eSyM: An Electronic Health Record-Integrated Patient-Reported Outcomes-Based Cancer Symptom Management Program Used by Six Diverse Health Systems

Michael J Hassett, Christine Cronin, Terrence C Tsou, Jason Wedge, Jessica Bian, Don S Dizon, Hannah Hazard-Jenkins, Raymond U Osarogiagbon, Sandra Wong, Ethan Basch, Toby Austin, Nadine McCleary, Deborah Schrag, Michael J Hassett, Christine Cronin, Terrence C Tsou, Jason Wedge, Jessica Bian, Don S Dizon, Hannah Hazard-Jenkins, Raymond U Osarogiagbon, Sandra Wong, Ethan Basch, Toby Austin, Nadine McCleary, Deborah Schrag

Abstract

Purpose: Collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can improve symptom control and quality of life, enhance doctor-patient communication, and reduce acute care needs for patients with cancer. Digital solutions facilitate PRO collection, but without robust electronic health record (EHR) integration, effective deployment can be hampered by low patient and clinician engagement and high development and deployment costs. The important components of digital PRO platforms have been defined, but procedures for implementing integrated solutions are not readily available.

Methods: As part of the NCI's IMPACT consortium, six health care systems partnered with Epic to develop an EHR-integrated, PRO-based electronic symptom management program (eSyM) to optimize postoperative recovery and well-being during chemotherapy. The agile development process incorporated user-centered design principles that required engagement from patients, clinicians, and health care systems. Whenever possible, the system used validated content from the public domain and took advantage of existing EHR capabilities to automate processes.

Results: eSyM includes symptom surveys on the basis of the PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) plus two global wellness questions; reminders and symptom self-management tip sheets for patients; alerts and symptom reports for clinicians; and population management dashboards. EHR dependencies include a secure Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant patient portal; diagnosis, procedure and chemotherapy treatment plan data; registries that identify and track target populations; and the ability to create reminders, alerts, reports, dashboards, and charting shortcuts.

Conclusion: eSyM incorporates validated content and leverages existing EHR capabilities. Build challenges include the innate technical limitations of the EHR, the constrained availability of site technical resources, and sites' heterogenous EHR configurations and policies. Integration of PRO-based symptom management programs into the EHR could help overcome adoption barriers, consolidate clinical workflows, and foster scalability and sustainability. We intend to make eSyM available to all Epic users.

Conflict of interest statement

Michael J. HassettResearch Funding: IBM Jason WedgeEmployment: EpicStock and Other Ownership Interests: Epic Don S. DizonConsulting or Advisory Role: i-Mab, Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, Tesaro, Pfizer, Oasmia Pharmaceutical ABResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Kazia Therapeutics (Inst), Pfizer (Inst)Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/744193/summary Raymond U. OsarogiagbonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Lilly, Pfizer, Gilead SciencesHonoraria: Biodes, MedscapeConsulting or Advisory Role: Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC), AstraZeneca, American Cancer Society, Triptych Health Partners, Genentech/Roche, National Cancer InstitutePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Two US patents and one China patent for lymph node specimen collection kit and method of pathologic evaluationOther Relationship: Oncobox Ethan BaschConsulting or Advisory Role: SIVAN Innovation, Carevive Systems, Navigating Cancer, AstraZenecaOther Relationship: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Cancer Institute, American Society of Clinical Oncology, JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, Patient-Centered OUtcomes Research Institute (PCORI)Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/427875/summary Toby AustinEmployment: Epic SystemsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Epic Systems Nadine McClearyResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation Deborah SchragStock and Other Ownership Interests: Merck (I)Honoraria: PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: JAMA-Journal of the American Medical AssociationResearch Funding: AACR (Inst), GRAIL (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: PRISSMM model is trademarked, and curation tools are available to academic medical centers and government under creative commons licenseOther Relationship: JAMA-Journal of the American Medical AssociationNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Overview of eSyM. ED, emergency department; EHR, electronic health record; eSyM, electronic symptom management; PRO, patient-reported outcome; SIMPRO, Symptom Management Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
eSyM questionnaire items. eSyM questionnaires includes 12 required symptom items, two required general context items, and up to 20 optional symptom questions. Symptom questions are based on the PRO-CTCAE, which asks one-three questions per symptom and aggregates responses into a four-point scale (0 = no symptoms, to 3 = severe symptoms). The complete PRO-CTCAE questionnaire system and terms of use can be accessed at the National Cancer Institute. eSyM, electronic symptom management; PRO-CTCAE, Patient-Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Patient-facing eSyM tools. Four views of the smartphone version of MyChart, Epic's patient-facing mobile application (from left to right). (A) The MyChart mobile home screen with a link to the eSyM program. (B) The eSyM Welcome Page, where the user can answer questionnaires, view past responses, and access tip sheets. (C) The eSyM questionnaire for pain, where the patient reports the severity, frequency, and interference of selected symptoms. (D) The eSyM Patient Alert Screen, which is presented to patients who have reported severe symptoms. eSyM, electronic symptom management.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Key clinician-facing eSyM tools. (A) The eSyM dashboard shows key performance indicators and can be used to access reporting workbench reports that facilitate population management. It can be customized by each user to focus on a clinician, department, or service area. (B) The Symptom Management Report shows all submitted questionnaires from the past week. It is color-coded to highlight patients reporting severe symptoms and includes tool-tips that show symptom trends. It can be filtered and sorted on the basis of multiple features including symptom severity. Additional symptom scores and trends are displayed by hovering over the severe symptom indicator column. eSyM, electronic symptom management.
FIG 5.
FIG 5.
Process flow for eSyM. Automated (Epic-based) functionality occupies the center swim lane, with adjacent swim lanes indicating tasks accomplished by the patients, the program nurses who provide supportive care, the MD, NP, and PA staff who oversee care, and the programmatic staff who support the eSyM program. Medical oncology patients are considered active on eSyM until their chemotherapy treatment plan is discontinued or 180 days later, whichever comes first. Surgery patients are considered active on eSyM for 60 days. eSyM assignments can be manually removed at any time by study staff. Red dashed lines indicate processes that may be site specified (ie, may only be used on some sites). DAR, department appointment report; eSyM, electronic symptom management; MD, medical doctor; NP, nurse practitioner; PA, physician assistant; RN, registered nurse; RWB, reporting workbench.
FIG 6.
FIG 6.
Examples of eSyM challenges and solutions. EHR, electronic health record; ePRO, electronic patient reported outcome; eSyM, electronic symptom management; PRO-CTCAE, Patient Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

References

    1. Barbera L, Taylor C, Dudgeon D: Why do patients with cancer visit the emergency department near the end of life? CMAJ 182:563-568, 2010
    1. Brooks GA, Abrams TA, Meyerhardt JA, et al. : Identification of potentially avoidable hospitalizations in patients with GI cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:496-503, 2014
    1. Mayer DK, Travers D, Wyss A, et al. : Why do patients with cancer visit emergency departments? Results of a 2008 population study in North Carolina. J Clin Oncol 29:2683-2688, 2011
    1. Berry DL, Blonquist TM, Hong F, et al. : Self-reported adherence to oral cancer therapy: Relationships with symptom distress, depression, and personal characteristics. Patient Prefer Adherence 9:1587-1592, 2015
    1. Fish JA, Prichard I, Ettridge K, et al. : Psychosocial factors that influence men's help-seeking for cancer symptoms: A systematic synthesis of mixed methods research. Psychooncology 24:1222-1232, 2015
    1. Hendren S, Birkmeyer JD, Yin H, et al. : Surgical complications are associated with omission of chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1587-1593, 2010
    1. Nathan H, Yin H, Wong SL: Postoperative complications and long-term survival after complex cancer resection. Ann Surg Oncol 24:638-644, 2017
    1. Tevis SE, Kohlnhofer BM, Stringfield S, et al. : Postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer are associated with delays in chemotherapy that lead to worse disease-free and overall survival. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1339-1348, 2013
    1. Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, et al. : Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:557-565, 2016
    1. Handley NR, Schuchter LM, Bekelman JE: Best practices for reducing unplanned acute care for patients with cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 14:306-313, 2018
    1. Barkley R, Soobader MJ, Wang J, et al. : Reducing cancer costs through symptom management and triage pathways. JCO Oncol Pract 15:e91-e97, 2019
    1. Cohen E, Botti M: Cancer patients' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to patient participation in symptom management during an episode of admission. Cancer Nurs 38:458-465, 2015
    1. Basch E, Deal AM, Dueck AC, et al. : Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. JAMA 318:197-198, 2017
    1. Basch E, Dueck AC, Rogak LJ, et al. : Feasibility of implementing the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in a multicenter trial: NCCTG N1048. J Clin Oncol 36:3120-3125, 2018
    1. Basch E, Stover AM, Schrag D, et al. : Clinical utility and user perceptions of a digital system for electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring during routine cancer care: Findings from the PRO-TECT trial. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 4:947-957, 2020
    1. Abelson JS, Symer M, Peters A, et al. : Mobile health apps and recovery after surgery: What are patients willing to do? Am J Surg 214:616-622, 2017
    1. Denis F, Lethrosne C, Pourel N, et al. : Randomized trial comparing a web-mediated follow-up with routine surveillance in lung cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 109:djx029, 2017
    1. Rivera SC, Kyte DG, Aiyegbusi OL, et al. : The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: A systematic review and critical analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 17:156, 2019
    1. Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, et al. : Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1425-1437, 2016
    1. Rao AD, Sugar EA, Chang DT, et al. : Patient-reported outcomes of a multicenter phase 2 study investigating gemcitabine and stereotactic body radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 6:417-424, 2016
    1. Ribi K, Luo W, Bernhard J, et al. : Adjuvant tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression versus tamoxifen alone in premenopausal women with early breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the suppression of ovarian function trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1601-1610, 2016
    1. Lee SJ, Logan B, Westervelt P, et al. : Comparison of patient-reported outcomes in 5-year survivors who received bone marrow vs peripheral blood unrelated donor transplantation: Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2:1583-1589, 2016
    1. Snyder C, Wu AW (eds): Users’ Guide to Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Electronic Health Records. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), 2017
    1. IMPACT Consortium Overview. National Cancer Institute, 2018.
    1. Glaze J: Epic Systems Draws on Literature Greats for Its Next Expansion. January 6, 2015.
    1. Landi H: Epic, Cerner Growing EHR Market Share With Increased Hospital Consolidation: KLAS. FierceHealthcare, April 30, 2019.
    1. Sutherland JV, S K, Cockburn A, et al. : The Agile Manifesto, 2001.
    1. Basch E, Becker C, Rogak LJ, et al. : Composite grading algorithm for the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Clin Trials 18:104-114, 2021
    1. Basch E, Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, et al. : Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju244, 2014
    1. National Cancer Institute : PRO-CTCAE Instrument & Form Builder.
    1. Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), National Cancer Institute. Accessed July 1, 2020.
    1. Beng TS, Ann YH, Guan NC, et al. : The suffering pictogram: Measuring suffering in palliative care. J Palliat Med 20:869-874, 2017
    1. Fitch MI, Bunston T, Mings D: The fatigue pictogram: Assessing the psychometrics of a new screening tool. Can Oncol Nurs J 22:42-52, 2012
    1. Kapu AN, Borg Card E, Jackson H, et al. : Assessing and addressing practitioner burnout: Results from an advanced practice registered nurse health and well-being study. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 33:38-48, 2019
    1. Rothenberger DA: Physician burnout and well-being: A systematic review and framework for action. Dis Colon Rectum 60:567-576, 2017
    1. Gold HT, Karia RJ, Link A, et al. : Implementation and early adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures into an electronic health record: A technical report. Health Inform J 26:129-140, 2020

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel