The use of social media by state tobacco control programs to promote smoking cessation: a cross-sectional study

Jennifer C Duke, Heather Hansen, Annice E Kim, Laurel Curry, Jane Allen, Jennifer C Duke, Heather Hansen, Annice E Kim, Laurel Curry, Jane Allen

Abstract

Background: The promotion of evidence-based cessation services through social media sites may increase their utilization by smokers. Data on social media adoption and use within tobacco control programs (TCPs) have not been reported.

Objective: This study examines TCP use of and activity levels on social media, the reach of TCP sites, and the level of engagement with the content on sites.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study of state TCP social media sites and their content was conducted.

Results: In 2013, 60% (30/50) of TCPs were using social media. Approximately one-quarter (26%, 13/50) of all TCPs used 3 or more social media sites, 24% (12/50) used 2, and 10% (5/50) used 1 site. Overall, 60% (30/50) had a Facebook page, 36% (18/50) had a Twitter page, and 40% (20/50) had a YouTube channel. The reach of social media was different across each site and varied widely by state. Among TCPs with a Facebook page, 73% (22/30) had less than 100 likes per 100,000 adults in the state, and 13% (4/30) had more than 400 likes per 100,000 adults. Among TCPs with a Twitter page, 61% (11/18) had less than 10 followers per 100,000 adults, and just 1 state had more than 100 followers per 100,000 adults. Seven states (23%, 7/30) updated their social media sites daily. The most frequent social media activities focused on the dissemination of information rather than interaction with site users. Social media resources from a national cessation media campaign were promoted infrequently.

Conclusions: The current reach of state TCP social media sites is low and most TCPs are not promoting existing cessation services or capitalizing on social media's interactive potential. TCPs should create an online environment that increases participation and 2-way communication with smokers to promote free cessation services.

Keywords: mass media; public health; smoking; social media; tobacco.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average number of monthly Facebook posts by state tobacco control programs (n=30), January to December 2013. Gray lines denote standard deviation of monthly posts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average number of monthly tweets by state tobacco control programs (n=17), January to December 2013. Gray lines denote standard deviation of monthly tweets. Data for AZ are not included in the graph because there was no posted content to its Twitter site in 2013.

References

    1. Schiller J, Ward B, Freeman G. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Dec 17, [2014-07-01]. Early release of selected estimates based on data from the January–June 2013 National Health Interview Survey .
    1. Centers for Disease ControlPrevention (CDC) Quitting smoking among adults--United States, 2001-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Nov 11;60(44):1513–9.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014. .
    1. Centers for Disease ControlPrevention (CDC) Increases in quitline calls and smoking cessation website visitors during a national tobacco education campaign--March 19-June 10, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Aug 31;61(34):667–70.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services . The health consequences of smoking-50 years of progress: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2012. [2014-07-01]. .
    1. Backinger CL, Thornton-Bullock A, Miner C, Orleans CT, Siener K, DiClemente CC, Phillips TM, Rowden JN, Arkin E. Building consumer demand for tobacco-cessation products and services: The national tobacco cessation collaborative's consumer demand roundtable. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Mar;38(3 Suppl):S307–11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.002.
    1. Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:273–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235.
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL. Health behavior interventions in the age of facebook. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):571–2. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.001.
    1. Duggan M, Smith A. Social media update 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2013. Dec 30, [2014-06-19].
    1. De la Torre-Díez I, Díaz-Pernas FJ, Antón-Rodríguez M. A content analysis of chronic diseases social groups on Facebook and Twitter. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(6):404–8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0227.
    1. Keim-Malpass J, Steeves RH. Talking with death at a diner: young women's online narratives of cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 Jul;39(4):373–8, 406. doi: 10.1188/12.ONF.373-378.
    1. Sugawara Y, Narimatsu H, Hozawa A, Shao L, Otani K, Fukao A. Cancer patients on Twitter: a novel patient community on social media. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:699. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-699.
    1. Christakis NA. Health care in a web. BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a452.
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL, Abrams DB. Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1282–9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165449.
    1. Rosenquist JN, Murabito J, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. The spread of alcohol consumption behavior in a large social network. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 6;152(7):426–33, W141. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-7-201004060-00007.
    1. Thackeray R, Neiger BL, Smith AK, Van Wagenen SB. Adoption and use of social media among public health departments. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:242. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-242.
    1. Emery S, Aly EH, Vera L, Alexander RL. Tobacco control in a changing media landscape: how tobacco control programs use the internet. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Mar;46(3):293–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.005.
    1. Harris JK, Choucair B, Maier RC, Jolani N, Bernhardt JM. Are public health organizations tweeting to the choir? Understanding local health department Twitter followership. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2972.
    1. Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier CG, Fagen MC. Evaluating social media's capacity to develop engaged audiences in health promotion settings: use of Twitter metrics as a case study. Health Promot Pract. 2013 Mar;14(2):157–62. doi: 10.1177/1524839912469378.
    1. Harris JK, Snider D, Mueller N. Social media adoption in health departments nationwide: the state of the states. Frontiers in PHSSR. 2013;2(1):5–5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301166.
    1. Neuendorf KA. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
    1. Peters K, Chen Y, Kaplan AM, Ognibeni B, Pauwels K. Social media metrics — A framework and guidelines for managing social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2013 Nov;27(4):281–298. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.007.
    1. Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Van Wagenen SA, Hanson CL, West JH, Barnes MD, Fagen MC. Use of social media in health promotion: purposes, key performance indicators, and evaluation metrics. Health Promot Pract. 2012 Mar;13(2):159–64. doi: 10.1177/1524839911433467.
    1. The Conclave Complete social media measurement standards. 2013. [2014-06-19]. .
    1. Cooper B. Fast Company. 2013. [2014-06-19]. 7 powerful Facebook statistics you should know about Fast Company .
    1. Neher K. Smart Business. 2013. [2014-06-19]. Images versus text - which is stronger in the world of social media marketing?
    1. Capurro D, Cole K, Echavarría MI, Joe J, Neogi T, Turner AM. The use of social networking sites for public health practice and research: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e79. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2679.
    1. Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Burton SH, Thackeray CR, Reese JH. Use of twitter among local health departments: an analysis of information sharing, engagement, and action. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2775.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014. [2014-06-19]. .
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL, Byron MJ, Niaura RS, Abrams DB, Workshop Participants Online social networks and smoking cessation: a scientific research agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e119. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1911.
    1. . 2014. [2014-06-19]. Health communication and health information technology .
    1. Phua J. Participating in health issue-specific social networking sites to quit smoking: how does online social interconnectedness influence smoking cessation self-efficacy? J Commun. 2013;63(5):933–52. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12054.
    1. Kim HS, Lee S, Cappella JN, Vera L, Emery S. Content characteristics driving the diffusion of antismoking messages: implications for cancer prevention in the emerging public communication environment. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013 Dec;2013(47):182–7. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt018.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel