Analysis of Pediatric Tendon Injuries in the Hand in Comparison with Adults

Jin Sung Kim, Seung Je Sung, Young Joon Kim, Young Woong Choi, Jin Sung Kim, Seung Je Sung, Young Joon Kim, Young Woong Choi

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the epidemiologic characteristics of hand tendon injuries in children and to compare these with those of adults.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on acute traumatic tendon injuries of the hand treated at our institution from 2005 to 2013, based on medical records and X-ray findings. Age, sex, hand injured, mechanism of injury, tendons and zones injured, number of affected digits, and comorbidities and complications were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a pediatric group (≤15 years) and an adult group (>15 years).

Results: Over the 9-year study period, 533 patients were surgically treated for acute traumatic tendon injuries of the hand. In the pediatric group (n=76), being male, the right hand, the extensor tendon, complete rupture, the middle finger, and glass injury predominated in hand tendon injuries. In the adult group (n=457), results were similar, but injury to the index finger and knife injury were the most common. An accompanying fracture was more common in the adult group and complication rates were non-significantly different.

Conclusions: This comparative analysis revealed no significant epidemiologic intergroup differences. The belief that pediatric tendon injuries tend to be less severe is misplaced, and careful physical examination and exploration should be conducted in pediatric cases of hand injury.

Keywords: Child; Epidemiologic studies; Hand; Tendons; Wounds and injuries.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1. Distribution of pediatric patients according…
Fig. 1. Distribution of pediatric patients according to age
Fig. 2. Age and mechanism in pediatric…
Fig. 2. Age and mechanism in pediatric group
Analysis of pediatric hand injuries with respect to age and mechanism.

References

    1. Frazier WH, Miller M, Fox RS, et al. Hand injuries: incidence and epidemiology in an emergency service. JACEP. 1978;7:265–268.
    1. Valencia J, Leyva F, Gomez-Bajo GJ. Pediatric hand trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(432):77–86.
    1. Strickland JW. Bone, nerve, and tendon injuries of the hand in children. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1975;22:451–463.
    1. Nietosvaara Y, Lindfors NC, Palmu S, et al. Flexor tendon injuries in pediatric patients. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:1549–1557.
    1. Lehfeldt M, Ray E, Sherman R. MOC-PS(SM) CME article: treatment of flexor tendon laceration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(4 Suppl):1–12.
    1. Sikora S, Lai M, Arneja JS. Pediatric flexor tendon injuries: a 10-year outcome analysis. Can J Plast Surg. 2013;21:181–185.
    1. Chesney A, Chauhan A, Kattan A, et al. Systematic review of flexor tendon rehabilitation protocols in zone II of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1583–1592.
    1. Berndtsson L, Ejeskar A. Zone II flexor tendon repair in children: a retrospective long term study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995;29:59–64.
    1. Grobbelaar AO, Hudson DA. Flexor tendon injuries in children. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19:696–698.
    1. Kato H, Minami A, Suenaga N, et al. Long-term results after primary repairs of zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in children younger than age 6 years. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:732–735.
    1. de Jong JP, Nguyen JT, Sonnema AJ, et al. The incidence of acute traumatic tendon injuries in the hand and wrist: a 10-year population-based study. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6:196–202.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel