Combined acetaminophen and ibuprofen for pain relief after oral surgery in adults: a randomized controlled trial

A F Merry, R D Gibbs, J Edwards, G S Ting, C Frampton, E Davies, B J Anderson, A F Merry, R D Gibbs, J Edwards, G S Ting, C Frampton, E Davies, B J Anderson

Abstract

Background: Acetaminophen is often used with a non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drug for acute pain. Hitherto, these drugs have had to be given separately, typically at different time intervals. Maxigesic tablets combine acetaminophen and ibuprofen in clinically appropriate doses to simplify administration and dosage regimen. We compared this combination with each of the constituent drugs for the relief of pain after extraction of third molar teeth.

Methods: Adults (more than 16 yr) having one or more wisdom teeth removed under general or local anaesthesia were instructed to take two tablets before operation, then two tablets every 6 h for up to 48 h of: (i) a combination of acetaminophen 500 mg and ibuprofen 150 mg per tablet (Maxigesic); (ii) acetaminophen 500 mg per tablet alone; or (iii) ibuprofen 150 mg per tablet alone. The primary outcome measure was the area under the curve (AUC) of the 100 mm visual analogue scale pain measurements taken for up to 48 h after surgery, divided by time, at rest and on activity. Pharmacokinetic data were collected in a subset of patients.

Results: The mean (sem) time-corrected AUC on rest and activity, respectively, were: combination group 22.3 (3.2) and 28.4 (3.4); acetaminophen group 33.0 (3.1) and 40.4 (3.3); and ibuprofen group 34.8 (3.2) and 40.2 (3.4); P<0.01 for each of the four comparisons of combination vs constituent drug. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between acetaminophen and ibuprofen administered together.

Conclusions: Maxigesic tablets provide superior pain relief after oral surgery to acetaminophen or ibuprofen alone.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow of participants through trial. Not randomized (n=54): (i) declined to participate (n=15), (ii) did not meet inclusion criteria (n=14), (iii) other reasons (n=25); other reasons: the surgery was cancelled or rescheduled; patient could not be contacted; patient was given the wrong date of the surgery.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Mean (+95% CI) mm of time-adjusted AUC (AUC/time) for VAS at rest and on activity by treatment group.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Mean (se) mm VAS out of 100 at rest (a) and on activity (b).

References

    1. Cousins MJ, Brennan F, Carr DB. Pain relief: a universal human right. Pain. 2004;112:1–4.
    1. Merry A, Power I. Perioperative NSAIDs: towards greater safety. Pain Rev. 1995;2:268–91.
    1. MARTINDALE: The Extra Pharmacopoeia. London: The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 1996.
    1. Mehlisch DR. The efficacy of combination analgesic therapy in relieving dental pain. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133:861–71.
    1. Desmeules J, Rollason V, Piguet V, Dayer P. Clinical pharmacology and rationale of analgesic combinations. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 2003;20:7–11.
    1. Altman RD. A rationale for combining acetaminophen and NSAIDs for mild-to-moderate pain. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22:110–7.
    1. Hyllested M, Jones S, Pedersen JL, Kehlet H. Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: a qualitative review. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:199–214.
    1. Dahl V, Dybvik T, Steen T, Aune AK, Rosenlund EK, Ræder JC. Ibuprofen vs. acetaminophen vs. ibuprofen and acetaminophen after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:471–5.
    1. Gazal G, Mackie IC. A comparison of paracetamol, ibuprofen or their combination for pain relief following extractions in children under general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17:169–77.
    1. Merry AF, Swinburn PF, Middleton NG, Edwards JL, Calder MV. Tenoxicam and paracetamol–codeine combination after oral surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:875–80.
    1. Mitchell A, van Zanten SV, Inglis K, Porter G. A randomized controlled trial comparing acetaminophen plus ibuprofen versus acetaminophen plus codeine plus caffeine after outpatient general surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:472–9.
    1. Menhinick KA, Gutmann JL, Regan JD, Taylor SE, Buschang PH. The efficacy of pain control following nonsurgical root canal treatment using ibuprofen or a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int Endod J. 2004;37:531–41.
    1. Viitanen H, Tuominen N, Vääräniemi H, Nikanne E, Annila P. Analgesic efficacy of rectal acetaminophen and ibuprofen alone or in combination for paediatric day-case adenoidectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:363–7.
    1. Henry D, McGettigan P. Epidemiology overview of gastrointestinal and renal toxicity of NSAIDs. Int J Clin Pract. 2003;135(Suppl.):43–9.
    1. TGA Medicines Evaluation Committee, 2003. Australia: Therapeutic Goods Administration; 2003. Review of non-prescription analgesics: Multiple Strength of Oral Liquids.
    1. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. Monitoring during anaesthesia (Review P18). Melbourne: The College; 2008.
    1. Merry AF, Sidebotham DA, Middleton NG, Calder MV, Webster CS. Tenoxicam 20 mg or 40 mg after thoracotomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002;30:160–6.
    1. Davies NM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen. The first 30 years. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998;34:101–54.
    1. Prescott LF. Paracetamol (Acetaminophen): A Critical Bibliographic Review. New York: Taylor & Francis Inc.; 2001. Pharmacokinetics of paracetamol; pp. 205–15.
    1. Rainsford KD. Ibuprofen: A Critical Bibliographic Review. London: Taylor & Francis; 1999. The pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen in humans and animals; pp. 92–5.
    1. Ianiro S, Jeansonne B, McNeal S, Eleazer P. The effect of preoperative acetaminophen or a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block for teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2007;33:11–4.
    1. Cooper SA, Schachtel BP, Goldman E, Gelb S, Cohn P. Ibuprofen and acetaminophen in the relief of acute pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;29:1026–30.
    1. AHFS: Drug Information. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacist; 2007.
    1. Coll AM, Ameen JRM, Mead D. Postoperative pain assessment tools in day surgery: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46:124–33.
    1. Philip BK. Parametric statistics for evaluation of the visual analogue scale. Anesth Analg. 1990;71:710.
    1. Schou S, Nielsen H, Nattestad A, et al. Analgesic dose–response relationship of ibuprofen 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg after surgical removal of third molars: a single-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind study of 304 patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;38:447–54.
    1. Barden J, Edwards J, Moore A, McQuay H. Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online) 2004
    1. Anderson B, Cranswick N. The placebo (I shall please)—is it so pleasing in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15:809–13.
    1. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Faculty of Pain Medicine. Acute Pain Management: Scientific Evidence. Australian Government: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2005.
    1. Moore RA, Edwards JE, McQuay HJ. Acute pain: individual patient meta-analysis shows the impact of different ways of analysing and presenting results. Pain. 2005;116:322–31.
    1. Quiding H, Oksala E, Happonen RP, Lehtimaki K, Ojala T. The visual analog scale in multiple-dose evaluations of analgesics. J Clin Pharmacol. 1981;21:424–9.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel