Electrocardiographic intervals in foetuses with CHD

Betul Yilmaz, Hari K Narayan, Abigail Wilpers, Christina Wiess, William P Fifer, Ismée A Williams, Betul Yilmaz, Hari K Narayan, Abigail Wilpers, Christina Wiess, William P Fifer, Ismée A Williams

Abstract

Objectives: To assess foetal electrocardiographic intervals across gestational age among foetuses with and without congenital heart disease, and to investigate differences between groups.

Design: A prospective observational cohort study.

Setting: Center for Prenatal Pediatrics, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York-Presbyterian. Population or sample A total of 92 participants with singleton pregnancies, 41 with normal anatomy and 51 with congenital heart disease were included in this study.

Methods: Using a maternal abdominal monitor, foetal electrocardiogram was obtained serially from foetuses with and without congenital heart disease at 20-24 weeks (F1), 28-32 weeks (F2), and 34-38 weeks (F3) of gestation. A signal-averaged waveform was calculated, and PR, QRS, and QT intervals were measured. Intervals from controls were compared with gestational age norms. Using Pearson's correlation coefficient, we analysed the relationship between gestational age and foetal electrocardiographic intervals. Intervals from control and congenital heart disease foetuses were compared by Student's t-test.

Results: PR (r=0.333, p=0.02) and QRS (r=0.248, p=0.05) intervals correlated with gestational age only among controls. QRS intervals in foetuses with congenital heart disease were significantly longer than controls at F1 (63 ± 6 versus 52 ± 5 ms, p<0.001), F2 (61 ± 8 versus 56 ± 7 ms, p=0.02), and F3 (64 ± 10 versus 56 ± 9 ms, p=0.007).

Conclusions: PR and QRS intervals lengthen across gestational age among foetuses with normal cardiac anatomy but not in foetuses with congenital heart diseases. As early as 20 weeks of gestation, differences between foetuses with and without congenital heart disease are discernible, with congenital heart disease foetuses demonstrating longer QRS intervals compared with controls.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00115934.

Keywords: Foetal electrocardiography; congenital heart disease; electrocardiographic intervals.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of the presented manuscript, or other conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example of a signal-averaged waveform obtained from each recording channel where 1,000 fetal QRS complexes were averaged. Tracings obtained from channels (CH) 1, 2, and 3 were analyzed independently to calculate PR, QRS, and QT interval length. Note that the T wave detection was poor on this subject.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PR interval correlates positively with gestational age among non-CHD fetuses indicating PR interval lengthens as pregnancy progresses.
Figure 3
Figure 3
QRS interval correlates positively with gestational age among non-CHD fetuses indicating QRS interval lengthens as pregnancy progresses.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel