Pharmacokinetics of Sugammadex Dosed by Actual and Ideal Body Weight in Patients With Morbid Obesity Undergoing Surgery

Kate Mostoller, Rebecca Wrishko, Lata Maganti, W Joseph Herring, Mariëlle van Zutphen-van Geffen, Kate Mostoller, Rebecca Wrishko, Lata Maganti, W Joseph Herring, Mariëlle van Zutphen-van Geffen

Abstract

This analysis of a published study (NCT03346070) evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of sugammadex dosed by actual body weight (ABW) or ideal body weight (IBW) for reversal of moderate or deep neuromuscular block (M-NMB or D-NMB) in adults with morbid obesity. Adults with body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 , ABW ≥ 100 kg, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 3 were stratified by NMB agent (rocuronium or vecuronium) and randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to (i) M-NMB, sugammadex 2 mg/kg ABW; (ii) M-NMB, sugammadex 2 mg/kg IBW; (iii) M-NMB, neostigmine 5 mg + glycopyrrolate 1 mg; (iv) D-NMB, sugammadex 4 mg/kg ABW; and (v) D-NMB, sugammadex 4 mg/kg IBW. Plasma samples for sugammadex quantification were collected predose, 2, 5, 15, 60, and 120 minutes, and 4, 6 hours postdose. Natural log PK parameters were analyzed using linear fixed effect model with treatment, mode (ABW and IBW), and mode by treatment interaction as fixed terms. The sugammadex PK profile showed rapid distribution followed by monophasic decline consistent with a two-compartment model examined by dose and mode. Absolute sugammadex exposures were ~ 50% higher in the ABW vs. IBW group; dose-independent parameters (clearance and volume of distribution) and terminal half-life remained constant. Sugammadex PK parameter values increased in dose-dependent, linear manner following dosing by ABW or IBW, such that PK continues to be predictive across the clinical dose range. In conjunction with previously published results showing faster recovery with ABW vs. IBW dosing across NMB agent and depth of NMB, these PK findings continue to support dosing by ABW in patients with morbid obesity irrespective of depth of NMB.

Conflict of interest statement

K.M., R.W., L.M., and W.J.H. are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, and may own stock and/or stock options in Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. M.v.Z.‐v.G. is a paid consultant for Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, and does not own stock or stock options in Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

© 2020 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean sugammadex plasma concentration‐time profiles following the administration of a single i.v. dose of sugammadex. We administered 2 mg/kg (a) or 4 mg/kg (b) in patients with morbid obesity. The blue and red lines represent the observed plasma concentrations for patients in the actual body weight (ABW) and ideal body weight (IBW) groups, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose normalized median sugammadex plasma concentration‐time profiles following the administration of a single i.v. dose of sugammadex 2 mg/kg (blue lines) or 4 mg/kg (red lines) in patients with morbid obesity (log‐linear scale). ABW, actual body weight; IBW, ideal body weight.

References

    1. Bom, A. et al. A novel concept of reversing neuromuscular block: chemical encapsulation of rocuronium bromide by a cyclodextrin‐based synthetic host. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 41, 266–270 (2002).
    1. Epemolu, O. , Bom, A. , Hope, F. & Mason, R. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade and simultaneous increase in plasma rocuronium concentration after the intravenous infusion of the novel reversal agent Org 25969. Anesthesiology 99, 632–637 (2003), discussion 636A.
    1. Blobner, M. et al. Reversal of rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex compared with neostigmine during sevoflurane anaesthesia: results of a randomised, controlled trial. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 27, 874–881 (2010).
    1. Jones, R.K. , Caldwell, J.E. , Brull, S.J. & Soto, R.G. Reversal of profound rocuronium‐induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology 109, 816–824 (2008).
    1. Khuenl‐Brady, K.S. et al. Sugammadex provides faster reversal of vecuronium‐induced neuromuscular blockade compared with neostigmine: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth. Analg. 110, 64–73 (2010).
    1. Lemmens, H.J. , El‐Orbany, M.I. , Berry, J. , Morte, J.B. Jr & Martin, G. Reversal of profound vecuronium‐induced neuromuscular block under sevoflurane anesthesia: sugammadex versus neostigmine. BMC Anesthesiol. 10, 15 (2010).
    1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA . Information for Health Professionals. Data sheet Bridion. Website <> (2019). Accessed August 4, 2020.
    1. Peeters, P.A. et al. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of sugammadex using single high doses (up to 96 mg/kg) in healthy adult subjects: a randomized, double‐blind, crossover, placebo‐controlled, single‐centre study. Clin. Drug Investig. 30, 867–874 (2010).
    1. Gijsenbergh, F. , Ramael, S. , Houwing, N. & van Iersel, T. First human exposure of Org 25969, a novel agent to reverse the action of rocuronium bromide. Anesthesiology 103, 695–703 (2005).
    1. Mitchell, C. & Lobaz, S. An Overview of Sugammadex. Anaesthesia Tutorial of the Week <> (2006) Accessed October 27, 2020.
    1. Peeters, P. Sugammadex is cleared rapidly and primarily in an unchanged form via renal excretion. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 85, S83 (Abstract PIII‐50) (2009).
    1. Kleijn, H.J. , Zollinger, D.P. , van den Heuvel, M.W. & Kerbusch, T. Population pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic analysis for sugammadex‐mediated reversal of rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular blockade. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 72, 415–433 (2011).
    1. McDonagh, D.L. et al. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of sugammadex for the reversal of rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular blockade in elderly patients. Anesthesiology 114, 318–329 (2011).
    1. World Health Organization . Obesity and overweight. Website <> (2020). Accessed August 3, 2020.
    1. MacLean, L.D. , Rhode, B.M. & Nohr, C.W. Late outcome of isolated gastric bypass. Ann. Surg. 231, 524–528 (2000).
    1. Casati, A. & Putzu, M. Anesthesia in the obese patient: pharmacokinetic considerations. J. Clin. Anesth. 17, 134–145 (2005).
    1. Palmer, J. et al. Underestimating the size of the problem? UK anaesthesia for patients with obesity. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 11, 703–708 (2017).
    1. Cook, T.M. , Woodall, N. , Harper, J. Benger, J. & Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society . Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br. J. Anaesth. 106, 632–642 (2011).
    1. Pandit, J.J. et al. 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors. Br. J. Anaesth. 113, 549–559 (2014).
    1. Hanley, M.J. , Abernethy, D.R. & Greenblatt, D.J. Effect of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of drugs in humans. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 49, 71–87 (2010).
    1. Lee, J.B. , Winstead, P.S. & Cook, A.M. Pharmacokinetic alterations in obesity. Orthopedics 29, 984–988 (2006).
    1. Dong, D. et al. Morbid obesity alters both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol: dosing recommendation for anesthesia induction. Drug Metab. Dispos. 44, 1579–1583 (2016).
    1. Smit, C. et al. A prospective clinical study characterizing the influence of morbid obesity on the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin: towards individualized dosing in obese patients. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 58, 1333–1343 (2019).
    1. Cheymol, G. Effects of obesity on pharmacokinetics implications for drug therapy. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 39, 215–231 (2000).
    1. Forbes, G.B. & Welle, S.L. Lean body mass in obesity. Int. J. Obes. 7, 99–107 (1983).
    1. Collis, T. et al. Relations of stroke volume and cardiac output to body composition: the strong heart study. Circulation 103, 820–825 (2001).
    1. Stokholm, K.H. , Brochner‐Mortensen, J. & Hoilund‐Carlsen, P.F. Increased glomerular filtration rate and adrenocortical function in obese women. Int. J. Obes. 4, 57–63 (1980).
    1. Ingrande, J. & Lemmens, H.J. Dose adjustment of anaesthetics in the morbidly obese. Br. J. Anaesth. 105(suppl. 1), i16–i23 (2010).
    1. Llaurado, S. , Sabate, A. , Ferreres, E. , Camprubi, I. & Cabrera, A. Sugammadex ideal body weight dose adjusted by level of neuromuscular blockade in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesthesiology 117, 93–98 (2012).
    1. Jahr, J.S. et al. Sugammadex: a scientific review including safety and efficacy, update on regulatory issues, and clinical use in Europe. Am. J. Ther. 22, 288–297 (2015).
    1. Horrow, J. et al. Actual body weight vs ideal body weight dosing of Sugammadex in the morbidly Obese. American Society of Anesthesiologists [Abstract Archive] <> (2019). Accessed August 4, 2020.
    1. Kammerer, M.R. , Porter, M.M. , Beekley, A.C. & Tichansky, D.S. Ideal body weight calculation in the bariatric surgical population. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 19, 1758–1762 (2015).
    1. Zeng, W. , Xu, Y. , Constanzer, M.L. , Goykhman, D. & Woolf, E.J. Determination of sugammadex in human plasma using protein precipitation and ultra high performance liquid chromotography / tandem mass spectrometry. SF J. Pharmaceut. Analyt. Chem. 1, 1007 (2018).
    1. Certara . Phoenix WinNonlin. Software. Version 8.1.0.3530 <>. Accessed August 4, 2020.
    1. Sorgenfrei, I.F. et al. Reversal of rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular block by the selective relaxant binding agent sugammadex: a dose‐finding and safety study. Anesthesiology 104, 667–674 (2006).
    1. Sparr, H.J. et al. Early reversal of profound rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex in a randomized multicenter study: efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Anesthesiology 106, 935–943 (2007).

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel