Antiepileptic Effects of a Novel Non-invasive Neuromodulation Treatment in a Subject With Early-Onset Epileptic Encephalopathy: Case Report With 20 Sessions of HD-tDCS Intervention

Oded Meiron, Rena Gale, Julia Namestnic, Odeya Bennet-Back, Nigel Gebodh, Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Vladislav Mandzhiyev, Marom Bikson, Oded Meiron, Rena Gale, Julia Namestnic, Odeya Bennet-Back, Nigel Gebodh, Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Vladislav Mandzhiyev, Marom Bikson

Abstract

The current clinical investigation examined high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) as a focal, non-invasive, anti-epileptic treatment in a child with early-onset epileptic encephalopathy. We investigated the clinical impact of repetitive (20 daily sessions) cathode-centered 4 × 1 HD-tDCS (1 mA, 20 min, 4 mm ring radius) over the dominant seizure-generating cortical zone in a 40-month-old child suffering from a severe neonatal epileptic syndrome known as Ohtahara syndrome (OS). Seizures and epileptiform activity were monitored and quantified using video-EEG over multiple days of baseline, intervention, and post-intervention periods. Primary outcome measures were changes in seizure frequency and duration on the last day of intervention versus the last baseline day, preceding the intervention. In particular, we examined changes in tonic spasms, tonic-myoclonic seizures (TM-S), and myoclonic seizures from baseline to post-intervention. A trend in TM-S frequency was observed indicating a reduction of 73% in TM-S frequency, which was non-significant [t(4) = 2.05, p = 0.1], and denoted a clinically significant change. Myoclonic seizure (M-S) frequency was significantly reduced [t(4) = 3.83, p = 0.019] by 68.42%, compared to baseline, and indicated a significant clinical change as well. A 73% decrease in interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) frequency was also observed immediately after the intervention period, compared to IED frequency at 3 days prior to intervention. Post-intervention seizure-related peak delta desynchronization was reduced by 57%. Our findings represent a case-specific significant clinical response, reduction in IED, and change in seizure-related delta activity following the application of HD-tDCS. The clinical outcomes, as noted in the current study, encourage the further investigation of this focal, non-invasive neuromodulation procedure in other severe electroclinical syndromes (e.g., West syndrome) and in larger pediatric populations diagnosed with early-onset epileptic encephalopathy. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02960347, protocol ID: Meiron 2013-4.

Keywords: electroencephalography (EEG); high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS); interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs); neonatal epileptic encephalopathy; seizure.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study overview detailing the three phases of assessments including baseline, intervention, and post-intervention. The timing and procedures administered are detailed for each of the three phases.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Computer simulations of 4 × 1 HD-tDCS intervention in an age-matched MRI-derived head model. (A) FEM MRI-derived model of an age-matched infant with electrode positioning is based on the 10/10 International system. Locations were used for recording EEG (gray) and stimulation (blue: cathode; red: anode). (B) Model-based prediction from FEM indicating scalp voltages across the head and at the anodes and cathode (false color: blue minimum = –70 mV, red maximum = 47 mV, green = 0 mV). (C) Model-based current flow field across the brain indicating maximal electric field under the cathode (false color: blue = 0 V/m, red = 1.57 V/m). (D) Finite-element model predictions of the normal electric field across the brain indicating electric field under the cathode (false color: blue = 0 V/m, red = 0.6 V/m). The color scheme maximized to 0.6 V/m (seen in adult brains under 2 mA of applied current) indicated a large right temporal lobe electric field. (E) Model-based radial electric field distribution across the brain indicating electric field under the cathode (false color: blue = –0.4 V/m- outward-radial electric field, inhibitory; red = 0.4 V/m-inward-radial electric field, excitatory).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
EEG seizure baseline and post-intervention comparisons. (A) Seizure frequency for baseline and post intervention divided into M-S and TM-S. M-S frequency was significantly reduced (p = 0.019) and TM-S were reduced by more than 50% post intervention. (B) TM-S duration between baseline and post-intervention periods. (C) Mean spike amplitudes at baseline (3 days before intervention) versus intervention day 20 (immediately after the last treatment session). Spike amplitudes were significantly reduced (p < 0.001) compared to baseline. Spike amplitudes over the post-intervention period were significantly reduced (p < 0.001) compared to baseline. (D) Topographic scalp maps of normalized delta activity (2 Hz) comparing baseline (3 days before stimulation) and post intervention (3 days after intervention). (E) There was a significant difference (p = 0.01) between seizure-related mean peak delta desynchronization between baseline and post intervention.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Interictal epileptic discharges (spike waves and sharp waves) during the intervention period. (A) Mean spike frequency of the right and left hemisphere over days of stimulation (baseline prior to HD-tDCS: M = 8330.8, SD = 2017.86). (B) Mean spike amplitudes of the right and left hemisphere over days of stimulation (baseline prior to HD-tDCS: M = 142.26, SD = 6.03 μV). (C) Mean spike duration of the right and left hemisphere over days of stimulation (baseline prior to HD-tDCS: M = 0.093, SD = 0. 0044 s).

References

    1. Alam M., Truong D. Q., Khadka N., Bikson M. (2016). Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Phys. Med. Biol. 61 4506–4521. 10.1088/0031-9155/61/12/4506
    1. Auvichayapat N., Rotenberg A., Gersner R., Ngodklang S., Tiamkao S., Tassaneeyakul W., et al. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of refractory childhood focal epilepsy. Brain stimul. 6 696–700. 10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.009
    1. Auvichayapat N., Sinsupan K., Tunkamnerdthai O., Auvichayapat P. (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of childhood pharmacoresistant lennox-gastaut syndrome: a pilot study. Front. Neurol. 7:66. 10.3389/fneur.2016.00066
    1. Beal J. C., Cherian K., Moshe S. L. (2012). Early-onset epileptic encephalopathies: ohtahara syndrome and early myoclonic encephalopathy. Pediatr. Neurol. 47 317–323. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2012.06.002
    1. Bikson M., Inoue M., Akiyama H., Deans J. K., Fox J. E., Miyakawa H., et al. (2004). Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. J. Physiol. 557 175–190. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.055772
    1. Bindman L. J., Lippold O. C., Redfearn J. W. (1964). The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects. J. Physiol. 172 369–382. 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007425
    1. Brunoni A. R., Nitsche M. A., Bolognini N., Bikson M., Wagner T., Merabet L., et al. (2012). Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul. 5 175–195. 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002
    1. Cancelli A., Cottone C., Tecchio F., Truong D. Q., Dmochowski J., Bikson M. (2016). A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models. J. Neural Eng. 13:036022. 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036022
    1. Chan C. Y., Nicholson C. (1986). Modulation by applied electric fields of Purkinje and stellate cell activity in the isolated turtle cerebellum. J. Physiol. 371 89–114. 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015963
    1. Datta A., Bansal V., Diaz J., Patel J., Reato D., Bikson M. (2009). Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul. 2:207e201.
    1. Delorme A., Makeig S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134 9–21. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
    1. Dmochowski J. P., Datta A., Bikson M., Su Y., Parra L. C. (2011). Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. J. Neural Eng. 8:046011. 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046011
    1. Dmochowski J. P., Koessler L., Norcia A. M., Bikson M., Parra L. C. (2017). Optimal use of EEG recordings to target active brain areas with transcranial electrical stimulation. Neuroimage 157 69–80. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.059
    1. Eastin T. M., Lopez-Gonzalez M. A. (2017). Stimulation and neuromodulation in the treatment of epilepsy. Brain Sci. 8:E2.
    1. Edwards D., Cortes M., Datta A., Minhas P., Wassermann E. M., Bikson M. (2013). Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS. Neuroimage 74 266–275. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.042
    1. Fregni F., Thome-Souza S., Nitsche M. A., Freedman S. D., Valente K. D., Pascual-Leone A. (2006). A controlled clinical trial of cathodal DC polarization in patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia 47 335–342. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00426.x
    1. Gaily E., Liukkonen E., Paetau R., Rekola R., Granstrom M. L. (2001). Infantile spasms: diagnosis and assessment of treatment response by video-EEG. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 43 658–667. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2001.tb00139.x
    1. Ghai R. S., Bikson M., Durand D. M. (2000). Effects of applied electric fields on low-calcium epileptiform activity in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices. J. Neurophysiol. 84 274–280. 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.274
    1. Gluckman B. J., Neel E. J., Netoff T. I., Ditto W. L., Spano M. L., Schiff S. J. (1996). Electric field suppression of epileptiform activity in hippocampal slices. J. Neurophysiol. 76 4202–4205. 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.4202
    1. Hahn C., Rice J., Macuff S., Minhas P., Rahman A., Bikson M. (2013). Methods for extra-low voltage transcranial direct current stimulation: current and time dependent impedance decreases. Clin. Neurophysiol. 124 551–556. 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.028
    1. Huang Y., Thomas C., Datta A., Parra L. C. (2018). Optimized tDCS for targeting multiple brain regions: an integrated implementation. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2018 3545–3548. 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513034
    1. Karvigh S. A., Motamedi M., Arzani M., Roshan J. H. (2017). HD-tDCS in refractory lateral frontal lobe epilepsy patients. Seizure 47 74–80. 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.03.005
    1. Kuo H. I., Bikson M., Datta A., Minhas P., Paulus W., Kuo M. F., et al. (2013). Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study. Brain Stimul. 6 644–648. 10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.010
    1. Kwon C. S., Ripa V., Al-Awar O., Panov F., Ghatan S., Jette N. (2018). Epilepsy and neuromodulation-randomized controlled trials. Brain Sci. 8:E69. 10.3390/brainsci8040069
    1. Meiron O., Gale R., Namestnic J., Bennet-Back O., David J., Gebodh N., et al. (2018). High-Definition transcranial direct current stimulation in early onset epileptic encephalopathy: a case study. Brain Inj. 32 135–143. 10.1080/02699052.2017.1390254
    1. Nitsche M. A., Paulus W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Physiol. 527(Pt 3), 633–639. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
    1. Nitsche M. A., Paulus W. (2009). Noninvasive brain stimulation protocols in the treatment of epilepsy: current state and perspectives. Neurotherapeutics 6 244–250. 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.01.003
    1. Nune G., DeGiorgio C., Heck C. (2015). Neuromodulation in the treatment of epilepsy. Curr. Treat Options Neurol. 17:375.
    1. Ohtahara S., Yamatogi Y. (2006). Ohtahara syndrome: with special reference to its developmental aspects for differentiating from early myoclonic encephalopathy. Epilepsy Res. 70(Suppl. 1), S58–S67.
    1. Payen J.-F., Bru O., Bosson J.-L., Lagrasta A., Novel E., Deschaux I., et al. (2001). Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale. Crit. Care Med. 29 2258–2263. 10.1097/00003246-200112000-00004
    1. Rahman A., Reato D., Arlotti M., Gasca F., Datta A., Parra L. C., et al. (2013). Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. J. Physiol. 591 2563–2578. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247171
    1. Rosso O. A., Martin M. T., Figliola A., Keller K., Plastino A. (2006). EEG analysis using wavelet-based information tools. J. Neurosci. Methods 153 163–182. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.10.009
    1. San-Juan D., Espinoza Lopez D. A., Vazquez Gregorio R., Trenado C., Fernandez-Gonzalez Aragon M., Morales-Quezada L., et al. (2017). Transcranial direct current stimulation in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis. Brain Stimul. 10 28–35. 10.1016/j.brs.2016.08.013
    1. Siniatchkin M., Van Baalen A., Jacobs J., Moeller F., Moehring J., Boor R., et al. (2007). Different neuronal networks are associated with spikes and slow activity in hypsarrhythmia. Epilepsia 48 2312–2321.
    1. Sunderam S., Gluckman B., Reato D., Bikson M. (2010). Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control. Epilepsy Behav. 17 6–22. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.10.017
    1. Villamar M. F., Volz M. S., Bikson M., Datta A., Dasilva A. F., Fregni F. (2013). Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). J. Vis. Exp. 77:e50309. 10.3791/50309
    1. Watanabe K., Negoro T., Aso K. (1993a). Benign partial epilepsy with secondarily generalized seizures in infancy. Epilepsia 34 635–638. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb00440.x
    1. Watanabe K., Negoro T., Aso K., Matsumoto A. (1993b). Reappraisal of interictal electroencephalograms in infantile spasms. Epilepsia 34 679–685. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb00446.x
    1. Wu C., Sharan A. D. (2013). Neurostimulation for the treatment of epilepsy: a review of current surgical interventions. Neuromodulation 16 10–24; discussion 24. 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00501.x
    1. Yook S. W., Park S. H., Seo J. H., Kim S. J., Ko M. H. (2011). Suppression of seizure by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in an epileptic patient - a case report. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 35 579–582. 10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.579

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel