Couples-based approach to HIV prevention for transgender women and their partners: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial testing the efficacy of the 'It Takes Two' intervention

Kristi E Gamarel, Jae M Sevelius, Torsten B Neilands, Rachel L Kaplan, Mallory O Johnson, Tooru Nemoto, Lynae A Darbes, Don Operario, Kristi E Gamarel, Jae M Sevelius, Torsten B Neilands, Rachel L Kaplan, Mallory O Johnson, Tooru Nemoto, Lynae A Darbes, Don Operario

Abstract

Introduction: HIV transmission and acquisition risk among transgender women is particularly high in the context of primary partnerships. This project extends a previous pilot couples-focused HIV intervention programme, which was shown to be feasible, acceptable and promising in reducing sexual risk behaviour among transgender women and their partners. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) tests the efficacy of this culturally sensitive HIV prevention programme for HIV-serodiscordant and HIV-negative seroconcordant transgender women and their partners.

Methods and analysis: To finalise the protocol for trial, we used qualitative methods to hone eligibility criteria, refine the intervention and control manuals, and name and brand the intervention ('It Takes Two'). The RCT investigates the effects of the It Takes Two intervention on Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) among 100 couples. CR-HIV is a binary indicator of couple HIV risk using validated measures of sexual behaviour, pre-exposure prophylaxis use among HIV-negative participants and viral suppression among participants living with HIV. Using a two-arm RCT, we will examine intervention effects on CR-HIV at 12-month follow-up comparing transgender women and their partners randomised to the intervention versus control (HIV prevention information only).

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been reviewed and approved by the University of California, San Francisco (19-28624) and the University of Michigan (HUM00147690) Institutional Review Boards. Participants provide informed consent before taking part of the study activities. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. We will make our results available to the community of researchers and general public interested in transgender health to avoid unintentional duplication of research, as well as to others in the health and social services community, including LGBT community-based organisations, AIDS service organisations and other transgender-serving organisations. The full de-identified dataset and codebook will be shared at the University of Michigan Digital Repository.

Trial registration number: NCT04067661.

Keywords: HIV & AIDS; mental health; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
It Takes Two: schedule of enrolment, intervention and assessments.

References

    1. Poteat T, German D, Kerrigan D. Managing uncertainty: a grounded theory of stigma in transgender health care encounters. Soc Sci Med 2013;84:22–9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.019
    1. Baral SD, Poteat T, Strömdahl S, et al. . Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:214–22. 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70315-8
    1. Becasen JS, Denard CL, Mullins MM, et al. . Estimating the prevalence of HIV and sexual behaviors among the US transgender population: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2006-2017. Am J Public Health 2019;109:e1–8. 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304727
    1. Herbst JH, Jacobs ED, Finlayson TJ, et al. . Estimating HIV prevalence and risk behaviors of transgender persons in the United States: a systematic review. AIDS Behav 2008;12:1–17. 10.1007/s10461-007-9299-3
    1. Clark H, Babu AS, Wiewel EW, et al. . Diagnosed HIV infection in transgender adults and adolescents: results from the National HIV surveillance system, 2009-2014. AIDS Behav 2017;21:2774–83. 10.1007/s10461-016-1656-7
    1. Melendez RM, Pinto R. 'It's really a hard life': love, gender and HIV risk among male-to-female transgender persons. Cult Health Sex 2007;9:233–45. 10.1080/13691050601065909
    1. Nemoto T, Operario D, Keatley J, et al. . Social context of HIV risk behaviours among male-to-female transgenders of colour. AIDS Care 2004;16:724–35. 10.1080/09540120413331269567
    1. Nemoto T, Operario D, Keatley J, et al. . HIV risk behaviors among male-to-female transgender persons of color in San Francisco. Am J Public Health 2004;94:1193–9. 10.2105/AJPH.94.7.1193
    1. Operario D, Nemoto T, Iwamoto M, et al. . Unprotected sexual behavior and HIV risk in the context of primary partnerships for transgender women. AIDS Behav 2011;15:674–82. 10.1007/s10461-010-9795-8
    1. Reisner SL, Mimiaga MJ, Bland S, et al. . Hiv risk and social networks among male-to-female transgender sex workers in Boston, Massachusetts. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2009;20:373–86. 10.1016/j.jana.2009.06.003
    1. Reisner SL, Menino D, Leung K, et al. . "Unspoken Agreements": Perceived Acceptability of Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) Among Cisgender Men with Transgender Women Partners. AIDS Behav 2019;23:366–74. 10.1007/s10461-018-2198-y
    1. El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Witte S, et al. . Couple-based HIV prevention in the United States: advantages, gaps, and future directions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010;55 Suppl 2:S98–101. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181fbf407
    1. Wu E, El-Bassel N, McVinney LD, et al. . Feasibility and promise of a couple-based HIV/STI preventive intervention for methamphetamine-using, black men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav 10.1007/s10461-011-9997-8
    1. El-Bassel N, Witte SS, Gilbert L, et al. . The efficacy of a relationship-based HIV/STD prevention program for heterosexual couples. Am J Public Health 2003;93:963–9. 10.2105/AJPH.93.6.963
    1. Crepaz N, Tungol-Ashmon MV, Vosburgh HW, et al. . Are couple-based interventions more effective than interventions delivered to individuals in promoting HIV protective behaviors? A meta-analysis. AIDS Care 2015;27:1361–6. 10.1080/09540121.2015.1112353
    1. Reisner SL. Project LUST: adapting couples HIV counseling and testing (CHCT) for transgender women and their cisgender male sexual partners, in Harvard University CFAR conference presentation. Boston, MA, 2015.
    1. Operario D, Nemoto T, Iwamoto M, et al. . Risk for HIV and unprotected sexual behavior in male primary partners of transgender women. Arch Sex Behav 2011;40:1255–61. 10.1007/s10508-011-9781-x
    1. Gamarel KE, Reisner SL, Laurenceau J-P, et al. . Gender minority stress, mental health, and relationship quality: a dyadic investigation of transgender women and their cisgender male partners. J Fam Psychol 2014;28:437–47. 10.1037/a0037171
    1. Gamarel KE, Reisner SL, Darbes LA, et al. . Dyadic dynamics of HIV risk among transgender women and their primary male sexual partners: the role of sexual agreement types and motivations. AIDS Care 2016;28:104–11. 10.1080/09540121.2015.1069788
    1. Operario D, Gamarel KE, Iwamoto M, et al. . Couples-focused prevention program to reduce HIV risk among transgender women and their primary male partners: feasibility and promise of the couples HIV intervention program. AIDS Behav 2016;21.
    1. Reisner SL, Gamarel KE, Nemoto T, et al. . Dyadic effects of gender minority stressors in substance use behaviors among transgender women and their non-transgender male partners. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers 2014;1:63–71. 10.1037/0000013
    1. Mitchell JW, Wu Y, Gamarel KE. Timing and sequence of events: HIV status disclosure, condomless anal sex, and sexual agreement formation among same-sex male couples. J Sex Res 2019;56:728–39. 10.1080/00224499.2018.1523361
    1. Parsons JT, Starks TJ, Gamarel KE, et al. . Non-monogamy and sexual relationship quality among same-sex male couples. J Fam Psychol 2012;26:669–77. 10.1037/a0029561
    1. Gass K, Hoff CC, Stephenson R, et al. . Sexual agreements in the partnerships of internet-using men who have sex with men. AIDS Care 2012;24:1255–63. 10.1080/09540121.2012.656571
    1. Hoff CC, Beougher SC, Chakravarty D, et al. . Relationship characteristics and motivations behind agreements among gay male couples: differences by agreement type and couple serostatus. AIDS Care 2010;22:827–35. 10.1080/09540120903443384
    1. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. . Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2587–99. 10.1056/NEJMoa1011205
    1. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. . Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med 2011;365:493–505. 10.1056/NEJMoa1105243
    1. Cohen MS, McCauley M, Gamble TR. HIV treatment as prevention and HPTN 052. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2012;7:99–105. 10.1097/COH.0b013e32834f5cf2
    1. Gamarel KE, Chakravarty D, Neilands TB, et al. . Composite risk for HIV: a new approach towards integrating biomedical and behavioral strategies in Couples-Based HIV prevention research. AIDS Behav 2019;23:283–8. 10.1007/s10461-018-2229-8
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . Spirit 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. CDC HIV surveillance report, diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2015.
    1. California Department of Public Health The California HIV surveillance report. Sacramento, CA: Center for Infectious Diseases, Office of AIDS, 2017.
    1. San Francisco AIDS Foundation Transgender persons and HIV. San Francisco, CA, 2009.
    1. McMahon JM, Tortu S, Torres L, et al. . Recruitment of heterosexual couples in public health research: a study protocol. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:24. 10.1186/1471-2288-3-24
    1. Syvertsen JL, Robertson AM, Abramovitz D, et al. . Study protocol for the recruitment of female sex workers and their non-commercial partners into couple-based HIV research. BMC Public Health 2012;12:136. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-136
    1. Castillo-Mancilla J. Emtricitabine-triphosphate in dried blood spots as a marker of recent dosing. antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016.
    1. Gandhi M, Glidden DV, Liu A, et al. . Strong correlation between concentrations of tenofovir (TFV) emtricitabine (FTC) in hair and TFV diphosphate and FTC triphosphate in dried blood spots in the iPrEx open label extension: implications for pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence monitoring. J Infect Dis 2015;212:1402–6. 10.1093/infdis/jiv239
    1. Kurdek LA. Conflict resolution styles in gay, lesbian, heterosexual nonparent, and heterosexual parent couples. J Marriage Fam 1994;56:705–22. 10.2307/352880
    1. Bonache H, Ramírez-Santana G, Gonzalez-Mendez R. Conflict resolution styles and teen dating violence. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2016;16:276–86. 10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.03.003
    1. Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping inventory (DCI). test manual. Bern Göttingen: Huber Testverlag, 2008.
    1. Gamarel KE, Golub SA. Sexual goals and perceptions of goal congruence in individuals’ PrEP adoption decisions: A mixed-methods study of gay and bisexual men who are in primary relationships. Ann Behav Med 2020;54:237–48. 10.1093/abm/kaz043
    1. NCSS NCSS PASS[computer program. Version 2008 Kaysville,Utah: NCSS Statistical Software, 2008.
    1. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of longitudinal data. New York: Oxford University, 1994.
    1. Sevelius JM, Patouhas E, Keatley JG, et al. . Barriers and facilitators to engagement and retention in care among transgender women living with human immunodeficiency virus. Ann Behav Med 2014;47:5–16. 10.1007/s12160-013-9565-8
    1. Gamarel KE, Comfort M, Wood T, et al. . A qualitative analysis of male couples’ coping with HIV: Disentangling the “we”. J Health Psychol 2016;21:2125–37. 10.1177/1359105315571975
    1. Saberi P, Gamarel KE, Neilands TB, et al. . Ambiguity, ambivalence, and apprehensions of taking HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis among male couples in San Francisco: a mixed methods study. PLoS One 2012;7:e50061. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050061
    1. Conroy AA, Gamarel KE, Neilands TB, et al. . Relationship dynamics and partner beliefs about viral suppression: a longitudinal study of male couples living with HIV/AIDS (the Duo project). AIDS Behav 2016;20:1572–83. 10.1007/s10461-016-1423-9
    1. Gamarel KE, Neilands TB, Conroy AA, et al. . A longitudinal study of persistent smoking among HIV-positive gay and bisexual men in primary relationships. Addict Behav 2017;66:118–24. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.11.019
    1. Gamarel KE, Starks TJ, Dilworth SE, et al. . Personal or relational? examining sexual health in the context of HIV serodiscordant same-sex male couples. AIDS Behav 2014;18:171–9. 10.1007/s10461-013-0490-4
    1. Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Pachankis JE, Gamarel KE, et al. . Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a Live-Chat social media intervention to reduce HIV risk among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav 2015;19:1214–27. 10.1007/s10461-014-0911-z
    1. Luellen JK, Shadish WR, Clark MH. Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test. Eval Rev 2005;29:530–58. 10.1177/0193841X05275596
    1. Rubin DB. On principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2004;13:855–7. 10.1002/pds.968
    1. Seaman S, Copas A. Doubly robust generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data. Stat Med 2009;28:937–55. 10.1002/sim.3520
    1. Shadish WR, Luellen JK, Clark M. Propensity scores and Quasi-Experiments: a testimony to the practical side of Lee Sechrest, 2006.
    1. Weitzen S, Lapane KL, Toledano AY, et al. . Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2004;13:841–53. 10.1002/pds.969
    1. Westfall P, Young S. Resampling-Based multiple testing: examples and methods for p-Value adjustment. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1993.
    1. Kahan BC, Morris TP. Improper analysis of trials randomised using stratified blocks or minimisation. Stat Med 2012;31:328–40. 10.1002/sim.4431
    1. Valeri L, VanderWeele TJ. Mediation analysis allowing for exposure–mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol Methods 2013;18:137–50. 10.1037/a0031034
    1. Muthén B. Applications of causally Dened direct and indirect effects in mediation analysis using SEM in mPLUS, 2011. Available:
    1. Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical analyses with missing data. 3rd ed Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wily & Sons, 2020.
    1. Meolenberghs G, Fitzmaurice G, Kenward MG, et al. . Handbook of missing data methodology. Boca Raton, Florida: Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.
    1. Collins LM, Schafer JL, Kam CM. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychol Methods 2001;6:330–51. 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330
    1. Carpenter JR, Kenward MG, White IR. Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation under missing at random: a weighting approach. Stat Methods Med Res 2007;16:259–75. 10.1177/0962280206075303
    1. Reback CJ, Fletcher JB. HIV prevalence, substance use, and sexual risk behaviors among transgender women recruited through outreach. AIDS Behav 2014;18:1359–67.
    1. Wilson IB, Fowler FJ, Cosenza CA, et al. . Cognitive and field testing of a new set of medication adherence self-report items for HIV care. AIDS Behav 2014;18:2349–58.
    1. Hoff CC, Chakravarty D, Bircher AE, et al. . Attitudes towards PrEP and anticipated condom use among concordant HIV-negative and HIV-discordant male couples. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2015;29:408–17.
    1. Stall R, Hoff C, Coates TJ, et al. . Decisions to get HIV tested and to accept antiretroviral therapies among gay/bisexual men: implications for secondary prevention efforts. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1996;11:151–60.
    1. Bohns VK, Lucas GM, Molden DC, et al. . Opposites fit: regulatory focus complementarity and relationship well-being. Soc Cogn 2013;31:1–14. 10.1521/soco.2013.31.1.1
    1. Gamarel KE, Golub SA. Sexual goals and perceptions of goal congruence in individuals’ PrEP adoption decisions: A mixed-methods study of gay and bisexual men who are in primary relationships. Ann Behav Med 2020;54:237–48.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel