Circulating miR-150 in CSF is a novel candidate biomarker for multiple sclerosis

Petra Bergman, Eliane Piket, Mohsen Khademi, Tojo James, Lou Brundin, Tomas Olsson, Fredrik Piehl, Maja Jagodic, Petra Bergman, Eliane Piket, Mohsen Khademi, Tojo James, Lou Brundin, Tomas Olsson, Fredrik Piehl, Maja Jagodic

Abstract

Objective: To explore circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in cell-free CSF as novel biomarkers for multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods: Profiling of miRNAs in CSF of pooled patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), patients with relapsing-remitting MS, and inflammatory and noninflammatory neurologic disease controls was performed using TaqMan miRNA arrays. Two independent patient cohorts (n = 142 and n = 430) were used for validation with real-time PCR.

Results: We reliably detected 88 CSF miRNAs in the exploratory cohort. Subsequent validation in 2 cohorts demonstrated significantly higher levels of miR-150 in patients with MS. Higher miR-150 levels were also observed in patients with CIS who converted to MS compared to nonconverters, and in patients initiating natalizumab treatment. Levels of miR-150 correlated with immunologic parameters including CSF cell count, immunoglobulin G index, and presence of oligoclonal bands, and with candidate protein biomarkers C-X-C motif chemokine 13, matrix metallopeptidase 9, and osteopontin. Correlation with neurofilament light chain (NFL) was observed only when NFL was adjusted for age using a method that requires further validation. Additionally, miR-150 discriminated MS from controls and CIS converters from nonconverters equally well as the most informative protein biomarkers. Following treatment with natalizumab, but not fingolimod, CSF levels of miR-150 decreased, while plasma levels increased with natalizumab and decreased with fingolimod, suggesting immune cells as a source of miR-150.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate miR-150 as a putative novel biomarker of inflammatory active disease with the potential to be used for early diagnosis of MS.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that CSF miR-150 distinguishes patients with MS from patients with other neurologic conditions.

Figures

Figure 1. Levels of miR-150 are elevated…
Figure 1. Levels of miR-150 are elevated in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) who convert to MS
Relative levels of mature microRNAs (miRNAs) were measured using multiplexed specific TaqMan miRNA assays and normalized to an average of 3 spike-ins (cel-miR-39, cel-miR-54, and cel-miR-238). Levels of (A) miR-150 are significantly different between disease groups, while (B) there was no difference between levels of miR-145. Levels of miR-150 are also (C) higher in patients with CIS who converted to MS (CIS-MS) compared to those who never converted and (D) can discriminate MS from noninflammatory neurologic disease controls (NINDCs) based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Graph intersection indicates the cutoff value for miR-150 that proved the best specificity and sensitivity. Levels of miR-150 in relation to descriptive disease parameters (E) oligoclonal bands (OCB), (F) relapse and remission, (G) number of MRI lesions, and (H) subsequent treatment with natalizumab. Lines in dot plots represent median and interquartile range. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. INDC = inflammatory neurologic disease controls.
Figure 2. Levels of miR-150 are altered…
Figure 2. Levels of miR-150 are altered in CSF and plasma following treatment with disease-modifying drugs
Relative levels of mature miR-150 were measured in CSF and in plasma from patients with multiple sclerosis treated with (A,B) natalizumab and (C,D) fingolimod at baseline and at 12 months. Quantification was performed using multiplexed specific TaqMan microRNA assays and normalized to an average of 3 spike-ins (cel-miR-39, cel-miR-54, and cel-miR-238). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3. MicroRNA (miRNA) pairs can be…
Figure 3. MicroRNA (miRNA) pairs can be used to normalize miRNA levels
The ratio of miR-150 and miR-204, calculated and normalized using the ΔΔCT method (see Methods), is significantly different (A) between disease groups and (B) between patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) who have converted or not converted to multiple sclerosis (MS). The miR-150/miR-204 ratio improves (C) the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) (AUC) curve, indicating improved specificity and sensitivity to discriminate MS from noninflammatory neurologic disease controls (NINDC) compared to miR-150 normalized to spike-ins. The miR-150/204 ratio can furthermore (D) predict conversion from CIS to MS as indicated by the ROC curve generated to compare converters and nonconverters. The miR-150/miR-204 ratio is an independent significant (p = 0.017) predictor of conversion when known risk factors such as age, oligoclonal bands (OCB), and MRI lesions are taken into account, and it can improve their combined predictive value. Lines represent (A, B) median and interquartile range. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. INDC = inflammatory neurologic disease controls.

References

    1. Piehl F. A changing treatment landscape for multiple sclerosis: challenges and opportunities. J Intern Med 2014;275:364–381.
    1. Comabella M, Montalban X. Body fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:113–126.
    1. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004;116:281–297.
    1. Engels BM, Hutvagner G. Principles and effects of microRNA-mediated post-transcriptional gene regulation. Oncogene 2006;25:6163–6169.
    1. Weber JA, Baxter DH, Zhang S, et al. The microRNA spectrum in 12 body fluids. Clin Chem 2010;56:1733–1741.
    1. Valadi H, Ekstrom K, Bossios A, Sjostrand M, Lee JJ, Lotvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007;9:654–659.
    1. Gandhi R, Healy B, Gholipour T, et al. Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for disease staging in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2013;73:729–740.
    1. Fenoglio C, Ridolfi E, Cantoni C, et al. Decreased circulating miRNA levels in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2013;19:1938–1942.
    1. Siegel SR, Mackenzie J, Chaplin G, Jablonski NG, Griffiths L. Circulating microRNAs involved in multiple sclerosis. Mol Biol Rep 2012;39:6219–6225.
    1. Haghikia A, Haghikia A, Hellwig K, et al. Regulated microRNAs in the CSF of patients with multiple sclerosis: a case-control study. Neurology 2012;79:2166–2170.
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria.” Ann Neurol 2005;58:840–846.
    1. Khademi M, Dring AM, Gilthorpe JD, et al. Intense inflammation and nerve damage in early multiple sclerosis subsides at older age: a reflection by cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. PLoS One 2013;8:e63172.
    1. Teunissen CE, Petzold A, Bennett JL, et al. A consensus protocol for the standardization of cerebrospinal fluid collection and biobanking. Neurology 2009;73:1914–1922.
    1. Sondergaard HB, Hesse D, Krakauer M, Sorensen PS, Sellebjerg F. Differential microRNA expression in blood in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2013;19:1849–1857.
    1. Keller A, Leidinger P, Lange J, et al. Multiple sclerosis: microRNA expression profiles accurately differentiate patients with relapsing-remitting disease from healthy controls. PLoS One 2009;4:e7440.
    1. Martinelli-Boneschi F, Fenoglio C, Brambilla P, et al. MicroRNA and mRNA expression profile screening in multiple sclerosis patients to unravel novel pathogenic steps and identify potential biomarkers. Neurosci Lett 2012;508:4–8.
    1. Jernas M, Malmestrom C, Axelsson M, et al. MicroRNA regulate immune pathways in T-cells in multiple sclerosis (MS). BMC Immunol 2013;14:32.
    1. Roberts TC, Coenen-Stass AM, Wood MJ. Assessment of RT-qPCR normalization strategies for accurate quantification of extracellular microRNAs in murine serum. PLoS One 2014;9:e89237.
    1. Kroh EM, Parkin RK, Mitchell PS, Tewari M. Analysis of circulating microRNA biomarkers in plasma and serum using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). Methods 2010;50:298–301.
    1. Boeri M, Verri C, Conte D, et al. MicroRNA signatures in tissues and plasma predict development and prognosis of computed tomography detected lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:3713–3718.
    1. Povlishock JT. Pathobiology of traumatically induced axonal injury in animals and man. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:980–986.
    1. Lycke JN, Karlsson JE, Andersen O, Rosengren LE. Neurofilament protein in cerebrospinal fluid: a potential marker of activity in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:402–404.
    1. Vågberg M, Norgren N, Dring A, et al. Levels and age dependency of neurofilament light and glial fibrillary acidic protein in healthy individuals and their relation to the brain parenchymal fraction. PLoS One 2015;10:e0135886.
    1. Junker A, Krumbholz M, Eisele S, et al. MicroRNA profiling of multiple sclerosis lesions identifies modulators of the regulatory protein CD47. Brain 2009;132:3342–3352.
    1. Bjersing JL, Lundborg C, Bokarewa MI, Mannerkorpi K. Profile of cerebrospinal microRNAs in fibromyalgia. PLoS One 2013;8:e78762.
    1. Holm A, Bang-Berthelsen CH, Knudsen S, et al. MiRNA profiles in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with central hypersomnias. J Neurol Sci 2014;347:199–204.
    1. Denk J, Boelmans K, Siegismund C, Lassner D, Arlt S, Jahn H. MicroRNA profiling of CSF reveals potential biomarkers to detect Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One 2015;10:e0126423.
    1. Burgos KL, Javaherian A, Bomprezzi R, et al. Identification of extracellular miRNA in human cerebrospinal fluid by next-generation sequencing. RNA 2013;19:712–722.
    1. Stuve O, Marra CM, Jerome KR, et al. Immune surveillance in multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab. Ann Neurol 2006;59:743–747.
    1. Chun J, Hartung HP. Mechanism of action of oral fingolimod (FTY720) in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neuropharmacol 2010;33:91–101.
    1. de Candia P, Torri A, Gorletta T, et al. Intracellular modulation, extracellular disposal and serum increase of MiR-150 mark lymphocyte activation. PLoS One 2013;8:e75348.
    1. Li J, Zhang Y, Liu Y, et al. Microvesicle-mediated transfer of microRNA-150 from monocytes to endothelial cells promotes angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 2013;288:23586–23596.
    1. Stangel M, Fredrikson S, Meinl E, Petzold A, Stuve O, Tumani H. The utility of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in patients with multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9:267–276.
    1. Xiao C, Calado DP, Galler G, et al. MiR-150 controls B cell differentiation by targeting the transcription factor c-Myb. Cell 2007;131:146–159.
    1. Zhou B, Wang S, Mayr C, Bartel DP, Lodish HF. miR-150, a microRNA expressed in mature B and T cells, blocks early B cell development when expressed prematurely. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:7080–7085.
    1. Ghisi M, Corradin A, Basso K, et al. Modulation of microRNA expression in human T-cell development: targeting of NOTCH3 by miR-150. Blood 2011;117:7053–7062.
    1. Trifari S, Pipkin ME, Bandukwala HS, et al. MicroRNA-directed program of cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:18608–18613.
    1. Mittelbrunn M, Gutierrez-Vazquez C, Villarroya-Beltri C, et al. Unidirectional transfer of microRNA-loaded exosomes from T cells to antigen-presenting cells. Nat Commun 2011;2:282.
    1. Zhang Y, Liu D, Chen X, et al. Secreted monocytic miR-150 enhances targeted endothelial cell migration. Mol Cell 2010;39:133–144.
    1. Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res 2008;18:997–1006.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel