Phenotyping of UGT1A1 Activity Using Raltegravir Predicts Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Irinotecan in FOLFIRI

Lawrence Soon-U Lee, Kok-Yong Seng, Ling-Zhi Wang, Wei-Peng Yong, Kim-Hor Hee, Thomas I Soh, Andrea Wong, Pei F Cheong, Richie Soong, Nur S Sapari, Ross Soo, Lu Fan, Soo-Chin Lee, Boon C Goh, Lawrence Soon-U Lee, Kok-Yong Seng, Ling-Zhi Wang, Wei-Peng Yong, Kim-Hor Hee, Thomas I Soh, Andrea Wong, Pei F Cheong, Richie Soong, Nur S Sapari, Ross Soo, Lu Fan, Soo-Chin Lee, Boon C Goh

Abstract

Background: Irinotecan toxicity correlates with UGT1A1 activity. We explored whether phenotyping UGT1A1 using a probe approach works better than current genotyping methods.

Methods: Twenty-four Asian cancer patients received irinotecan as part of the FOLFIRI regimen. Subjects took raltegravir 400 mg orally and intravenous midazolam 1 mg. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using WinNonLin and NONMEM. Genomic DNA was isolated and screened for the known genetic variants in UGT1A1 and CYP3A4/5.

Results: SN-38G/SN-38 AUC ratio correlated well with Raltegravir glucuronide/ Raltegravir AUC ratio (r = 0.784 p<0.01). Midazolam clearance correlated well with irinotecan clearance (r = 0.563 p<0.01). SN-38 AUC correlated well with Log10Nadir Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) (r = -0.397 p<0.05). Significant correlation was found between nadir ANC and formation rate constant of raltegravir glucuronide (r = 0.598, P<0.005), but not UGT1A1 genotype.

Conclusion: Raltegravir glucuronide formation is a good predictor of nadir ANC, and can predict neutropenia in East Asian patients. Prospective studies with dose adjustments should be done to develop raltegravir as a probe to optimize irinotecan therapy.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00808184.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. CONSORT Flow Diagram for trial.
Fig 1. CONSORT Flow Diagram for trial.
Fig 2. The raltegravir-raltegravir glucuronide (parent-metabolite) compartment…
Fig 2. The raltegravir-raltegravir glucuronide (parent-metabolite) compartment model.
N1 denotes the first hypothetical transit compartment up to Nn compartment. ktr is the transit rate constant. ka is the absorption rate constant from the hypothetical drug depot compartment to plasma. CL/V (or k) is the elimination rate constant of raltegravir. FMET is the fraction of raltegravir clearance for the formation of raltegravir glucuronide. VM, the distribution volume of the metabolite, was fixed to 1. As such, FMET is estimated as the ratio of the formation rate of glucuronide to VM. CLM is the glucuronide clearance.
Fig 3. Scatterplot and linear correlation between…
Fig 3. Scatterplot and linear correlation between nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and rate constant of formation of raltegravir glucuronide from raltegravir (K23).
The regression equation is ANC = 129.2 + 89461.5*K23. R is 0.598 (p = 0.00158).
Fig 4. Box-plot showing the association between…
Fig 4. Box-plot showing the association between the rate constant of formation of raltegravir glucuronide from raltegravir (K23) and presence or absence of dose delay amongst the patients.
Fig 5. Box-plots showing the statistically insignificant…
Fig 5. Box-plots showing the statistically insignificant associations between the nadir absolute neutrophil count and UGT1A1 genotypes.

References

    1. Pfizer Inc. (2006) Camptosar: irinotecan hydrochloride injection. FDA approved label.
    1. Charasson V, Bellott R, Meynard D, Longy M, Gorry P, Robert J (2004) Pharmacogenetics of human carboxylesterase 2, an enzyme involved in the activation of irinotecan into SN-38. Clin Pharmacol Ther 76: 528–535.
    1. Rosner GL, Panetta JC, Innocenti F, Ratain MJ (2008) Pharmacogenetic pathway analysis of irinotecan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 84: 393–402. 10.1038/clpt.2008.63
    1. Xie R, Mathijssen RH, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, Karlsson MO (2002) Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in relation with diarrhea. Clin Pharmacol Ther 72: 265–275.
    1. Innocenti F, Schilsky RL, Ramirez J, Janisch L, Undevia S, House LK, et al. (2014) Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study to optimize the dosing of irinotecan according to the UGT1A1 genotype of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 32: 2328–2334. 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.2307
    1. Ichikawa R, Torii Y, Oe S, Kawamura K, Kato R, Hasegawa K, et al. (2014) Retrospective comparative study of irinotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for platinum-resistant or -refractory epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290: 979–984. 10.1007/s00404-014-3268-7
    1. Kweekel DM, Gelderblom H, Van der Straaten T, Antonini NF, Punt CJ, Guchelaar HJ, et al. (2008) UGT1A1*28 genotype and irinotecan dosage in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group study. Br J Cancer 99: 275–282. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604461
    1. Marcuello E, Paez D, Pare L, Salazar J, Sebio A, del Rio E, et al. (2011) A genotype-directed phase I-IV dose-finding study of irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil/leucovorin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 105: 53–57. 10.1038/bjc.2011.206
    1. Gao J, Zhou J, Li Y, Peng Z, Li Y, Wang X, et al. (2013) Associations between UGT1A1*6/*28 polymorphisms and irinotecan-induced severe toxicity in Chinese gastric or esophageal cancer patients. Med Oncol 30: 630 10.1007/s12032-013-0630-8
    1. van der Bol JM, Mathijssen RH, Creemers GJ, Planting AS, Loos WJ, Wiemer EA, et al. (2010) A CYP3A4 phenotype-based dosing algorithm for individualized treatment of irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res 16: 736–742. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1526
    1. Hee KH, Yao Z, Lee LS (2013) Simultaneous determination of probe drugs, metabolites, inhibitors and inducer in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and its application to pharmacokinetic study. J Pharm Biomed Anal 88C: 584–593.
    1. Gupta E, Lestingi TM, Mick R, Ramirez J, Vokes EE, Ratain MJ (1994) Metabolic fate of irinotecan in humans: correlation of glucuronidation with diarrhea. Cancer Res 54: 3723–3725.
    1. Wang LZ, Lee LS, Thuya WL, Soon GH, Kong LR, Nye PL, et al. (2010) Simultaneous determination of raltegravir and raltegravir glucuronide in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method. J Mass Spectrom 46: 202–208.
    1. Karlsson MO, Savic RM (2007) Diagnosing model diagnostics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82: 17–20.
    1. Savic RM, Karlsson MO (2009) Importance of shrinkage in empirical bayes estimates for diagnostics: problems and solutions. AAPS J 11: 558–569. 10.1208/s12248-009-9133-0
    1. Seng KY, Hee KH, Soon GH, Sapari NS, Soong R, Goh BC, et al. (2014) CYP3A5*3 and bilirubin predict midazolam population pharmacokinetics in Asian cancer patients. J Clin Pharmacol 54: 215–224. 10.1002/jcph.230
    1. Heizmann P, Ziegler WH (1981) Excretion and metabolism of 14C-midazolam in humans following oral dosing. Arzneimittelforschung 31: 2220–2223.
    1. Wang L, Soon GH, Seng KY, Li J, Lee E, Yong EL, et al. (2011) Pharmacokinetic modeling of plasma and intracellular concentrations of raltegravir in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 4090–4095. 10.1128/AAC.00593-11
    1. Savic RM, Jonker DM, Kerbusch T, Karlsson MO (2007) Implementation of a transit compartment model for describing drug absorption in pharmacokinetic studies. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 34: 711–726.
    1. Mould DR, Upton RN (2013) Basic concepts in population modeling, simulation, and model-based drug development-part 2: introduction to pharmacokinetic modeling methods. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2: e38 10.1038/psp.2013.14
    1. Seng KY, Hee KH, Soon GH, Chew N, Khoo SH, Lee LS (2015) Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Isoniazid, Acetylisoniazid, and Isonicotinic Acid in Healthy Volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59: 6791–6799. 10.1128/AAC.01244-15
    1. Liu X, Cheng D, Kuang Q, Liu G, Xu W (2014) Association of UGT1A1*28 polymorphisms with irinotecan-induced toxicities in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis in Caucasians. Pharmacogenomics J 14: 120–129. 10.1038/tpj.2013.10

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel