A New Measure for Assessing Youth Program Participation

Jennifer Sarah Tiffany, Deinera Exner-Cortens, John Eckenrode, Jennifer Sarah Tiffany, Deinera Exner-Cortens, John Eckenrode

Abstract

Participation in after-school programs is an important lever to improve adolescents' health and well-being; however, well-defined measurement of the quality of participation in these programs is limited. The present study validated a newly designed measure of participation in a sample of urban youth enrolled in community-based after-school programs. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the structure of the 20-item Tiffany-Eckenrode Program Participation Scale (TEPPS). Results suggest that the scale is comprised of four subscales (Personal Development, Voice/Influence, Safety/Support and Community Engagement). The TEPPS was also correlated with several commonly used measures of program participation. Findings from this paper provide support for the use of the newly designed scale as a valid and reliable measure of quality program participation by youth.

Keywords: HIV risk reduction; adolescent sexual health; factor analysis; participation; positive youth development.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

    1. Bentler PM. Comparative t indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin. 1990;107:238–246.
    1. Bohnert AM, Fredricks J, Randall E. Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research. 2010;80:576–610.
    1. Bronfenbrenner U. Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In: Friedman SL, Wachs TD, editors. Measuring environment across the life span. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. pp. 3–28.
    1. Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA. The ecology of developmental process. In: Damon W, Lerner RM, editors. Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development. 5. New York: John Wiley; 1998. pp. 993–1028.
    1. Camino L, Zeldin S, Mook C, O’Connor C. Youth and adult leaders for program excellence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, ACT for Youth Center of Excellence; 2004.
    1. Durlak JA, Mahoney JL, Bohnert AM, Parente ME. Developing and improving after-school programs to enhance youth’s personal growth and adjustment: A special issue of AJCP. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2010;45:285–293.
    1. Galinsky AM, Sonenstein FL. The association between developmental assets and sexual enjoyment among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2011;48:610–615.
    1. Gardner M, Roth J, Brooks-Gunn J. Adolescents’ participation in organized activities and developmental success 2 and 8 years after high school: Do sponsorship, duration, and intensity matter? Developmental Psychology. 2008;44:814–830.
    1. Hart RA. Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. New York: Earthscan; 1997.
    1. Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Arthur MW. Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors. 2002;27:951–976.
    1. Hayton JC, Allen DG, Scarpello V. Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods. 2004;7:191–205.
    1. Hirsch BJ, Mekinda MA, Stawicki J. More than attendance: The importance of after-school program quality. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2010;45:447–452.
    1. Hu L, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods. 1998;3:424–453.
    1. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago, IL: National Education Resources; 1981.
    1. Kirby D, Miller BC. Interventions designed to promote parent-teen communication about sexuality. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development. 2002;97:93–110.
    1. Klein JD, Sabaratnam P, Matos MA, Smith SM, Kodjo C, Lewis K, Dandino C. Development and factor structure of a brief instrument to assess the impact of community programs on positive youth development: The Rochester Evaluation of Asset Development for Youth (READY) tool. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2006;39:252–260.
    1. Larson RW, Angus RM. Adolescents’ development of skills for agency in youth programs: Learning to think strategically. Child Development. 2011;82:277–294.
    1. Linver MR, Roth JL, Brooks-Gunn J. Patterns of adolescents’ participation in organized activities: Are sports best when combined with other activities? Developmental Psychology. 2009;45:354–367.
    1. Mahoney JL, Lord H, Carryl E. An ecological analysis of after-school program participation in the development of academic performance and motivational attributes for disadvantaged children. Child Development. 2005;76:811–825.
    1. Mahoney JL, Parente ME, Lord H. After-school program engagement: Links to child competence and program quality and content. Elementary School Journal. 107:385–404.
    1. Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;103:391–410.
    1. McGuire KJ, Gamble WC. Community service for youth: The value of psychological engagement over number of hours spent. Journal of Adolescence. 2006;29:289–298.
    1. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Community based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2003.
    1. Nelson LR. Some observations on the scree test, and on coefficient alpha. Journal of Educational Research and Measurement. 2005;3:1–17.
    1. O’Connor BP. SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 2000;32:396–402.
    1. O’Donoghue JL, Kirshner B, McLaughlin M. Youth participation: From myths to effective practice. The Prevention Researcher. 2006;13:3–6.
    1. Pedhauzer E, Schmelkin L. Measurement, design and analysis: an integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1991.
    1. Peterson NA, Peterson CH, Agre L, Christens BD, Morton CM. Measuring youth empowerment: Validation of a sociopolitical control scale for youth in an urban community context. Journal of Community Psychology. 2011;39:592–605.
    1. Pittman K, Irby M, Tolman J, Yohalem N, Ferber T. Preventing problems, promoting development, encouraging engagement: Competing priorities or inseparable goals? Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment, Impact Strategies, Inc; 2003.
    1. Prilleltensky I, Nelson G, Peirson L. The role of power and control in children’s lives: An ecological analysis of pathways towards wellness, resilience, and problems. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. 2001;11:143–158.
    1. Randall ET, Bohnert AM. Organized activity involvement, depressive symptoms, and social adjustment in adolescents: Ethnicity and socioeconomic status as moderators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2009;38:1187–1198.
    1. Riggs NR, Greenberg MT. After-school youth development programs: A developmental-ecological model of current research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2004;7:177–190.
    1. Satorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika. 2001;66:507–514.
    1. Schalet AT. Subjectivity, intimacy, and the empowerment paradigm of adolescent sexuality: The unexplored room. Feminist Studies. 2009;35:133–159.
    1. Shernoff DJ. Engagement in after-school programs as a predictor of social competence and academic performance. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2010;45:325–337.
    1. Shinn M, Yoshikawa H. Toward positive youth development: Transforming schools and community programs. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
    1. Smith C, Peck SC, Denault A, Blazevski J, Akiva T. Quality at the point of service: Profiles of practice in after-school settings. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2010;45:358–369.
    1. Steiger JH. EzPATH: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT; 1989.
    1. Stevens JP. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 2002.
    1. Tiffany JS, Brea M, Eckenrode JJ, Friedrichs EK, Peters RM, Richards-Clarke C, Stewart D, Tallon T. Exploring participatory HIV prevention strategies for youth through a community-based participatory research partnership. Paper presented at the 135th American Public Health Association (APHA) Annual Meeting; November 3–7, 2007; Washington, DC. 2007a. Abstract #154104.
    1. Tiffany JS, Prado G, Eckenrode J, Birnel SV, Bat-Chava Y. Building an ecological-developmental model for adolescent HIV prevention: Program participation and family connectedness. Poster presentation during the 137th APHA Annual Meeting; November 7–11, 2009; Philadelphia, PA. 2009. Abstract #208762.
    1. Tiffany JS, Tallon T, Brea M, Eckenrode JJ, Friedrichs EK, Richards-Clarke C, Stewart D, Peters RM. HIV prevention and participatory program strategies for youth: Are voice, choice, decision-making, and opportunities for personal development linked to risk reduction practices?. Paper presented at the 135th APHA Annual Meeting; November 3–7, 2007; Washington, DC. 2007b. Abstract #155680.
    1. Tucker LR, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1973;38:1–10.
    1. Wallerstein N. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? 2006 Retrieved from .
    1. Weiss HB, Little PMD, Bouffard SM. More than just being there: Balancing the participation equation. New Directions for Youth Development. 2005;105:15–31.
    1. Werner E, Smith R. Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. New York: Cornell University Press; 1992.
    1. Whitlock JL. Places to be and places to belong. Ithaca, NY: ACT for Youth Center of Excellence, Cornell University, Family Life Development Center; 2004.
    1. Yohalem N, Wilson-Ahlstrom A. Inside the black-box: Assessing and improving quality in youth programs. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2010;45:350–357.
    1. Yuan K, Bentler PM. Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology. 2000;30:165–200.
    1. Zimmerman MA. Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1995;23:581–600.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel