Certolizumab Pegol Efficacy in Patients With Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Stratified by Baseline MRI and C-Reactive Protein Status: An Analysis From the C-axSpAnd Study

Philip C Robinson, Walter P Maksymowych, Lianne S Gensler, Stephen Hall, Martin Rudwaleit, Bengt Hoepken, Lars Bauer, Thomas Kumke, Mindy Kim, Natasha de Peyrecave, Atul Deodhar, Philip C Robinson, Walter P Maksymowych, Lianne S Gensler, Stephen Hall, Martin Rudwaleit, Bengt Hoepken, Lars Bauer, Thomas Kumke, Mindy Kim, Natasha de Peyrecave, Atul Deodhar

Abstract

Objective: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are an effective treatment for non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). To be eligible, however, many authorities require patients with nr-axSpA to show active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level, possibly resulting in a perception that patients with nr-axSpA without both factors have only low responses to TNFi treatment. We evaluated clinical responses to certolizumab pegol (CZP) in patients with nr-axSpA stratified by baseline MRI/CRP status.

Methods: C-axSpAnd was a phase 3, multicenter study on CZP in adult patients with active nr-axSpA and objective signs of inflammation. This analysis assessed efficacy of CZP over the 52-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period in patients stratified into subgroups based on the presence of active sacroiliitis on MRI and CRP level at baseline.

Results: CZP-treated patients across all MRI/CRP subgroups achieved clinical responses greater than placebo. Across outcome measures, CZP-treated MRI+/CRP+ patients demonstrated the greatest clinical responses, but substantial improvements were also observed in CZP-treated MRI+/CRP- and MRI-/CRP+ patients. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Major Improvement response rates at week 52 among CZP-treated patients (75.6% MRI+/CRP+; 47.5% MRI-/CRP+; and 29.7% MRI+/CRP-) were higher than rates in placebo groups (range: 3.9%-12.5%). Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% response, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, and Bath Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Functional Index had similar response patterns, although differences between the CZP-treated MRI/CRP subgroups were smaller. Clinical responses among CZP-treated patients were also observed in additional subgroups, including those with low Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI sacroiliac joint inflammation scores and those with normal baseline CRP levels.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that CZP treatment benefits patients with nr-axSpA across MRI+/CRP+, MRI-/CRP+, and MRI+/CRP- subgroups.

© 2022 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical efficacy outcomes in patients stratified by baseline MRI/CRP status. Randomized set (N = 317). Missing values, or values collected after switching to open‐label CZP, were imputed using NRI for dichotomous variables and LOCF for continuous variables: at week 52, data were available for 121/159 patients randomized to CZP and 51/158 patients randomized to PBO. ASDAS‐MI, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; CfB, change from baseline; CRP, C‐reactive protein; CZP, certolizumab pegol; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NRI, non‐responser imputation; PBO, placebo.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ASDAS states in patients stratified by baseline MRI/CRP status. Randomized set (N = 317); LOCF. ASDAS‐HD: ASDAS ≥2.1 and ≤3.5; ASDAS‐ID: ASDAS 3.5. ASDAS, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; ASDAS‐HD, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score high disease activity; ASDAS‐ID, ASDAS‐inactive disease; ASDAS‐LDA, ASDAS‐low disease activity; ASDAS‐vHD, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score very high disease; CRP, C‐reactive protein; CZP, certolizumab pegol; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PBO, placebo.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Clinical efficacy outcomes in patients stratified by baseline SPARCC MRI SI Joint Inflammation score. Analysis set comprised 310 patients from the randomized patient population who had SPARCC SI joint scores recorded from MRI scans at screening. Missing values, or values collected after switching to open‐label CZP, were imputed using NRI for dichotomous variables and LOCF for continuous variables: at week 52, data from this analysis set were available for 110/156 patients randomized to CZP and 46/154 patients randomized to PBO. ASAS40, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% response; ASDAS‐MI, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score‐Major Improvement; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; CfB, change from baseline; CZP, certolizumab pegol; LOCF, last observation carried forward; NRI, non‐responser imputation; PBO, placebo; SPARCC, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Clinical efficacy outcomes in patients stratified by baseline CRP. Randomized set (N = 317). Missing values, or values collected after switching to open‐label CZP, were imputed using NRI for dichotomous variables and LOCF for continuous variables: at week 52, data were available for 121/159 patients randomized to CZP and 51/158 patients randomized to PBO. ASAS40, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% response; ASDAS‐MI, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score‐Major Improvement; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; CfB, change from baseline; CRP, C‐reactive protein; CZP, certolizumab pegol; LOCF, last observation carried forward; NRI, non‐responser imputation; PBO, placebo.

References

    1. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos‐Vargas R, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68(Suppl 2):ii1–44.
    1. Baraliakos X, Braun J. Non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: what are the similarities and differences? RMD Open 2015;1(Suppl 1):e000053.
    1. Rudwaleit M, Haibel H, Baraliakos X, Listing J, Märker‐Hermann E, Zeidler H, et al. The early disease stage in axial spondylarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:717–27.
    1. Kiltz U, Baraliakos X, Karakostas P, Igelmann M, Kalthoff L, Klink C, et al. Do patients with non‐radiographic axial spondylarthritis differ from patients with ankylosing spondylitis? [Original Research]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:1415–22.
    1. Lambert RG, Bakker PA, van der Heijde D, Weber U, Rudwaleit M, Hermann KG, et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on MRI for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: update by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:1958–63.
    1. Arends S, Brouwer E, van der Veer E, Groen H, Leijsma MK, Houtman PM, et al. Baseline predictors of response and discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor‐alpha blocking therapy in ankylosing spondylitis: a prospective longitudinal observational cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2011;13:R94.
    1. Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Mease PJ, Maksymowych WP, Brown MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results of a randomised placebo‐controlled trial (ABILITY‐1). Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:815–22.
    1. Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Maksymowych WP, Scott BB, Boice JA, et al. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, sixteen‐week study of subcutaneous golimumab in patients with active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:2702–12.
    1. Sieper J, Landewé R, Magrey M, Anderson JK, Zhong S, Wang X, et al. Predictors of remission in patients with non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis receiving open‐label adalimumab in the ABILITY‐3 study. RMD Open 2019;5:e000917.
    1. Brown MA, Bird PA, Robinson PC, Mease PJ, Bosch FVD, Surian C, et al. Evaluation of the effect of baseline MRI sacroiliitis and C reactive protein status on etanercept treatment response in non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a post hoc analysis of the EMBARK study. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:1091–3.
    1. Rudwaleit M, Schwarzlose S, Hilgert ES, Listing J, Braun J, Sieper J. MRI in predicting a major clinical response to anti‐tumour necrosis factor treatment in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:1276–81.
    1. Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, Haibel H, Listing J, Märker‐Hermann E, Zeidler H, et al. Rates and predictors of radiographic sacroiliitis progression over 2 years in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1369–74.
    1. Dougados M, Sepriano A, Molto A, van Lunteren M, Ramiro S, de Hooge M, et al. Sacroiliac radiographic progression in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis: the 5‐year data of the DESIR cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1823–8.
    1. Protopopov M, Poddubnyy D. Radiographic progression in non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2018;14:525–33.
    1. Deodhar A, Gensler LS, Kay J, Maksymowych WP, Haroon N, Landewé R, et al. A fifty‐two‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of certolizumab pegol in nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1101–11.
    1. van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Landewé R, Sieper J, Maksymowych WP, Rudwaleit M, et al. Sustained efficacy, safety and patient‐reported outcomes of certolizumab pegol in axial spondyloarthritis: 4‐year outcomes from RAPID‐axSpA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017;56:1498–509.
    1. Maksymowych WP, Inman RD, Salonen D, Dhillon SS, Williams M, Stone M, et al. Spondyloarthritis research Consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of sacroiliac joint inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2005;53:703–9.
    1. Braun J, Blanco R, Marzo‐Ortega H, Gensler L, Van den Bosch F, Kameda H, et al. Secukinumab improved signs and symptoms in patients with non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results from a randomized controlled phase III study stratified by baseline objective signs of inflammation [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72(suppl 10).
    1. Maksymowych WP, Marzo‐Ortega H, Ǿstergaard M, Gensler L, Ermann J, Deodhar A, et al. Efficacy of ixekizumab on disease activity and quality of life in patients with active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis and objective signs of inflammation, stratified by baseline CRP/sacroiliac joint MRI status [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72(suppl 10).
    1. Lukas C, Landewé R, Sieper J, Dougados M, Davis J, Braun J, et al. Development of an ASAS‐endorsed disease activity score (ASDAS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:18–24.
    1. Zochling J. Measures of symptoms and disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Scale (ASQoL), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS‐G), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Dougados Functional Index (DFI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire for the Spondylarthropathies (HAQ‐S). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63(Suppl 11):S47–58.
    1. Dougados M, van der Heijde D, Sieper J, Braun J, Maksymowych WP, Citera G, et al. Symptomatic efficacy of etanercept and its effects on objective signs of inflammation in early nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:2091–102.
    1. Machado P, Navarro‐Compán V, Landewé R, van Gaalen FA, Roux C, van der Heijde D. Brief report: calculating the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score if the conventional C‐reactive protein level is below the limit of detection or if high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein is used: an analysis in the DESIR cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:408–13.
    1. Landewe R, Nurminen T, Davies O, Baeten D. A single determination of C‐reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ‘CRP‐negative’. Arthritis Res Ther 2018;20:209.
    1. Lukas C, Cyteval C, Dougados M, Weber U. MRI for diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis: major advance with critical limitations ‘not everything that glisters is gold (standard)’. RMD Open 2018;4:e000586.
    1. Maksymowych WP. The role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of axial spondyloarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2019;15:657–72.
    1. Robinson PC, van der Linden S, Khan MA, Taylor WJ. Axial spondyloarthritis: concept, construct, classification and implications for therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2021;17:109–18.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel