Using Pharmacogenomic Testing in Primary Care: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Study

Beatriz Manzor Mitrzyk, Reema Kadri, Karen B Farris, Vicki L Ellingrod, Michael S Klinkman, Mack T Ruffin Iv, Melissa A Plegue, Lorraine R Buis, Beatriz Manzor Mitrzyk, Reema Kadri, Karen B Farris, Vicki L Ellingrod, Michael S Klinkman, Mack T Ruffin Iv, Melissa A Plegue, Lorraine R Buis

Abstract

Background: Antidepressants are used by primary care providers to treat a variety of conditions, including (but not limited to) depression and anxiety. A trial-and-error approach is typically used to identify effective therapy, as treatment efficacy and safety can vary based on the response, which is affected by certain gene types. Pharmacokinetic pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing provides phenotypic classification of individuals as poor, intermediate, extensive, and ultrarapid CYP450 metabolizers, providing information for optimal drug selection.

Objective: The objective of this pilot study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of PGx testing when used after starting a new antidepressant medication.

Methods: We are conducting a pilot study with physicians from 6 Department of Family Medicine clinics at the University of Michigan who are willing to use PGx test results to manage antidepressant medication use. From enrolled physicians, patients were recruited to participate in a 6-month randomized, wait-list controlled trial in which patient participants newly prescribed an antidepressant had PGx testing and were randomized equally to have the results released to their primary care physician as soon as results were available or after 3 months. Patients were excluded if they had been taking the antidepressant for more than 4 weeks or if they had undergone PGx testing in the past. Physician participants completed a baseline survey to assess demographics, as well as knowledge, feasibility, and acceptability of PGx testing for this population. At the conclusion of the study, physician participants will complete a survey to assess knowledge, satisfaction, feasibility, acceptability, perceived effectiveness, and barriers to widespread adoption of PGx testing. Patient participants will complete a baseline, 3-month, and 6-month assessment, and control patient participants will have an additional 9-month assessment. Data collected will include the reason for antidepressant use, self-reported medication adherence, side effects, patient health questionnaire 8-item depression scale, generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, work status or changes, and physician and emergency department visits. PGx knowledge and perceptions (including acceptability and feasibility) as well as demographic information will also be obtained.

Results: We recruited 23 physician participants between November 2017 and January 2019, and 52 patient participants between January 2018 and April 2019. Currently, all physician and patient participants have been recruited, and we expect data collection to conclude in January 2020.

Conclusions: This study will examine the preliminary effectiveness of PGx testing after treatment initiation and determine the feasibility and acceptability of PGx testing for use in primary care. Through this study, we expect to demonstrate the benefit of PGx testing and lay the foundation for translating this approach into use within primary care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03270891; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03270891.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR1-10.2196/13848.

Keywords: antidepressive agents; pharmacogenomics; primary care.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: LRB is obliged to disclose a conflict of interest, as her spouse is an employee and stock option holder at Progenity.

©Beatriz Manzor Mitrzyk, Reema Kadri, Karen B Farris, Vicki L Ellingrod, Michael S Klinkman, Mack T Ruffin IV, Melissa A Plegue, Lorraine R Buis. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 19.08.2019.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient participant flowchart. *Patient was withdrawn from the study 3 months after enrollment because it was discovered that the physician participant listed in the electronic medical record had no previous contact with the patient, and the physician who prescribed the antidepressant did not want to enroll in the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Physician participant study flow. PGx: pharmacogenomic.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient participant study flow. PGx: pharmacogenomic.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016. [2019-02-22]. Selected Prescription Drug Classes Used in the Past 30 Days, by Sex and Age: United States, Selected Years 1988–1994 Through 2011–2014 .
    1. Hirschfeld RM. The comorbidity of major depression and anxiety disorders: recognition and management in primary care. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;3(6):244–54. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v03n0609.
    1. Mark TL, Levit KR, Buck JA. Datapoints: psychotropic drug prescriptions by medical specialty. Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Sep;60(9):1167. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.9.1167.
    1. SAMHSA - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2013. [2019-08-07]. Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings .
    1. Cameron C, Habert J, Anand L, Furtado M. Optimizing the management of depression: primary care experience. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec;220(Suppl 1):S45–57. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1781(14)70005-8.
    1. Papakostas GI, Perlis RH, Scalia MJ, Petersen TJ, Fava M. A meta-analysis of early sustained response rates between antidepressants and placebo for the treatment of major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;26(1):56–60. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.02.003.
    1. Posternak MA, Zimmerman M. Is there a delay in the antidepressant effect? A meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;66(2):148–58. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v66n0201.
    1. Bousman CA, Forbes M, Jayaram M, Eyre H, Reynolds CF, Berk M, Hopwood M, Ng C. Antidepressant prescribing in the precision medicine era: a prescriber's primer on pharmacogenetic tools. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1230-5.
    1. Milani L, Leitsalu L, Metspalu A. An epidemiological perspective of personalized medicine: the Estonian experience. J Intern Med. 2015 Feb;277(2):188–200. doi: 10.1111/joim.12320. doi: 10.1111/joim.12320.
    1. Dunnenberger HM, Crews KR, Hoffman JM, Caudle KE, Broeckel U, Howard SC, Hunkler RJ, Klein TE, Evans WE, Relling MV. Preemptive clinical pharmacogenetics implementation: current programs in five US medical centers. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;55:89–106. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124835.
    1. Klein ME, Parvez MM, Shin JG. Clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics for personalized precision medicine: barriers and solutions. J Pharm Sci. 2017 Sep;106(9):2368–79. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.04.051.
    1. St Sauver JL, Bielinski SJ, Olson JE, Bell EJ, Mc Gree ME, Jacobson DJ, McCormick JB, Caraballo PJ, Takahashi PY, Roger VL, Vitek CR. Integrating pharmacogenomics into clinical practice: promise vs reality. Am J Med. 2016 Oct;129(10):1093–9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.04.009.
    1. Mikat-Stevens NA, Larson IA, Tarini BA. Primary-care providers' perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med. 2015 Mar;17(3):169–76. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.101.
    1. Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026.
    1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
    1. Kripalani S, Risser J, Gatti ME, Jacobson TA. Development and evaluation of the adherence to refills and medications scale (ARMS) among low-literacy patients with chronic disease. Value Health. 2009;12(1):118–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00400.x.
    1. CPIC: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. 2019. [2019-02-22]. What is CPIC? .
    1. Huo T, Guo Y, Shenkman E, Muller K. Assessing the reliability of the short form 12 (SF-12) health survey in adults with mental health conditions: a report from the wellness incentive and navigation (WIN) study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Feb 13;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0858-2.
    1. Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353–65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006.
    1. Wilson IB, Lee Y, Michaud J, Fowler Jr FJ, Rogers WH. Validation of a new three-item self-report measure for medication adherence. AIDS Behav. 2016 Nov;20(11):2700–8. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1406-x.
    1. Stanek EJ, Sanders CL, Taber KA, Khalid M, Patel A, Verbrugge RR, Agatep BC, Aubert RE, Epstein RS, Frueh FW. Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Mar;91(3):450–8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.306.
    1. Bradley P, Shiekh M, Mehra V, Vrbicky K, Layle S, Olson MC, Maciel A, Cullors A, Garces JA, Lukowiak AA. Improved efficacy with targeted pharmacogenetic-guided treatment of patients with depression and anxiety: a randomized clinical trial demonstrating clinical utility. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jan;96:100–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.024.
    1. Bartlett G, Antoun J, Zgheib NK. Theranostics in primary care: pharmacogenomics tests and beyond. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2012 Nov;12(8):841–55. doi: 10.1586/erm.12.115.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. 2018. [2019-02-22]. The FDA Warns Against the Use of Many Genetic Tests with Unapproved Claims to Predict Patient Response to Specific Medications: FDA Safety Communication .

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel