Interfractional change of high-risk CTV D90 during image-guided brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer

Yu Ohkubo, Tatsuya Ohno, Shin-ei Noda, Nobuteru Kubo, Akiko Nakagawa, Masahiro Kawahara, Takanori Abe, Hiroki Kiyohara, Masaru Wakatsuki, Takashi Nakano, Yu Ohkubo, Tatsuya Ohno, Shin-ei Noda, Nobuteru Kubo, Akiko Nakagawa, Masahiro Kawahara, Takanori Abe, Hiroki Kiyohara, Masaru Wakatsuki, Takashi Nakano

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate interfractional changes of the minimum dose delivered to 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV D90) and D2cc of the bladder and rectum during brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer patients. A total of 52 patients received external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). For each of four ICBT applications, a pelvic CT scan was performed and the HR-CTV was delineated. Retrospectively, these patients were divided into two groups: (i) the standard dose group with 6 Gy to point A in each ICBT, and (ii) the adaptive dose group with a modified dose to point A to cover the HR-CTV with the 6-Gy isodose line as much as possible. The HR-CTV D90 was assessed in every session, and analyzed as interfractional changes. In the standard dose group, the interfractional changes of the HR-CTV D90 showed a linear increase from the first to the third of the four ICBT (average 6.1, 6.6, 7.0 and 7.1 Gy, respectively). In contrast, those of the adaptive dose group remained almost constant (average 7.2, 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4 Gy, respectively). Especially, in the case of a large HR-CTV volume (≥35 cm(3)) at first ICBT, the total HR-CTV D90 of the adaptive dose group with brachytherapy was significantly higher than that of the standard dose group. There were no significant differences in total D2cc in bladder and rectum between the two groups. Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy based on interfractional tumor volume change improves the dose to the HR-CTV while keeping rectal and bladder doses within acceptable levels.

Keywords: 3D image-based planning; dose-volume histogram analysis; high-dose-rate brachytherapy; radiotherapy; uterine cervical cancer.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Axial computed tomography image of an example case of ICBT. (A) A dose of 6 Gy was administered to point A. The high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) was not covered with the 6-Gy isodose line. (B) A dose of 7 Gy was prescribed to point A. The 6-Gy isodose line almost encompasses the HR-CTV.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Changes during treatment time-course of prescribed point A dose (A), and the HR-CTV D90 (B) of first to fourth HDR-ICBT. In the standard dose group, the first and second HR-CTV D90 were significantly lower than those of the adaptive dose group. Circles and solid lines show the averages for the standard dose group; boxes and dotted lines show the averages for the adaptive dose group. Bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 by Mann–Whitney U test.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Changes in the HR-CTV D90 and volume during treatment time-course in differentiated pretreatment tumor size groups. A small group (≤4 cm) is shown in (A) and (D), a medium group (4–6 cm) in (B) and (E), and a large group (≥6 cm) in (C) and (F). At first ICBT, the HR-CTV D90 in the standard dose group was significantly lower than in the adaptive dose group for the medium and large tumor groups. Circles and solid lines show averages for the standard dose group; boxes and dotted lines show averages for the adaptive dose group. Bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 by Mann-Whitney U test.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Changes in the HR-CTV D90 and volume during treatment time-course in differentiated HR-CTV volumes at first ICBT. The ‘small’ group (3) is shown in (A) (C) and the ‘large’ group (≥35 cm3) in (B) (D). At first, second and third ICBT, the HR-CTV D90 in the standard dose group was significantly lower than in the adaptive dose group in the large tumor groups. In the adaptive dose group, the HR-CTV volume at second ICBT diminished more steeply in the large tumor groups. Circles and solid lines show averages for the standard dose group; boxes and dotted lines show averages for the adaptive dose group. Bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 by Mann–Whitney U test.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Changes in D2cc of bladder and rectum during treatment time-course in differentiated HR-CTV volumes at first ICBT. A small group (3) is shown in (A) and (C) and a large group (≥35 cm3) in (B) and (D). Circles and solid lines show averages for the standard dose group; boxes and dotted lines show averages for the adaptive dose group. Bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 by Mann–Whitney U test.

References

    1. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Bethesda, MD: ICRU; 1985. Dose and volume specification for reporting intracavitary therapy in gynecology. ICRU Report 38.
    1. Haie-Meder C, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image-based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol. 2005;74:235–45.
    1. Pötter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78:67–77.
    1. Dimopoulos JCA, Lang S, Kirisits C, et al. Dose-volume histogram parameters and local tumor control in magnetic resonance image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:56–63.
    1. Pötter R, Georg P, Dimopoulos JCA, et al. Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2011;100:116–23.
    1. Schmid MP, Kirisits C, Nesvacil N, et al. Local recurrences in cervical cancer patients in the setting of image-guided brachytherapy: a comparison of spatial dose distribution within a matched-pair analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2011;100:468–72.
    1. Tanderup K, Georg D, Pötter R, et al. Adaptive management of cervical cancer radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2010;20:121–9.
    1. Lindegaard JC, Tanderup K, Nielsen SK, et al. MRI-guided 3D optimization significantly improves DVH parameters of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:756–64.
    1. Nakano T, Arai T, Gomi H, et al. Clinical evaluation of the MR imaging for radiotherapy of uterine carcinoma. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1987;47:1181–8.
    1. Lee CM, Shrieve DC, Gaffney DK. Rapid involution and mobility of carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:625–30.
    1. Isohashi F, Yoshioka Y, Koizumi M, et al. Rectal dose and source strength of the high-dose-rate iridium-192 both affect late rectal bleeding after intracavitary radiation therapy for uterine cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:758–64.
    1. Kato S, Tran DNL, Ohno T, et al. CT-based 3D dose-volume parameter of the rectum and late rectal complication in patients with cervical cancer treated with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy. J Radiat Res. 2010;51:215–21.
    1. Kirisits C, Lang S, Dimopoulos J, et al. The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: design, application, treatment planning, and dosimetric results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:624–30.
    1. Dimopoulos J, Kirisits C, Petric P, et al. The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: clinical feasibility and preliminary results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:83–90.
    1. Wakatsuki M, Ohno T, Yoshida D, et al. Intracavitary combined with CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: introduction of the technique and a case presentation. J Radiat Res. 2011;52:54–8.
    1. Viswanathan AN, Erickson BA. Three-dimensional imaging in gynecologic brachytherapy: a survey of the American Brachytherapy Society. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:104–9.
    1. Viswanathan AN, Dimopoulos J, Kirisits C, et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:491–8.
    1. Beriwal S, Kim H, Coon D, et al. Single magnetic resonance imaging vs magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy. Clin Oncol. 2009;21:483–7.
    1. Beriwal S, Kannan N, Kim H, et al. Three-dimensional high dose rate intracavitary image-guided brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer using a hybrid magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography approach: feasibility and early results. Clin Oncol. 2011;23:685–90.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel