The PROactive instruments to measure physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Elena Gimeno-Santos, Yogini Raste, Heleen Demeyer, Zafeiris Louvaris, Corina de Jong, Roberto A Rabinovich, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Michael I Polkey, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Maggie Tabberer, Fabienne Dobbels, Nathalie Ivanoff, Willem I de Boer, Thys van der Molen, Karoly Kulich, Ignasi Serra, Xavier Basagaña, Thierry Troosters, Milo A Puhan, Niklas Karlsson, Judith Garcia-Aymerich, PROactive consortium, Nathalie Ivanoff, Niklas Karlsson, Solange Corriol-Rohou, Ian Jarrod, Damijen Erzen, Caterina Brindicci, Tim Higenbottam, Mario Scuri, Paul McBride, Nadia Kamel, Margaret Tabberer, Thierry Troosters, Fabienne Dobbels, Judith Garcia-Aymerich, Karoly Kulich, Alastair Glendenning, Katja Rudell, Frederick J Wilson, Michael I Polkey, Nick S Hopkinson, Royal Brompton, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Enkeleida Nikai, Thys van der Molen, Corina De Jong, Roberto A Rabinovich, Bill MacNee, Milo A Puhan, Anja Frei, Elena Gimeno-Santos, Yogini Raste, Heleen Demeyer, Zafeiris Louvaris, Corina de Jong, Roberto A Rabinovich, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Michael I Polkey, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Maggie Tabberer, Fabienne Dobbels, Nathalie Ivanoff, Willem I de Boer, Thys van der Molen, Karoly Kulich, Ignasi Serra, Xavier Basagaña, Thierry Troosters, Milo A Puhan, Niklas Karlsson, Judith Garcia-Aymerich, PROactive consortium, Nathalie Ivanoff, Niklas Karlsson, Solange Corriol-Rohou, Ian Jarrod, Damijen Erzen, Caterina Brindicci, Tim Higenbottam, Mario Scuri, Paul McBride, Nadia Kamel, Margaret Tabberer, Thierry Troosters, Fabienne Dobbels, Judith Garcia-Aymerich, Karoly Kulich, Alastair Glendenning, Katja Rudell, Frederick J Wilson, Michael I Polkey, Nick S Hopkinson, Royal Brompton, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Enkeleida Nikai, Thys van der Molen, Corina De Jong, Roberto A Rabinovich, Bill MacNee, Milo A Puhan, Anja Frei

Abstract

No current patient-centred instrument captures all dimensions of physical activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our objective was item reduction and initial validation of two instruments to measure physical activity in COPD.Physical activity was assessed in a 6-week, randomised, two-way cross-over, multicentre study using PROactive draft questionnaires (daily and clinical visit versions) and two activity monitors. Item reduction followed an iterative process including classical and Rasch model analyses, and input from patients and clinical experts.236 COPD patients from five European centres were included. Results indicated the concept of physical activity in COPD had two domains, labelled "amount" and "difficulty". After item reduction, the daily PROactive instrument comprised nine items and the clinical visit contained 14. Both demonstrated good model fit (person separation index >0.7). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the bidimensional structure. Both instruments had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α>0.8), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.9) and exhibited moderate-to-high correlations (r>0.6) with related constructs and very low correlations (r<0.3) with unrelated constructs, providing evidence for construct validity.Daily and clinical visit "PROactive physical activity in COPD" instruments are hybrid tools combining a short patient-reported outcome questionnaire and two activity monitor variables which provide simple, valid and reliable measures of physical activity in COPD patients.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside the online version of this article at erj.ersjournals.com

Copyright ©ERS 2015.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study visits and assessments. PRO: patient-reported outcome; CRQ: chronic respiratory questionnaire; CCQ: clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire; CAT: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test; HADS: hospital anxiety and depression scale; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; mMRC: modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale; SAE: serious adverse event; 6MWT: 6-min walk test. #: assessments could be split between visit 1 and visit 2; ¶: in the exacerbated patients group only.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flowchart of the iterative process for the item reduction process.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Conceptual frameworks of a) the daily version of PROactive Physical Activity in COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (D-PPAC) and b) the clinical visit version of PROactive Physical Activity in COPD (C-PPAC) instruments: final domains and items.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Person-item maps and overall fit of the model for factors 1 (“amount”) and 2 (“difficulty”) of the daily version of PROactive physical activity in COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (D-PPAC) and the clinical visit version of the PROactive Physical Activity in COPD (C-PPAC) instruments. These plots indicate that the final items are well targeted to the patients and cover a wide range of the factor measured. Person separation index (PSI) values indicate that each factor is precise enough to differentiate between different patients’ physical activity experiences. a) D-PPAC final items of factor 1 in combination with final variables of Dynaport; b) C-PPAC final items of factor 1 in combination with final variables of Dynaport; c) D-PPAC final items of factor 1 in combination with final variables of Actigraph; d) C-PPAC final items of factor 1 in combination with final variables of Actigraph; e) D-PPAC final items of factor 2; f) C-PPAC final items of factor 2.

References

    1. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, et al. . Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 1435–1445.
    1. Garcia-Aymerich J, Lange P, Benet M, et al. . Regular physical activity reduces hospital admission and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population based cohort study. Thorax 2006; 61: 772–778.
    1. Garcia-Aymerich J, Lange P, Serra I, et al. . Time-dependent confounding in the study of the effects of regular physical activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an application of the marginal structural model. Ann Epidemiol 2008; 18: 775–783.
    1. Vorrink SNW, Kort HSM, Troosters T, et al. . Level of daily physical activity in individuals with COPD compared with healthy controls. Respir Res 2011; 12: 33–40.
    1. Shrikrishna D, Patel M, Tanner RJ, et al. . Quadriceps wasting and physical inactivity in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 1115–1122.
    1. Troosters T, Sciurba F, Battaglia S, et al. . Physical inactivity in patients with COPD, a controlled multi-center pilot-study. Respir Med 2010; 104: 1005–1011.
    1. Pitta F, Troosters T, Spruit M, et al. . Characteristics of physical activities in daily life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 972–977.
    1. Giacomini M, DeJean D, Simeonov D, et al. . Experiences of living and dying with COPD: a systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative empirical literature. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2012; 12: 1–47.
    1. Gimeno-Santos E, Frei A, Steurer-Stey C, et al. . Determinants and outcomes of physical activity in patients with COPD: a systematic review. Thorax 2014; 69: 731–739.
    1. Van Remoortel H, Giavedoni S, Raste Y, et al. . Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012; 84–106.
    1. Dobbels F, de Jong C, Drost E, et al. . The PROactive innovative conceptual framework on physical activity. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1223–1233.
    1. Williams K, Frei A, Vetsch A, et al. . Patient-reported physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review of content and format. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 28–45.
    1. Gimeno-Santos E, Frei A, Dobbels F, et al. . Validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011; 9: 86–99.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. 2009. Date last accessed: July 26, 2014.
    1. Rabinovich RA, Louvaris Z, Raste Y, et al. . Validity of physical activity monitors during daily life in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 1205–1215.
    1. Van Remoortel H, Raste Y, Louvaris Z, et al. . Validity of six activity monitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparison with indirect calorimetry. PLoS One 2012; 7: e39198.
    1. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency. Qualification of Novel Methodologies for Drug Development: Guidance to Applicants. 2008. Date last accessed: July 26, 2014.
    1. Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, et al. . Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 648–654.
    1. Jones PW, Chen W-H, Wilcox TK, et al. . Characterizing and quantifying the symptomatic features of COPD exacerbations. Chest 2011; 139: 1388–1394.
    1. Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, et al. . Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care 2007; 45: S22–S31.
    1. Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978; 43: 561–573.
    1. Meguro M, Barley EA, Spencer S, et al. . Development and validation of an improved, COPD-specific version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire. Chest 2007; 132: 456–463.
    1. Pesudovs K, Burr JM, Harley C, et al. . The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 663–674.
    1. Crane PK, Gibbons LE, Jolley L, et al. . Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar. Med Care 2006; 44: S115–S123.
    1. Choi SW, Gibbons LE, Crane PK. lordif: an R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. J Stat Softw 2011; 39: 1–30.
    1. Hill CD, Edwards MC, Thissen D, et al. . Practical issues in the application of item response theory: a demonstration using items from the pediatric quality of life (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales. Med Care 2007; 45: S39–S47.
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32: 307–317.
    1. Troosters T, Sciurba FC, Decramer M, et al. . Tiotropium in patients with moderate COPD naive to maintenance therapy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2014; 24: 14003.
    1. Hataji O, Naito M, Ito K, et al. . Indacaterol improves daily physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2013; 8: 1–5.
    1. O'Donnell DE, Casaburi R, Vincken W, et al. . Effect of indacaterol on exercise endurance and lung hyperinflation in COPD. Respir Med 2011; 105: 1030–1036.
    1. Donaire-Gonzalez D, Gimeno-Santos E, Serra I, et al. . Validación del cuestionario de actividad física de Yale en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica. [Validation of the Yale Physical Activity Survey in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.] Arch Bronconeumol 2011; 47: 552–560.
    1. Frost MH, Reeve BB, Liepa AM, et al. . What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? Value Health 2007; 10: Suppl. 2, S94–S105.
    1. Snyder CF, Watson ME, Jackson JD, et al. . Patient-reported outcome instrument selection: designing a measurement strategy. Value Health 2007; 10: Suppl. 2, S76–S85.
    1. Turner RR, Quittner AL, Parasuraman BM, et al. . Patient-reported outcomes: instrument development and selection issues. Value Health 2007; 10: Suppl. 2, S86–S93.
    1. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. . Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health 2007; 10: Suppl. 2, S125–S137.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel