Effect of PARACT (PARAmedical Interventions on Patient ACTivation) on the Cancer Care Pathway: Protocol for Implementation of the Patient Activation Measure-13 Item (PAM-13) Version

Elise Verot, Wafa Bouleftour, Corinne Macron, Romain Rivoirard, Franck Chauvin, Elise Verot, Wafa Bouleftour, Corinne Macron, Romain Rivoirard, Franck Chauvin

Abstract

Background: The increase in the number of cancer cases and the evolution of cancer care management have become a significant problem for the French health care system, thereby making patient empowerment as a long sought-after goal in chronic pathologies. The implementation of an activation measure via the Patient Activation Measure-13 item (PAM-13) in the course of cancer care can potentially highlight the patient's needs, with nursing care adapting accordingly.

Objective: The objectives of this PARACT (PARAmedical Interventions on Patient ACTivation) multicentric study were as follows: (1) evaluate the implementation of PAM-13 in oncology nursing practices in 5 comprehensive cancer centers, (2) identify the obstacles and facilitators to the implementation of PAM-13, and (3) produce recommendations for the dissemination of such interventions in other comprehensive cancer centers.

Methods: This study will follow the "Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance" framework and will consist of 3 stages. First, a robust preimplementation analysis will be conducted using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) linked to the "Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior" model to identify the obstacles and facilitators to implementing new nursing practices in each context. Then, using the Behavior Change Wheel, we will personalize a strategy for implementing the PAM-13, depending on the specificities of each context, to encourage acceptability by the nursing staff involved in the project. This analysis will be performed via a qualitative study through semistructured interviews. Second, the patient will be included in the study for 12 months, during which the patient care pathway will be studied, particularly to collect all relevant contacts of oncology nurses and other health professionals involved in the pathway. The axes of nursing care will also be collected. The primary goal is to implement PAM-13. Secondary factors to be measured are the patient's anxiety level, quality of life, and health literacy level. The oncology nurses will be responsible for completing the questionnaires when the patient is at the hospital for his/her intravenous chemotherapy/immunotherapy treatment. The questionnaires will be completed thrice in a year: (1) at the time of the patient's enrollment, (2) at 6 months, and (3) at 12 months. Third, a postimplementation analysis will be performed through semistructured interviews using the TDF to investigate the implementation problems at each site.

Results: This study was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health (PHRIP PARACT 2016-0405) and the Lucien Neuwirth Institute of Cancerology of Saint-Etienne, France. Data collection for this study is ongoing.

Conclusions: This study would improve the implemented targeted nursing interventions in cancer centers so that a patient is offered a personalized cancer care pathway. Furthermore, measuring the level of activation and the implementation of measures intended to increase such activation could constitute a significant advantage in reducing social health inequalities.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03240341; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03240341.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/17485.

Keywords: PAM-13; REALM-R; health literacy; implementation science; mixed method; nursing; oncology; patient activation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Elise Verot, Wafa Bouleftour, Corinne Macron, Romain Rivoirard, Franck Chauvin. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 08.12.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall design of the PARACT (PARAmedical Interventions on Patient ACTivation) multicentric study.

References

    1. Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé. Plan cancer 2014-2019. 2014. [2019-05-14]. .
    1. Institut National du Cancer. Les cancers en France - Edition 2017. INCa: The 2017 report “Cancers in France” is available. 2018. Apr 01, [2019-05-14].
    1. Institut National du Cancer. INCa; 2015. Jan 01, [2019-05-14]. Les cancers en France, Les Données, INCa, édition 2015. .
    1. Quelle prise en charge des cancers en 2020? Internet. Unicancer. [2019-05-14]. .
    1. Les Plans cancer de 2003 à 2007. Institut National du Cancer. [2019-11-14]. .
    1. The 2009-2013 Cancer Plan. Institut National du Cancer. [2019-11-14]. .
    1. Grimaldi A, Caillé Y, Pierru F, Tabuteau D. Les maladies chroniques Vers la troisième médecine. In: Odile Jacob., editor. Odile Jaco. Paris: Odile Jacob; 2017. Mar 15,
    1. Hendren S, Fiscella K. Patient Navigation Improves the Care Experience for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer. JCO. 2014 Jan 01;32(1):3–4. doi: 10.1200/jco.2013.53.2960.
    1. Walters R, Leslie S, Polson R, Cusack T, Gorely T. Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):1040. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08991-0.
    1. Rondia K, Adriaenssens J, Van DBS, Kohn L. Littératie en santé?: quels enseignements tirer des expériences d'autres pays? Vol. KCE Report, Health Services Research (HSR) 2019. [2019-05-14]. .
    1. McCorkle R, Ercolano E, Lazenby M, Schulman-Green D, Schilling L, Lorig K, Wagner E. Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(1):50–62. doi: 10.3322/caac.20093. doi: 10.3322/caac.20093.
    1. Freeman H, Muth B, Kerner J. Expanding access to cancer screening and clinical follow-up among the medically underserved. Cancer Pract. 1995;3(1):19–30.
    1. Freeman H, Rodriguez R. History and principles of patient navigation. Cancer. 2011 Aug;117(15 Suppl):3539–42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26262. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26262.
    1. Ali-Faisal S, Colella T, Medina-Jaudes N, Benz Scott Lisa. The effectiveness of patient navigation to improve healthcare utilization outcomes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):436–448. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.014.
    1. Koh C, Nelson JM, Cook PF. Evaluation of a Patient Navigation Program. Clin J Onc Nursing. 2011 Jan 28;15(1):41–48. doi: 10.1188/11.cjon.41-48.
    1. Crane-Okada R. Evaluation and outcome measures in patient navigation. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2013 May;29(2):128–40. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2013.02.008.
    1. INCa Expérimentation du parcours personnalisé des patients pendant et après le cancer. French National Cancer Institut. 2011. [2019-05-14]. .
    1. Sørensen Kristine, Van den Broucke Stephan, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, Brand H, (HLS-EU) Consortium Health Literacy Project European Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 25;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.
    1. Schillinger D, Bindman A, Wang F, Stewart A, Piette J. Functional health literacy and the quality of physician–patient communication among diabetes patients. Patient Education and Counseling. 2004 Mar;52(3):315–323. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00107-1.
    1. Jiang S, Hong YA. Mobile-based patient-provider communication in cancer survivors: The roles of health literacy and patient activation. Psychooncology. 2018 Mar;27(3):886–891. doi: 10.1002/pon.4598.
    1. Koay K, Schofield Penelope, Jefford Michael. Importance of health literacy in oncology. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar;8(1):14–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2012.01522.x.
    1. Boland L, Stacey D. La littératie en santé dans la pratique clinique et en recherche. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2016;26(4):362–364.
    1. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97–107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.
    1. Easton P, Entwistle V, Williams B. Health in the 'hidden population' of people with low literacy. A systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 05;10:459. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-459.
    1. Murphy PW, Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Decker BC. Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM): A quick reading test for patients. JSTOR. 1993. [2019-05-14]. .
    1. Bass P, Wilson J, Griffith C. A shortened instrument for literacy screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Dec;18(12):1036–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.10651.x.
    1. Grandjacquot Delphine. French validation of REALM-R, a tool for the assessment of health literacy. DUMAS. 2016. [2019-05-14]. .
    1. Gruman J, Rovner MH, French ME, Jeffress D, Sofaer S, Shaller D, Prager DJ. From patient education to patient engagement: implications for the field of patient education. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Mar;78(3):350–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.002.
    1. Health CFA. Center for Advancing Health. A New Definition of Patient Engagement: What is Engagement and Why is it Important. [2019-05-14]. .
    1. Ngooi Bx. What Are The Crucial Components of Patient Activation Interventions? BJSTR. 2017 Jul 26;1(2) doi: 10.26717/bjstr.2017.01.000215.
    1. Hibbard J, Stockard J, Mahoney E, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):1005–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x.
    1. Greene J, Hibbard J, Tusler M. How Much Do Health Literacy and Patient Activation Contribute to Older Adults? Ability to Manage Their Health? AARP Public Policy Institute. 2005. Jun 05, [2019-11-14]. .
    1. Laranjo L, Dias V, Nunes C, Paiva D, Mahoney B. Translation and Validation of the Patient Activation Measure in Portuguese People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Acta Med Port. 2018 Aug 31;31(7-8):382–390. doi: 10.20344/amp.9072.
    1. Brenk-Franz K, Hibbard J, Herrmann W, Freund T, Szecsenyi J, Djalali S, Steurer-Stey C, Sönnichsen Andreas, Tiesler F, Storch M, Schneider N, Gensichen J. Validation of the German version of the patient activation measure 13 (PAM13-D) in an international multicentre study of primary care patients. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074786.
    1. Moljord Inger Elise O, Lara-Cabrera M, Perestelo-Pérez Lilisbeth, Rivero-Santana Amado, Eriksen Lasse, Linaker Olav M. Psychometric properties of the Patient Activation Measure-13 among out-patients waiting for mental health treatment: A validation study in Norway. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Nov;98(11):1410–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.009.
    1. Roberts N, Kidd L, Dougall N, Patel I, McNarry S, Nixon C. Measuring patient activation: The utility of the Patient Activation Measure within a UK context-Results from four exemplar studies and potential future applications. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Oct;99(10):1739–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.006.
    1. Rademakers J, Nijman J, van der Hoek Lucas, Heijmans M, Rijken M. Measuring patient activation in The Netherlands: translation and validation of the American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 31;12:577. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-577.
    1. Rademakers J, Maindal HT, Steinsbekk A, Gensichen J, Brenk-Franz K, Hendriks M. Patient activation in Europe: an international comparison of psychometric properties and patients' scores on the short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 12;16(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1828-1.
    1. Graffigna G, Barello S, Bonanomi A, Lozza E, Hibbard J. Measuring patient activation in Italy: Translation, adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the patient activation measure 13 (PAM13-I) BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Dec 23;15:109. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0232-9.
    1. Prey JE, Qian M, Restaino S, Hibbard J, Bakken S, Schnall R, Rothenberg G, Vawdrey DK, Masterson Creber R. Reliability and validity of the patient activation measure in hospitalized patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):2026–2033. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.029.
    1. Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):520–6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1931-2.
    1. Hibbard J, Gilburt H, Helen G. Supporting people to manage their health?: an introduction to patient activation. Kings Fund. 2014. May, [2019-05-14]. .
    1. Casalino LP. Disease management and the organization of physician practice. JAMA. 2005 Jan 26;293(4):485–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.4.485.
    1. Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, Sobel DS, Brown BW, Bandura A, Gonzalez VM, Laurent DD, Holman HR. Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care. 2001 Nov;39(11):1217–23. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00008.
    1. Harvey L, Fowles JB, Xi M, Terry P. When activation changes, what else changes? the relationship between change in patient activation measure (PAM) and employees' health status and health behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):338–43. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.005.
    1. Hibbard J, Greene J, Overton V. Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients' 'scores'. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013 Feb;32(2):216–22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1064.
    1. Smith SG, Curtis LM, Wardle J, von Wagner C, Wolf MS. Skill set or mind set? Associations between health literacy, patient activation and health. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074373.
    1. Rijken M, Heijmans M, Jansen D, Rademakers J. Developments in patient activation of people with chronic illness and the impact of changes in self-reported health: results of a nationwide longitudinal study in The Netherlands. Patient Education and Counseling. 2014 Dec;97(3):383–390. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.09.006.
    1. Kinney R, Lemon S, Person S, Pagoto S, Saczynski J. The association between patient activation and medication adherence, hospitalization, and emergency room utilization in patients with chronic illnesses: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2015 May;98(5):545–552. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.02.005.
    1. Parrotta J, Greene J, Hibbard R, Sacks V, Overton C, Greene J, Hibbard J, Sacks R, Overton V, Parrotta C. When Patient Activation Levels Change, Health Outcomes And Costs Change, Too. Connecticut Health Center/LM Stowe Library on Health Affairs by Internet. 2015 Mar;34(3) doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0452.
    1. James J. Health Policy Brief: Patient Engagement. People actively involved in their health and health care tend to have better outcomes- and, some evidence suggests, lower costs. 2013 Feb 14; doi: 10.1377/hpb20130214.898775.
    1. Carman K, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, Sweeney J. Patient And Family Engagement: A Framework For Understanding The Elements And Developing Interventions And Policies. Health Affairs Internet. 2013 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.
    1. Lundahl B, Moleni T, Burke BL, Butters R, Tollefson D, Butler C, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):157–68. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012.
    1. Mercer SW, Neumann M, Wirtz M, Fitzpatrick B, Vojt G. General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland--a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):240–5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.022.
    1. Mercer SW, Jani BD, Maxwell M, Wong SYS, Watt GCM. Patient enablement requires physician empathy: a cross-sectional study of general practice consultations in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Feb 08;13:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-6.
    1. Pawlikowska T, Zhang W, Griffiths F, van Dalen J, van der Vleuten C. Verbal and non-verbal behavior of doctors and patients in primary care consultations - how this relates to patient enablement. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):70–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.019.
    1. Greene J, Yedidia MJ, Take Care to Learn Evalutation Collaborative Provider behaviors contributing to patient self-management of chronic illness among underserved populations. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005 Nov;16(4):808–24. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2005.0097.
    1. Bender BG. Can health care organizations improve health behavior and treatment adherence? Popul Health Manag. 2014 Apr;17(2):71–8. doi: 10.1089/pop.2013.0045.
    1. Cadre pour des services de santé intégrés centrés sur la personne. World Health Organization. 2016. Apr 15, [2019-05-14]. .
    1. Patient activation and PAM. NHS. [2019-05-14]. .
    1. Fitch MI. Cadre des soins de soutien. CONJ. 2008;18(1):15–24. doi: 10.5737/1181912x1811524.
    1. Bultz BD, Groff SL, Fitch M, Blais MC, Howes J, Levy K, Mayer C. Implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a Canadian strategy for changing practice. Psychooncology. 2011 May;20(5):463–9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1932.
    1. van Houtum Lieke, Rijken M, Heijmans M, Groenewegen P. Self-management support needs of patients with chronic illness: do needs for support differ according to the course of illness? Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):626–32. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.021.
    1. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Canada: SAGE; 2019. Dec 09, pp. 153–154.
    1. Guadagnolo B, Dohan D, Raich P. Metrics for evaluating patient navigation during cancer diagnosis and treatment: crafting a policy-relevant research agenda for patient navigation in cancer care. Cancer. 2011 Aug;117(15 Suppl):3565–74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26269. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26269.
    1. Glasgow R, Emmons K. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145.
    1. Malterud K. The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. The Lancet. 2001 Aug;358(9279):397–400. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05548-9.
    1. Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O'Connor Denise, Patey A, Ivers N, Foy R, Duncan E, Colquhoun H, Grimshaw J, Lawton R, Michie S. A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
    1. Michie Susan, Atkins Lou, West Robert. A guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014. [2019-05-14]. The Behaviour Change Wheel.
    1. Godin G. Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal. Montréal: PUM; 2012. Behaviours in the field of health: understanding to better intervene (Les comportements dans le domaine de la santé: comprendre pour mieux intervenir)
    1. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
    1. Glasper A, Rees C. Wiley. Hoboken: Wiley; 2016. Nursing and Health care Research at a Glance; p. 226.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):26–33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.
    1. Phillips CJ, Marshall AP, Chaves NJ, Jankelowitz SK, Lin IB, Loy CT, Rees G, Sakzewski L, Thomas S, To T, Wilkinson SA, Michie S. Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:139–46. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S78458. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S78458.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006 Jan;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349–57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
    1. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1918–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x.
    1. Zigmond A, Snaith R. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
    1. Guideline for Management of Depression and Generalised Anxiety disorder in Primary Care. NHS. 2016. [2019-05-14]. .
    1. Haute Autorité de santé Anorexie mentale: prise en charge. Recommandations de bonne pratique, juin 2010. Nutrition Clinique et Métabolisme. 2011 Jun;25(2):57–74. doi: 10.1016/j.nupar.2011.04.005.
    1. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337–43. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087.
    1. Pickard AS, Wilke CT, Lin H, Lloyd A. Health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(5):365–84. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725050-00002.
    1. The R foundation. [2020-03-01].
    1. The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is a key vital sign for patient-centered, value-based care. [2018-04-26].
    1. Deen D, Lu W, Rothstein D, Santana L, Gold MR. Asking questions: the effect of a brief intervention in community health centers on patient activation. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):257–60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.026.
    1. Lawson KL, Jonk Y, O'Connor Heidi, Riise KS, Eisenberg DM, Kreitzer MJ. The impact of Telephonic Health Coaching on Health Outcomes in a High-risk Population. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013 May;2(3):40–7. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.039.
    1. Shively MJ, Gardetto NJ, Kodiath MF, Kelly A, Smith TL, Stepnowsky C, Maynard C, Larson CB. Effect of Patient Activation on Self-Management in Patients With Heart Failure. J Cardiovasc Nursing. 2013;28(1):20–34. doi: 10.1097/jcn.0b013e318239f9f9.
    1. Hibbard J, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013 Feb;32(2):207–14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061.
    1. Frosch DL, Rincon D, Ochoa S, Mangione CM. Activating seniors to improve chronic disease care: results from a pilot intervention study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Aug;58(8):1496–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02980.x.
    1. Hibbard J, Greene J, Tusler M. Improving the outcomes of disease management by tailoring care to the patient's level of activation. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jun;15(6):353–60.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel