The role of Facebook in Crush the Crave, a mobile- and social media-based smoking cessation intervention: qualitative framework analysis of posts

Laura Louise Struik, Neill Bruce Baskerville, Laura Louise Struik, Neill Bruce Baskerville

Abstract

Background: Social networking sites, particularly Facebook, are increasingly included in contemporary smoking cessation interventions directed toward young adults. Little is known about the role of Facebook in smoking cessation interventions directed toward this age demographic.

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the content of posts on the Facebook page of Crush the Crave, an evidence-informed smoking cessation intervention directed toward young adults aged 19 to 29 years.

Methods: Crush the Crave Facebook posts between October 10, 2012 and June 12, 2013 were collected for analysis, representing page activity during the pilot phase of Crush the Crave. Of the 399 posts included for analysis, 121 were original posts, whereas the remaining 278 were reply posts. Posts were coded according to themes using framework analysis.

Results: We found that the original Crush the Crave Facebook posts served two main purposes: to support smoking cessation and to market Crush the Crave. Most of the original posts (86/121, 71.1%) conveyed support of smoking cessation through the following 7 subthemes: encouraging cessation, group stimulation, management of cravings, promoting social support, denormalizing smoking, providing health information, and exposing tobacco industry tactics. The remaining original posts (35/121, 28.9%) aimed to market Crush the Crave through 2 subthemes: Crush the Crave promotion and iPhone 5 contest promotion. Most of the reply posts (214/278, 77.0%) were in response to the supporting smoking cessation posts and the remaining 64 (23.0%) were in response to the marketing Crush the Crave posts. The most common response to both the supporting smoking cessation and marketing Crush the Crave posts was user engagement with the images associated with each post at 40.2% (86/214) and 45% (29/64), respectively. The second most common response consisted of users sharing their smoking-related experiences. More users shared their smoking-related experiences in response to the supporting smoking cessation posts (81/214, 37.9%) compared to the marketing Crush the Crave posts (11/64, 17%). With the exception of 4 posts, a moderator posted all the original posts. In addition, although 56.00% (18,937/33,815) of Crush the Crave Facebook page users were men, only 19.8% (55/278) of the reply posts were made by men. Finally, men were found to be more likely to express sarcasm or make strong assertions about quitting smoking and Crush the Crave than women.

Conclusions: The CTC Facebook page presents as a unique platform for supporting young adult smoking cessation at all stages of the cessation process. The findings of this study indicate that social networking sites, especially Facebook, warrant inclusion in tobacco control efforts directed towards young adults. Research on effectiveness of the Facebook page for quitting smoking is needed.

Keywords: Internet; qualitative research; smoking cessation; social media; young adult.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Crush the Crave Facebook page.

References

    1. Duggan M, Brenner J. The demographics of social media users-2013. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2012. [2013-12-09]. .
    1. Health Canada. 2012. [2013-12-09]. Canadian tobacco use monitoring survey (CTUMS) .
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. [2013-12-09]. Adult cigarette smoking in the United States: Current estimate
    1. Crush the Crave. [2014-06-23].
    1. Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco UseDependence 2008 Update Panel‚ Liaisons‚Staff A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):158–76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.009.
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL, Byron MJ, Niaura RS, Abrams DB, Workshop Participants Online social networks and smoking cessation: a scientific research agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e119. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1911.
    1. Abroms LC, Padmanabhan N, Thaweethai L, Phillips T. iPhone apps for smoking cessation: a content analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Mar;40(3):279–85. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.032.
    1. Fiore M. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update: Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: DIANE Publishing Company; 2008.
    1. Fogg BJ, Hreha J. A method for matching target behaviors with solutions. In: Ploug T, Hasle P, Oinas-Kukkonen H, editors. Pursuasive Technology. Berlin: Springer; 2010. pp. 117–131.
    1. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RH, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994.
    1. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications; 2003.
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub Co; 1967.
    1. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.
    1. YouTube. [2014-06-25]. The Truth About Tobacco: How Much is a Life Worth? .
    1. Ploderer B, Smith W, Howard S. Patterns of support in an online community for smoking cessation. 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies; June 29-July 2, 2013; Munich, Germany. New York, NY: ACM; 2013.
    1. Cohen S. Social relationships and health. Am Psychol. 2004 Nov;59(8):676–84. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676.
    1. Westmaas JL, Bontemps-Jones J, Bauer JE. Social support in smoking cessation: reconciling theory and evidence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Jul;12(7):695–707. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq077.
    1. Lindsay S, Smith S, Bellaby P, Baker R. The health impact of an online heart disease support group: a comparison of moderated versus unmoderated support. Health Educ Res. 2009 Aug;24(4):646–54. doi: 10.1093/her/cyp001.
    1. Syred J, Naidoo C, Woodhall SC, Baraitser P. Would you tell everyone this? Facebook conversations as health promotion interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e108. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3231.
    1. Brandt CL, Dalum P, Skov-Ettrup L, Tolstrup JS. "After all--it doesn't kill you to quit smoking": an explorative analysis of the blog in a smoking cessation intervention. Scand J Public Health. 2013 Nov;41(7):655–61. doi: 10.1177/1403494813489602.
    1. Morris E. Digital Collections University of Colorado Boulder. 2013. [2014-06-26]. She "likes" it, he doesn't: Gender differences in Facebook communication behaviors .
    1. Newman MW, Lauterbach D, Munson SA. It's not that I don't have problems, I'm just not putting them on Facebook: Challenges and opportunities in using online social networks for health. ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work; March 19-23, 2011; New York, NY. ACM; 2011. pp. 341–350.
    1. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G. Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossy-Bass; 2011.
    1. Hampton KN, Goulet LS, Marlow C. Why most Facebook users get more than they give. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2012. Feb, [2013-12-09]. .
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL, Abrams DB. Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1282–9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165449.
    1. Minian N, Schwartz R, Di Sante E. Ontario Tobacco Research Unit. 2010. [2014-06-27]. Impact of the smoking cessation system on young male smokers .
    1. Thomson R, Murachver T. Predicting gender from electronic discourse. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Jun;40(Pt 2):193–208.
    1. Institute of Medicine . Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
    1. Smoke-free Ontario Scientific Advisory Committee Evidence to Guide Action: Comprehensive Tobacco Control in Ontario. 2010. [2014-06-27]. .

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel