Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Immunogenicity of CMAB807, a New Denosumab Biosimilar, in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Hanjing Chen, Weili Chen, Fei Yuan, Qingcheng Guo, Xunmin Zhang, Chenguang Wang, Xuening Li, Hanjing Chen, Weili Chen, Fei Yuan, Qingcheng Guo, Xunmin Zhang, Chenguang Wang, Xuening Li

Abstract

Objective: Pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and immunogenicity studies were conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of CMAB807, a biosimilar to denosumab (Prolia®), which is the only approved RANKL inhibitor for the treatment of osteoporosis. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, single-dose phase I study, 132 healthy Chinese male subjects received a subcutaneous injection of 60 mg of CMAB807 or denosumab at a 1:1 ratio. The PK, PD, safety and immunogenicity results were assessed prior to and up to 126 days after administration. Results: The PK profiles of CMAB807 and denosumab were similar. The geometric mean ratios of the maximum concentration (Cmax), AUC0-t and AUCo-∞ were 102.41, 104.15 and 103.89%, respectively, and the 90% confidence interval was observed to be within 80.00-125.00%, which indicated the bioequivalence of CMAB807 and denosumab. The PD profiles of the two groups were also comparable. The production of the C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX1) was inhibited by up to 85% for 10 days, and this inhibition was sustained for up to 126 days in both the CMAB807 and denosumab groups. No subjects in the CMAB807 group, three subjects in the denosumab group before administration, and two subjects in the denosumab group after administration were positive for anti-drug antibody (ADA). Adverse events (AEs) were observed in 98.5% of subjects in both groups. The most common AE recorded was increased parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, with incidences of 92.4 and 95.5% in the CMAB807 and denosumab groups, respectively. No clinically meaningful differences were observed in safety and immunogenicity between CMAB807 and denosumab. Conclusion: CMAB807 represents a new potential treatment option for patients with osteoporosis. Clinical Trial Registration: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03925051" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT03925051), http://www.chinadrugtrial/org.cn/index.html (Registration No. CTR20190800).

Keywords: RANKL; biosimilar; denosumab; immunogenicity; osteoporosis; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors QG, XZ and CW were employed by Taizhou Mabtech Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Chen, Chen, Yuan, Guo, Zhang, Wang and Li.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart of the study.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean serum concentration-time profiles following the SC injection of 60 mg of CMAB807 or denosumab in healthy Chinese male subjects (A): Linear scale (B): semilog scale. Note: the error bars indicate the standard deviations (SD); the dashed horizontal line refers to the LLOQ (25.0 ng/ml).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Median percent change in the CTX1-time profiles from baseline. Note: the error bars indicate the SD.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Mean serum PTH concentration versus time profiles after the SC injection of 60 mg of CMAB807 or denosumab in healthy Chinese male subjects. Note: the error bars indicate the SD.

References

    1. Amgen (2021). Prolia (Denosumab) Highlights of Prescribing Information. Available at: . (Accessed Aug 12, 2021).
    1. Amgen (2020). Prolia (Denosumab Injection) Product Monograph. Available at: . (Accessed Aug 12, 2021).
    1. An G. (2020). Concept of Pharmacologic Target-Mediated Drug Disposition in Large-Molecule and Small-Molecule Compounds. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 60 (2), 149–163. 10.1002/jcph.1545
    1. Bekker P. J., Holloway D. L., Rasmussen A. S., Murphy R., Martin S. W., Leese P. T., et al. (2004). A Single-Dose Placebo-Controlled Study of AMG 162, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to RANKL, in Postmenopausal Women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 19 (7), 1059–1066. 10.1359/JBMR.040305
    1. Chen Q., Hu C., Liu Y., Song R., Zhu W., Zhao H., et al. (2018). Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Denosumab in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. PLoS One 13 (6), e0197984. 10.1371/journal.pone.0197984
    1. Civitelli R., Ziambaras K. (2011). Calcium and Phosphate Homeostasis: Concerted Interplay of New Regulators. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 34 (7 Suppl), 3–7. 10.1080/07853890701689645
    1. Deeks E. D. (2018). Author Correction to: Denosumab: A Review in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Drugs Aging 35 (3), 261. 10.1007/s40266-018-0535-5
    1. EMA (2015). Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products. Available at: . (Accessed Jan 11, 2022).
    1. FDA (2010). Clinical Pharmacology Biopharmaceutics Reviews. Available at: . (Accessed Aug 12, 2021).
    1. FDA (2015). Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product. Available at: . (Accessed Jan 11, 2022).
    1. Glassman P. M., Balthasar J. P. (2016). Physiologically-based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn 43 (4), 427–446. 10.1007/s10928-016-9482-0
    1. Grant S. K. (2009). Therapeutic Protein Kinase Inhibitors. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66 (7), 1163–1177. 10.1007/s00018-008-8539-7
    1. Jose V., Singh I., Patel R., Arora S. (2021). Denosumab Biosimilar in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women: A Randomized, Assessor-Blind, Active-Controlled Clinical Trial. Indian J. Pharmacol. 53 (1), 6–12. 10.4103/ijp.IJP_346_19
    1. Khan T. H. (2021). Received Acceptance Notification for Clinical Trial Application from NMPA for its Denosumab Biosimilar HLX14. Available at: . (Accessed Jan 11, 2022).
    1. Li J. Y., Yu M., Pal S., Tyagi A. M., Dar H., Adams J., et al. (2020). Parathyroid Hormone-dependent Bone Formation Requires Butyrate Production by Intestinal Microbiota. J. Clin. Invest. 130 (4), 1767–1781. 10.1172/JCI133473
    1. Mulcahy A. W., Hlavka J. P., Case S. R. (2018). Biosimilar Cost Savings in the United States: Initial Experience and Future Potential. Available at: . (Accessed January 11, 2022).
    1. Nakamura Y., Kamimura M., Ikegami S., Mukaiyama K., Uchiyama S., Taguchi A., et al. (2015). Changes in Serum Vitamin D and PTH Values Using Denosumab with or without Bisphosphonate Pre-treatment in Osteoporotic Patients: a Short-Term Study. BMC Endocr. Disord. 15 (1), 81. 10.1186/s12902-015-0077-3
    1. NMPA (2015). Guidelines on Development and Evaluation of Biosimilars. Available at: . (Accessed Jan 11, 2022).
    1. Sutjandra L., Rodriguez R. D., Doshi S., Ma M., Peterson M. C., Jang G. R., et al. (2011). Population Pharmacokinetic Meta-Analysis of Denosumab in Healthy Subjects and Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia or Osteoporosis. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 50 (12), 793–807. 10.2165/11594240-000000000-00000
    1. Tanaka S., Nakamura K., Takahasi N., Suda T. (2005). Role of RANKL in Physiological and Pathological Bone Resorption and Therapeutics Targeting the RANKL-RANK Signaling System. Immunol. Rev. 208, 30–49. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00327.x
    1. Wang W., Wang E. Q., Balthasar J. P. (2008). Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 84 (5), 548–558. 10.1038/clpt.2008.170
    1. Williams C., Sapra A. (2021). Osteoporosis Markers. Available at: (Accessed Aug 12, 2021).
    1. Zhang H., Wu M., Zhu X., Li C., Li X., Sun J., et al. (2020). A Phase I, Randomized, Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Biosimilarity of QL1206 to Denosumab Among Chinese Healthy Subjects. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 01329. 10.3389/fphar.2020.01329
    1. Zhang H., Li C., Liu J., Wu M., Li X., Zhu X., et al. (2021). Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Biosimilar of Denosumab (KN012): Phase 1 and Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Chinese Subjects. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 30 (2), 185–192. 10.1080/13543784.2021.1863371

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel