K., Singla S., Baruah J., Sharma J. B., Kumar S., Singh N. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic myomectomy in patients with infertility and recurrent abortions. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2010;282(5):553–560. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1531-0.
    1. Valle R. F., Baggish M. S. Hysteroscopic myomectomy. In: Baggish M. S., Valle R. F., Guedj H., editors. Hysteroscopy. Visual Perspectives of Uterine Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology Diagnostic and Operative Hysteroscopy. 3rd. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer; 2007. pp. 385–404.
    1. Mettler L., Schollmeyer T., Tinelli A., Malvasi A., Alkatout I. Complications of uterine fibroids and their management, surgical management of fibroids, laparoscopy and hysteroscopy versus hysterectomy, haemorrhage, adhesions, and complications. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2012;2012:8. doi: 10.1155/2012/791248.791248
    1. Camanni M., Bonino L., Tessarolo M., Migliaretti G., Ferrero B., Deltetto F. Is it possible to obtain a presurgical Lasmar score for hysteroscopic myomectomy by ultrasound alone? Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012;40(1):106–111. doi: 10.1002/uog.11165.
    1. Negm S. M. M., Kamel R. A., Momtaz M., Magdi A. M., Azab H. S. Correlation between three dimensional multi-slice sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis and classification of submucous myomas. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2010;15(3):209–215. doi: 10.1016/j.mefs.2010.07.004.
    1. Vercellini P., Zàina B., Yaylayan L., Pisacreta A., De Giorgi O., Crosignani P. G. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: long-term effects on menstrual pattern and fertility. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;94(3):341–347. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00346-4.
    1. Takeda A., Manabe S., Hosono S., Nakamura H. Preoperative evaluation of submucosal myoma by virtual hysteroscopy. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. 2004;11(3):404–409. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60058-8.
    1. Wamsteker K., Emanuel M. H., de Kruif J. H. Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: results regarding the degree of intramural extension. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1993;82(5):736–740.
    1. Hamerlynck T. W. O., Dietz V., Schoot B. C. Clinical implementation of the hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine myomas and polyps. A retrospective descriptive study. Gynecological Surgery. 2011;8(2):193–196. doi: 10.1007/s10397-010-0627-7.
    1. van Dongen H., Emanuel M. H., Wolterbeek R., Trimbos J. B., Jansen F. W. Hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine polyps and myomas: a randomized controlled pilot study among residents in training. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2008;15(4):466–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.02.002.
    1. Haimovich S., Mancebo G., Alameda F., et al. Feasibility of a new two-step procedure for office hysteroscopic resection of submucous myomas: results of a pilot study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2013;168(2):191–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.01.002.
    1. Haimovich S., Mancebo G., Alameda F., Agramunt S., Hernández J. L., Carreras R. Endometrial preparation with desogestrel before Essure hysteroscopic sterilization: preliminary study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2013;20(5):591–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.003.
    1. D'Angelo E., Prat J. Uterine sarcomas: a review. Gynecologic Oncology. 2010;116(1):131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.023.
    1. Parker W. H., Fu Y. S., Berek J. S. Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing leiomyoma. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1994;83(3):414–418.
    1. Pritts E. A., Parker W. H., Brown J., Olive D. L. Outcome of occult uterine leiomyosarcoma after surgery for presumed uterine fibroids: a systematic review. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2015;22(1):26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.781.
    1. Solima E., Brusati V., Ditto A., et al. Hysteroscopy in endometrial cancer: new methods to evaluate transtubal leakage of saline distension medium. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;198(2):214.e1–214.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.035.
    1. Berry E., Lindheim S. R., Connor J. P., et al. Sonohysterography and endometrial cancer: incidence and functional viability of disseminated malignant cells. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;199(3):240.e1–240.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.042.
    1. Bettocchi S., Di Spiezio Sardo A., Ceci O., et al. A new hysteroscopic technique for the preparation of partially intramural myomas in office setting (OPPIuM technique): a pilot study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2009;16(6):748–754. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.07.016.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel