An audit of oral administration of Angusta® (misoprostol) 25 µg for induction of labor in 976 consecutive women with a singleton pregnancy in a university hospital in Denmark

Rikke B Helmig, Lone E Hvidman, Rikke B Helmig, Lone E Hvidman

Abstract

Introduction: Induction of labor (IOL) is used to improve the outcome of pregnancy for mother and child. Since 2013, oral misoprostol has been used for IOL at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The purpose of the present paper is to describe our experience of the use of a new, 25-µg misoprostol tablet commercially manufactured for the purpose of IOL regarding efficacy and outcome for mother and neonate in both an inpatient and an outpatient regimen.

Material and methods: We performed an audit from 1 April 2016, including data on all IOL in women with singleton pregnancies until 1000 consecutive women were registered. Data from 976 consecutive women with gestational age ≥37+0 weeks induced in accordance with the "Aarhus protocol" were included in the present analyses. All inductions were by oral misoprostol. Outpatient induction is standard procedure in low-risk pregnancies, that is, pregnancies with a healthy mother and no signs of placental insufficiency. In the outpatient IOL, the first dose of misoprostol is administered after a normal cardiotocography registration at the hospital. Subsequent doses are taken at home according to a predefined regimen. Following delivery, data on baseline variables and outcome variables for the mother and neonate were retrieved from the medical records.

Results: In 71.9% of cases, the women were induced in an outpatient regimen. Delivery within 24 hours was achieved in 38.8% of women (nulliparous 32.3%, multiparous 50.9%) and within 48 hours in 70.1% (nulliparous 66.2%, multiparous 77.2%). Hyperstimulation during induction occurred in 0.6%. The mode of delivery was spontaneous vaginal in 75.5% of cases. The cesarean section rate was 14.9% (nulliparous 20.7%, multiparous 4.1%). Apgar <7 at 5 minutes and pH <7.0 in the umbilical artery was seen in 0.9% and 0.7%, respectively.

Conclusions: Induction of labor by a commercially produced low-dose (25 µg) misoprostol tablet for oral induction according to the "Aarhus protocol" is feasible in an outpatient as well as an inpatient regimen. Delivery was achieved within 48 hours for 70.1% of women. Few adverse events were seen; however, the audit was underpowered for safety.

Keywords: delivery; labor induction-outpatient; obstetric; oral misoprostol; prostaglandins.

© 2020 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

References

REFERENCES

    1. National Health Data Authority. Date 12.05.2019.
    1. Kelly AJ, Alfirevic Z, Ghosh A. Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(11):CD007372.
    1. Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(6):CD001338.
    1. Shetty A, Danielian P, Templeton A. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term. BJOG. 2001;108:238-243.
    1. Weeks AD, Navaratnam K, Alfirevic Z. Simplifying oral misoprostol protocols for the induction of labour. BJOG. 2017;124:1642-1645.
    1. Dos Santos F, Drymiotou S, Antequera Martin A, et al. Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study. BJOG. 2018;125:1673-1680.
    1. Robson M, Murphy M, Byrn F. Quality assurance: The 10-Group Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131:S23-S27.
    1. Bendix JM, Petersen JF, Andersen BR, Bødker B, Løkkegaard EC. Induction of labor with high- or low-dosage oral misoprostol- A Danish descriptive retrospective cohort study 2015-16. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;00:1-9.
    1. Palomäki O, Eerikäinen H, Huhtala H, et al. Prediction of successful labor induction by evaluation of maternal symptoms at an early stage of the misoprostol induction protocol. J. Perinat. Med. 2011;39:299-304.
    1. Kundodyiwa TW, Alfirevic Z, Weeks AD. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:374-383.
    1. Petersen JF, Bergholt T, Løkkegaard ECL. Safe induction of labour with low-dose misoprostol, but less effective than the conventional dinoprostone regimen. Dan Med J. 2013;60:A4706.
    1. Wallstrom T, Jarnbert-Pettersson H, Stenson D, et al. Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6840592.
    1. Danish Quality Database on Deliveries.
    1. Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys Lancet Glob. Health. 2015;3:e260-e270.
    1. Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:297-308.
    1. Kramer MS, Dahhou M, Vallerand D, Liston R, Joseph KS. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage: can we explain the recent temporal increase? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33:810-819.
    1. Rauf Z, Alfirevic Z. Outpatient approaches to elective induction of labor: past, present, and future. Clin Obst Gynecol. 2014;57:391-400.
    1. Turnbull D, Adelson P, Oster C, Bryce R, Fereday J, Wilkinson C. Psychosocial outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of outpatient cervical priming for induction of labor. Birth. 2013;40:75-80.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel