Mode of birth in women with low-lying placenta: protocol for a prospective multicentre 1:3 matched case-control study in Italy (the MODEL-PLACENTA study)

Sara Ornaghi, Elisabetta Colciago, Isadora Vaglio Tessitore, Alessandra Abbamondi, Laura Antolini, Anna Locatelli, Annalisa Inversetti, Armando Pintucci, I Cetin, Benedetta Bracco, Elisa Fabbri, Valentina Sala, Mario Meroni, Grazia Volpe, Sara Benedetti, Camilla Bulfoni, Annamaria Marconi, Federica Lagrasta, Cinzia Lucia Paolini, Elisabetta Mazza, Massimo Candiani, Luca Valsecchi, Maddalena Smid, Federica Pasi, Mirko Pozzoni, Maria Castoldi, Michele Vignali, Giulia Dal Molin, Alice Guarano, Antonio Pellegrino, Clelia Callegari, Marta Betti, Sara Lazzarin, Federico Prefumo, Cristina Zanardini, Valentina Parolin, Anna Catalano, Edoardo Barbolini, Patrizio Antonazzo, Lucrezia Pignatti, Mauro Tintoni, Federico Spelzini, Anna Martinelli, Fabio Facchinetti, G Chiossi, Patrizia Vergani, Sara Ornaghi, Elisabetta Colciago, Isadora Vaglio Tessitore, Alessandra Abbamondi, Laura Antolini, Anna Locatelli, Annalisa Inversetti, Armando Pintucci, I Cetin, Benedetta Bracco, Elisa Fabbri, Valentina Sala, Mario Meroni, Grazia Volpe, Sara Benedetti, Camilla Bulfoni, Annamaria Marconi, Federica Lagrasta, Cinzia Lucia Paolini, Elisabetta Mazza, Massimo Candiani, Luca Valsecchi, Maddalena Smid, Federica Pasi, Mirko Pozzoni, Maria Castoldi, Michele Vignali, Giulia Dal Molin, Alice Guarano, Antonio Pellegrino, Clelia Callegari, Marta Betti, Sara Lazzarin, Federico Prefumo, Cristina Zanardini, Valentina Parolin, Anna Catalano, Edoardo Barbolini, Patrizio Antonazzo, Lucrezia Pignatti, Mauro Tintoni, Federico Spelzini, Anna Martinelli, Fabio Facchinetti, G Chiossi, Patrizia Vergani

Abstract

Introduction: The term placenta praevia defines a placenta that lies over the internal os, whereas the term low-lying placenta identifies a placenta that is partially implanted in the lower uterine segment with the inferior placental edge located at 1-20 mm from the internal cervical os (internal-os-distance). The most appropriate mode of birth in women with low-lying placenta is still controversial, with the majority of them undergoing caesarean section. The current project aims to evaluate the rate of vaginal birth and caesarean section in labour due to bleeding by offering a trial of labour to all women with an internal-os-distance >5 mm as assessed by transvaginal sonography in the late third trimester.

Methods and analysis: The MODEL-PLACENTA is a prospective, multicentre, 1:3 matched case-control study involving 17 Maternity Units across Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna regions, Italy. The study includes women with a placenta located in the lower uterine segment at the second trimester scan. Women with a normally located placenta will be enrolled as controls. A sample size of 30 women with an internal-os-distance >5 mm at the late third trimester scan is needed at each participating Unit. Since the incidence of low-lying placenta decreases from 2% in the second trimester to 0.4% at the end of pregnancy, 150 women should be recruited at each centre at the second trimester scan. A vaginal birth rate ≥60% in women with an internal-os-distance >5 mm will be considered appropriate to start routinely admitting to labour these women.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval for the study was given by the Brianza Ethics Committee (No 3157, 2019). Written informed consent will be obtained from study participants. Results will be disseminated by publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation in international conferences.

Trial registration number: NCT04827433 (pre-results stage).

Keywords: maternal medicine; prenatal diagnosis; ultrasonography.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart: participants’ antenatal care and follow-up scans. *Trial of labour, the onset of labour could be spontaneous or induced through an artificial rupture of membranes, otherwise the woman should undergo a CS between 41 and 41+5 weeks. ** Trial of labour, a pharmacological induction of labour is allowed. ARM, artificial rupture of membranes; AS, abdominal scan; CS, caesarean section; FU, follow-up; IOL, induction of labour; IOD, internal os distance; TVS, transvaginal sonography; TOL, trial of labour; w: weeks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
TVS evaluation of low-lying placenta. cervical length of 2.17 cm (1); IOD of 1.28 cm (2); placental edge thickness of 0.681 cm (3) shown by the red arrow; the angle between the basal and chorionic plates is identified by the yellow dotted lines. IOD, internal os distance; TVS, transvaginal sonography.

References

    1. Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, et al. . Fetal imaging: Executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of child health and human development, Society for Maternal-Fetal medicine, American Institute of ultrasound in medicine, American College of obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of radiology, Society for pediatric radiology, and society of radiologists in ultrasound fetal imaging workshop. J Ultrasound Med 2014;33:745–57. 10.7863/ultra.33.5.745
    1. Oppenheimer L, Armson A, Farine D, MATERNAL FETAL MEDICINE COMMITTEE . Diagnosis and management of placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:261–6. 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32401-X
    1. Dashe JS. Toward consistent terminology of placental location. Semin Perinatol 2013;37:375–9. 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.06.017
    1. Farine D, Fox HE, Jakobson S, et al. . Vaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:566–9. 10.1016/S0002-9378(88)80009-7
    1. Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, et al. . Placenta praevia and placenta accreta: diagnosis and management: Green-top guideline No. 27a. BJOG 2019;126:e1-e48. 10.1111/1471-0528.15306
    1. Fukuda M, Fukuda K, Shimizu T, et al. . Ultrasound assessment of lower uterine segment thickness during pregnancy, labour, and the postpartum period. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016;38:134–40. 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.009
    1. Ginsberg Y, Goldstein I, Lowenstein L, et al. . Measurements of the lower uterine segment during gestation. J Clin Ultrasound 2013;41:214–7. 10.1002/jcu.22023
    1. Silver RM. Abnormal placentation: placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:654–68. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001005
    1. Bronsteen R, Valice R, Lee W, et al. . Effect of a low-lying placenta on delivery outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:204–8. 10.1002/uog.6304
    1. Vergani P, Ornaghi S, Pozzi I, et al. . Placenta previa: distance to internal os and mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:266.e1–266.e5. 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.009
    1. Nakamura M, Hasegawa J, Matsuaka R, et al. . Amount of hemorrhage during vaginal delivery correlates with length from placental edge to external os in cases with low-lying placenta whose length between placental edge and internal os was 1-2 cm. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2012;38:1041–5. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01776.x
    1. Al Wadi K, Schneider C, Burym C, et al. . Evaluating the safety of labour in women with a placental edge 11 to 20 MM from the internal cervical os. JOGC 2014;36:674–7. 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30508-9
    1. Wortman AC, Twickler DM, McIntire DD, et al. . Bleeding complications in pregnancies with low-lying placenta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:1367–71. 10.3109/14767058.2015.1051023
    1. Taga A, Sato Y, Sakae C, et al. . Planned vaginal delivery versus planned cesarean delivery in cases of low-lying placenta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:618–22. 10.1080/14767058.2016.1181168
    1. ACOG Committee opinion no. 764: medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e151–5. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003083
    1. Derks J. Modus partus bij placenta praevia marginalis. NVOG, 2015.
    1. Jain V, Bos H, Bujold E. Guideline No. 402: diagnosis and management of placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2020;42:906–17. 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.07.019
    1. Ornaghi S, Tessitore V, Vergani P. Pregnancy and delivery outcomes in women with persistent versus resolved low-lying placenta in the late third trimester. J Ultrasound Med 2021:1–11.
    1. Jansen C, Mooij YM, Blomaard CM, et al. . Vaginal delivery in women with a low‐lying placenta: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy 2019;126:1118–26. 10.1111/1471-0528.15622
    1. Ogueh O, Morin L, Usher RH, et al. . Obstetric implications of low-lying placentas diagnosed in the second trimester. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;83:11–17. 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00211-X
    1. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. . Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:95. 10.1186/1471-2393-11-95
    1. Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Sergienko R, et al. . Placenta accreta: risk factors, perinatal outcomes, and consequences for subsequent births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:219.e1–219.e7. 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.037
    1. Farquhar CM, Li Z, Lensen S, et al. . Incidence, risk factors and perinatal outcomes for placenta accreta in Australia and New Zealand: a case-control study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017713. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017713
    1. World Health Organization . WHO statement on caesarean section rates, 2015.
    1. Euro-Peristat Project . European perinatal health report. core indicators of the health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2015. Available: [Accessed 10 Jan 2021].

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel