Intra and interrater reliability and clinical feasibility of a simple measure of cervical movement sense in patients with neck pain

Isabelle M Werner, Markus J Ernst, Julia Treleaven, Rebecca J Crawford, Isabelle M Werner, Markus J Ernst, Julia Treleaven, Rebecca J Crawford

Abstract

Background: Pattern tracing tasks can be used to assess cervical spine movement sense (CMS). A simple clinical measure of CMS (tracing fixed figure-of-eight (F8) and zigzag (ZZ) patterns with a head mounted laser) has been proposed and assessed in asymptomatic subjects. It is important to determine if examiner ratings of the traces are reliable and feasible for clinical use in those with neck pain. We therefore examined the intra- and inter-rater reliability of rating video recordings of the CMS tasks, and the feasibility of undertaking the tests in clinic by comparing slow motion versus real-time video ratings.

Methods: Cross-sectional study examining neck pain subjects from a physiotherapy clinic. F8 and ZZ patterns traced with a head-mounted laser pointer at two velocities (accurate; accurate & fast) were videoed and later examined. Time (total time taken to complete the pattern), error frequency (number of deviations) and error magnitude (sum of deviations multiplied by distance from the central line) were measured. Two assessors independently evaluated the laser tracing videos in slow motion; a third rated the videos in real time. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurements (SEM) were calculated for intra- and inter-tester reliability, and feasibility.

Results: Twenty neck pain patient (13 women) videos were assessed. Intra-and inter-rater reliability was substantial to almost-perfect (ICC 0.76-1.00; SEM < 0.01-2.50). Feasibility was moderate to almost-perfect (ICC 0.54-1; SEM < 0.01-2.98).

Conclusions: Video (slow motion) ratings of time and errors for F8 and ZZ movement patterns in neck pain subjects showed high intra and inter-rater reliability. Achieving reliable ratings in clinic (real-time) appears feasible. Synthesising our results, the most reliable and feasible CMS ratings appear to be when the subject uses accurate rather than accurate and fast execution. The ZZ movement pattern may be superior to F8 in terms of rating. Time and error frequency for tracing F8 and ZZ as accurately as possible in determining CMS appears promising for use in clinic. Future research directions were identified.

Keywords: Feasibility; Movement sense testing; Neck pain; Proprioception; Reliability; Sensorimotor control.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee of Zurich (Switzerland) (2017–00311). All participants have been informed and gave written consent prior to data collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Test set-up. Subject sitting on a chair with LASER-Pointer on her head, at 100 cm distance from the ZZ-pattern. Laptop connected to a webcam at a distance of 50 cm from the centre of the pattern
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Feasibility of rating error frequency performed by subjects at accurate velocity. ICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, SEM = Standard error measurement
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Feasibility of rating error frequency performed by subjects at accurate& fast velocity. ICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, SEM = Standard error measurement

References

    1. Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, Blyth F, Brooks P, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Blore J, Murray C, et al. The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1309–1315. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431.
    1. Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, Bertozzi-Villa A, Biryukov S, Bolliger I, Charlson F, Davis A, Degenhardt L, Dicker D, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:743–800.
    1. Childs Maj John D., Fritz Julie M., Piva Sara R., Whitman Julie M. Proposal of a Classification System for Patients With Neck Pain. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2004;34(11):686–700. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.11.686.
    1. Stanton TR, Leake HB, Chalmers KJ, Moseley GL. Evidence of impaired proprioception in chronic, idiopathic neck pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2016;96(6):876–887. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150241.
    1. Jull Gwendolen, Sterling Michele, Falla Deborah, Treleaven Julia, O'Leary Shaun. Whiplash, Headache, and Neck Pain. 2008. Future Directions; pp. 231–237.
    1. Kristjansson E, Treleaven J. Sensorimotor function and dizziness in neck pain: implications for assessment and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(5):364–377. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2834.
    1. Kulkarni V, Chandy MJ, Babu KS. Quantitative study of muscle spindles in suboccipital muscles of human foetuses. Neurol India. 2001;49(4):355–359.
    1. Liu JX, Thornell LE, Pedrosa-Domellof F. Muscle spindles in the deep muscles of the human neck: a morphological and immunocytochemical study. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003;51(2):175–186. doi: 10.1177/002215540305100206.
    1. Treleaven J. Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye movement control. Man Ther. 2008;13(1):2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.06.003.
    1. McLain RF. Mechanoreceptor endings in human cervical facet joints. Spine. 1994;19(5):495–501. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199403000-00001.
    1. Richmond FJ, Bakker DA. Anatomical organization and sensory receptor content of soft tissues surrounding upper cervical vertebrae in the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1982;48(1):49–61. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.1.49.
    1. Roijezon U, Clark NC, Treleaven J. Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 1: basic science and principles of assessment and clinical interventions. Man Ther. 2015;20(3):368–377. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.01.008.
    1. Clark NC, Roijezon U, Treleaven J. Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 2: clinical assessment and intervention. Man Ther. 2015;20(3):378–387. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.01.009.
    1. Treleaven J, Chen X, Sarig Bahat H. Factors associated with cervical kinematic impairments in patients with neck pain. Man Ther. 2016;22:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.10.015.
    1. Treleaven J. Dizziness, unsteadiness, visual disturbances, and sensorimotor control in traumatic neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(7):492–502. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7052.
    1. Michiels S, De Hertogh W, Truijen S, November D, Wuyts F, Van de Heyning P. The assessment of cervical sensory motor control: a systematic review focusing on measuring methods and their clinimetric characteristics. Gait Posture. 2013;38(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.10.007.
    1. Sarig Bahat H, Weiss PL, Laufer Y. The effect of neck pain on cervical kinematics, as assessed in a virtual environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(12):1884–1890. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.007.
    1. Sarig Bahat H, Chen X, Reznik D, Kodesh E, Treleaven J. Interactive cervical motion kinematics: sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant values for identifying kinematic impairments in patients with chronic neck pain. Man Ther. 2015;20(2):295–302. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.10.002.
    1. Woodhouse A, Stavdahl O, Vasseljen O. Irregular head movement patterns in whiplash patients during a trajectory task. Exp Brain Res. 2010;201(2):261–270. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2033-9.
    1. Kristjansson E, Oddsdottir GL. "The Fly": a new clinical assessment and treatment method for deficits of movement control in the cervical spine: reliability and validity. Spine. 2010;35(23):E1298–E1305. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e7fc0a.
    1. Pereira MJ, Beaudin C, Grewal G, Wong V, Treleaven J. Cervical movement sense: normative data for a clinical tool. In: Australian physiotherapy association conference: "New moves" Data provided by the first author as presented at the Conference. Melbourne: Australian physiotherapy association; 2013.
    1. Meisingset I, Woodhouse A, Stensdotter A-K, Stavdahl Ø, Lorås H, Gismervik S, Andresen H, Austreim K, Vasseljen O. Evidence for a general stiffening motor control pattern in neck pain: a cross sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0517-2.
    1. MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(5):400–417. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2930.
    1. Vernon H. The neck disability index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):491–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006.
    1. Swanenburg J, Humphreys K, Langenfeld A, Brunner F, Wirth B. Validity and reliability of a German version of the neck disability index (NDI-G). Man Ther. 2013.
    1. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E. Scientific monograph of the Quebec task force on whiplash-associated disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(8 Suppl):1S–73S.
    1. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983;16(1):87–101. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-X.
    1. Kurre A, van Gool CJ, Bastiaenen CH, Gloor-Juzi T, Straumann D, de Bruin ED. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the german version of the dizziness handicap inventory. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30(3):359–367. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181977e09.
    1. Tesio L, Alpini D, Cesarani A, Perucca L. Short form of the dizziness handicap inventory: construction and validation through Rasch analysis. Amer J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78(3):233–241. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199905000-00009.
    1. de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015.
    1. de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: University Press; 2011.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
    1. R-Development-Core-Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.
    1. Falissard B. psy: Various procedures used in psychometry. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012.
    1. Canti A, Ripley B. Boot: bootstrap R (S-plus) functions. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.
    1. Alahmari K, Reddy RS, Silvian P, Ahmad I, Nagaraj V, Mahtab M. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of neutral head position and target head position tests in patients with and without neck pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017;21(4):259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.05.003.
    1. Juul T, Langberg H, Enoch F, Sogaard K. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-339.
    1. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement Scales. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
    1. Pinsault N, Fleury A, Virone G, Bouvier B, Vaillant J, Vuillerme N. Test-retest reliability of cervicocephalic relocation test to neutral head position. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24(5):380–391. doi: 10.1080/09593980701884824.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel